Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Scientific American recently published one of the dumbest articles about sex and gender I can imagine. It's a pretty standard argument you're all familiar with now; biological sex is determined by a complex interaction of genes and hormones and the womb environment (this is all true), but since it's complex that means it's not real! Also intersex people exist, which proves trans people somehow! Gender is a construct but also gender is biological! Etc etc etc. Basically a gish gallop of "science" terms to get people to turn off their critical thinking and start nodding along.

As you can imagine, it's been linked to several subs by TRAs, and they've infected every comment section, downvoting all the reasonable comments and upvoting anything that currently aligns with The Narrative. The /r/skeptic one is the most amusing, and if you click on the profiles of the most vociferously anti-science you'll find plenty of typical examples of AGP incels

Unfortunately this one doesn't seem to have posted photos (must be truly hideous), but just scrolling through his post history (minecraft, dnd, atheism, etc) it's like there's a real "neckbeard to troon" pipeline.
 
I swear these "Biological sex isn't real but also the existence of intersex people proves trans people are the 'gender' they identity as!!1!!" articles are always the same. They are usually written in a smug manner – this one is a particularly striking example and Scientific Journal should be ashamed of themselves for publishing something that reads like a Gotcha! Tumblr post – and set out to prove that TRAs are right and everybody else is wrong. The "sex is more complex than you think" is always just a backdrop for pushing troon ideology. Seriously, they aren't even trying to hide it at this point. :roll:

I looked up the author, and unsurprisingly, it's a they/them genderspecial individual
ölklö.png
 
Scientific American recently published one of the dumbest articles about sex and gender I can imagine. It's a pretty standard argument you're all familiar with now; biological sex is determined by a complex interaction of genes and hormones and the womb environment (this is all true), but since it's complex that means it's not real! Also intersex people exist, which proves trans people somehow! Gender is a construct but also gender is biological! Etc etc etc. Basically a gish gallop of "science" terms to get people to turn off their critical thinking and start nodding along.

let's see

what does SRY stand for? sex-determining region Y. SEX DETERMINING. also most doctors call it TDF (testicular-determining factor)

the author says that there are no differences between male and female brains but goes on to say that troons and gay men have ladybrains regardless.

calling genitalia a secondary sex characteristic is just egregiously bad.

fucking neuroscientists.
 
the author says that there are no differences between male and female brains but goes on to say that troons and gay men have ladybrains regardless
Whoever professes this is a massive liar. Male and female brains are actually different in the same way men and women have biological differences. It's due to inmense pricks and retards like these that pharmacology industry has a crapload of problems because they have to test many drugs on both males and females to check for effects and side effects on both.
Scientists have an inmense hard time announcing scientific discoveries or testing new drugs because they have to be wary of any troon that comes out of the woodwork claiming that science is oppressing them.
 
I swear these "Biological sex isn't real but also the existence of intersex people proves trans people are the 'gender' they identity as!!1!!" articles are always the same. They are usually written in a smug manner – this one is a particularly striking example and Scientific Journal should be ashamed of themselves for publishing something that reads like a Gotcha! Tumblr post – and set out to prove that TRAs are right and everybody else is wrong. The "sex is more complex than you think" is always just a backdrop for pushing troon ideology. Seriously, they aren't even trying to hide it at this point. :roll:

I looked up the author, and unsurprisingly, it's a they/them genderspecial individual
View attachment 801244
simone sun.jpg
simon sun 02.jpg

DZoiyB9XUAANvP8.jpgDP3FS2bWsAAGf7V.jpgap4PjWc.jpg

801467
801479
1560602003962.png

(for someone with such credentials I wasn't expecting such crappy music)

wipe right.jpg
Don't forget to swipe right.



"Here's my psuedo-scientific take on why my fetish is actually an empowering natural thing I was born with. I can't help myself, transvesticistic eroticism is in my blood!"

Conflict of interest?

Check out all the self-congratulatory yodeling going on over at his Twitter. He has arrived.


