Another Current Affairs blowfile:
NJR: Here’s what I want to start with: I was thinking, in an ideal world, there would be no ContraPoints YouTube channel, because the points that you are contra to are horrible bigoted arguments by incels, racists, and transphobes.
NW: Yeah, they’re very bad points.
NJR: They’re terrible points! We don’t want the points. So it’s a shame that there even has to be a ContraPoints.
NW: Yes. It would be a makeup channel, if it weren’t for all of the other stuff.
Then STFU and go make a make up channel. No one's stopping you.
He thinks the alt right are over their peak:
I think that when you have a population that feels, in some way, that they’re humiliated, feels in some way that they’re not getting what they’re promised, and not getting what they deserve, feeling a lack of some kind of purpose, some kind of belonging to a cause that means anything… these are the conditions where these kinds of sinister techniques—scapegoating, resentment, in-group out-group thinking—this type of stuff can really thrive. And the alt-right, when they were at their peak, a couple years ago, they jumped on top of that.
Funny that Nyk would accuse others of "in-group out-group thinking" when he belongs to the SJW cult which is the most insular cliqueish group online that is certainly guilty of "in-group out-group thinking"
Nyk thinks that science is just an aesthetic:
NW: That’s a perfect example of this, what we’re talking about as a facts and logic aesthetic. Or even, in this case, a science aesthetic, where he’s constantly saying oh, trans people are crazy, they’re delusional, they just won’t look at the biology, they’re just wrong about biology, when the fact of the matter is I go to get my hormones filled every month, and the last whole few years of my life have been kind of revolved around basically constantly talking to doctors about my biology, and dealing with the situation of my biology. I am very acquainted with my biology. So it’s just a total straw man to suggest that oh, what we’re really debating about in this pronouns debate is biology. No, we are not. It’s not a debate about biology, it’s a debate about language, but the language debate, your STEM-lord is not equipped to have that debate, most of the time.
How is this "science is just an aesthetic" bulllshit not straight out of the pomo playbook? This is literally where every crazy pomo true believer ends up. That science is not about the objective presentation of objective facts but merely an attitude you adopt towards the presentation of facts. Keep in mind that troons only question science when it disputes their ideology, when they can weaponize science to support their bullshit they happily do so.
NW: Yeah, that’s my experience, too. people will come at me with this intense smugness, and just certainty that I’m basically a child that has no idea what I’m talking about with respect to anything. And then what’s amazing is that basically the opposite is revealed to be true within the conversation.
What conversation? Nyk never has any converstations with somoene who is a real opponent, like a dyed in the wool TERF or someone like that.
Nyk's guru Julia Serano gets mentioned (which is what cis journalists do when they want to virtue signal with trannies, they namedrop Julia Serano):
NJR: The thing you said about kind of how trans people think more about biology than anybody else. I always think about how Julia Serano, the trans writer, is a PhD biologist, but Ben Shapiro can’t acknowledge the existence of a person like that.
I thought science was just an attitude, so why does it matter that Julia Serano is a biologist? If science is just an attitude or an aesthetic according to SJW troons like Nyk, isn't Julia too merely adopting an attitude that will get her point across with little to no resistance because lay people are intimidated by and hence reluctant to argue against scientists?
First, the reason why Ben Shapiro doesn't acknowledge the existence of "a person like that" is because Julia herself a couple of years ago had published a rant on Medium saying she was going to withdraw from public participation and was only going to speak to trans-affirmative journalists. When you declare a personal blackout on the media don't act surprised when that same media ignores you. You got exactly what you asked for. If Julia Serano wants to debate Ben Shapiro she is free to do so anytime she wants.
Secondly, SJW trans activists always like to bring up the fact that Julia Serano is a biologist (when Julia openly admitted on a podcast back in 2014 that she hasn't actually worked at a lab as a professional biologist in almost a decade and is now basically a fulltime SJW) as supposed evidence of her academic superiority, but pointing out that Julia Serano has a biology degree is like saying: "This person has an Asian studies degree.". Do they speak Chinese? Japanese? Korean? What specific culture in Asia did they specialize in? Julia Serano's specialty as a biologist is fruitflies and crustaceans,
"creepy crawlers" as she calls them on her website. Julia has never specialized in anyhing related to the biology of living breathing human beings yet she claims studying crabs gives her the right to say anything about the biological effects of transitioning on humans. Julia did participate in a bizarre series of experiments where creepy crawlers were radiated in the lab to alter their genetics and then made to breed in order to observe the effects of radiation-induced mutations on the creepy crawlers' offspring. (You can see why a lot of troons like Laurelai are such huge fans of nuclear energy; the purpose of such bizarre research where they radiate animals to cause mutations and have them procreate in the lab is obviously to show that radiation is supposedly completely harmless/such mutations are harmless, in which case I suggest we buy Laurelai and Julia a one-way ticket to Pripyat. Or maybe Fukushiima, since a lot of troons are such Weeboos.). How the hell does radiating crabs give Julia Serano the authority to say anything about the biology of living breathing human beings? It's plain ridiculous.
