Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Weirdly the Left wasn't this triggered over Bush or Reagan to the point the entire media landscape smeared them though.

Is it because Trump is anti globalist?
Bush, both of them, didn't rock the boat and so therefore was ultimately harmless.
Reagan on the other hand was probably judged to be too popular/entrenched to go after.
Not that the bitching every truly stopped mind you.
 
785378



Boater Hats and Rhinestone Belts: Melania and Ivanka Trump’s Bonkers State Visit Fashion Is Pure ‘Dynasty’
Both Melania and Ivanka Trump channeled the 1980s on the first day of President Trump’s U.K. state visit, seemingly believing they were starring in a vintage episode of ‘Dynasty.’

On Monday morning in London, Melania Trump stepped off of a Marine One helicopter and into the year 1981, and specifically the moment that Joan Collins made her Dynasty debut as (then) Alexis Morell Carrington in a dramatic courtroom scene.

On day one of the Trumps' state visit to Britain, dressed in a white pencil dress, black collar, and belt by Dolce & Gabbana, the first lady seemed to be channeling Collins—especially when it came to the matching Hervé Pierre hat pinned over her bun. FLOTUS only needed black-rimmed sunglasses (and veil) to complete her Alexis metamorphosis.

Melania’s boater hat sat sharply tilted to the left, shielding her eyes from photographers, even though her usual deadpan never gives much away. The loss of her peripheral vision may explain why Melania gripped her husband’s hand while attending a remembrance ceremony at Westminster Abbey. (The first lady has previously evaded—or even swatted away—her husband’s attempts at public intimacy.)

Melania's buttoned-up silhouette is nothing new. When she’s not traipsing through Africa in colonial-era pith hats, FLOTUS gravitates towards Art of the Deal-era power dressing. She rests big coats on top of her shoulders to bulk up her silhouette, and displays remarkable agility when it comes to walking in skin-tight pencil skirts and four-inch Louboutins.

Staring out from behind a sheer curtain like some villainous American cousin in ‘Downton Abbey,’ Ivanka managed to out-’80s Melania.”
When photographed alone, the absurdity of her costume-like garments can be forgotten. But when pictured with others, as she was today with Camilla in a simple white sheath dress, Melania’s joyless, Nancy Reagan cosplay came off as all the more extreme.

Ivanka Trump watched the pomp of her father’s arrival at Buckingham Palace from a window above the palace’s lawn. Staring out from behind a sheer curtain like some villainous American cousin in Downton Abbey, Ivanka managed to out-’80s Melania in an (also white) peplum pleated skirt and blazer by Alessandra Rich.

The puff-sleeved style came with a gaudy rhinestone belt. It really felt like we were back in the 1980s, and the boxy-meets-flouncy silhouettes Diana wore in her early royal years.

While Melania played Queen Nancy, Ivanka channeled her mother, Ivana, with her more-is-more getup. As if her human doily look was not enough, Ivanka added a bizarre fascinator for the Westminster ceremony, leading the writer Paul Rudnick to imagine a Harry Potter scenario.


Ivanka’s tiny hat was unfairly compared to a maxi pad by Twitter critics, though it resembled less of a sanitary napkin and more of a half-assed balloon animal slapped onto her pin straight hair.

Still, the 37-year-old “first daughter” smiled as she took in the historic church. Ivanka’s easygoing, “nothing to see here” performance is all the more impressive considering it was fresh off of her husband Jared Kushner’s disastrous Axios interview on Sunday.

A few hours later, the entire crew changed for dinner and were back at it again—an inexplicable feat, really, by the gloriously pained looks slapped on each player's face.


The color white stayed popular at the night's banquet. The Queen, Camilla, and Melania all tried different takes on the hue, as if starring in an ill-advised First Wives Club reboot.

Melania opted for a mesh illusion neckline and feather design at the bust of her showgirl-y gown. She paired the dress with surgical-looking, ill-fitting evening gloves, as if covering nearly every part of her body might will her straight back to Trump Tower.

The younger generation—Will and Kate, Ivanka and Jared—smartly stayed away from the deliciously strange photo op Trump, Melania, the Queen, Charles, and Camilla all found themselves in.

Once the dinner was underway, Ivanka was spotted in a baby blue collared dress with floral appliqués. Her pearls and the dress’ demure silhouette was pure Stepford Wife, though the some bedazzling on the bodice resembled day old confetti.

Sitting next to her, a not amused Sophie, Countess of Wessex, looked like she was one champagne flute away from breaking the “Never complain” royal code.

785380


That model of hat the The Daily Beast are making fun of Ivanka for wearing they were praising just 3 weeks prior when it was worn on Lady Kitty:
785388

"Lady Kitty [...] became a social-media star after a showstopping appearance at Harry and Meghan’s wedding in an emerald-green hand-painted Dolce & Gabbana dress that was paired with a Philip Treacy fascinator."
785419

Alaina Demopoulos.jpg
The author, Alaina Demopoulos, dangerhair extraordinaire

Here she is lauding these totally not ridiculous hats:
Janelle-Monáe.jpg
How do you pull together an ensemble that features a wide hat and chain headpiece? Go for a classic, like Janelle did — red lipstick and ample highlighter will always look fabulous.

