Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

And then if a woman IS the best person and gets hired, she’s forever under the shadow of the hiring process. I really disagree with positive hiring done like this. Ask if your applicant pool is matching the society you live in, and if it isn’t, think why. Don’t just cut off half the qualified people who do apply. That’s the wrong point in the process.

Same with diversity hires like the CBC and BBC have tried to pull, excluding whites because "muh representation!" . How in the fuck do I know which asshole is a useful one, if they're hiring anything with the "right skin colour" or "correct genitals" or "correct gender expression" that has a heartbeat?

May the anti woke backlash be swift...

That backlash could come anytime, and I'd be okay with it, entirely because of the negative discrimination that ALSO exists.
810183


I'm 100% certain that gay men, being the LEAST likely to engage in sexually predatory relationship behaviours, should be fucking these exceptional fucks up, for this abominable opinion.

Edit for (Article Archive) and (Tweet Archive).

Second Edit -

Aren't apricot kernels one of the fad "natural" products right now, despite them being loaded with cyanide?

Doonesbury had a story arc about laetrile being a waste of time in the 1970's.

810201


Uncle Duke (based entirely on Hunter S. Thompson) from Doonesbury. Unfortunately, I can't find any of the relevant strips, but I know there were in a couple of the larger compilations, and I think some of them might have appeared in "But the pension fund was just sitting there!", which was mostly strips about Uncle Duke's various, nefarious, get-rich-quick schemes.
 
Last edited:
I think this movement is headed the same way as both the New Left of the 1960s and Evangelical Right of the 1980s.
Just because they've been eclipsed as moral busybodies doesn't mean the evangelicals disappeared. Someone is voting for all these Republicans.
I am a woman (a real one) and in STEM and I think this is a crap idea. You want the best person for the job, and you don’t have many women on staff. The solution to that is not preventing men from applying. It’s asking WHY women aren’t hired. Because all of the following scenarios have different solutions.

Are women applying at all? If not, why? Is there something about the ad that’s uniquely targeted to men, or very off putting to women? Where are we advertising?

Are women applying but not getting interviews? Why? Qualified women not getting through is an issue. Can we block out names on resumes?

Are no qualified women applying? Why? Pipeline issue?

Are women getting interviewed but not being hired? Why?

Are women being offered the job and not accepting? Why?

So, so many things that you can do that are way more useful. Just ‘no men applying’ means you may miss the best candidate.

Of course you could just identify as a woman ...
I think it pays to step back and look at this from a critical distance.

They feel it is necessary to (((positively))) discriminate to get more women into these positions.

In education. More women in education.

Next year, I assume it's nursing and psychology.
 
Exactly, it's like arguing that marijuana should be legal based upon the fact that it's "Just a plant, MAAN, so it's like, natural and nontoxic". While I agree with the conclusion the logic is fucking stupid. There are shitloads of deadly poisonous plants that are naturally going to kill you.
For the longest time the biggest argument against homosexuality was that it was considered unnatural because "God created Adam and Eve not Adam and STEVE!" so yes I consider it relevant to point out it occurs in natural biology among mammals and isn't just a bizarre creation of human society like so many still like to say it is and don't see a problem with a science museum acknowledging it as a natural phenomenon in the wild.
 
For the longest time the biggest argument against homosexuality was that it was considered unnatural because "God created Adam and Eve not Adam and STEVE!" so yes I consider it relevant to point out it occurs in natural biology among mammals and isn't just a bizarre creation of human society like so many still like to say it is and don't see a problem with a science museum acknowledging it as a natural phenomenon in the wild.
i was going to make that first point at some point
the whole "natural is good" argument comes from both sides of the political spectrum which show that it doesn't matter who makes the argument... if someone makes the argument, they're fucking retarded
 
They'll most likely be irrelevant/burn out by the 2030s.

Possibly the 2020s if Trump gets reelected and causes another meltdown.

