BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
N...nono, fascist-chan, you can only be left if you subscribe to this magical version of communism, where I will clearly be part of the ruling class, alongside such luminaries are Movie Bob and AoC, even though true communism is supposed to be an anarchic system, without hierarchy. *faps violently to Marxist hentai* - 99% of those fuckwits, as far as I can tell, except they'll also intersperse threats of violence against "teh libz", while maintaining that only through True Communism™ can perfect human agency be exercised.
What confuses me the most is how they say they're anarchists while at times acting like statists (ex. approving of censorship, wanting a welfare state, while also saying "no borders" and rioting like anarchists). I have doubts that they truly want anarchism, even though they say that over and over. As much as they hate tankies, at least tankies are honest about trusting the government
 
What confuses me the most is how they say they're anarchists while at times acting like statists (ex. approving of censorship, wanting a welfare state, while also saying "no borders" and rioting like anarchists). I have doubts that they truly want anarchism, even though they say that over and over. As much as they hate tankies, at least tankies are honest about trusting the government

They all somehow believe they'll be part of the Central Planning Committee.
 
I just found out about the BreadTube subreddit but I have been following a few breadpill channels on the political side of Youtube. I think this guy could be lolcow material in his own right but I'll put them here for you all to see for yourselves.

For those who don't know him, meet Pigpuncher
841275

Website
Youtube
Twitter
Discord
Twitch
Reddit

Pigpuncher first began his youtube endeavor as a gaming channel predominantly focusing on long-form Minecraft lets plays and including Fortnite as a staple as it became popular. On March 31st, he uploaded a video titled "ANTI-SJW'S" and after gaining a large amount of traction form this he pivoted his channel from gaming to political commentary. While he appears level headed during his scripted commentary vids, he becomes extremely spergy during his feature-length live streams which can reach up to seven hours in length. His autistic outbursts come from him being deathly paranoid of people he disagrees with politically and include: claiming any point made by the people he is attacking is a dog whistle, assuming all of his political opponents are Nazis, getting butthurt over perceived racial slights, getting pissed off at dissenters in his stream chat, being outraged when his political enemies are more popular than him, and white-knighting for women involved in nerd culture. These attributes are most visible in two of his videos, STEVEN CROWDER IS UNFUNNY AND WRONG (LIVE) and WEEABOOS DEFEND LITERAL NAZI ANIME REVIEWER (LIVE).
I think Pigpuncher is an exemplar of the breadpill community and his antics deserve their own tread, though they would be a good topic for this thread. There are a bunch of other breadpill Youtubers out there and the whole BreadTube community goes far beyond a cult of personality around ContraPoints.
 
What confuses me the most is how they say they're anarchists while at times acting like statists (ex. approving of censorship, wanting a welfare state, while also saying "no borders" and rioting like anarchists). I have doubts that they truly want anarchism, even though they say that over and over. As much as they hate tankies, at least tankies are honest about trusting the government

Because most of them are just progressives who say “fuck capitalism” every once and while. Despite being autistic as shit ancaps have a more coherent view of society then Ancoms. If you watch any of their videos on anarchy they’ll just describe a 17th century farming commune with magic machines that make everything for them.
 
Sargon mentions Breadtube in his video about Black Pidgeon Speaks being unpersoned: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sukdaC8ASpA

He points out that Caleb Cain, the "Youtube indoctrinated me into the alt-right!" guy was indoctrinated -- by the Youtube algo blocking conservative channels from suggested views and sending him to Breadtube. But lefty journalists don't (can't) see that as a problem, so instead the journalist took it as him being saved from the alt-right.
There are very good reasons to believe Caleb has never been alt right or even a light conservative.
Somehow the sentence "I found a youtuber Destiny" and his fake crying don't buy me.
I watched his video and here are my thoughts on it.
I was looking if this guy has a lolcow thread, to post my opinions on him.
His video is basically how almost every conservative youtuber described themselves as voting democrat and being liberal when young, but then suddenly x event happened and they 'woke up', except its the opposite sides.
His video is reading from a script. It's all an act. We also don't know anything about this guy.
My favorite parts of his video is "I found a youtuber called Destiny"
"I also stumbled to another youtuber Contra Points. Natalie spoke to me"
The fake cry when he watched the video of the NZ shooter, without shedding a single tear. He struggled so hard to make a single tear but with no avail... I guess you don't really care about the dead people do you Caleb?
I don't buy it for a second that this guy was ever an edgy alt righter.

