Carlos Maza / @gaywonk versus Steven Blake Crowder / @scrowder (#VoxAdpocalypse) - Twitter war between a Canadian in nationality and a Canadian in behavior

I would like to point out for those unfamiliar with Crowder that he has a lawyer on constant retention:
His name is Bill Richmond:
Though Richmond's services have been used to counter copyright strikes, I'm sure he can be used should Maza escalate the situation.
Crowder might charge Tortious Interference with Business Prospect on Maza and he might have a case.
Even better, Crowder and his studios are located in Dallas, Texas.

Fun Fact:
Bill Richmond recently represented Jeremy Hambly (TheQuartering) in his lawsuit.
 
Where's the proof for that? People change jobs all the time.
I'm not saying you should take me or Owen Benjamin at our words, but he stopped hanging out with Crowder even though for the longest time that dude would constantly lick his ass. Recently he posted a livestream saying Crowder didn't pay Sven and he was an absolute tyrant towards Jared.
Time stamp to avoid listening to him spill his purse. 18:34 I know Owen has been weird as shit, but for as long as that guy has been under Crowder i'm sure he has seen some shit. At this point its here say, but the way a lot people left and the fuckin sign Sven put up only for shit to get really awkward after that is really sus to me. Along with the weird tweets from Sven.
1559741410693.png
Not to mention once we find out he's gone at the end of one of Crowder's videos he weirdly talks about trust. Its fuckin weird.
 
Here Carlos Maza eviscerates Glenn Greenwald for his support of nazi white supremacist Tucker Carlson:
1559737430419.png

Fucking white people and their... desire for government accountability! Fucking whitey.
1559737771533.png

Here Meshuga Maza lisps on about how comedians make the best political commentators:


The entire Media Matters Mafia is jumping in on this. Vice's turn to rant!



So we have NBC and Disney chiming in, who's next on the deplatform Crowder gangbang?

Crazy Carlos Maza has awoken! Another day of plying victimhood for favor is afoot:
crepdadsa.jpg

Apparently a good nights rest did nothing for his condition.
 
I'm not saying you should take me or Owen Benjamin at our words, but he stopped hanging out with Crowder even though for the longest time that dude would constantly lick his ass. Recently he posted a livestream saying Crowder didn't pay Sven and he was an absolute tyrant towards Jared.
Time stamp to avoid listening to him spill his purse. 18:34 I know Owen has been weird as shit, but for as long as that guy has been under Crowder i'm sure he has seen some shit. At this point its here say, but the way a lot people left and the fuckin sign Sven put up only for shit to get really awkward after that is really sus to me. Along with the weird tweets from Sven.
View attachment 786631
Not to mention once we find out he's gone at the end of one of Crowder's videos he weirdly talks about trust. Its fuckin weird.
That's a lot of weird shit, but the problem with this kind of stuff is filtering through the bullshit. It could be all true, partially true, or all bullshit. It's hearsay filtered through a wacked-out guy who drank way too much conspiracy juice with a rabid fanbase that sucks his dick harder than he claims other people suck Crowder's. Jared and Sven can't talk about any of this due to NDAs, but Jared appears to have parted ways amiably while Sven's parting has been mired in a lot of the weird shit. Is he a bitter, angry ex-employee? :stress:

If people weren't stupid with their employment contracts then things would be simpler and easier. I like Jared, Sven, Crowder, used to like Owen before he started going off the deep-end and even saw one of his shows with my wife.
 
This homophobe is calling people queers! @YoutubeBabysitters

Crippled men @rickyberwick and @RealYungCripp trade video barbs on how Carlos Maza is a fragile cowering pussy:


And Madman Maza blocked them for it! Carlos Maza hates on those with disabilities.

786684


This is apparently him on Reddit, posting dick pics and videos of him fucking guys:


The account was made 1 year after his Twitter account, and after his interview where he explains why he chose that name ("i'm a wonk about gay stuff you guise!").

