Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
women don't care how they get bred. in fact, should you provide sufficient immorality and stupidity they're more likely keep the child, since you've proven that you're a good match in terms of evolution.
You know what funny about Fuckbot's posts? In one post he'll glorify rapists, but in the next he'll cry that all other men are rapists and that he's just a nice guy. It's like he's some bizarre cross between Fshit and an SJW.

By the way @Holden, do you know we scared off your mentor? He turned and ran just like you did.
 
Doesn't logically follow. You're cherrypicking details. We want proof.
How doesn't it follow? They had two men they slept with. Got pregnant with a non-thug, said they aborted because the man that impregnated wasn't an imbecile and expressed the desire to have the next child with the imbecile. It's all completely clear.
 
You legitimately think I am going to be locked up? You seriously have no idea how the world works. Maybe you never used to the word conspiracy, but that's because conspiracy theorists don't like calling their crackpot theories "conspiracies".

MANGINAz!!!11 FEMISPHERE!! OMEGAS!!! You sound like a fucking tool.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Coral Apples
How doesn't it follow? They had two men they slept with. Got pregnant with a non-thug, said they aborted because the man that impregnated wasn't an imbecile and expressed the desire to have the next child with the imbecile. It's all completely clear.
No. Woman slept with two men. Woman aborted child from first man. Woman said she didn't want a child from first man, but second man. I want proof that she said the reason was because the first man was not a rapist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
of course, because modern courts are just services for whatever the women want. i shouldn't even emphasize that.

im trying very hard to understand the thing about womens dominating the world but loving to be beated and treated like shit because according to you is the most logical way i realllyy dont understand
 
You legitimately think I am going to be locked up? You seriously have no idea how the world works.
If you knew how the world worked you wouldn't be paying for slutdom.

Maybe you never used to word conspiracy,
I haven't used it because I don't believe in any. Whoever mentions that shit on my blog gets a permaban.

You, on the other hand, believe in extremely crazy shit, like that paying for slutdom will get women anything but death by apes.
 
of course, because modern courts are just services for whatever the women want. i shouldn't even emphasize that.
Not true. I have witnessed many court cases where men are awarded custody rights over their children following a divorce.
 
of course, because modern courts are just services for whatever the women want. i shouldn't even emphasize that.
Actually only 2% of rape cases are won even with a positive rape kit. So you're wrong.
(The reason for this is how the defenders handle the case. They will commonly try to make it look like the women wanted it even if she said otherwise. In America more men end up in the jury box due to selection... so yeah... it's a systematic problem)
https://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/reporting-rates

And I have a citation. Get rekt.
 
You, on the other hand, believe in extremely crazy shit, like that paying for slutdom will get women anything but death by apes.

[citation needed] And I'm gonna need you to use the real recognized definitions of words, not the alternate ones you came up with after being sent to time out.
 
I want proof that she said the reason was because the first man was not a rapist.
This is the same nonsensical crap as you wanting proof for any of my claims that doesn't fit your crap, but none that shows me in what you see as bad light. Why haven't you ever asked for proof that I asked my mother that or that I'm unemployed?

See, that's the thing. Your hypocrisy.

Still waiting for my citation that those who don't use the word conspiracy are conspiracy theorists, 24.
 
This is the same nonsensical crap as you wanting proof for any of my claims that doesn't fit your crap, but none that shows me in what you see as bad light. Why haven't you ever asked for proof that I asked my mother that or that I'm unemployed?

See, that's the thing. Your hypocrisy.
Okay. Give me proof for everything. Give me the good and the bad. Let me determine it for myself, because if there's a grain of truth to what you're saying, the evidence should support it.
 
This is the same nonsensical crap as you wanting proof for any of my claims that doesn't fit your crap, but none that shows me in what you see as bad light. Why haven't you ever asked for proof that I asked my mother that or that I'm unemployed?

See, that's the thing. Your hypocrisy.

Tl;dr i dont have any proof
 
@Holden, do you really believe this incel/loveshy/reactionary horseshit? Are you really trying to convince us? If I was trying to convince someone of something that clashes radically with their previously established sources, I'd try and cite some decent sources to support my argument. Since you don't seem willing or able to do this, I wonder how sincere you really are? So, Holden, are you actually trying to advocate some kind of ideology, or are you just trying to be so offensive that someone will have to pay attention to you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back