Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
PuckishRogue said:
Like, it really isn't a trans issue, as evidenced by zero trans women bringing this up. It's a creep who wants to force women to wax his balls and they should handle it that way.
Click to expand...

There have been a number of trannies who demanded ball waxing in Canada (Jonny isn’t the only Canuck tranny pulling this shit) and Australia. Plenty of “legitimate” trannies (whatever the fuck that means) are obsessed with validation to the point of fucking up their own bodies. Shit, that’s the entire point of being a tranny.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Pips Star, MadameMidlifeCrisis, Brain Problems and 9 others
This is from the woman that provided info on Thursday and Friday's appearances before the tribunal.
She started again this morning an it continues. For that reason I won't provide a screenshot or archive as it is ongoing. Typical Jon behavior. He actually trying bringing the fake email into the hearing.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, Le Pew, Kiwi Lime Pie and 4 others
Clockwork_PurBle said:
I know Canada is a pussy nanny country but is having a taser for self defense really illegal?

I know Yaniv's version of "self defense" is more like "I will tase you for not kissing my lady balls" but this is a genuine question.
Click to expand...
Short answer, yes.
Long one is that there is no concealed carry and eye irritants are iffy at best. Oh and there’s no stand your ground, you have to retreat.
Edit: got beat by Cato
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, Trombonista and Clockwork_PurBle
Cato said:
Whether Yaniv has a dick or not is completely irrelevant to his gender identity, legally speaking.

What the respondent was getting at wasn't disputing Yaniv's gender identity (which would be a total loser of an argument given that the tribunal is going to accept self-identification), but rather arguing that their actions didn't constitute discrimination on the basis of gender identity, because they weren't in the business of waxing male genitalia regardless of the gender identity of the people they were attached to.
Click to expand...
Uh excuse you, but the moment Jonathan decided he was a woman, his male penis became a FEMALE PENIS. So now it IS female genitalia. Checkmate, terfs!
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Pips Star, MadameMidlifeCrisis, Kosher Salt and 8 others
Dick and balls confirmed. Uterus still up for debate.
SmartSelect_20190707-161451_Brave.jpg
archive.fo

Twitter

archived 7 Jul 2019 23:15:22 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, Safir, Brain Problems and 19 others
GnomeofDoc said:
Short answer, yes.
Long one is that there is no concealed carry and eye irritants are iffy at best. Oh and there’s no stand your ground, you have to retreat.
Edit: got beat by Cato
Click to expand...

Thanks for credit, but I'm afraid I have to quibble with most of what you posted here (none of which is relevant to the thread, so I'm sorry for that, but I don't want to let this stand unchallenged).


PART 3 Prohibited Weapons
Former Prohibited Weapons Order, No. 1
  • 1Any device designed to be used for the purpose of injuring, immobilizing or otherwise incapacitating any person by the discharge therefrom of
    • (a) tear gas, Mace or other gas, or
    • (b) any liquid, spray, powder or other substance that is capable of injuring, immobilizing or otherwise incapacitating any person.
Click to expand...

Bear spray can be legally obtained because it doesn't, on its face, have the "purpose" of being used against "any person." However one would still be charged for it if they possess it in a context where it couldn't credibly be used for its intended purpose (so, no carrying it around for self-defence purposes in an urban area, for example).
  • There is absolutely no duty to retreat in Canadian law. Nothing of the sort is mentioned in s.34(2) of the Criminal Code, which governs self-defence. There is also ample case law establishing that Canadians do not have an obligation to retreat from their own home, and an appeal was allowed in a high profile case because it was deemed an error that a judge told the jury that a failure to retreat was a factor to consider.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Pips Star, MadameMidlifeCrisis, chops and 21 others
moocow said:
It's become clear to me that the only reason he hasn't been beaten senseless already is that nobody's been pushed far enough to decide he's worth the jail time. You know stories like these get around in hospitals (and to family members/loved ones) and there has to be some angry boyfriend or husband just chomping at the bit to relieve Johnny of some teeth.

Of course, there are other ways to take revenge for this kind of thing than to just beat him senseless. If this were to happen in an American hospital the response would just be to assign him to the biggest, most boisterous and obnoxious black female nurse on staff to give him the "help" he's asking for. Embarrass the shit out of him while doing nothing actually wrong. He'd think twice about that "clever" ruse to get female attention after a few trips to the bathroom with Laquanda helping him on and off the toilet.
Click to expand...
He presses on the wrong Sikh's toes and I am certain someday he'll receive visit from family member. Up in Canada they have operations similar to mafioso and aren't afraid to alter jawline to match Guggenheim angle.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, welcometotherock, Brain Problems and 8 others
sixthwave said:
Mamma Yaniv made an appearance on FB today! In case you need another reason to cringe at the cheer lunacy that runs in this family. She SEES the shit JY posts and still supports the potato.

Yuck.
Click to expand...

Wait, she has a fb account? new pictures? caps please

ETA: NVM saw the response. i wonder if that's really miriam's account or if he socked his own mom. She used to have one under Miriam Altmann-Yaniv.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, TerribleIdeas™, lamp shade and 5 others
Canadians consider tasers a "prohibited weapon", which is outside the range of normal civilian ownership (with some exceptions for grandfathering and security professionals). It would be more legal and reasonable to claim to own an actual firearm in the "unrestricted" and "restricted" class. Ian from Forgotten Weapons did a video.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, Brain Problems, Dullahan and 4 others
Carolina001 said:
Dick and balls confirmed. Uterus still up for debate.
View attachment 831143
archive.fo

Twitter

archived 7 Jul 2019 23:15:22 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo
Click to expand...

Maybe I'm being dense here, but what is even the point of determining this? Are they trying to argue that Yaniv's genitals are an enlarged clitoris and a malformed labia and turning him away was "ableism" or some shit?

I mean, who cares if he has some weird mutant uterus? It's not like they were going to wax it. (I hope.)
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, Brain Problems, lamp shade and 4 others
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, welcometotherock, Kosher Salt and 13 others
I couldn't help but notice JY isn't having much success on the Twitter front nowadays.

I knew the potato would try to pull some things down, turns out their not as tech savvy as they let on or they’d have known about the Facebook edit feature.

Real funny to joke about having a weapon on Twitter, but use it as a threat on Facebook. Idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, Brain Problems, FuckYourPronounsDude and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back