Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

[Punitive Castration]

It's not changing your SEX. Gender is a different thing.

well no, if you do all of the above, because gender is an imposed social construct not an inherent trait, you'll still be treated as your original gender because your sex hasn't changed. at best you change your gender to trans.

 

[TotallyAChick]

well no, if you do all of the above, because gender is an imposed social construct not an inherent trait, you'll still be treated as your original gender because your sex hasn't changed. at best you change your gender to trans.

I mean, I disagree. Some trannies pass and that allows them to live as their chosen gender. Unless everyone around them knows.
I think gender can be changed with HRT and some surgeries (because you'll appear as m/f gender), unless your secondary sex features were too prominent- in which case they're fucked. Sex is what determines your chromosomes and genitals.

 

[Nykysnottrans]

In my previous post (the update on Meghan Murphy's lolsuit against Twitter with excerpts from the motions that Twitter and Meghan have been filing) I mentioned a Twitter account that keeps track of banned TERFs on Twitter. This is the Twitter account I was referring to:

https://twitter.com/rainbowradicals

This was their first list of all the TERFs that have been banned on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/rainbowradicals/status/1097789813422469120

Then they started a second list, where they have apparently 70+ TERFs who have been banned on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/rainbowradicals/status/1099964406841176064

If Meghan's Breitbart lawyers want to argue before the court that the censorship of gender critics on Twitter is systemic and intentional (in response to Twitter claiming that Meghan is only filing the lolsuit on her own behalf, not on behalf of the general public), why don't they just print out all these lists and include them as evidence in their lolsuit? Why do they only mention Greg Scott and Dr. Blanchard when there are all these other people who could be brought up as examples of the targeted censorship of gender critics on Twitter?

Update: A lawyer responds to Twitter's victory in Meghan Murphy's lolsuit against them:

The rulings over social media account suspensions/terminations are coming so fast and furious that I can barely keep up. They are uniformly going in favor of social media providers, so in that sense this opinion doesn’t break any new ground. Still, as plaintiffs fail with their different attempted work-arounds, it adds to the solid wall of defense-favorable precedent for the future.

Twitter Gets Another Significant Section 230 Win in Lawsuit by Suspended User-Murphy v. Twitter - Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Murphy had about 25,000 Twitter followers. She repeatedly referred to a trangendered female as male in her tweets. Twitter suspended her account for “misgendering.” After more negative interactions between them, Twitter permanently banned Murphy. Murphy claimed that Twitter changed its...

blog.ericgoldman.org

So all that was achieved in the end was to create another precedent in favour of Twitter and other social media providers who want to ban users arbitrarily. What is particularly scary is that this allows for the retroactive application of current changes to a ToS, which everyone agrees is unfair as no one can reasonably anticipate such changes.

It's a good thing that the judge rejected Twitter's use of anti-SLAPP law though, that was clearly abuse of law. Big tech corporations should not be allowed to manipulatively use anti-SLAPP law to prevent themselves from getting sued or to prevent discovery.

I have read the verdict now and it gets really schizo when it comes to the ongoing question of whether social media plaforms are publishers or not. This judge says that social media platforms like Twitter perform the functions of a publisher (like deciding what to keep on their platforms, which are "paradigmatic editorial decisions")... but despite performing the functions of a publisher, they are still not considered publishers themselves? If it quacks like a publisher, it is a publisher? Here are some excerpts from the verdict here the judge addresses this issue with regards to Section 230:

 

[AnOminous]

It's a good thing that the judge rejected Twitter's use of anti-SLAPP law though, that was clearly abuse of law. Big tech corporations should not be allowed to manipulatively use anti-SLAPP law to prevent themselves from getting sued or to prevent discovery.

That's what I was worried about more than her losing the case, which was more or less a foregone conclusion. California is the most aggressive state in enforcing § 230 more or less to immunize ISP conduct entirely, arguably even further than Congress intended.

However, it would be abusive to use a SLAPP statute to protect a massive corporation against an individual in a pro bono case whose case was only thrown out because of an interpretation of the law that wasn't actually established by case law, even if it was fairly obvious to anyone who has watched California § 230 interpretations in action recently.

I still think there may be room for action if Twitter's actions can be framed as a discrimination against a particular protected group, i.e. (real) lesbians for instance.