The left is playing the conservative tactics, trying their success in the face of the 2020 election.
That's all it is.
 
There are very good reasons to believe Caleb has never been alt right or even a light conservative.
That's how it is for a lot of these people, they remind me of how you'll see former /b/tards/goons talking about how they used to be such horrible racists back in the day, even though the worst they did was chuckle at offensive jokes like the rest of us. It's just an overplayed rhetorical device. Only place I've seen that really recognizes it as such, though, was some random fallacy list calling it a "statement of conversion".
 
That's how it is for a lot of these people, they remind me of how you'll see former /b/tards/goons talking about how they used to be such horrible racists back in the day, even though the worst they did was chuckle at offensive jokes like the rest of us. It's just an overplayed rhetorical device. Only place I've seen that really recognizes it as such, though, was some random fallacy list calling it a "statement of conversion".
A lot of the breadtubers I have seen have made videos like "The Alt-Right Pipeline" and "How I Almost Became Alt-Right". All of these breadtubers are paranoid about even being perceived as Alt-Right and will do anything to disavow anything of the sort. It's probably my biggest criticism of the BreadTube community, they are reactionaries to the Alt-Right / Anti-SJW crowd who themselves are reactionaries to modern radical progressives who themselves are reactionaries to mainstream conservatism. At the end of the day, the only point these breadtubers can argue is "Nazis are bad", it's all so tiresome.
 
A lot of the breadtubers I have seen have made videos like "The Alt-Right Pipeline" and "How I Almost Became Alt-Right". All of these breadtubers are paranoid about even being perceived as Alt-Right and will do anything to disavow anything of the sort. It's probably my biggest criticism of the BreadTube community, they are reactionaries to the Alt-Right / Anti-SJW crowd who themselves are reactionaries to modern radical progressives who themselves are reactionaries to mainstream conservatism. At the end of the day, the only point these breadtubers can argue is "Nazis are bad", it's all so tiresome.
the distributist did a tweetstorm on this phenomenon but it's honestly just the way the wind blows right now. the machine runs itself at this point, and for those of us who aren't on board we can only hope its speedy operation is also its demise ex-posthaste. i would spend time ITT deconstructing their BS but honestly, what's the point? when the entire academic scaffolding is staffed by the leftist priests who gave birth to this gaggle of nietzschean nightmares, then every encounter with these flatterers of dionysus (to use another nietzscheanism) is essentially an exhibition match, particularly that the left doesn't need rigorous arguments simply because they've already won the moral battle and can just brush things off with a huff. the right did the same thing for so long which is why the right can't even argue any more -- women were made for child rearing and homesteading.... because god said so, not because tens of thousands of years of societal equilibration put them in the role that made them the heads of the homestead (nassim taleb does an excellent exhibition on this in SITG which more right-wingers need to pick up and run with, namely the lindy effect). and if you suggest that old modes of being might have or have had merit, by the way, you're a bad person. and you aren't permitted to be a bad person. moreover only right-wingers are bad people; everyone else is just misguided. it simply isn't worth my time to reiterate over and over about how marxist ideals failed and still fail continuously for what should be stupidly obvious reasons and need(ed) to be reconfigured from the ground up before they were even remotely workable at any scale. but the academic establishment refuses to let the inner core of these ideas die because of the stain of post-christianity the west for some reason cannot scrub from its soul, namely bad conscience and moreover the power that bad conscience grants to someone who doesn't suffer from it, particularly brought on by the horrors of WWI/II and their aftermaths. if there's anything i'm learning from teaching myself history, it's that bad ideas die by spilled blood, not by spilled ink (this is also a reason why i label academics as outright cowards, who don't actually think for themselves by and large, for none of them could unironically support a side that lost an enormous war or for that matter could say anything good about them; historians don't vindicate history as much as use it as a method of self-vindication, you know). until a communist country has an actual bloody defeat, this is just another post-christian cross we'll need to bear, i fear.