I think this movement is headed the same way as both the New Left of the 1960s and Evangelical Right of the 1980s.
Possibly, but you may be right regardless if Trump gets re-elected or not. The best way to fight a SJW is with their own brand of insanity. I think it is starting to catch on now, but you take something they are doing, and you do some crazy origami crap to make it look like they are betraying their SJW principles. For example, just to use an earlier example, "men can't get raped". If you hamfist "black men" in there and pollute their message that they are saying "black people can't be raped"(basically pull their own BS that they constantly pull on topics like immigration), and they will go right into a tizzy and be painted into a corner where they have to either admit men can be raped or face "being a racist".

Their entire motif is insane that it can be short circuited by anybody with a mordicum of wit.
 
i was going to make that first point at some point
the whole "natural is good" argument comes from both sides of the political spectrum which show that it doesn't matter who makes the argument... if someone makes the argument, they're fucking exceptional
I mean you can debate the ethics of modern gay culture or whether the media's current glorification of the LGBT as trendy is a good thing but I don't know why science acknowledging a biological reality * especially when people lambast TRAs for denying it * or schools teaching kids that liking the same sex doesn't make them freaks sets some people off.
 
Last edited:
Are women applying but not getting interviews? Why?
It's only slightly relevant, but I've had run-ins with a company here (Moscow,Russia), that had various IT vacancies listed (they work with job centers, that's how I got my suspicion on them confirmed), and flat-out told all the female callers that "vacancies are taken, we just haven't renewed the listing".
Why? It had overwhelmingly female staff, and they probably wanted a guy or two for husbandening.
 
Their entire motif is insane that it can be short circuited by anybody with a mordicum of wit.
That's why these people hate comedy, since their idea of comedy like that one dyke "comedian" is that it doesn't have to be funny and it's supposed to make the audience clap like seals when they hear ORANGE MAN BAD. Actual comedy and making fun of their crazy beliefs or laughing at their lunacy (the same way you'd laugh at fundies screaming about demons in ouija boards) is utterly forbidden since it's such an easy way to expose them to a broad audience for the lunatics they are and make their causes look like the jokes they are. That's why they so fiercely attack memes like Clownworld (and most memes in general), and have labeled Kiwifarms as one of the most evil Nazi websites in existence since mockery is so destructive to their ideology (as it often can be to totalitarian philosophies). To mock these people denies them their power, and that's why most people get into social """""justice""""" (it's very rarely out of any actual concern for "marginalized groups), because they want to have a semblance of power and control over others.
Celebrating deformed, dysfunctional, and evolutionary useless animals. Fucking why even.
We celebrate troons, so we might as well celebrate other deformed, dysfunctional, and evolutionarily worthless animals too.
 
It's weird how they still find Scar queer/gay when the sequel proved that he had a dedicated relationship with a lioness and he hit on Nala (when she was older).

Yeah what they say and do seem to be two different things. You're a boy acting feminine? Your gay or a troon. You're a girl acting masculine? Your gay or a troon. They are very fond of labelling and organizing people into groups. Despite everything else they say.

It's almost as if they are marketers trying to apply labels to groups for advertising, political, or medical business referral purposes.
 
In fairness they aren't wrong, Homosexuality does naturally occur in the wild in several mammal species including our close relatives apes and chimpanzees.
Homosexual acts in animals is not "queer"; Queer is a made-up concept denoting a deliberate break in gender norms.
The Natural History Museum could have presented the facts as a, well, matter of fact, without drawing unwarranted parallel with human sexual behavior.

+ + +
Speaking of unwarranted parallel with human sexual behavior, care to see a veteran experimental physicist do the "how do you do fellow kids" routine?
812102


This is from the book Signatures of the Artist: The Vital Imperfections That Make Our Universe Habitable (Oxford University Press, 2018 ) by Steven E. Vigdor, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Indiana University and overseer of some of the biggest experiments in particle physics for the past 45 years. This metaphor is so inapt, so bizarre, so out-of-place, that it literally made me jump out of my bed. What's worse, Vigdor's hip posturing is not going to please either gender studists (gender expression ≠ biological sex; indeed you are bad person for believing in "biological sex" at all) or dangerhairs (gender identity is not binary!!!!! reeeee!!!!)