 

[Emperor Julian]

Jesus what a bunch of misrable catladies.

My old flatmate just made me aware of fun little group of UK Terfs who've been doing the creep with Strippers

Strippers 'terrified' over secret filming

Anti-strip club campaigners hired investigators to film private nude dances at two Manchester clubs.

www.bbc.co.uk

Apparantly illigally filming naked women in private venues without their consent is cutting edge femminism.

Objects website is pretty interesting considering the group valient stand against Trannies, Sex workers and......Surrogacy?

Surrogacy is the use of a woman's body to carry a child in exchange for money. Whereas prostitution is the commodification of women as sex objects - sold to men to rape and abuse; surrogacy is the commodification of women’s reproductive function - ‘wombs for rent’. We OBJECT.

https://www.objectnow.org/overview

Also I just spent 10 minites trying to figure out if site founder Dr Rakoff's name is some subtle meta wordplay.

 

[BE 911]

Surrogacy is the use of a woman's body to carry a child in exchange for money. Whereas prostitution is the commodification of women as sex objects - sold to men to rape and abuse; surrogacy is the commodification of women’s reproductive function - ‘wombs for rent’. We OBJECT.

Surrogacy was a system implemented for women that could not bear children on their own because of medical reasons, so preventing surrogate mothers to help these women is in fact hurting women.

A quick research would also show that surrogate mothers do these things out of desire to help childless couples. The money reason is more rare and monetary compensation is not even a guaranteed thing throughout. It's just a choice some women make to help the world. The keyword here is choice.

Feminism was first started as a movement to give women more freedom. This is trying to dictate what women should and shouldn't do, and a lot of what these people are saying is just honestly that: trying to dictate the world around. There's a clear difference at play here.

 

[Sissy Galvez]

Didn’t know where else to stick this as we don’t have a thread on this tranny but they’re often re-tweeted by Jake Alley aka SecretgamergrrrI

Trannies are screeching more at J.K Rowling’s following list on twitter. They’re policing it now and pointing out all the “TERF’s” she follows.

View attachment 818238View attachment 818239

It goes on for far too many tweets but this level of autistic insanity is only found in namely nerds and coincidentally trannies.

https://mobile.twitter.com/persenche/status/1142891666799382528

J.K. Rowling is officially a TERF now so says a man in a dress.

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

J.K. Rowling is officially a TERF now so says a man in a dress.

I think any real feminists would at this point proudly call themselves terfs... I mean, maybe they would object to the "radical" portion, but definitely the trans exclusionary part...

Hmm... how about... tuffs. Trans unbelieving fucking feminists. It looks lame with just one f...

 

[Emperor Julian]

I think one of my main critiques of Femminism is summerized on the Terf issue-everything has to be about Femminism. You can't consider transgender or Gays or fucking anything without putting it through a feminist lens, so you never really get to actually think through the merits of an issue.

 

[UE 558]

This gross clip from contra thread essentially proves that the TERFs are trollshielding catladies

 

[Stock Image Photographer]

This gross clip from contra thread essentially proves that the TERFs are trollshielding catladies

Is this an unironic live-action response video with a runtime in excess of one hour where the video being responded to is being played from a macbook? That's some next level autism. Where was this brought up in the Contrapoints thread? I can't seem to find it.

 

[UE 558]

Is this an unironic live-action response video with a runtime in excess of one hour where the video being responded to is being played from a macbook? That's some next level autism. Where was this brought up in the Contrapoints thread? I can't seem to find it.

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/contr...lie-wynn-parrott-nykytyne2.34349/post-4520550 and if you look closely at where it’s timestamped, she’s fucking freebleeding.

This chick looks more troonish than Contra herself

 

[Emperor Julian]

If she hates Contra that much she should just go to pol or even here come here that way she can get this all out of her system in a way which doesnt publically humiliate herself.

Her video's are pure cringe

"What up fellow memesters."

 

[UE 558]

If she hates Contra that much she should just go to pol or even here come here that way she can get this all out of her system in a way which doesnt publically humiliate herself.

Her video's are pure cringe

"What up fellow memesters."

Contra’s Buffalo Bill and she’s Eleanor Abernathy

 

[Gone_Fission]

TERFs are what happens when a woman is autistic/BPD enough to be a full blown troon, yet doesn't troon out. The TERF/Tranny war is just a street fight between two factions of mentally ill hyper-online weirdos, it's just that Terves are less of a public menace than AGP transbians while also providing less entertainment value.

