The pissing dildos are STP packers, but they have a whole host of other less-expensive shit they use like janky homemade devices and weird pissing troughs and non-dick-like silicone cups and all kinds of other crazy shit. Those are just STP devices, the packers are like the bougie version. The jankest one I've seen was a medicine spoon with the end cut off, I think that's the recommended one for troons who can't afford more than $5 on their fetish gear.
Whatever straw shit she's got looks homemade to me, but it could also be one of the shittier commercial products.
How the hell does it give you "dysphoria" to have to sit down to pee? It's comfortable. Way more comfortable than carrying around a moldy urine-soaked funnel.
With the exception of the fucking shaft stubble that neo-penis honestly looks pretty decent. Obviously it's not going to be confused for the real thing, but it's a reasonable imitation considering the limits of surgical medicine. A million times better than the backalley vaginas in this thread; they had me expecting skin stretched over a bit of PVC pipe.
If you are talking about IKEA cunt, the skin was the labia majora and the prosthesis is a silicone sack filled with saline solution. The left testicle contains the pumping mechanism to make the "penis" erect.
Black Mirror season 5 just dropped including a man in a female video game character's body. Said man has sex in her body and describes it as "a man is like a guitar solo but this is like a whole orchestra". Expect a lot of egg_irl and "I've made the decision to get the surgery because I want orchestral orgasms" posts.
Black Mirror season 5 just dropped including a man in a female video game character's body. Said man has sex in her body and describes it as "a man is like a guitar solo but this is like a whole orchestra". Expect a lot of egg_irl and "I've made the decision to get the surgery because I want orchestral orgasms" posts.
Not to mention the outspread of female nerve endings and internal clitoris is nothing like the little piece of dickhead the butcher sews onto your pelvis (if you're one of the "lucky ones" and don't get excruciating pain every time you touch it).
very interesting idea. maybe they could also start drilling multiple front holes into FTMs during surgery?
surely some cutting edge medical researcher somewhere will try this one day.
Mark my words: one day surgeons will offer animal themed cocks as an option. Giving someone a frankenstein horsecock would be the same as a normal phalloplasty, right? The only difference would be how it looks.
Mark my words: one day surgeons will offer animal themed cocks as an option. Giving someone a frankenstein horsecock would be the same as a normal phalloplasty, right? The only difference would be how it looks.
I know they make MTFs get some number of lasik rounds before they make a stink ditch, do they not do the same for FTMs? Why would you not do fucking lasik on this abortion of a fake dick?
How the hell does it give you "dysphoria" to have to sit down to pee? It's comfortable. Way more comfortable than carrying around a moldy urine-soaked funnel.
I'm glad that's satire, but I do wonder how much weirder these surgeries are going to get. I mean, I always heard that these surgeries would get more and more realistic but in fact now they're giving people combinations that don't even exist in nature? You can't easily use the "this is how I should have been born" reasoning for those.
With the exception of the fucking shaft stubble that neo-penis honestly looks pretty decent. Obviously it's not going to be confused for the real thing, but it's a reasonable imitation considering the limits of surgical medicine. A million times better than the backalley vaginas in this thread; they had me expecting skin stretched over a bit of PVC pipe.
You're not seeing it 'live' though. The pictures will be the 'optimal' of maybe dozens they've took. Consider how far up on the body it is too, there's at least an inch between the vagina and where the balls/penis are sewn on. They've also had it tattoo'd. The fact that it doesn't have 'plumbing' is probably what renders this one an 'ok' example, They made choices and stuck with it to get what they deemed optional and it's not as horrible as some neo-phallus but it's just as much a ghost of a penis as any pseudo-vagina. It looks like it does because it's had minimal carving up to give it a urethra/nerves/etc.
Black Mirror season 5 just dropped including a man in a female video game character's body. Said man has sex in her body and describes it as "a man is like a guitar solo but this is like a whole orchestra". Expect a lot of egg_irl and "I've made the decision to get the surgery because I want orchestral orgasms" posts.
Of course it's written by a male writer. I don't like to shit on men but man it's tiring to see this. Nobody benefits from media trying to paint the female orgasm as some magical experience. It's ok, good maybe great even. It is not earth shattering or like riding a roller coaster or an orchestra. Feels good and if your partner listens to your directions so you get the best of it it can be pretty great but it's not like Whoaaaslds mind blown, life changed. This ends up painting a very unrealistic expectation of sex and sexual pleasure, especially for women. Which means they're very let down when it isn't all that.
It's sad that a size-able portion of women don't get off because they don't take charge of their sexual experience or they're having orgasms but because it's not meeting their expectations based on what they think should happen when they orgasm they don't think they really are (this second one is soooooo common, it astounds me.) But like the aforementioned comment about the EP as well as commercials for lube and fake orgasms in porn, men and women tend to have unrealistic expectations of the female orgasm.