The metaphor is also completely unnecessary, for Vigdor's explanation in the next paragraph is absolutely clear:
812125

If a metaphor is needed, a better one is that of a fire engine siren: the sound has its intrinsic frequency, but what you hear depends on your velocity with respect to the fire engine.

Vigdor repeats this gender metaphor in the glossary.
 
Last edited:
Neon Genesis Evangelion has returned for a second life on Netflix, legally available for the first time in a couple decades. Watching Neon Genesis Evangelion in 2019 is fascinating for a number of reasons — namely, seeing what a new generation of people will make of the show — but the most interesting is the new world it’s been released back into. The anime was always apt, but in the two decades since the original series was first broadcast on TV Tokyo, it’s become the ideal anime for our time; thematically, the series is about the awful courage needed to stop an oncoming apocalypse, and what the people charged with protecting everyone else are obliged to cope with.

Neon Genesis Evangelion was critically acclaimed and beloved on its release (aside from the last two episodes, which were to put it mildly, controversial) both because it was a dense work of psychological fiction and because people could recognize it as a genuine artistic achievement. In 1995, when it was released, the western world was relatively prosperous and stable; Japan, however, had recently undergone both an earthquake in Kobe and a terrorist attack in Tokyo, which, that close to the end of the millennium, must have felt like the first rumblings of doomsday. Hideaki Anno’s masterpiece came into that void and had something to say about depression, cataclysm, and what it costs to save the world.

The plot goes something like this: Shinji is a 14-year-old boy who’s been conscripted by his estranged father, who runs a secret intergovernmental agency, to pilot an Evangelion, one of the titular giant robots. The organization’s purpose is to defeat the Angels — equally large aliens that are hellbent on destroying the human race — and the Evangelions are humanity’s final weapon, the only thing that’s strong enough to destroy them. Shinji does not want to pilot the Eva. And yet he has to, or humans are doomed.

While the show was always very good at synthesizing its philosophical influences into a coherent, cohesive whole, the fourth episode in particular does this quite well; it’s one of the earliest signs that Neon Genesis Evangelion is not just another fable about giant mechs and even bigger monsters. In episode four, we find Shinji breaking down from the stress of piloting the horribly beautiful EVA Unit 01, from fighting Angels. He runs away from the apartment he’s sharing with his guardian, Misato, and into the field surrounding Tokyo-3, the city built for the fight against the Angels. (And I mean: can you blame him? That’s a lot of stress for one hormonal teenager.)

This is one of the great tensions of the series: Shinji doesn’t want to fight and potentially die, but he has to. Only certain people can pilot the EVAs, and he’s drawn a cosmically short straw. Shinji returns to the city eventually, recaptured by the shadowy organization. He has a conversation with Misato (who also happens to be his boss) in which she forces his resignation because he doesn’t have the right attitude to be a pilot; she seems to think he needs to be more enthusiastic about saving humanity. There’s a beautiful shot of him at the train station, missing the train back to his former life, and being welcomed back by Misato to the only real home he’s ever known. He gets back in the proverbial robot.

That’s a very brief summary of the episode’s plot, but what’s really interesting here is the way Neon Genesis Evangelion depicts that emotional shift to the audience. It uses the Hedgehog’s Dilemma — an example drawn from the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer’s Parerga and Paralipomena (1851), the last major work he published before he died — to make a smart point about intimacy. The dilemma, in brief: it’s a cold day, and a group of hedgehogs is huddled together for warmth. The problem is that the closer they get the more their quills prick. The idea, naturally, is that humans work the same way: intimacy is often quite painful.

Shinji doesn’t really have anyone close to him, and therefore for him any kind of intimacy is as unbearable as the loneliness he can’t escape. (His father is the head of that aforementioned shadowy intergovernmental organization, and he transparently doesn’t care about Shinji’s well-being; his mother is dead.) He can’t seem to connect with his classmates, and he’s afraid to let Misato care for him because she doesn’t, at this juncture, seem emotionally capable of it — she’s an avatar of the work he hates and yet is compelled to do. Because again: everyone will die. And that, to Shinji, is the most unbearable thought of all.