 

[UE 558]

TERFs are what happens when a woman is autistic/BPD enough to be a full blown troon, yet doesn't troon out. The TERF/Tranny war is just a street fight between two factions of mentally ill hyper-online weirdos, it's just that Terves are less of a public menace than AGP transbians while also providing less entertainment value.

I respect you, you respect me, that’s my dogma online and overall in life. If a fat troon’s a nice person, I won’t give a fuck about their orientation, but when they behave like Yaniv, Fong-Jones, LKD, etc, I’ll take issue.

My issue with TERFs is that they’ll often start REEEEEEEEing at and harassing random troons who are just living their lives or they’ll go after them in a-loggy/gross ways (like the previously posted freebleeder)

 

[Feline Darkmage]

Okay I don't use the word "cuck" unironically too often but this is the most cucked fucking thing I've ever seen in my life

https://twitter.com/RobbieQtoronto/status/1043589373751635974

Robbie Q on Twitter: "Fionne, I've seen Likes and Retweets to your st…

archived 12 Jul 2019 06:56:09 UTC

archive.fo

This male TERF literally prostrated himself and asked for consent to follow a self-loathing tranny that calls themselves a "TiM" and attention whores to thirsty cat ladies (who totally don't want girldick in their lives) by posting a fuckton of selfies.

I actually feel super bad for Fionne, this is no way to live. Get out before a male TERFist cuck sexually harasses you in DM, pleaase.

 

[Piga Dgrifm]

Checked the last few pages and didn't see this posted yet. The original video is deleted now unfortunately as they mention here, but here's a TERF who pissed everywhere and blamed a trans person that may or may not even exist:

Transphobe PEES ON THE FLOOR And Blames a Trans Woman

Blaire's Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDmCBKaKOtOrEqgsL4-3C8Q Our Video on Her Channel: https://youtu.be/3G3MvRcrSY8 GET MY NEW MERCH HERE ► htt...

www.youtube.com

 

[Nykysnottrans]

Terri Strange's friend Ceres Revenge is on fire and has posted this angry video telling radfems to fuck off:

"I don't identify with the radical feminist movement because it's the most sadistic movement I have ever witnessed in my life!", good job alienating another ally, TERFs!

"Some of the women who have given me the most shit are some of Leah Tverly's biggest fans.". Duh, who do you think has been downvoting my shit here every time I posted about Meghan's lolsuit? Who has given young feminists a license to shit all over other women? Leah Tverly certainly has, what with calling every woman who isn't as radical as she is a HOP. Leah Tverly is teaching by example, and she is teaching young feminists that to be a feminist you have to be as obnoxious as possible, which Leah then justifies by saying that she's getting in touch with her repressed female anger deep inside, the anger that the patriarchy has taught Leah and other women that it's wrong to indulge and express... but where is that outburst of repressed anger directed at? Other women. Feminism tells women to get in touch with their repressed anger but inevitably that results in these women becoming obnoxious and attacking other women. If feminism is supposed to be different from mainstream society, if feminism is supposed to be non-conformist, then why did y'all turn into such stereotypical mean girls?

Ceres talks WOLF and Julia Beck and claims that Terri Strange too was targeted by them for speaking out against radical feminists working with The Heritage Foundation. But then of course she goes into full paranoid conspiracy mode (as she has a tendency to do) and claims that she sputted da fed and Julia Beck iz a fed "because how the fuck else did she get before congress twice, and how she ended up on Fox News?". I guess Ceres doesn't know that Julia Beck had joined Baltimore's LGBTQ Commission? That kind of "official" political affiliation gives you political connections and hence access to things, including congress. Also, LMAO, Ceres is the one with the Youtube channel telling women to violently break the law, to stop being Anon online and to doxx themselves "in the name of being brave", etc. Classic provocateuring in other words.

I love it when radical feminists start accusing one another of being fedz. It reminds me of that time when a feminist got up and suggested that lesbianism was a CIA plot to destroy feminism.

 

[AnOminous]

"Video unavailable."

How can someone put up a cover of a classic X-Ray Spex song in 2014 and have no more than a couple hundred views? Literally who?