As for idolizing it, IDK because some people think it's incredibly hard to get an orgasm from a woman and women have unrealistic expectations of what an orgasm is so they fake really aggressive ones which gives men an ego boost thinking they've managed to catch that mythical human cryptid that is the female orgasm.
If she ain't super slick, not leaking wet (in most cases) but slippery, and her vagina isn't doing rhythmic contractions on your fingers or dick that are almost purely internal- no matter how much she moaned, screamed, flailed, or anything else, she did not cum.
Of course it's written by a male writer. I don't like to shit on men but man it's tiring to see this. Nobody benefits from media trying to paint the female orgasm as some magical experience. It's ok, good maybe great even. It is not earth shattering or like riding a roller coaster or an orchestra. Feels good and if your partner listens to your directions so you get the best of it it can be pretty great but it's not like Whoaaaslds mind blown, life changed. This ends up painting a very unrealistic expectation of sex and sexual pleasure, especially for women. Which means they're very let down when it isn't all that.
It's sad that a size-able portion of women don't get off because they don't take charge of their sexual experience or they've having orgasms but because it's not meeting their expectations based on what they think should happen when they orgasm they don't think they really are (this second one is soooooo common, it astounds me.) But like the aforementioned comment about the EP as well as commercials for lube and fake orgasms in porn, men and women tend to have unrealistic expectations of the female orgasm.
As for idolizing it, IDK because some people think it's incredibly hard to get an orgasm from a woman and women have unrealistic expectations of what an orgasm is so they fake really aggressive ones which gives men an ego boost thinking they've managed to catch that mythical human cryptid that is the female orgasm.
If she ain't super slick, not leaking wet (in most cases) but slippery, and her vagina isn't doing rhythmic contractions on your fingers or dick that are almost purely internal- no matter how much she moaned, screamed, flailed, or anything else, she did not cum.
I recall an experiment--a survey, more accurately--where men and women were asked to describe an orgasm, and the descriptions were identical save for anatomical differences. I could be misremembering this part in particular, but believe it was also a double-blind experiment, and the psychologists conducting it where unable to pin which was from a male or female test subject without their specific names.
Partially why people mystify that which pertains to the opposite sex is similarly to how people mystify the unknown. If you make it your obsession, it's inevitable that you'll fantasize something which exceeds reality. Our imaginations are much more wild and vivid than the world we live in will allow. Especially when it's something you can never realistically obtain. That's how you get these idiots who believe being a woman is sunshine and rainbows, or being a man is fun times and easy living.
On the matter of women lacking orgasms, blame inexperience from both parties. Nobody specifically is at fault, other than the inherent reluctance towards female sexuality. Freud himself theorized that a woman who uses her clitoris for sexual pleasure was mentally stunted, to give perspective on that matter. Not to sound like a gender studies student, of course--it's obviously improved, it's just laughable that people surround female sexuality with so much mysticism, both in or against its favor, when it's just as mundane as anything else in life.
Oh, and also you can't magically experience the opposite sex's orgasms because turned your crotch into Play-Dough.
I know they make MTFs get some number of lasik rounds before they make a stink ditch, do they not do the same for FTMs? Why would you not do fucking lasik on this abortion of a fake dick?
I recall an experiment--a survey, more accurately--where men and women were asked to describe an orgasm, and the descriptions were identical save for anatomical differences. I could be misremembering this part in particular, but believe it was also a double-blind experiment, and the psychologists conducting it where unable to pin which was from a male or female test subject without their specific names.
Partially why people mystify that which pertains to the opposite sex is similarly to how people mystify the unknown. If you make it your obsession, it's inevitable that you'll fantasize something which exceeds reality. Our imaginations are much more wild and vivid than the world we live in will allow. Especially when it's something you can never realistically obtain. That's how you get these idiots who believe being a woman is sunshine and rainbows, or being a man is fun times and easy living.
On the matter of women lacking orgasms, blame inexperience from both parties. Nobody specifically is at fault, other than the inherent reluctance towards female sexuality. Freud himself theorized that a woman who uses her clitoris for sexual pleasure was mentally stunted, to give perspective on that matter. Not to sound like a gender studies student, of course--it's obviously improved, it's just laughable that people surround female sexuality with so much mysticism, both in or against its favor, when it's just as mundane as anything else in life.
Few people in Freud's time knew what the clitoris looked like or how it functioned. Even now, very few people are clear on it at all. Orgasms in women arise from the clit, not the vaginal canal.
Ironically women's bathrooms are on average way dirtier than the men's, because women take on most of the cleaning roles at home and relish having a place where they have no obligation to pick up after themselves.