Currently, we are facing our own seemingly intractable — but ultimately solvable — problems, much as Shinji faces the Angels. Right-wing authoritarianism is on the rise around the globe; climate change, still unchecked, is beginning to ravage the planet; and economic inequality is more visible than it’s ever been before. There are concentration camps in America, and there is a government agency tasked with conducting raids of unsuspecting immigrant families and capturing the ones without what the government deems correct paperwork. The president has personally approved this. Things are bad, and they are getting almost unstoppably worse. Morally and physically, the world is on the brink of disaster.

Here, Shinji’s reaction in episode four — which, by the way, is called “Hedgehog’s Dilemma” — is instructive. Stress leads him to flee, to look away from the fights to come; but he returns in the end because of his moral obligation to the rest of society. I don’t think, in the end, that he returns out of a noble sense of duty. Shinji returns because he’s betting on the small chance that he, a hedgehog, can move a little closer to Misato and, through her, to the rest of humanity.

Watching it now is unsettling because of how timely it feels. The idea that we are required to help the people who can’t help themselves — anyone materially threatened by the current regime — is powerfully resonant. It feels like an emotional guide for what to do next.

Nowadays, it also feels like social media has turned the experience of using the internet into its own kind of society-wide hedgehog’s dilemma; private abuses can be broadcast to a global audience instantly, and that is its own terrible intimacy. When children die in government-run camps for migrants, for example, or when police shoot unarmed black civilians, to take another, more common scenario, we hear about it through platforms like Twitter and Facebook; we’re close enough now to feel the spines.

And it is unbearable. It is an unbearably intimate thing to see or to hear about. Another example. The other day I saw a video in one of my various feeds, of white cops beating a restrained and hooded man. It began to autoplay, and what I saw was abjectly horrifying.


The strange thing, however, was that watching the video felt in a way like bearing witness. It was as though I’d come face-to-face with the unedited present; I understood that a version of that beating — comparatively mild, in the grand scheme of things — was playing out in various unseen ways across the country. It is not so often that you witness someone exercising power over another person when they’re not afraid of the consequences of being watched.

Shinji never becomes a righteous, unafraid hero. He can’t help but be himself; he can’t help feeling terrified and powerless every time he enters his EVA before a battle with an unknown and unknowable Angel. And here, I think, is the final lesson: intimacy is painful, but the warmth that’s possible when people draw together is worth fighting for. Even if you’re afraid, and especially if you feel powerless. We don’t have to change ourselves to fight. The prick of those spines should spur us into collective action.
 
And not even Eva can please its fanbase when the translators decided to make a minor change in the dialogue of one scene and the fanbase completely erupted over it.

EDIT: at some point, Verge needs to have their own thread.
 
Last edited:
Neon Genesis Evangelion has returned for a second life on Netflix, legally available for the first time in a couple decades. Watching Neon Genesis Evangelion in 2019 is fascinating for a number of reasons — namely, seeing what a new generation of people will make of the show — but the most interesting is the new world it’s been released back into. The anime was always apt, but in the two decades since the original series was first broadcast on TV Tokyo, it’s become the ideal anime for our time; thematically, the series is about the awful courage needed to stop an oncoming apocalypse, and what the people charged with protecting everyone else are obliged to cope with.

Neon Genesis Evangelion was critically acclaimed and beloved on its release (aside from the last two episodes, which were to put it mildly, controversial) both because it was a dense work of psychological fiction and because people could recognize it as a genuine artistic achievement. In 1995, when it was released, the western world was relatively prosperous and stable; Japan, however, had recently undergone both an earthquake in Kobe and a terrorist attack in Tokyo, which, that close to the end of the millennium, must have felt like the first rumblings of doomsday. Hideaki Anno’s masterpiece came into that void and had something to say about depression, cataclysm, and what it costs to save the world.

