ContraPoints / William Nicholas Parrott / Natalie Wynn Parrott / Nykytyne2 - GamerGhazi Cannibalism Victim, Youtube "Intellectual"

@Nykysnottrans just needs to tell us what Contra did to her to make her so mad already.

Nothing particularly dramatic, just realizing that I and others were being systematically lied to by this person. I was watching a video that Tim Pool posted the other week where he described meeting one of the leaders at Occupy Wall Street (when he was covering those protests as a young documentary maker) who told Tim that he "just wanted to watch the world burn". This was a lightbulb moment for Tim, when he began to realize that those the left considers to be its leaders don't have any actual progressive goals or values, they just want chaos for the sake of chaos. That's Nyk for me, that person.

I could never bully my dear, sweet, ContraPoints-hating waifu

But I already have a waifu, this is my twin flame waifu. I am not poly, I am a married monogamous irate furry. Also, can people please make up their mind about muh gendar? I have been referred to as a she and as a he, so what's it gonna be? I can't be non-binary, we have to agree on muh gendar. Or should my irate furry just be an alien like Jeffree Star without the plastic surgery but with fur and accepting of all pronouns?

Lol, this is now a thread for bullying @Nykysnottrans. Oh, how the tables have turned!

It's pretty obvious at this point that these are just clueless newbies who did not bother to familiarize themselves with the forum before signing up. If you don't like e-celebrity gossip, WTF are you even doing on Kiwi Farms? Back in the old days of netiquette, you had to lurk on a forum for a few days before posting anything, familiarize yourself with the threads, the tone of the conversation, etc. I guess these newbies took a wrong turn on the internet and ended up here or something. They see the words "Internet Famous" and some e-celebs they recognize, and assume this must be some kind of an online fanclub for their favourite e-celeb. Can you imagine them going into any other thread on this forum and accusing the regulars there of posting "gossip"? They would be laughed right out of the thread. This is the only thread where we are expected to put up with this bullshit from clueless newbies who don't even know what forum they're on. I like to imagine what would happen if these newbies would go into, say, the Zinnia Jones thread here on KF and start complaining about people posting Satana Kennedy anal porn there, LMAO. "Why are you posting all this anal porn of this guy? You're obviously obsessed with his ass!". That thread would be nothing but Satana Kennedy "highlights" for the rest of the week.

To return to the topic at hand, Nyk apparently told the truth to the LA Times about his channel being archived by the LoC:

LoCReply.jpg

Nyk has a fan at the LoC. Still, who is more culturally relevant at the moment, Pewdiepie or Nyk? Or is there, you know, discrimination at work here? (Because Pewdiepie is a Swede whereas Nyk is a homeboy.)
 
To return to the topic at hand, Nyk apparently told the truth to the LA Times about his channel being archived by the LoC:

LoCReply.jpg

Nyk has a fan at the LoC. Still, who is more culturally relevant at the moment, Pewdiepie or Nyk? Or is there, you know, discrimination at work here? (Because Pewdiepie is a Swede whereas Nyk is a homeboy.)
What the fuck. There's hundreds of other more culturally significant channels that even normies would recognize and know. Fucking Fred is bigger than this tranny.

I can guarantee that if you asked a random sample of the population that the majority would never have heard of "ContraPoints".
 
I wonder why the fuck there is such a push to get this vapid asshole mainstream, even more baffling to me is the fact that it's working. Are there so many sheltered, mentally unsound people out there who identity with this clown?

The videos that have a shred of reason behind them are preaching to the fucking choir and are smug as shit. This cunt is just as retarded as the fuckers the channel criticizes, hell maybe even more. Now, clowning yourself out and making considerable dosh kinda bothers me, I'm fucking jealous of the money part, I admit. But holy fuck, getting archived by LoC is beyond the realm of reason, why, oh why the fuck is this channel worth saving? What fucking values does it teach to anyone that's not already common sense?
 
I wonder why the fuck there is such a push to get this vapid asshole mainstream, even more baffling to me is the fact that it's working. Are there so many sheltered, mentally unsound people out there who identity with this clown?

The videos that have a shred of reason behind them are preaching to the fucking choir and are smug as shit. This cunt is just as exceptional as the fuckers the channel criticizes, hell maybe even more. Now, clowning yourself out and making considerable dosh kinda bothers me, I'm fucking jealous of the money part, I admit. But holy fuck, getting archived by LoC is beyond the realm of reason, why, oh why the fuck is this channel worth saving? What fucking values does it teach to anyone that's not already common sense?
Except it isn't working. People like Dave Rubin and Ben Shapiro have much more reach. Hell, even Gavin McInnes has a larger audience and he's been deplatformed from everywhere but YouTube.
 