Here she lauding a hat similar to Ivanka's:
tmp_Ckieud_aee1001e8a7d9912_GettyImages-698805114.jpg
As synonymous with posh, perfect blowouts as Kate Middleton is, there's a distinct pleasure that comes from looking at her updos. Perhaps it's the fact that Kate's chic buns are often pinned back with the help of gloriously impractical fascinators. Or maybe it's because with the hair out of her face, we get a better glimpse at her gorgeous skin. Whatever it is, you'll scream when you learn the key product the Duchess of Cambridge uses to secure her updos.

And another!
BBUKSvT.img.jpg
Her new looks do not totally abandon that lifelong ethos—after all, just two days ago she wore a red cap from Lock & Co, the world's oldest hat shop. But by experimenting, Middleton is presenting herself as a symbol of more modern Britain.
It's enough to make one wonder if Dangerhair Alaina Demopoulos's criticism isn't based on appearances at all, but the point is to create a politically-biased hit piece?


edit: i realize now this isn't TDS. i may be in the wrong palce but this took about 10 minutes so whatever.
 
Last edited:
The Left did bitch a lot about Bush in the 2000's, but in retrospect it was fairly mild compared to how they're reacting to Trump.

None of the major Democrat leaders ever proposed to impeach Bush when he was in office, and there was a lot more grounds for an impeachment of Bush than there was for Trump, especially once it became public knowledge that the Iraq War was built on a lie.

It does help that the Bush Administration was objectively god-awful by most standards and a lot of the main problems plaguing America today can largely be traced back to his presidency (and Obama continuing most of his policies and expanding on them, despite his initial promises to the contrary)

The War On Terror, the 2008 Global Recession, and the current scope of the NSA surveillance state can all be traced back to Bush.

Even the SJW zeitgeist is partly his fault due to how much he pandered to the Religious Right and the more hardliner Neocons, and when combined with his terrible economic and foreign policies, it left a very bad impression on all those Millennials who were mostly angst-ridden adolescents for the bulk of his presidency
 
LOL What?

Yes, they were, and yes, they did. Just because now they don't hate him anymore doesn't mean they didn't then.
I don't remember mainstream news media institutions completely tanking their credibility and eating multiple lawsuits because they can't stop sperging about oilgate and how Bush is a member of the KKK and trying to incite lynchmobs against basic ass Conservatives * like MAGA kid *.

The Democrats also weren't showing naked contempt/hostility towards the entire midwest in the mid-late 2000s like they are now

You also didn't have the entirety of Hollywood/the entertainment media in general openly declaring jihad on anyone to the Right of Mao.
 
The Left did bitch a lot about Bush in the 2000's, but in retrospect it was fairly mild compared to how they're reacting to Trump.

None of the major Democrat leaders ever proposed to impeach Bush when he was in office, and there was a lot more grounds for an impeachment of Bush than there was for Trump, especially once it became public knowledge that the Iraq War was built on a lie.

It does help that the Bush Administration was objectively god-awful by most standards and a lot of the main problems plaguing America today can largely be traced back to his presidency (and Obama continuing most of his policies and expanding on them, despite his initial promises to the contrary)

The War On Terror, the 2008 Global Recession, and the current scope of the NSA surveillance state can all be traced back to Bush.

Even the SJW zeitgeist is partly his fault due to how much he pandered to the Religious Right and the more hardliner Neocons, and when combined with his terrible economic and foreign policies, it left a very bad impression on all those Millennials who were mostly angst-ridden adolescents for the bulk of his presidency
The 2008 global recession wasn't Bush's fault, that falls squarely on Pelosi, Barney whatshisface, and their stupid Fanny Mae bullshit. They insisted on subprime mortgages being offered to people who couldn't pay them back, then surprise surprise, the people couldn't pay them back, and the housing market collapsed.

The iraq war was actually not built on a lie, there actually were WMDs there. The supposed evidence was uh.... shaky at best, admittedly. But let's not all get collective amnesia again about the weapons inspectors repeatedly being denied access.

What Bush was really, really bad at, was defending his choices and actions. He suffered from the same problem as a lot of Republicans, he wanted to be "respectful" and "fight fair" while the other side did not.

The war on terror can be partially blamed on bush, for sure. But the house and senate went along with him on all that, dems and republicans. The patriot act was approved by democrats too.

That last part is silly, what policies did he have that pandered to the religious right? Were you, by chance, in college when he was president? It was popular to say stuff like what's being said about trump now.
 
That would be funny... But could Khan try to have Trump arrested for hurting his feelings? Or does diplomatic immunity cover that?

Khan would arrest Trump in a heartbeat if he thought he could get away with it and not unleash a catastrophic torrent of consequences upon Britain and the rest of the world.

Hell I would not be shocked, if he floated the idea only to have everyone around him break from their normal routine of kissing Khan's poop smeared rear to read him the riot act over the Pandora's Box of arresting a sitting US President simply because he hates the man. And I would not be shocked if security forces in London have put the fear in Khan to not try and sabotage the trip even more than he already did in basically giving an open green light for protesting Trump like he did.
 
