- Joined
- Sep 20, 2016
Reading her brand of tortured sentimentalism that can only issue forth from the unread, I often thought of this quote. Just replace "Jane Austen" with "Christine", "books" with "posts", pretend she's dead, and here ya go.Emmeline Grangerford is a 'sentimental' artist.
Huck is inspecting the art of Emmeline and expressing his feelings about them in the text.
If you read Huck’s explanations without examining the underlying meanings you will find that Huck is completely clueless as to the artists’ sentimental intentions. He evaluates one picture called “Shall I Never See Thee More Alas” by describing a woman “under a weeping willow” (Twain 119) in a graveyard, another picture with a woman “crying into a handkerchief”, and yet another with a crying woman about to jump off a bridge. All three of these illustrations are obvious cliches of sentimental art of the 19th century.
Huck looks at the images and simply sees “nice pictures”, not realizing the intent of the artist, Emmeline. His lack of understanding lets Twain shit on purple prose faggotry. Point of the passage is to poke fun at the sentimentalists’. He makes Huck’s similes ugly, such as bulges on a dress looking “like a cabbage” and “black slippers, like a chisel” to mock the tryhard faggotry which was popular at the time that he wrote the book.
"I often want to criticise Jane Austen, but her books madden me so that I can't conceal my frenzy from the reader; and therefore I have to stop every time I begin. Every time I read 'Pride and Prejudice' I want to dig her up and beat her over the skull with her own shin-bone." -Mark Twain