Except it isn't working. People like Dave Rubin and Ben Shapiro have much more reach. Hell, even Gavin McInnes has a larger audience and he's been deplatformed from everywhere but YouTube.

Anecdotal but they must be making some headway because I have never seen this channel before in my life, a 4chins thread pushed my curiosity to check the farms and only after did I realize that I have seen this mug before in a YouTube feed. Now that I'm sucked in, I would also kinda like to see on real fucking radical converted by Mommy Contra. Sounds fucking absurd.
 
But I already have a waifu, this is my twin flame waifu. I am not poly, I am a married monogamous irate furry. Also, can people please make up their mind about muh gendar? I have been referred to as a she and as a he, so what's it gonna be? I can't be non-binary, we have to agree on muh gendar. Or should my irate furry just be an alien like Jeffree Star without the plastic surgery but with fur and accepting of all pronouns?
Oh please, I’m a perfectly good catgirl that’s just sitting here. It doesn’t matter if you’re a she or not, I know that your inner waifu is destined to make me sammiches while I sit on my ass and play video games.
To return to the topic at hand, Nyk apparently told the truth to the LA Times about his channel being archived by the LoC:

LoCReply.jpg

Nyk has a fan at the LoC. Still, who is more culturally relevant at the moment, Pewdiepie or Nyk? Or is there, you know, discrimination at work here? (Because Pewdiepie is a Swede whereas Nyk is a homeboy.)
What the actual fuck... this is utterly baffling. I don’t even know what to say to this. If I was a conspiritard I would be all over this shit, I would probably believe that there’s some conspiracy at hand that somehow caused a dubious, obscure incident of a small youtuber being “deradicalized” to be a front-page NYT story, as well as the ContraPoints channel to somehow be archived in the fucking Library of Congress.

What’s going on here? Am I just acting retárded right now?
 
Last edited:
I wonder why the fuck there is such a push to get this vapid asshole mainstream, even more baffling to me is the fact that it's working. Are there so many sheltered, mentally unsound people out there who identity with this clown?
Except it isn't working. People like Dave Rubin and Ben Shapiro have much more reach. Hell, even Gavin McInnes has a larger audience and he's been deplatformed from everywhere but YouTube.

Remember that graph that's shared by Anons on 4chan every time Nyk's cult tries to spam /pol with his content there? Nyk is really no big deal. That's why I tell people to just ignore him and not start arguments about him, his novelty will wear off and he'll be old news sooner than later. We all know who the really big fish are, and if Nyk is "fish" like he claims to be, he's definitely not one of the big ones. No one gives a shit about Nyk outside of Youtube and a handful of MSM fangirls, he is not deradicalizing anyone or anything outside of a handful of centrists who were already open to leftwing arguments. Nyk is not reaching the real rightwingers because no real rightwinger is going to listen to a mentally ill troon like Nyk. Nyk might seem "valid" because the mainstream media suck his limp dick and because he's a Youtube millionaire, but when has the MSM ever been right about anything?

a 4chins thread pushed my curiosity

So you read one of those shill threads at the image boards? I gotta say, you guys at the chans dish out some of the best backhanded compliments at Nyk. One of my most recent favourites was this one (the thread got deleted for being spam, but this comment was funny nonetheless):

Fairly talented at musical instruments, speaks German well, potentially more languages.

So, xer parents invested an incredible amount in xer, and is from from an ultra-upper class background. Now, xe is a freak and xer parents regret giving birth to this fucking dropout loser. It does not make a great effort (potentially incapable?) of making any real argumentsw, and just dresses in costumes and invokes the vaporwave aesthetic, that's it. Way overfunded. Hilariously overfunded. How much editing and aesthetics that go into the videos are insane. But it's obvious to see why xe dropped out. You're not smart you fucking freak of nature and eternal shame to your parents, now kill yourself, I know you're here.



Oh please, I’m a perfectly good catgirl that’s just sitting here. It doesn’t matter if you’re a she, I know that your inner waifu is destined to make me sammiches while I sit on my ass and play video games.

