- Joined
- Dec 11, 2014
well if they call again and he happens to pick up, he might see to it that they shut the hell AND fuck up
but not one or the other
but not one or the other
FB 1/15 - Chris has something important to share of importance
- Thread starter lynx
- Start date
-
🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
- Status
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2013
I thought about that. And I kind of hope it is because it would mean Chris is back in touch with reality. But I'm probably being optomistic.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2014
Excuse me as I sperg for a minute.
Chris is correct as to no one from any Gamestop store should be contacting him about the incident.
To reiterate, there are only four reasons for these alleged calls:
1.)
Outside weens using something to create a false caller ID. There are various websites and apps to do this. Highly likely scenario but I doubt they would only call twice.
2.)Chris fabricating this out of desperation. If I were to really believe Chris he should have deleted the contact name to show the phone number in his message box, not the contact name. He could have easily just changed Barb's contact name to Gamestop, and screened capped these pictures to make it seem as if the store has been contacting him. Also not listening to the messages and deleting them is
, but is something Chris would do. Fabricating the messages and using the excuse that they were never listened to is also likely something Chris would do 
.
3.) Weens work at the store in question who know about Chris and are legitimately attempting to harass him, which is dumb. If this is true they will be terminated for sure. Unlikely though.
4.) They called regarding a pre-order. Quick research shows there is literally nothing of note released on December 30th. Very unlikely.
It is very unlikely that anyone from the store called Chris to inform him of a bann. Official bans have to have a offical trespassing citation signed and notated by a police officer, and delivered to the subject at hand during the trespassing.A Gamesterp manager alone can tell someone to leave the store and never come back but for it to actually have weight they have to have a police officer cite a trespass warning. Just my two cents on the matter.
Chris is correct as to no one from any Gamestop store should be contacting him about the incident.
To reiterate, there are only four reasons for these alleged calls:
1.)
Outside weens using something to create a false caller ID. There are various websites and apps to do this. Highly likely scenario but I doubt they would only call twice.2.)Chris fabricating this out of desperation. If I were to really believe Chris he should have deleted the contact name to show the phone number in his message box, not the contact name. He could have easily just changed Barb's contact name to Gamestop, and screened capped these pictures to make it seem as if the store has been contacting him. Also not listening to the messages and deleting them is
, but is something Chris would do. Fabricating the messages and using the excuse that they were never listened to is also likely something Chris would do .3.)
Weens work at the store in question who know about Chris and are legitimately attempting to harass him, which is dumb. If this is true they will be terminated for sure. Unlikely though.4.) They called regarding a pre-order. Quick research shows there is literally nothing of note released on December 30th. Very unlikely.
It is very unlikely that anyone from the store called Chris to inform him of a bann. Official bans have to have a offical trespassing citation signed and notated by a police officer, and delivered to the subject at hand during the trespassing.A Gamesterp manager alone can tell someone to leave the store and never come back but for it to actually have weight they have to have a police officer cite a trespass warning. Just my two cents on the matter.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2013
>implying Chris was ever in touch with reality to begin with.
Chris's upbringing has stunted him so badly that I don't think anything is ever going to really get through to him. If anything, he has only retreated further into his fantasies with every tragedy and every resistance he has encountered. The best case scenario might just be to contain him and minimize the damage so to speak.
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
Why are there two gamestops less than a mile from each other? (The one Chris refers to as Rio gamestop and the Fashion Square gamestop.)
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2013
Once again, the Commonwealth of Viriginia is either pressing charges or not pressing charges. The victims, whether they be the employee of GameStop or GameStup itself are just witnesses. The prosecutor can take the wishes of the victims into consideration, but there doesn't need to be an exact delineation between the employee as a person and the employee as an employee.
I suppose. The way I read it was that he was charged with that felony because it was a more specific description of the crime he committed. Why charge him with a general assault when you can charge him specifically with the exact type of assault he committed?
In Virginia an assault can be a felony or a misdemeanor. So I suppose a logical plea deal would be a misdemeanor assault.
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
...and how exactly would Chris be contacted by one of the Gamestop stores not related to his macing at the Fashion Square Mall? Did he hand them his phone number when he vandalized their stores?
It's also worth nothing that for having "numbers for any inquiries in the past" he apparently didn't make sure they were the right numbers. The number for "F Square" is turning up on a quick google search to be the one for the Rio Gamestop (which is Fashion Square, admittedly), and the Rio phone number is really for the Seminole GameStop which no entry for was made (because Chris labeled it as the Rio GS, even though that's what the Fashion Square location uses for its address). In fairness to how such a mistake could be made, the Rio and Seminole Gamestops are somehow on opposite sides of State Route 29, but even then if he was trying to prove these places were contacting him, the names shouldn't have that error...unless he manually entered them.