The plot goes something like this: Shinji is a 14-year-old boy who’s been conscripted by his estranged father, who runs a secret intergovernmental agency, to pilot an Evangelion, one of the titular giant robots. The organization’s purpose is to defeat the Angels — equally large aliens that are hellbent on destroying the human race — and the Evangelions are humanity’s final weapon, the only thing that’s strong enough to destroy them. Shinji does not want to pilot the Eva. And yet he has to, or humans are doomed.

While the show was always very good at synthesizing its philosophical influences into a coherent, cohesive whole, the fourth episode in particular does this quite well; it’s one of the earliest signs that Neon Genesis Evangelion is not just another fable about giant mechs and even bigger monsters. In episode four, we find Shinji breaking down from the stress of piloting the horribly beautiful EVA Unit 01, from fighting Angels. He runs away from the apartment he’s sharing with his guardian, Misato, and into the field surrounding Tokyo-3, the city built for the fight against the Angels. (And I mean: can you blame him? That’s a lot of stress for one hormonal teenager.)

This is one of the great tensions of the series: Shinji doesn’t want to fight and potentially die, but he has to. Only certain people can pilot the EVAs, and he’s drawn a cosmically short straw. Shinji returns to the city eventually, recaptured by the shadowy organization. He has a conversation with Misato (who also happens to be his boss) in which she forces his resignation because he doesn’t have the right attitude to be a pilot; she seems to think he needs to be more enthusiastic about saving humanity. There’s a beautiful shot of him at the train station, missing the train back to his former life, and being welcomed back by Misato to the only real home he’s ever known. He gets back in the proverbial robot.

That’s a very brief summary of the episode’s plot, but what’s really interesting here is the way Neon Genesis Evangelion depicts that emotional shift to the audience. It uses the Hedgehog’s Dilemma — an example drawn from the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer’s Parerga and Paralipomena (1851), the last major work he published before he died — to make a smart point about intimacy. The dilemma, in brief: it’s a cold day, and a group of hedgehogs is huddled together for warmth. The problem is that the closer they get the more their quills prick. The idea, naturally, is that humans work the same way: intimacy is often quite painful.

Shinji doesn’t really have anyone close to him, and therefore for him any kind of intimacy is as unbearable as the loneliness he can’t escape. (His father is the head of that aforementioned shadowy intergovernmental organization, and he transparently doesn’t care about Shinji’s well-being; his mother is dead.) He can’t seem to connect with his classmates, and he’s afraid to let Misato care for him because she doesn’t, at this juncture, seem emotionally capable of it — she’s an avatar of the work he hates and yet is compelled to do. Because again: everyone will die. And that, to Shinji, is the most unbearable thought of all.

Currently, we are facing our own seemingly intractable — but ultimately solvable — problems, much as Shinji faces the Angels. Right-wing authoritarianism is on the rise around the globe; climate change, still unchecked, is beginning to ravage the planet; and economic inequality is more visible than it’s ever been before. There are concentration camps in America, and there is a government agency tasked with conducting raids of unsuspecting immigrant families and capturing the ones without what the government deems correct paperwork. The president has personally approved this. Things are bad, and they are getting almost unstoppably worse. Morally and physically, the world is on the brink of disaster.

Here, Shinji’s reaction in episode four — which, by the way, is called “Hedgehog’s Dilemma” — is instructive. Stress leads him to flee, to look away from the fights to come; but he returns in the end because of his moral obligation to the rest of society. I don’t think, in the end, that he returns out of a noble sense of duty. Shinji returns because he’s betting on the small chance that he, a hedgehog, can move a little closer to Misato and, through her, to the rest of humanity.

Watching it now is unsettling because of how timely it feels. The idea that we are required to help the people who can’t help themselves — anyone materially threatened by the current regime — is powerfully resonant. It feels like an emotional guide for what to do next.