Do you even know how big my traditional family already is that you think I will just give it all up to take care of your gaming catgirl ass? Do you know how many childrenz I already haz that I need to bring home the bacon and prepare sandwiches for everyday? Boxes full of them kidz:

MyChildren.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nothing particularly dramatic, just realizing that I and others were being systematically lied to by this person. I was watching a video that Tim Pool posted the other week where he described meeting one of the leaders at Occupy Wall Street (when he was covering those protests as a young documentary maker) who told Tim that he "just wanted to watch the world burn". This was a lightbulb moment for Tim, when he began to realize that those the left considers to be its leaders don't have any actual progressive goals or values, they just want chaos for the sake of chaos. That's Nyk for me, that person.

Really disappointed. Was hoping you'd be able to give us a dick report.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Icasaracht
Over produced and edited smug-lefty-essay-videos are the new sloppily-animated-animal-avatars of the 'explaining why ur wrong' genre of youtube.
I couldn't watch Contra's videos even if I agreed with the main point, because that pompous lecture-ing quality reminds me of the rational sceptics™. Just because you dressed up as Elizabeth Bathory and lit the set like it's the cirque de soleil doesn't make you any different to a sweaty white atheist with a combover at 28, chuckling to himself as he explains why buzzfeed's manspreading video was bad feminism.
 
Over produced and edited smug-lefty-essay-videos are the new sloppily-animated-animal-avatars of the 'explaining why ur wrong' genre of youtube.
I couldn't watch Contra's videos even if I agreed with the main point, because that pompous lecture-ing quality reminds me of the rational sceptics™. Just because you dressed up as Elizabeth Bathory and lit the set like it's the cirque de soleil doesn't make you any different to a sweaty white atheist with a combover at 28, chuckling to himself as he explains why buzzfeed's manspreading video was bad feminism.
And yet they feel perfectly secure in making potshots and video essays about what was wrong with the Skeptics, as if they're not the exact same thing but with a different coat of paint.
(Timestamp 0:33. I guess Shaun did the voice of the parody Skeptic)
They're doomed to the same fate and I seriously doubt that anyone could convince me otherwise. It's the unwarranted attitude of "we are fundamentally different and inherently better than those guys" that drives me nuts. Do people ever learn?
 
And yet they feel perfectly secure in making potshots and video essays about what was wrong with the Skeptics, as if they're not the exact same thing but with a different coat of paint.
(Timestamp 0:33. I guess Shaun did the voice of the parody Skeptic)
They're doomed to the same fate and I seriously doubt that anyone could convince me otherwise. It's the unwarranted attitude of "we are fundamentally different and inherently better than those guys" that drives me nuts. Do people ever learn?
The Skeptic community died because they were fucking incompetent. People got bored of the same "SJW lol" content over and over again. When they tried to debate the alt-right. they fucking failed catastrophically. That's were Breadtube found success: they were atrractive for people that wanted an answer to the alt-right. You see, rebutting random Tumblrettes's points is easy but debating people that know more about you on the matter is considerably more harder. From all the Skeptic spectrum, Dr Layman is maybe the only one that has knowledge on social science. Hell, he even managed to humillate Ollie from Philosophy Tube for his exceptional dogmatic political arguments. But the Skeptics don't know much about history, politics or sociology, because they started as a response to stupid ignorant radlibs that just wanted a quick buck (Zoe, Anita). That's why every debate that Skeptics had ended in a fucking failure. Sargon got dunked by Kristi Winter, Jim and fucking Richard Spencer (he got lucky with Natalie becuase she is not that good of a debater). Kraut failed to demostrate to Vaush (leftie Destiny) why the USA didn't invade Iraq for oil and to defend himself against Jim for the gay ops.

The Skeptics were victims of their own success, they believed to be more inteligent that they really were. Their failure to create a political alternative to SJW's and the alt-right was what doomed their cause: their poltiical ideas were really vague and all over the place. What about Breadtube then? They're gonna last for a while: mostly with the help of Internet corporations. I see four ways they can collapse
1) A big sexual scandal that basically destroys the entire cohesion of Breadtube. It has to ProJared's level of shitshow. Could be likely, they all seem really exceptional people that can fuck things up somehow. Harry was really close to this.
2) The alt-right simply dissapears over time and Breadtubers loses their meaning to exist. Unlikely, they're really strong online and they get stronger everytime that Youtube or other corporation pulls some shit (Crowder's example)
3) Some kind of serious idelogical drift, like the one that happened on the anti-SJW community between the Skeptics and the alt-right. Maybe a big political could be the case. Unlikely, because they ideological cohesion is bigger than the anti-SJW. Liberals like Bob Chipman and Lily Orchard are rejected because they're not high enough on historical materialism
4) Corporations decide to act against them because they prefer identity politcs completely devoid of class. Radical leftists get the big oof and only moderate intersectional content remains. (this could correlate to number 3 where Breatubers that didn't got Thanos'd can have conflicts with their more radical wing)

I see number 4 more likely, number 1 would pushing luck too far. But something is clear: if the alt-right decays, Breadtube is gonna suffer for it.
 