Odd to see him flashing his dick and his threesomes all over Reddit. Seems bizarre for someone in the media? Considering how much of a hypersenstive SJW that user is and he's stanning for Hillary Clinton I'd reckon its him:


Why does reddit tolerate and upvote the word "faggot"?
 
Last edited:
The depressing thing about people like Maza is that they still think they're minority activists fighting a guerilla war against The Man when actually they are working for The Man trying to silence activists fighting a guerilla war.

That's not to say that Crowder doesn't have some skeletons in his closet, but in all situations you have to decide who is worse and oppose them, not think that the people you're supporting are in any way perfect.
 
He talks this big game about being a journalist going undercover. This is him undercover:
786764


Undercover. Using his real name and real backstory. Undercover. No wonder he hates Crowder so much, as Crowder has successfully pulled off undercover jobs even though he is far more recognizable than Nobody Carlos Maza. I think he sees Crowder as the cool Chad he never was and never will be. Carlos Maza is still stuck reeeing that fat kids lament. Every time Crowder shuts down Maza's stupid videos he's being retraumatized over all those times he as called a lardass dweeb as a kid. Carlos has Media Matters and Vox and NBC pushing him heavily yet everyone fucking hates his shitty videos. While Crowder has been demonetized and banned and under constant threat, yet his fans adore him! He has tons of fans! That must hurt a lot.

What a sad mug. Carlos: let it go, little fella. Cheer up! Nobody likes you, but at least you can blame that on oppression then throw tantrums to get your way to some state of half-assed non-achievement. That's better than nothing! You may not win the race, but at least you'll have that shiny participation trophy. "I threw a fit and people found me pitiful and disgusting. It was glorious."
 
I’m actually scared of people like this. What rational human being intentionally drums up a massive digital media shitstorm like this? He is definitely a Lolcow, but a dangerous lolcow.

A rational human being who has an ego that even Florida can't tolerate, and has worked for multiple left leaning media groups trying to gatekeep and mislead us into a future he deems appropriate. This is 'superior future' Movie Bob but with actual real world influence and someone who has done actual real damage to the world with his misinformation. This is the guy who still puts on blast that Tucker Carlson is a white supremacist on his FUCKING TWITTER BIO even after Carlson's wife and children were nearly lynched at their private home after he made a video accusing Tucker Carlson of being a white supremacist.

This is also a guy who actively defends ANTIFA.

 
Last edited:

YouTube just banned supremacist content, and thousands of channels are about to be removed
Casey Newton@CaseyNewton

YouTube is changing its community guidelines to ban videos promoting the superiority of any group as a justification for discrimination against others based on their age, gender, race, caste, religion, sexual orientation, or veteran status, the company said today. The move, which will result in the removal of all videos promoting Nazism and other discriminatory ideologies, is expected to result in the removal of thousands of channels across YouTube.

“The openness of YouTube’s platform has helped creativity and access to information thrive,” the company said in a blog post. “It’s our responsibility to protect that, and prevent our platform from being used to incite hatred, harassment, discrimination and violence.”
The changes announced on Wednesday attempt to improve its content moderation in three ways. First, the ban on supremacists will remove Nazis and other extremists who advocate segregation or exclusion based on age, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, or veteran status. In addition to those categories, YouTube is adding caste, which has significant implications in India, and “well-documented violent events,” such as the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting and 9/11. Users are no longer allowed to post videos saying those events did not happen, YouTube said.

Second, YouTube said it would expand efforts announced in January to reduce the spread of what it calls “borderline content and harmful misinformation.” The policy, which applies to videos that flirt with violating the community guidelines but ultimately fall short, aims to limit the promotion of those videos through recommendations. YouTube said the policy, which affects videos including flat-earthers and peddlers of phony miracle cures, had already decreased the number of views that borderline videos receive by 50 percent. In the future, the company said, it will recommend videos from more authoritative sources, like top news channels, in its “next watch” panel.