Nowadays, it also feels like social media has turned the experience of using the internet into its own kind of society-wide hedgehog’s dilemma; private abuses can be broadcast to a global audience instantly, and that is its own terrible intimacy. When children die in government-run camps for migrants, for example, or when police shoot unarmed black civilians, to take another, more common scenario, we hear about it through platforms like Twitter and Facebook; we’re close enough now to feel the spines.

And it is unbearable. It is an unbearably intimate thing to see or to hear about. Another example. The other day I saw a video in one of my various feeds, of white cops beating a restrained and hooded man. It began to autoplay, and what I saw was abjectly horrifying.


The strange thing, however, was that watching the video felt in a way like bearing witness. It was as though I’d come face-to-face with the unedited present; I understood that a version of that beating — comparatively mild, in the grand scheme of things — was playing out in various unseen ways across the country. It is not so often that you witness someone exercising power over another person when they’re not afraid of the consequences of being watched.

Shinji never becomes a righteous, unafraid hero. He can’t help but be himself; he can’t help feeling terrified and powerless every time he enters his EVA before a battle with an unknown and unknowable Angel. And here, I think, is the final lesson: intimacy is painful, but the warmth that’s possible when people draw together is worth fighting for. Even if you’re afraid, and especially if you feel powerless. We don’t have to change ourselves to fight. The prick of those spines should spur us into collective action.
This faggot is projecting too much and smearing his Orange Man Bad Everyone Bad Me Good bullshit all over a series he has no capacity of understanding beyond looking up the name of the title on Wikipedia to read what other spergs wrote about it for 15 fucking years.

Just wait till he gets to the episode where he nuts all over the blue haired chick's face while she's unconscious, then he'll really be reminded of himself.
 
Homosexual acts in animals is not "queer"; Queer is a made-up concept denoting a deliberate break in gender norms.
The Natural History Museum could have presented the facts as a, well, matter of fact, without drawing unwarranted parallel with human sexual behavior.

+ + +
Speaking of unwarranted parallel with human sexual behavior, care to see a veteran experimental physicist do the "how do you do fellow kids" routine?
View attachment 812102

This is from the book Signatures of the Artist: The Vital Imperfections That Make Our Universe Habitable (Oxford University Press, 2018 ) by Steven E. Vigdor, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Indiana University and overseer of some of the biggest experiments in particle physics for the past 45 years. This metaphor is so inapt, so bizarre, so out-of-place, that it literally made me jump out of my bed. What's worse, Vigdor's hip posturing is not going to please either gender studists (gender expression ≠ biological sex; indeed you are bad person for believing in "biological sex" at all) or dangerhairs (gender identity is not binary!!!!! reeeee!!!!)

The metaphor is also completely unnecessary, for Vigdor's explanation in the next paragraph is absolutely clear:
View attachment 812125
If a metaphor is needed, a better one is that of a fire engine siren: the sound has its intrinsic frequency, but what you hear depends on your velocity with respect to the fire engine.

Vigdor repeats this gender metaphor in the glossary.
"...intrinsic BINARY properties..."

TRANSPHOBE!!!!1!! ("enbyphobe"... whatever)
 
This dumbfuck needs his own thread. Possibly the biggest fag in Toronto.

That dumb fuck is 100% convinced that Marc Lepine was an MRA, even though the MRM didn't exist in 1989, and no part of Lepine's manifesto referenced the MRM. It mentioned feminists, and his brutally abusive Muslim father installing a pathological hatred of women in him, especially women that tried to operate outside of rigidly defined and archeo-conservative gender roles that his father thought were "correct."

Interesting, I haven't even seen MeaDoofus disparage The Honourable Anne Cools, even though she's openly said things that the MRM agrees with, because she's the first Caribbean-born, African-descended Senator in the the country's history. I also seem to remember his unreservedly took the side of Steph Guthrie, et al., during the Gregory Alan Elliot case, even though a normal person would reasonably admit that there was no grounds for a charge of criminal harassment within miles of that waste of taxpayers money that was called an investigation and court case.
 
Back