I can't quite decide if the chair, his sweater, or that guy's face is the least-aesthetic part of that video. It's like some sort of Trifecta of Ugly. I think it's his face, but it's almost like the garishness of his surroundings draw away some of the attention from the Picasso-painting that is this man's head -- so perhaps his choice in home decor and wardrobe is in fact a conscious decision.

I'd still rather watch him than Nyk.

edit: his ideas are also more well-formed and coherent. Not going to sit around another half hour for him to make some sort of nebulous point about the skeptic community, but at least he seems fairly clever. And maybe he could make the ugly sweater thing a part of his channel..?
 
1) A big sexual scandal that basically destroys the entire cohesion of Breadtube. It has to ProJared's level of shitshow. Could be likely, they all seem really exceptional people that can fuck things up somehow. Harry was really close to this.

I honestly would not be surprised if something like that was happening right now. Other than being a sexual harassment apologist, what did Harry do again? I can't keep up with BreadTube, they're too obnoxious.

Liberals like Bob Chipman and Lily Orchard are rejected because they're not high enough on historical materialism

Lily Orchard's a freak anyways and the liberals should've ditched her long ago.
 
I can't quite decide if the chair, his sweater, or that guy's face is the least-aesthetic part of that video. It's like some sort of Trifecta of Ugly. I think it's his face, but it's almost like the garishness of his surroundings draw away some of the attention from the Picasso-painting that is this man's head -- so perhaps his choice in home decor and wardrobe is in fact a conscious decision.

I'd still rather watch him than Nyk.
Thank you for validating my feelings on how weird I think Big Joel looks. To me he almost looks like an FtM trans for some reason, which is highly unfortunate for a biological man.
3) Some kind of serious idelogical drift, like the one that happened on the anti-SJW community between the Skeptics and the alt-right. Maybe a big political could be the case. Unlikely, because they ideological cohesion is bigger than the anti-SJW. Liberals like Bob Chipman and Lily Orchard are rejected because they're not high enough on historical materialism
Yeah, that’s a good point regarding the ideological cohesion. They’re not afraid to explicitly be a “community”, unlike the Skeptics who were highly reluctant to do so. For a long time their genre didn’t even have a commonly-used name, it was just something along the lines of “the anti-feminist/anti-SJW youtubers”.
 
This is still largely true, but other members of the Breadtube community exhibit similar patterns to Nyk, so addressing the community as a whole is inevitable. Namely Hbomberguy, Peter Coffin and Shaun. I am laced with many hobbies and scant few hours to review the movement in its entirety, so it'll be welcomed if any of you could recommend me some other very prominent Breadtubers for my 'fore-mentioned task.
A prominent one that you didn't mention would be Philosophy Tube, a friend of Nyk's that he may or may not have fucked at some point.

I keep tabs on several smaller (but still well-known within that sphere) BreadTubers, they're probably unnecessary to discuss but I'll bring them up anyway. Big Joel, Jack Saint, and Sarah Z (who's one of the whitest white girls I've ever seen in my life. I just had to say that) all do media-related video essays. There's also Quinton Reviews (KF thread), who's ultimately more of a wannabe BreadTuber than an actual, accepted member of their community. People are especially irritated by Quinton because he's a turncoat suck-up as well as a manchild.

And then there's the debacle with Faraday Speaks, who you've probably already seen a lot of in this thread.
 
You see, rebutting random Tumblrettes's points is easy but debating people that know more about you on the matter is considerably more harder.
I wouldn't exactly qualify it as knowledge. Social sciences is a frequent target for mockery for a multitude of reasons. What separates breadtubers from regular feminists is that the breadtubers is your typical sperg from high school debate class that uses nothing but gish gallops and word salads to give you a full broadside of verbal diarrhea. Their political ideologues will then fervently declare their argument the superior, even though it was just another long winded rant that in essence can be boiled down to "communism will work this time, for sure."
 
Back