Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

[Johnny Bravo]

sample size for what? I haven't used that number as a sample size for anything. My sample size on how western women act and think comes from interacting with thousands of people, male and female, and is about 5,000 times larger.

Data or GTFO.

 

[Cubanodun]

Also known in scientific terms as 'insufficient sample size.'

Actually he always use the number 50 for everything

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

C'mon, Holden. Now you're just fucking around.

I am not. It is really so. It seems that any decency and respect, any consideration are seen as traits of utter scum.

Another example of this are the claims that I threatened a woman. Why are these claims made? Because I was trying to be honest with the cops and told them she even exists. Anybody on LS.com who's been there in 2008 can tell you this first hand.

If you're anything but a liar and scum you are seen as utter danger that must be destroyed.

 

[RequiredName]

@Holden, does your therapist have a degree?

 

[Arkangel]

sample size for what? I haven't used that number as a sample size for anything. My sample size on how western women act and think comes from interacting with thousands of people, male and female, and is about 5,000 times larger.

Four thousand people compared to hundreds of millions over multiple cultures (western society isn't some monolithic culture) is still a small sample size.

 

[Cubanodun]

f you're anything but a liar and scum you are seen as utter danger that must be destroyed.

Is not that how you describe thugs? And according to you they are kings

 

[Marionette]

why would it be seduction? these products aren't meant for seduction. if i tried to use seduction i'd just look silly because i'm not a rape ape. i can't say what they are but they don't have anything to do with seduction.

You already admitted being a rape ape like 10 pages ago. At the very LEAST get THAT shit together.

 

[24isthehighestnumber]

At this point, I just want to know what the hell he thinks a trucker is!

 

[MerriedManJr]

I am not. It is really so. It seems that any decency and respect, any consideration are seen as traits of utter scum.

Another example of this are the claims that I threatened a woman. Why are these claims made? Because I was trying to be honest with the cops and told them she even exists. Anybody on LS.com who's been there in 2008 can tell you this first hand.

If you're anything but a liar and scum you are seen as utter danger that must be destroyed.

But where do you get anal rape with blood lube and smashing a woman's jaw on a table? It's so specific.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

I didn't read most of this... You obviously didn't either so I think we're fair.
YOU ASKED ME FOR EVIDENCE TO MY CLAIMS. Don't even pretend that you didn't.
I linked some good sources along with some blog-type things because that's what you do. You don't want to except feminist blogs? Well I don't accept incel blogs. We're equal there.

macie, we're not equal. i never used incel blogs as scientific proof. if you believe that you're fucked in the head, pure and simple. i told that imbecile what i used my blog for - info about my life and views.

as for the "good sources" you used, they're so good that immediately the first claim they make was debunked by thornhill and palmer.

We've asked you about your life, we've asked you about your relationships/QUOTE]
There were very few questions on this but thousands of posts about sex. Again, if you don't see this you're fucked in the head.

 

[Cubanodun]

Page 686 of the maríjan léxicanum

Still no proofs of anything

Marijan now has a fetish with apes

 

[4Macie]

macie, you do know that to anybody sane (which means not many here) you just sunk your cause? when i posted sources they were from scientists (and no, i didn't use my blog or fschmidt as sources, just as info on my life or opinions). you're using left wing hate sites as sources.

What scientist? All I have seen from you is blogs. And you did you your blog AND fschmidt's. The sites I listed were not left wing hates sites. So, what exactly kind of evidence do you want? You obviously aren't taking women TELLING YOU DIRECTLY that they don't like rape. What do you want?

And seriously, we've asked you a shit ton of other life questions. You refuse to answer them or you have just gone back to sex.

 

[Ti-99/4A]

almost all women in the west are. out of the 4 women i fucked all were sluts at the time. it's just that one of them became a lesbian now.

I've made love to 7 women at least 50 times each. What do I win????

 

[Johnny Bravo]

i never used incel blogs as scientific proof.

So where is your proof?

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

i never used incel blogs as scientific proof.

Just because you say something doesn't make it true.

Especially in your case.

 

[4Macie]

@Holden
How's your mom?
How's your dad?
How's your brother?
Did you spend Xmas with them and new years?
If not, who did you spend it with?
So you're going to be a daddy, you excited?
What you gonna do when the momma goes after you for child support? You ready? Cuz, you know, they can force you to pay childsupport out of your social security.

 

[Ariel]

You need to cite evidence when you make a claim like that @Holden

 

[Cubanodun]

i never used incel blogs as scientific proof

Not here but in reddit you did it a lot of times

 

[Coldgrip]

I am scum.

I just shortened this sentence for you, I hope you don't mind.

Another example of this are the claims that I threatened a woman. Why are these claims made?

Because you've made them before Rape Ape.

Because I was trying to be honest with the cops and told them she even exists. Anybody on LS.com who's been there in 2008 can tell you this first hand.

And anybody here can tell that you're a pathetic welfare leech that likes to threaten rape and violence on women.

If you're anything like me, a liar and scum, you are seen as utter danger that must be destroyed.

That would be for the best really. I mean your country would have one less moocher to deal with.

 

[4Macie]

macie, we're not equal. i never used incel blogs as scientific proof. if you believe that you're fucked in the head, pure and simple. i told that imbecile what i used my blog for - info about my life and views.

as for the "good sources" you used, they're so good that immediately the first claim they make was debunked by thornhill and palmer.

Randy Thornhill is an evolutionary biologist at the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque. Craig T. Palmer is an evolutionary anthropologist at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs.
These are two men. They're works are not even being peer reviewed. As far as I saw, they never said women like rape (in fact they straight up say it's bad and made someone they both knew traumatized for years after); they talked about the history of rape FROM THEIR POINT OF VIEW. They never even looked for evidence to dispute their own claims (as good scientist do), they just found whatever evidence supported their end point and rolled with it. Again, it's two men. Two men against every woman ever. Seems legit. Find me a WOMAN that says she likes being raped, and maybe I'll entertain your notions.

So. How's your mom? How's your dad? How's your brother? Do you have any pets? Would you like to have pets? If you could be any animal in the world (past or present), what animal would it be?