I think that in some ways, the current aesthetic of my channel is sort of like a drag show, that’s essentially what it looks like.
Nyk is not a drag queen. Making Youtube videos in your bedroom is not drag. Drag is theatre, it is a live performance art. Nyk is just ripping off drag culture while shitting all over the drag scene for being insufficiently accomodating of troons for his personal profit.
And then, I think, doing the drag aesthetic, now that I’ve transitioned, is kind of the same thing as like okay, call me a drag queen—if you’re going to call me a drag queen anyway, I’ll be the most extravagant drag queen on YouTube.
No one mistakes Nyk for a drag queen and he is not the most extravagant queen either. He's just another SJW troon who shits all over drag queens while stealing their looks, jokes and slang to give himself counter cultural cred by claiming access to or knowledge of a gay subculture he has no involvement in or interactions with. He is LAPRing at being a queen just like he's LARPing at being trans.
I don’t think anyone ever thought to take gamers serious as a political community until Gamergate happened. Then, these, like, vultures, Milo Yiannopoulos and so on, found a way to take that gamer resentment, and basically funnel it into Breitbart.com. That’s kind of what I see as an important lesson for YouTube. There are these communities that you don’t expect to be political that can turn political, fast. I think that’s important knowledge to have.
And Nyk is basically the Milo of the drag scene. No one took drag queens seriously until RPDR, that's when Nyk decided to move in and appropriate (now popular and mainstream-safe) drag so as to politicize it and turn it into another cultural battlefield for his army of SJW cult members. Queens, watch out for these SJW troons, you've let the fox into the hen house.
And I think that kind of sentiment was really effectively exploited by the people who were sort of pushing that conservatism is the new counterculture, or punk rock narrative. One of the things that I’m proud of with my channel is that I feel like I’ve been sort of successful, at least within my own little limited domain, at refusing to let them get away with that. In other words, by just being way more punk rock.
A Youtube millionaire claiming he's more punk than the punks... You are a usurper, an appropriator. Nothing more.
Oh, no, Bill 6…—this is how he got famous, remember, with all this scaremongering nonsense, now proven to be absolute nonsense, about how the pronoun police are going to be marching through the streets, throwing people in jail for not saying xe/xem. What is this, if not like oh, gosh, help me, I’m so oppressed, this is an Orwellian nightmare. Oh no, our speech is being poisoned.
That's exactly what happened. People are being thrown in jail for misgendering, people are being sued and losing their jobs, people are being ostracized and demonized for saying they don't believe in transitioning, whether for it's for secular or religious reasons. Jordan Peterson was 100% right. We are living in an Orwellian nightmare where speech and personal conscience (both secular and religious) is criminalized. The pronouns police just beat up British feminist Julie Bindel, urged on by the likes of ContraPoints and Julia Serano. "But it's not political violence when our side does it because our side is right."
NW: Yes, It’s something that’s extremely important to me. I think back on my time in grad school, and I just remember long, long afternoons of just absolute, soul-crushing boredom
If you were so bored out of your ass you could've gone to a real punk rock show and met some real punks, but hey, they might tell your snowflake ass shit you don't wanna hear about free speech and thinking for yourself rather than joining cults. Yes, I know some punks are trooning out themselves, revealing themselves to be the spineless bandwagon-jumping transtrenders they are.
Sadie Switchblade was unable to raise the funds needed for his FFS. Unlike Nyk, Sadie is an actual punk rocker active in the scene but he is not a popular, massively overfunded Patreon millionaire like Nyk, plus he alienated the whole punk scene from himself by
going after gender critical punk bands getting them dropped from their label. People are now avoiding Sadie because they don't want to donate money to a meddlesome bothersome SJW cult member attacking others in punk and telling them what to think or say. If Nyk was a punk or in punk they would've dealt with him likewise, and he too would would have been unable to fundraise, having earned himself a reputation for censoring others. Punks don't like censorship and if they can't make it known publically because of political correctness, they will make it known privately by refusing to fund your transtrending. Sadie got woke and went broke.
And I was someone who was raised with the Internet: My attention span is short, I like to be amused.
Cousin Pink said it best.
I remember watching Trump’s inauguration on this livestream with a million viewers, and the live chat was just this wave after wave of swastikas and Pepes, and I was like what is happening? And that’s gone. Like, it’s not gone, but it’s much more controlled, it’s contained. That hard right fashy energy has kind of lost its momentum, and that’s very reassuring to me.
Out of sight, out of mind because that's how delusional the left is, they think that if you can't see something it must not be happening. Just like with transition where you're banned from mentioning someone's past, even shit you saw them do with your own eyes, you are being encouraged to forget and repress history for the sake of maintaining peace in the present. All the SJW cult has done is created a massive toxic stew of repressed resentment waiting for that spark to explode (and it doesn't have to be a single event either, it can be multiple smaller things that begin to add up). Typical how these pomo true believers always forget Marcuse warning them that the repressed comes back to haunt.