The 2008 global recession wasn't Bush's fault, that falls squarely on Pelosi, Barney whatshisface, and their stupid Fanny Mae bullshit. They insisted on subprime mortgages being offered to people who couldn't pay them back, then surprise surprise, the people couldn't pay them back, and the housing market collapsed.

The iraq war was actually not built on a lie, there actually were WMDs there. The supposed evidence was uh.... shaky at best, admittedly. But let's not all get collective amnesia again about the weapons inspectors repeatedly being denied access.

What Bush was really, really bad at, was defending his choices and actions. He suffered from the same problem as a lot of Republicans, he wanted to be "respectful" and "fight fair" while the other side did not.

The war on terror can be partially blamed on bush, for sure. But the house and senate went along with him on all that, dems and republicans. The patriot act was approved by democrats too.

That last part is silly, what policies did he have that pandered to the religious right? Were you, by chance, in college when he was president? It was popular to say stuff like what's being said about trump now.

There were WMD's in Iraq but they were almost entirely decommissioned by the time of the 2003 invasion. And I do condemn the Senate and the House for their own role in both the 2008 Recession and the War On Terror. Bush and Congress were both equally liable in that whole clusterfuck.

Bush was very popular with the Religious Right, more than Trump is now. And he pandered to them on the campaign trails in 2000 and 2004, and it didn't help that this was at a time when the Religious Right had actual power, influence, and visibility outside of the Bible Belt.

Heck, the Satanic Panic from the 1980's was still ongoing in the rural Bible Belt for most of the 1990's albeit it was refocused on Goths and video games instead of hair metal and D&D, and the panic was given a brief second wind in the Bible Belt during the late 90's following incidents like Rod Ferrell's vampire murders, the Lillelid Murders and especially after the media circus surrounding Columbine. The worst moral hysterias of the Religious Right didn't fully die out until 9/11.

The way the media treated Bush (both his liberal detractors and his neocon sycophants at Fox News) made Bush look like a borderline theocratic leader in the eyes of many young and impressionable Millennial kids and teens.
 
Last edited:
What the fuck is with Liberals and their weird obsession with what the rest of the world thinks? World Politics isn't a High School clique...At least not in that way.
It doesn't matter how much Britbongs are triggered by Orange Man. Their PM still won't even breath without clearing it with America first.
Thats the cool thing about being a Superpower. Everyone else can bitch all they want but they still need us more way than we need them.

It's part popularity contest (even the most lunatic of the lunatic left want America to be #1) and kissing up to the countries who are the equivalent of that one kid in high school, with the "cool parents" who let him get drunk and smoke weed in the house in front of them, has free access to his parents bank account to splurge, has all of the best designer clothing, and who got a sports car when he got his driver's permit. The sort of spoiled kid with super permissive parents who let their kid walk all over them, who uses his spineless parents to appear as the "cool kid". When at best, he's horribly lonely and all but outright emotionally abused due to the not giving a shit about him in any actual way and who would just throw money and gifts at him and turn a blind eye towards open acts of rebellion because they literally don't give a shit about their kid, or worse, are full on quisling cowards who cater to their kids every whims and demands because the parents themselves are emotional cripples that will let their kids get away with murder and drain their parents dry financially, in order to make the kid "love them" because they have no one else in their lives to give them ANY sort of emotional validation and they have no shame with how much abuse they can take to get it.
 
Weirdly the Left wasn't this triggered over Bush or Reagan to the point the entire media landscape smeared them though.

Is it because Trump is anti globalist?

The left actually went mental over Bush and were already pulling what they did with Trump, though with the cavet that their view was that Bush was a retard and not a traitor. To the point that they actually flipped the Senate on Bush back to the Democrats by convincing one RINO to go Democrat because Bush's clique wasn't giving him any love.

The only difference between Bush and Trump though, is that 9-11 happened super early in Bush's first term. This was critical in basically turning the media 100% to Bush's side and granting him protection from criticism that lasted through 2006 and Hurricane Katrina.
 
The left actually went mental over Bush and were already pulling what they did with Trump, though with the cavet that their view was that Bush was an exceptional individual and not a traitor. To the point that they actually flipped the Senate on Bush back to the Democrats by convincing one RINO to go Democrat because Bush's clique wasn't giving him any love.

The only difference between Bush and Trump though, is that 9-11 happened super early in Bush's first term. This was critical in basically turning the media 100% to Bush's side and granting him protection from criticism that lasted through 2006 and Hurricane Katrina.
So the only reason we didn't get full on Bush Derangement was because some assholes started a war with us?
 
To the point that they actually flipped the Senate on Bush back to the Democrats by convincing one RINO to go Democrat because Bush's clique wasn't giving him any love.

You're talking about Jeffords, who switched to "independent" and then caucused with Democrats. IIRC, the split was 50-50 until he did that, which put it 50-49-1 Democrats.

Mostly, I think they were worried because Dick Cheney would be voting a lot on their bills.
 
Back