Reddit did not entirely validate his identity. Hoh shit:


Choice cut:
1560603260036.png

Case closed:
sciam bias.jpg

But wait, a rebuff from Scientific American:
801561


What a ringing endorsement!

So, no matter what a pundit, politician or internet troll may say, trans people are an indispensable part of our living reality.

Transgender humans represent the complexity and diversity that are fundamental features of life, evolution and nature itself. That is a fact.
What a clown! With all of their credentials I was really really expecting something more polished. That article is a glorified blog post by a mentally ill guy who had the misfortune to start balding when he was 8 years old. How embarrassing for Scientific American! He fits the stereotypical transsexual with autogynephilia diagnosis to perfection, he ticks every single box of the textbook definition.


Bonus: (Clown World headquarters up in this bitch.)
 
Last edited:
"Veiws", nice. Also how can you be both transgender and nonbinary? Isn't it contradicting?! I don't know man, tran's language always baffles me, I genuinely struggle to understand it.
I always see," trans and nonbinary people" ie "Welcome to all our Trans and Nonbinary friends!!" implying that they are separate entities but then when some enby is accused of transphobia/fetishism "ok but I am LITRALLY trans??"

So I assume they just separate the two because they want a special mention.
 
Whoever professes this is a massive liar. Male and female brains are actually different in the same way men and women have biological differences.

I fucking hated embryology in med school, but at least it prevented me from writing puff pieces about "yaaas queen ladybrains"

In order to be entirely biologically male except for a ladybrain would require the mother to take exogenous hormones that cross the placental barrier during rapid fetal brain development during the third trimester, but NOT during genital differentiation in the first. It's actually pretty time-specific.

How do I know this? Well some brave research team trooned out a bunch of monkeys

e: also IIRC the head researcher passed away during that study. at least he died doing what he loved: watching female rhesus monkeys with testosterone-fueled gigantic clits screech and hump each other.

Yeah I don't know why that was ever greenlit.
 
Last edited:
If there's one thing that annoys me it's people using "it's natural" as a cover to say "we should bend our knee to every whim of the trannies".
If they were just a medical acceptance movement--"we were born with a birth defect and need more research for treatment options"--then they would have my donations money 100% of the time over "I'm deluded to think I'm a woman, therefore I am one, if you say I'm not then die."

Imagine if schizophreniacs, instead of telling everyone they're normal people on a wide spectrum of issues who need treatment to function, went around insisting that if we don't pretend to hear the same voices as them then we're bigots. It's natural after all!
Yeah, sure it's natural to snip your prick and take insane amounts of hormones to radically alter your body, sure. It's not to say that they also use the horrid and failed experiment of a disgraceful man that molested and mutilated a child that was so traumatized that him and his brother killed themselves.

I remember there was a documentary on David Reimer that was filmed shortly before his suicide where he said "Of course it's a lie. I know it because it's true, i've lived through it. Does someone need to die to finally know that this is not true?" Even with his suicide, no one cared. That is fucking dreadful.
I fucking hated embryology in med school, but at least it prevented me from writing puff pieces about "yaaas queen ladybrains"

In order to be entirely biologically male except for a ladybrain would require the mother to take exogenous hormones that cross the placental barrier during rapid fetal brain development during the third trimester, but NOT during genital differentiation in the first. It's actually pretty time-specific.

How do I know this? Well some brave research team trooned out a bunch of monkeys

e: also IIRC the head researcher passed away during that study. at least he died doing what he loved: watching female rhesus monkeys with testosterone-fueled gigantic clits screech and hump each other.

Yeah I don't know why that was ever greenlit.
Well, that sure it's fucking important. But you better not say out loud or the troons will chimp out and ask whoever is in charge to dogpile you and sack your ass faster than they can take their hormones.
 
GD is a real "natural" disorder just like depression, psychosis, autism, etc. can occur without outside intervention. Cutting off your dick is not and that's why I'm opposed to troons gathering sympathy with "I didn't ask to have this neuro disorder" to segue into "you should call me a woman and pay for my hormones". Only in clown world is a mental problem everyone else's responsibility to cater to, and not yours to keep under control. Did you read my post at all?