Finally, YouTube said it would restrict channels from monetizing their videos if they are found to “repeatedly brush up against our hate speech policies.” Those channels will not be able to run ads or use Super Chat, which lets channel subscribers pay creators directly for extra chat features. The last change comes after BuzzFeed reported that the paid commenting system had been used to fund creators of videos featuring racism and hate speech.

In 2017, YouTube took a step toward reducing the visibility of extremists on the platform when it began placing warnings in front of some videos. But it has come under continued scrutiny for the way that it recruits followers for racists and bigots by promoting their work through recommendation algorithms and prominent placement in search results. In April, Bloomberg reported that videos made by far-right creators represented one of the most popular sections of YouTube, along with music, sports, and video games.

At the same time, YouTube and its parent company, Alphabet, are under growing political pressure to rein in the bad actors on the platform. The Christchurch attacks in March led to widespread criticism of YouTube and other platforms for failing to immediately identify and remove videos of the shooting, and several countries have proposed laws designed to force tech companies to act more quickly. Meanwhile, The New York Times found this week that YouTube algorithms were recommending videos featuring children in bathing suits to people who had previously watched sexually themed content — effectively generating playlists for pedophiles.
YouTube did not disclose the names of any channels that are expected to be affected by the change. The company declined to comment on a current controversy surrounding my Vox colleague Carlos Maza, who has repeatedly been harassed on the basis of his race and sexual orientation by prominent right-wing commentator Steven Crowder. (After I spoke with the company, it responded to Maza that it plans to take no action against Crowder’s channel.)

Still, the move is likely to trigger panic among right-wing YouTube channels. In the United States, conservatives have promoted the idea that YouTube and other platforms discriminate against them. Despite the fact that there is no evidence of systematic bias, Republicans have held several hearings over the past year on the subject. Today’s move from YouTube is likely to generate a fresh round of outrage, along with warnings that we are on the slippery slope toward totalitarianism.

Of course, as the Maza case has shown, YouTube doesn’t always enforce its own rules. It’s one thing to make a policy, and it’s another to ensure that a global workforce of underpaid contractors accurately understands and applies it. It will be fascinating to see how the new policy, which prohibits “videos alleging that a group is superior in order to justify ... segregation or exclusion,” will affect discussion of immigration on YouTube. The company says that political debates about the pros and cons of immigration are still allowed, but a video saying that “Muslims are diseased and shouldn’t be allowed to migrate to Europe” will be banned.

The changed policy goes into effect today, YouTube said, and enforcement will “ramp up” over the next several days.


I’m actually scared of people like this. What rational human being intentionally drums up a massive digital media shitstorm like this? He is definitely a Lolcow, but a dangerous lolcow.

He spent 5+ years at Media Matters. Of course he's going to be a monster. His behavior is absolutely textbook for how they operate.
 
(apologies, I couldn't find an article that was very neutral)

YouTube concluded that conservative pundit Stephen Crowder’s derogatory remarks about Vox host Carlos Maza did not violate any of its policies. In a series of tweets Tuesday, the video site said that after an “in-depth review” of Maza’s claims against Crowder, it found Crowder’s words “hurtful” but not in violation of its rules. “As an open platform, it’s crucial for us to allow everyone—from creators to journalists to late-night TV hosts—to express their opinions w/in the scope of our policies,” YouTube wrote. “Opinions can be deeply offensive, but if they don’t violate our policies, they’ll remain on our site.” The platform also said that even though the video in question remains on its site, that doesn’t mean it endorses or supports “that viewpoint.” YouTube also said it is evaluating “other aspects” of Crowder’s channel in the meantime.

In a series of tweets of his own, Maza said YouTube’s decision was the result of an “absolutely batsh*t policy that gives bigots free license.” The decision comes after Maza pointed out instances where Crowder called him a “anchor baby, a lispy queer, [and] a Mexican,” and Crowder published an apology video.
 
Back