not to say that taking potshots at these genetic and psychological failures isn't particularly fun or enjoyable, however.
 
the distributist did a tweetstorm on this phenomenon but it's honestly just the way the wind blows right now. the machine runs itself at this point, and for those of us who aren't on board we can only hope its speedy operation is also its demise ex-posthaste.
For the longest time I didn't get why traditional conservatives and legislators in red states fail to engage with the left on the internet or even advance an argument against the pro-censorship online media establishment. But then I realized, the vast majority of the tradcon base (modern "republicans") literally can't understand how or even why metro progressives (technologically literate leftist activists) attack free thought online. While I don't live in a firmly red state, I do live in a fairly rural small-town community and outside of a few of my friends and maybe a handful of really media-savvy people, I don't know anyone in my community who would understand that an online political commentator being banned off of a platform is a political tactic used by those who run the platform or even why the platform would ban a user for their political viewpoints.

Currently, the right-wing party in America is the far less internet and media-savvy party. I'm sure that the great majority of people in my home town have at least one social media account which they use regularly (most likely a Facebook or Twitter) and by and large, these accounts are used to keep in touch with family members and friends. And likely, the average social media user in my town doesn't conscience think about the people whose job is to run the platform, they only know it as a domain or an app where they chat with people they know when they can't be face-to-face.

(this is also a reason why i label academics as outright cowards, who don't actually think for themselves by and large, for none of them could unironically support a side that lost an enormous war or for that matter could say anything good about them; historians don't vindicate history as much as use it as a method of self-vindication, you know).

Honestly, why would the average red-state conservative (middle-age, working-class, high school educated, average income) even care about the culture war? Why would a person who works fifty-hour work weeks to make ends meet for a growing family need or afford the time to educate themselves about a battle of ideas being waged on the internet? How would a person who knows little of the internet outside of Facebook, Google, and Amazon approach a debate which has an uncountable amount of individuals voicing their opinions at the same time across areas of the internet which are nearly inaccessible through typical browsing methods in the free time of a working schedule?

The fact is that there is an extreme barrier to entry to the sphere of debate surrounding the culture war. A working man gets no value, emotional or economical, out of exposing political extremists over the internet. However, a cosmopolitan young adult with a budding career in journalism can easily find value in lampooning those who his audience is predisposed to disagree with. Those who are limited to a vocational understanding of the internet by the lives they lead do not have time to ponder the deeper implications of social media as a platform for free thought and political expression. But a person who lives a life that is supported by a career which is advanced by an academic study of using the internet to push a political agenda is afforded the time and resources to do so weather for the benefit of the person's employer or the person's ego.

As the culture war is brought up more and more frequently in mainstream political discussion, a new dichotomy is beginning to emerge: those who understand the greater social implications of the high ground on the internet and those who do not. As the haves continue to take advantage of the ignorance of the have nots this dichotomy will only continue to grow and those on either side will seek refuge on opposing political movements.
 
That's how it is for a lot of these people, they remind me of how you'll see former /b/tards/goons talking about how they used to be such horrible racists back in the day, even though the worst they did was chuckle at offensive jokes like the rest of us. It's just an overplayed rhetorical device. Only place I've seen that really recognizes it as such, though, was some random fallacy list calling it a "statement of conversion".
I believe that Caleb and some of his buddies that constantly plug each others channels in their videos have always been fans of other, bigger Breadtubers. Hence they have never been alt right. Suddenly inspired to destroy nazism and hungry for attention they make youtube channels. They even had a perfect moment to fake concern and sadness with the Christchurch event.
The channel FaradaySpeaks is created on march 17, just two days after the shooting.
 
