Monica Rial / Monica Jean Rial / Rialisms & Ron Toye / Ronald Toye III / rontoye3 - 5th Bulma and Ron "Pick Up the Phone or You'll Find Your Dog Dead When You Get Home" Toye

Casey is hiding in a corner screaming at ron and telling him to stop tweeting but ron cant help himself.we don't have to wish the worst for the pathetic wannabe victims because theyve dug their own fucking grave and have to lie in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShinyStar
  • Like
Reactions: Le Pew, Kosher Salt and (deleted member)
AnOminous said:
This is frankly nonsense. The complaint includes numerous specific statements made on specific dates, sometimes even including screen shots of the allegedly defamatory statements. Have these people even read the complaint?

If so, are they deliberately lying about it?

Here's a sample page:

View attachment 802820

How do these not sufficiently identify the allegedly defamatory statements as required under Texas's notice pleading standards?

Are we even looking at the same document?
Click to expand...
Think Mike was talking about the TI with Contract stuff not the defamation as far as the pleading goes.
 
Urbanmech said:
Think Mike was talking about the TI with Contract stuff not the defamation as far as the pleading goes.
Click to expand...

He was talking about the tortious interference with prospective business relations depending on the existence of a separate wrongful act. That other act is defamation. He was very specific about that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt
AnOminous said:
He was talking about the tortious interference with prospective business relations depending on the existence of a separate wrongful act. That other act is defamation. He was very specific about that.
Click to expand...
Right but the pleading only got brought up when he mentions TI With a Contract saying "there are too few details in the complaints" and then someone makes the notice pleading joke, then he says there are rules for pleadings. I mean with him saying the TI with prospective contracts dies with Vic losing could be talking about the TCPA working or just meaning Vic losing defamation in general.
 
Urbanmech said:
Right but the pleading only got brought up when he mentions TI With a Contract saying "there are too few details in the complaints" and then someone makes the notice pleading joke, then he says there are rules for pleadings. I mean with him saying the TI with prospective contracts dies with Vic losing could be talking about the TCPA working or just meaning Vic losing defamation in general.
Click to expand...

And there are not too few details in the complaint with regard to defamation. There are very specific details, with times, dates, authors, locations of the statements, and the specific statements in question.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt
AnOminous said:
And there are not too few details in the complaint with regard to defamation. There are very specific details, with times, dates, authors, locations of the statements, and the specific statements in question.
Click to expand...
He was saying there are too few details in the pleading for TI with a Contract, not defamation. He just did a catch all lose thing for the defamation ,nothing specific, for the TI with Prospective Bus.
 
Urbanmech said:
He was saying there are too few details in the pleading for TI with a Contract, not defamation. He just did a catch all lose thing for the defamation ,nothing specific, for the TI with Prospective Bus.
Click to expand...

As for the TI with contract, it ought to be more specific as well. There's definitely well-pled defamation, though, and that's prerequisite for the TI with PBR, which by its very nature can't be pled with specificity, because if it could be, you'd specifically be pleading TI with an existing contract.

The existing contract would be with Kamehacon would be the only specific contract I know of where they could prove TI, and it would be hard to prove damages since they went back and actually honored their contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Le Pew and Bootylicious Bootyhole
AnOminous said:
As for the TI with contract, it ought to be more specific as well. There's definitely well-pled defamation, though, and that's prerequisite for the TI with PBR, which by its very nature can't be pled with specificity, because if it could be, you'd specifically be pleading TI with an existing contract.

The existing contract would be with Kamehacon would be the only specific contract I know of where they could prove TI, and it would be hard to prove damages since they went back and actually honored their contract.
Click to expand...
That's assuming they don't have evidence of TI associated with other cons dropping Vic. Ron's texts appear to demonstrate that the evidence likely exists (if he's right about Rial's agent speaking with other cons), but the question is whether Ty has that evidence.
 
teriyakiburns said:
That's assuming they don't have evidence of TI associated with other cons dropping Vic. Ron's texts appear to demonstrate that the evidence likely exists (if he's right about Rial's agent speaking with other cons), but the question is whether Ty has that evidence.
Click to expand...

Well, the question raised by Dunford is whether it should be in the pleading, and the answer may be yes. That's not at all the case with the TI with PBR though, nor is it remotely true for the defamation claims which are articulated at length with a good deal of specificity.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Kosher Salt and teriyakiburns
Farmer Y said:
More from the mind of Ron. WTF would throwing jellybeans at Nick even matter for this case?
View attachment 802728

Can't wait yet he still is stalling and hiding.
View attachment 802730

Oh I'm sure he has your whole collection of nudes. Let that tummy roll.
View attachment 802731
Click to expand...
I'm thoroughly confused by the nothingburger shit Soye thinks is evidence of... something.

Vic taking a picture with his own attorney and the guy who set up his GFM while at the same public event is something to send to Casey?

Nick mocking the jellybean incident, which he already does on his channel, is "great information" for their case (I'm generously assuming he means his future case against Nick, since that has nothing to do with Vic)?

What a waste of Casey's time. I hope he's wringing out every penny from this idiot.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: ConSluttant, Harvey Danger, Francis York Morgan and 4 others
AnOminous said:
As for the TI with contract, it ought to be more specific as well. There's definitely well-pled defamation, though, and that's prerequisite for the TI with PBR, which by its very nature can't be pled with specificity, because if it could be, you'd specifically be pleading TI with an existing contract.

The existing contract would be with Kamehacon would be the only specific contract I know of where they could prove TI, and it would be hard to prove damages since they went back and actually honored their contract.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't be surprised BHBH has other sources of TI with an EC, also wouldn't be surprised they have had those Discord Chats for a few months now.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kosher Salt and Botchy Galoop
AnOminous said:
Well, the question raised by Dunford is whether it should be in the pleading, and the answer may be yes. That's not at all the case with the TI with PBR though, nor is it remotely true for the defamation claims which are articulated at length with a good deal of specificity.
Click to expand...
Is the suggestion that paragraph 19 could do with more specificity?
803046

803047
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Coach Kreeton Of All That, Le Pew, Francis York Morgan and 6 others
  • Agree
Reactions: Coach Kreeton Of All That, Botchy Galoop, Harvey Danger and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back