The bizarre combination of medical treatment and politics is where the problem lies.

HRT can treat GD. It's also fairly safe. SRS is not. But SRS is the end point of transitioning and it's big money right now.

Every troon slowly walks towards Dr. Choppadick with every titty skittle they consume and there's no stopping them.
 
"Views my own" has to be the most pointless shit... Yeah of course they are, everyone can figure that out. Won't make any difference if you act like an idiot and your employer thinks it makes them look bad. And it's not like you won't still try to get a motherfucker fired for wrongthink even though those views are the individual's and not the employer's. It's a stupid, meaningless line that changes nothing.
 
HRT can treat GD only alongside heavy therapy and only after all other treatment options have been thoroughly exhausted.
I guess that's why the 40% exists. They are not trying to help them, just validate their derangement and mutilate their bodies to further exhacerbate the problem. And of course the health problems tied to hormone blockers are small potatoes compared to the whole cause of transgenderism. Just look ahd Sophie Labelle, who is totally ok with giving kids those even if they will have a myriad of health issues later in life.
"Views my own" has to be the most pointless shit... Yeah of course they are, everyone can figure that out. Won't make any difference if you act like an idiot and your employer thinks it makes them look bad. And it's not like you won't still try to get a motherfucker fired for wrongthink even though those views are the individual's and not the employer's. It's a stupid, meaningless line that changes nothing.
Reminds me of the furfag who got fired from NASA internship for behaving like an idiot and telling a NASA veteran employee "suck my dick". Even if the views are your own, potential customers will not want to do business with your company just because they don't want to support an imbecile. A company is in their rights to fire anyone who chimps out on a regular basis and makes himself an ass.
 
Reminds me of the furfag who got fired from NASA internship for behaving like an idiot and telling a NASA veteran employee "suck my dick". Even if the views are your own, potential customers will not want to do business with your company just because they don't want to support an imbecile. A company is in their rights to fire anyone who chimps out on a regular basis and makes himself an ass.

It also wasn't just any old veteran NASA employee, it was Homer Hickam of "October Sky" fame.
 
Scientific American recently published one of the dumbest articles about sex and gender I can imagine. It's a pretty standard argument you're all familiar with now; biological sex is determined by a complex interaction of genes and hormones and the womb environment (this is all true), but since it's complex that means it's not real! Also intersex people exist, which proves trans people somehow! Gender is a construct but also gender is biological! Etc etc etc. Basically a gish gallop of "science" terms to get people to turn off their critical thinking and start nodding along.

As you can imagine, it's been linked to several subs by TRAs, and they've infected every comment section, downvoting all the reasonable comments and upvoting anything that currently aligns with The Narrative. The /r/skeptic one is the most amusing, and if you click on the profiles of the most vociferously anti-science you'll find plenty of typical examples of AGP incels

Unfortunately this one doesn't seem to have posted photos (must be truly hideous), but just scrolling through his post history (minecraft, dnd, atheism, etc) it's like there's a real "neckbeard to troon" pipeline.
I'm pretty surprised at the upvotes/downvotes in that /r/skeptic post. Reddit's trans community is its own exceptionally insane thing, which is why we're here making fun of it, but usually when troon issues this fucking stupid appear on neutral territory in Reddit, sanity largely prevails. I had to cleanse my palate with the response to the article on Twitter.
 
Also I won't even tackle that "fairly safe" point, unless you think colon cancer, breast cancer, thyroid cancer, prostate cancer, uterine cancer, ovarian cysts, blood clots, thrombosis, high blood pressure, low blood pressure, osteoporosis, anemia, the thinning of the blood, the thickening of the blood, kidney failure, liver failure, and a myriad of other health conditions linked to hormone therapy are small potatoes.

Nah. Being fat is more of a risk factor than taking IM estradiol valerate.

CROSS-SEX HORMONES WILL LITERALLY KILL YOU is like DARE's approach to keep kids off of drugs. Obviously when you blatantly lie about things then nobody takes you seriously as an authority.
 
Back