Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
They'll have little power struggles over trite bullshit like not being supportive of something, but they never go after the pedophiles or rapists in their own midst. I reckon it's mainly because so many of them are just as guilty of awful behavior. It's an entire movement of awful people using each other to troll shield.
The moment someone ceases their usefulness, they are gone and shamed. I noticed this a lot during the Star Wars fiasco with Comicsgate. These people are the closest comparison to sociopaths.
 
But how often do SJWs turn on actual predators in their ranks? They're typically more than happy to have them in their ranks even when those people speak openly about their predilections and will even continue defending said predators after they've been exposed. Then again most venomous snakes don't bite their own.
Pretty much as soon as the predator is no longer useful to their cause. It's a very "Libs get the bullet too" kind of mindset.

The real question here is, why the fuck do some of these idiots think Shane is anything resembling useful? He can't even properly be a heat magnet for them- every time Shane pops up, folks point and laugh at him for a minute, and then go right back to the actually important things to be talked about. And we've basically, at this point, turned him into the Mascot of KickVic, and they let us. That's right up there in some of the worst PR moves I've ever seen. Clearly, someone there has never paid any sort of attention to actual civil rights movements: your figure head needs to always be charismatic. Always. No exception. Being the living embodiment of an ongoing trainwreck is not charismatic.
 
The moment someone ceases their usefulness, they are gone and shamed. I noticed this a lot during the Star Wars fiasco with Comicsgate. These people are the closest comparison to sociopaths.

But there are just as many counter examples like Nyberg or that pedo-apologist whore that worked for Nintendo whose name escapes me at the moment. There are plenty of SJWs that will still defend those idiots even though they've outlived any usefulness they have. Perhaps Shane lacks the longtime in-group status that would spare him such treatment, but he's also the kind of lickspittle that will take his lumps and remain obedient, which means the other idiots will keep him around because he kowtows to them and feeds their desire to be in control.

None of them really care about keeping women safe or any of the other bullshit that they constantly carry on about. They just want power and control and as such they'll overlook any transgressions as long as they can keep a person under their thumb. It's only the people who try to have some respect for themselves and to remove themselves from that control are castigated and shunned for daring not to kiss the ring. All the better to have someone guilty of horrible acts because it means that they'll stay subservient due to their own fear of exposure.
 
But there are just as many counter examples like Nyberg or that pedo-apologist whore that worked for Nintendo whose name escapes me at the moment. There are plenty of SJWs that will still defend those idiots even though they've outlived any usefulness they have. Perhaps Shane lacks the longtime in-group status that would spare him such treatment, but he's also the kind of lickspittle that will take his lumps and remain obedient, which means the other idiots will keep him around because he kowtows to them and feeds their desire to be in control.

None of them really care about keeping women safe or any of the other bullshit that they constantly carry on about. They just want power and control and as such they'll overlook any transgressions as long as they can keep a person under their thumb. It's only the people who try to have some respect for themselves and to remove themselves from that control are castigated and shunned for daring not to kiss the ring. All the better to have someone guilty of horrible acts because it means that they'll stay subservient due to their own fear of exposure.

Nyberg eventually did get unpersoned though.
 
Maybe I'm the sperg for checking, but most days when I check these threads I check to see the last time that Shane was actively logged in. It is almost daily because he loves to see those sweet sweet notifications I imagine. He is an active user, almost always on in the morning to see whats going on. He has more posts than casual users who have been on for years, when he only joined around the Nick stream. The association to this should be bad enough with the people he aligns himself with, and thats not even getting into the content of the posts themselves. This is probably hopeful but I can't imagine it will be too long before people are throwing him under the bus for undermining the KV cause, and then digging up him talking about his pet-project wife.
Iirc, he joined a good while after that stream.
 
Iirc, he joined a good while after that stream.
What do you think he would do when he saw playing down the middle literally wasn't doing him any favors? He doesn't have the charisma nor aptittude to come to the ISWV side of things and get any real attention. So he did the only thing he could. Went full KV because that's the only way he could have managed any relevancy.
 
Shane says he "leaked" information on Kiwi Farms about Vic supposedly admitting his guilt and this information was quickly relayed to Nick.

View attachment 818073

Shane started talking about this on Kiwi Farms after his tweet about changing his profile banner was linked here.
View attachment 818085

"He admitted he did it to two different defendants. He was willing to admit to everything for, you guessed it, money"
View attachment 818089

In addition, his post on Kiwi Farms was a week after he had already talked about this on twitter,

View attachment 818119

and three weeks after he had talked about it on his Discord on June 4th. I transcribed a good portion of it so people wouldn't have to listen to it. Here's another fun fact: If you listen closely to "That makes no sense, but OK." from person #2, you will notice that is the same guy Nick interviewed on May 31st who was at the hearing on that date. It was no secret that people in Shane's Discord were also in Nick's and that any information he gave out would talked about all over the internet.



Shame is also a person from a different time who participated in some not-so-okay things.
 
I speculate Shane originally tried to play things all "neutral" because, in the event that Vic wins the case, he can turn around and say "See? Vic did all this shit and he's innocent! So all this heinous shit I did? Doesn't matter!"
He doesn't realize that double-crossers are the first to get the chop when one side loses. Has no one read him the Aesop classic The Bat, the Birds, and the Beasts?
 
I speculate Shane originally tried to play things all "neutral" because, in the event that Vic wins the case, he can turn around and say "See? Vic did all this shit and he's innocent! So all this heinous shit I did? Doesn't matter!"
He doesn't realize that double-crossers are the first to get the chop when one side loses. Has no one read him the Aesop classic The Bat, the Birds, and the Beasts?
... Well that's new. I've never heard of that one.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ManateeHunter
I speculate Shane originally tried to play things all "neutral" because, in the event that Vic wins the case, he can turn around and say "See? Vic did all this shit and he's innocent! So all this heinous shit I did? Doesn't matter!"
He doesn't realize that double-crossers are the first to get the chop when one side loses. Has no one read him the Aesop classic The Bat, the Birds, and the Beasts?
His idea of neutral is pretty damn skewed, he always gave off the vibe like Vic was a problem that needed to be contained, it just progressively decreased into a more negative light.
 
... Well that's new. I've never heard of that one.
Really? Well damn, I never realized there are cultural differences in what Aesop stories we got in our childhoods…

Long ago, beasts and birds were at odes with one another. The bat, who was cowardly, hatched a plan to play both sides. When the beasts were winning, he would go to them and said "I am covered in fur, so I am on your side". Then, when the birds were winning, he would go to them and said "I have wings, so I am on your side".
Eventually, both sides agreed to put an end to their petty feud. However, the bat, after its numerous betrayals, found himself shunned from both beasts and birds alike. The bat decided to live in a cave and fly only at night, and continues to do so to this day.
TLDR: Bat tries to take advantage of both beasts and birds, ends up disgraced from both for his traitorous acts.

…OK, maybe this won't work in this context because Shane is full-blown KV, but you get my drift.
 
Can Shane even claim any sort of neutrality? Wasn't he all up on Discord calling himself the leader of KickVic?
yes he did claim he was essentially the leader of kickvic. Which nobody bought but confirmed that every time he said anything even remotely neutral is just a lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evil Bunny
Back