It's also worth nothing that for having "numbers for any inquiries in the past" he apparently didn't make sure they were the right numbers. The number for "F Square" is turning up on a quick google search to be the one for the Rio Gamestop (which is Fashion Square, admittedly), and the Rio phone number is really for the Seminole GameStop which no entry for was made (because Chris labeled it as the Rio GS, even though that's what the Fashion Square location uses for its address). In fairness to how such a mistake could be made, the Rio and Seminole Gamestops are somehow on opposite sides of State Route 29, but even then if he was trying to prove these places were contacting him, the names shouldn't have that error...unless he manually entered them.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2014
I have two gamestops in the same stupid mall in my town, make of that what you will.
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
I considered the name "Fashion Square" to be the appropriate name for the F Square one. I interpreted the Rio name for the other one to be a confusion on Chris' part because it's near the intersection between Rio Road and Seminole Trail.
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2014
Yea I don't think he uses Amazon that much, because he has a photo album on facebook where he begs for gift cards to a bunch of different places. It's got most of the big retailers in it, but not Amazon. I have to imagine the convenience of Amazon is lost on Chris. It's not like he's too busy to go to the store... with refusing to work and all. He seems to really enjoy shopping in person too, much like the people who eat to feel happy do. I think it gives him that high that little kids in a toy store get when their parents let them spend their own money in there.
Taking a second look at his gift card begging facebook album, I noticed something. Chris is banned from a lot of these retailers. Wouldn't it be funny if he amassed thousands of dollars in gift cards to stores that wouldn't even let him in the front door.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Do we have some reason to think there's a restraining order? There hasn't even been an arraignment.
He might have gotten lucky. Considering Chris hasn't even been arraigned yet, the prosecutor could add charges.
Do we know he has one yet? The public case information site says "P/D" for his attorney, but that may be just pro forma. It doesn't indicate anyone has even met Chris, much less made an appearance in his case.
Another thing. Apparently, in Virginia, a grand jury is required to indict for any charges where a prison sentence (a year or more of incarceration) is on the table. I believe that is why the statute he is being charged under lists penalties as "For Class 6 felonies, a term of imprisonment of not less than one year nor more than five years, or in the discretion of the jury or the court trying the case without a jury, confinement in jail for not more than 12 months and a fine of not more than $2,500, either or both."
My guess is that while an indicted defendant would be subject to either set of penalties, but that without a grand jury, the court could only sentence to "not more than 12 months." So my guess is that if we don't see any kind of grand jury being involved, Chris is not looking at one to five years, but at most 12 months. I'll look into that a bit more and make a separate post whether I'm right or wrong.
(A state grand jury of this sort is often not a separate grand jury convened solely for one case, but a grand jury at the county court level that hears a bunch of cases in pretty rapid-fire fashion.)
- Joined
- May 12, 2013
It is true there might be a simple, straight path to the "normal" one, but some people just want to be adventurous and they might enter Rio, and there ain't nothing to be ashamed about that.
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
Still raises the question of why that store's phone number would be a contact in his phone, given he's more than indirectly acknowledged he never forgot he was banned from that store for at least the previous year. Why would he be making inquiries to a store he couldn't go to?
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2014
The local GameStops have probably been on his phone from before his ban, and he never deleted them. Perhaps he was waiting for an apology.
It's possible these calls are meant to remind Chris he's still banned. Remember, he said to the manager on Dec. 27 "Can't we just let bygones be bygones?", were I the manager, I'd advise my colleagues to remind the Chandler boy to stay away.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2014
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
Except the calls he claims to have gotten two weeks ago were from a different GameStop.
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2014
The other GameStop is a 15-minute waddle away, yes? If so, why wouldn't the Fashion Square location's manager warn the manager of the other GameStop?
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
Small, shitty retailers made redundant by the Internet seem to spawn locations like cockroaches.
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2013
I can't remember which topic it was in but someone dug up an old pic of Chris's room and his games are organized on shelves exactly like if he were in a store. Chris definitely seems to get some sort of fulfillment from shopping considering it seems to be one of the only activities he shows a passion for. I think beyond the obvious thrill he gets from getting new toys, Chris likes going shopping because it's an endeavor that allows him some form of non-Barb human contact. He tends to create relationships with the various workers at stores due to them being the only ones who acknowledge him. God, that is depressing.
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2013
The GameStop is a store, not a person. They don't need to get a restraining order. They can just tell him to stay the fuck out of their establishment and he is legally obliged to.
If one or more of the employees felt the need to get a restraining order that would cover them outside of work they could try. Although they would probably have to demonstrate that he constituted a threat to them outside of work and that banning him from the store did not offer them sufficient protection. Considering there have been no incidents or threats involving the GameStop employees outside of the GameStop I am not sure they could meet the burden of proof.
- Status