DESMOND IS AMAZING / desmondisamazing / Wendylou, Andrew, & Desmond Napoles - Child being abused/sexualized by parents for financial gain and fame.

  • Thread starter Thread starter RI 360
  • Start date Start date
You seriously thought Matt Stone and
Trey Parker got the idea for that South Park episode out of thin air?

I did, it seemed so ridiculous that I thought that it must have been made up and didn’t even check. Well, seems like we do live in a clown world after all.

On a more related note, here’s more of Desmond’s mom accusing anyone who’s called CPS on them of diddling kids:
1CC9E482-5F41-4446-AF15-26CF22151B30.jpeg
 
Does Wendy even care for Desmond's safety or have we gone into the "I can't let them know they're right" phase of this shit. If and when Desmond does get molested, kidnapped, or killed what will Wendy say? Also if the drag kid thing does rightfully get more public scorn what is there left for Desmond? He spent his whole life having his mother use him to parade around in some vain attempt to change the world. Is there even a part of Desmond's life that isn't tangled into this weird "Yay gay!" stuff. Like if Desmond turns out to like girls is he going to have to be forced into a closet to please Wendy?
 
To all of the exceptional Twitter users who think that drag “isn’t sexual”, no one fucking asked you if you thought it was sexual. ALL THAT MATTERS IS THAT THERE IS AN ACTIVE AUDIENCE OF PEDOPHILES WHO FIND DESMOND’S DRAG VERY FUCKING SEXUAL INDEED. If you think drag isn’t sexual therefore it’s okay for kids to do, good for you. That doesn’t make these kids in any less danger, and didn’t make the parents any less despicable.
 
To all of the exceptional Twitter users who think that drag “isn’t sexual”, no one fucking asked you if you thought it was sexual. ALL THAT MATTERS IS THAT THERE IS AN ACTIVE AUDIENCE OF PEDOPHILES WHO FIND DESMOND’S DRAG VERY FUCKING SEXUAL INDEED. If you think drag isn’t sexual therefore it’s okay for kids to do, good for you. That doesn’t make these kids in any less danger, and didn’t make the parents any less despicable.
So, as I'm sure you all know, Dan Schneider - producer of iCarly, Drake and Josh, Victorious, etc. - has a foot fetish.
In light of people finding out about his foot fetish, several instances in his shows became much more disturbing. iCarly featured lots of scenes with close-ups of the teen stars' feet, one of which was included in the opening sequence for at least one season. Victorious had an entire episode where the B-plot was the characters getting a foot treatment that involves tiny fish eating off dead skin, and spending plenty of time in the episode stroking each other's feet and saying how smooth and nice the feet feel.
The logo of Nickelodeon on one of their buildings was even a foot for a bit.
When I was a kid, I saw nothing wrong with those scenes. When I was a teen, I saw nothing wrong with those scenes. Feet do nothing at all for me, so I didn't see the foot humor as anything more than lolrandom humor. Plus I really loved the shows, so I didn't want to think about anything unsavory occurring behind the scenes, even if I had gotten a bad feeling about the feet.
But knowing about the foot fetish makes it immediately apparent that those scenes are very sexually stimulating for the right (wrong?) people, and therefore more than a bit questionable since teens/tweens are involved. Just because I personally don't get aroused doesn't mean that it's okay.

Of course, foot fetishism isn't part of LGBT. So everyone accepts that it's gross that Schneider got his teen stars to stroke each other's feet for his jollies.
 
So, as I'm sure you all know, Dan Schneider - producer of iCarly, Drake and Josh, Victorious, etc. - has a foot fetish.
In light of people finding out about his foot fetish, several instances in his shows became much more disturbing. iCarly featured lots of scenes with close-ups of the teen stars' feet, one of which was included in the opening sequence for at least one season. Victorious had an entire episode where the B-plot was the characters getting a foot treatment that involves tiny fish eating off dead skin, and spending plenty of time in the episode stroking each other's feet and saying how smooth and nice the feet feel.
The logo of Nickelodeon on one of their buildings was even a foot for a bit.
When I was a kid, I saw nothing wrong with those scenes. When I was a teen, I saw nothing wrong with those scenes. Feet do nothing at all for me, so I didn't see the foot humor as anything more than lolrandom humor. Plus I really loved the shows, so I didn't want to think about anything unsavory occurring behind the scenes, even if I had gotten a bad feeling about the feet.
But knowing about the foot fetish makes it immediately apparent that those scenes are very sexually stimulating for the right (wrong?) people, and therefore more than a bit questionable since teens/tweens are involved. Just because I personally don't get aroused doesn't mean that it's okay.

Of course, foot fetishism isn't part of LGBT. So everyone accepts that it's gross that Schneider got his teen stars to stroke each other's feet for his jollies.

Unsurprisingly about 80% of his shows' fandoms are creepy autist adults.
 
This is it exactly. They have immersed themselves in a world of "slaves" and "pup play" and tampon fetishists and dildo cakes as political statements. And now they can't tell right from wrong even when it's really fucking obvious.
To the people in those scenes, Eyes Wide Shut is just normal and healthy sexual behavior.
It's not even a frog boiling slowly, the frogs turning up the heat itself. It's just not good for kids to be around.

The worst part, if you bring up that he's being sexualized, it's all just, "What kind of pervert are you that you look at this kid and think of sex?" The same way someone without a foot fetish can recognize when Dan Schneider has one.
The presentation of it all.

And I forgot, is Desmond supposed to be gay or trans or is he just a drag queen?
 
Last edited:
To the people in those scenes, Eyes Wide Shut is just normal and healthy sexual behavior.
It's not even a frog boiling slowly, the frogs turning up the heat itself. It's just not good for kids to be around.

The worst part, if you bring up that he's being sexualized, it's all just, "What kind of pervert are you that you look at this kid and think of sex?" The same way someone without a foot fetish can recognize when Dan Schneider has one.
The presentation of it all.

And I forgot, is Desmond supposed to be gay or trans or is he just a drag queen?

According to Wendy he's supposed to be the reincarnation of some gay dude who died of aids.
 
Does Wendy even care for Desmond's safety or have we gone into the "I can't let them know they're right" phase of this shit. If and when Desmond does get molested, kidnapped, or killed what will Wendy say? Also if the drag kid thing does rightfully get more public scorn what is there left for Desmond? He spent his whole life having his mother use him to parade around in some vain attempt to change the world. Is there even a part of Desmond's life that isn't tangled into this weird "Yay gay!" stuff. Like if Desmond turns out to like girls is he going to have to be forced into a closet to please Wendy?

Considering what her daughter's had to say, I'm guessing it's the former. She's making a lot of money off of her son, so what does she care?

I think if Desmond does make it to adulthood, gay or straight, and he makes it out okay, maybe he'll be a spokesman for exploited children?
 
“What kind of people look at Desmond and see sex?”

Nice gaslighting, Piggylou.

View attachment 821041
the Keith Haring one isn't so bad. that's more normal, in a weird way. the rest. . . SHUDDER

edit: child beauty pageants are disgusting as well in every same way as this, all of it is horrifying. ugh
 
To the people in those scenes, Eyes Wide Shut is just normal and healthy sexual behavior.
It's not even a frog boiling slowly, the frogs turning up the heat itself. It's just not good for kids to be around.

The worst part, if you bring up that he's being sexualized, it's all just, "What kind of pervert are you that you look at this kid and think of sex?" The same way someone without a foot fetish can recognize when Dan Schneider has one.
The presentation of it all.

And I forgot, is Desmond supposed to be gay or trans or is he just a drag queen?
He supposedly came out of the closet "at birth." It sounds like they literally groomed him since before he was born to be gay, and if somehow he ends up not being gay they will probably just troon him the rest of the way out.
 
Does Wendy even care for Desmond's safety or have we gone into the "I can't let them know they're right" phase of this shit.

There are three chances with her;

1. she's indeed passing around her kid to pedos and doesn't care (God, let me be wrong...)

2. that she's aware she's baited pedos and some even give her money, but she still is trying to keep them away from Desmond, yet, she can't accuse them because she's gonna risk losing her cash cow.

3. she's indeed very clueless about her son being pedo-bait and believes these awful people won't ever hurt him.


At most, it's a combination of 2 or 3. She knows she's baited pedots, but she believes Desmon will never be in any danger.
 
There are three chances with her;

1. she's indeed passing around her kid to pedos and doesn't care (God, let me be wrong...)

2. that she's aware she's baited pedos and some even give her money, but she still is trying to keep them away from Desmond, yet, she can't accuse them because she's gonna risk losing her cash cow.

3. she's indeed very clueless about her son being pedo-bait and believes these awful people won't ever hurt him.


At most, it's a combination of 2 or 3. She knows she's baited pedots, but she believes Desmon will never be in any danger.

I do wonder, however, how much longer is Wendylou and their supporters plan on carrying on the Notsexual™ charade? Even Jessica Mélanchon has pretty much conceded that her son dresses and behaves in a sexual manner, but shrugs off the risk of attracting pedophiles as “not her problem.” She may sound like a ruthless and frigid cunt of a stage mother, but at least she’s not self-deluded and/or in complete self-denial like Wendylou. I mean, even Linda Lovelace’s pious Catholic mother eventually faced the grim truth and admitted her daughter wasn’t making “documentary films.”
 
Last edited:
edit: child beauty pageants are disgusting as well in every same way as this, all of it is horrifying. ugh
at least those happen during the day at places that don't serve alcohol, and are mostly attended by moms. Beauty pageants are creepy but there are a lot of protective factors that desmond doesn't have.
 
Does Wendy even care for Desmond's safety or have we gone into the "I can't let them know they're right" phase of this shit. If and when Desmond does get molested, kidnapped, or killed what will Wendy say? Also if the drag kid thing does rightfully get more public scorn what is there left for Desmond? He spent his whole life having his mother use him to parade around in some vain attempt to change the world. Is there even a part of Desmond's life that isn't tangled into this weird "Yay gay!" stuff. Like if Desmond turns out to like girls is he going to have to be forced into a closet to please Wendy?
Even if it doesn’t get the opposition it should, Desmond’s future does not look good. In a couple of years’ time, he’ll be hitting puberty. “Former child drag queen, now just regular drag queen” isn’t much of a selling point.
 
Back