Last edited:
Ian Danskin (another breadtuber) in one of his videos about "The Alt-Right Playbook", which is full of strawman arguments, is shocked that conservatives can even genuinely hold beliefs which run contrary to his own. And at the end of that video, he insinuates that those who hold conservative valuse are dangerously close to becoming fascists and encourages anyone who is afraid of being a fascist to radicalize to the left. In his follow-up video, he attempts to show how his infallible research proves that conservatives are self-centered fatcats while completely failing to understand the blinding difference between fiscal conservatism and cultural conservatism.
That's how it is for a lot of these people, they remind me of how you'll see former /b/tards/goons talking about how they used to be such horrible racists back in the day, even though the worst they did was chuckle at offensive jokes like the rest of us. It's just an overplayed rhetorical device. Only place I've seen that really recognizes it as such, though, was some random fallacy list calling it a "statement of conversion".
After watching Caleb's video about him being groomed by the spooky alt-right I realized that the way he describes his "dissent" into alt-right thinking and his return to leftist ideology makes it sound as if he will consume any political talking point which is presented to him. I truly believe that all of these breadtubers who have campfire stories about their flirt with alt-right lack the cognitive reasoning skills to think critically about the political views they are presented with.
 
I believe that Caleb and some of his buddies that constantly plug each others channels in their videos have always been fans of other, bigger Breadtubers. Hence they have never been alt right. Suddenly inspired to destroy nazism and hungry for attention they make youtube channels. They even had a perfect moment to fake concern and sadness with the Christchurch event.
The channel FaradaySpeaks is created on march 17, just two days after the shooting.
Big Joel made a stream for the Christchurch shooting that was a giant circlejerk. None of the people involved were big players on breadtube only wannabes.

Now that this thread's in the community watch forum, how long will it take for /r/BreadTube to react?

Meanwhile, here are some threads where we're mentioned:
The fuck? The rules are everywhere about "not your personal army", if you want to start a crusade you are pretty much on the way to get your own thread.
Its not like Richard Spencer, Ben Harrison, Vox Day, Milo Yiannapoulos and the most autistic skeptics have threads. The difference is that the social left accepts your shit no matter how many corpses you have on your closet allowing more exceptionalism to laugh at. Love tho how they want to include Chris-Chan pr their defense force.
 
Ian Danskin (another breadtuber) in one of his videos about "The Alt-Right Playbook", which is full of strawman arguments, is shocked that conservatives can even genuinely hold beliefs which run contrary to his own. And at the end of that video, he insinuates that those who hold conservative valuse are dangerously close to becoming fascists and encourages anyone who is afraid of being a fascist to radicalize to the left. In his follow-up video, he attempts to show how his infallible research proves that conservatives are self-centered fatcats while completely failing to understand the blinding difference between fiscal conservatism and cultural conservatism.

He also claimed that all conservatives are monarchist capitalist nazis because the term right wing originated in the French Revolution (don’t tell him liberals use to be capitalist and that he’s an anti capitalist liberal).
 
Ian Danskin (another breadtuber) in one of his videos about "The Alt-Right Playbook", which is full of strawman arguments, is shocked that conservatives can even genuinely hold beliefs which run contrary to his own. And at the end of that video, he insinuates that those who hold conservative valuse are dangerously close to becoming fascists and encourages anyone who is afraid of being a fascist to radicalize to the left. In his follow-up video, he attempts to show how his infallible research proves that conservatives are self-centered fatcats while completely failing to understand the blinding difference between fiscal conservatism and cultural conservatism.

After watching Caleb's video about him being groomed by the spooky alt-right I realized that the way he describes his "dissent" into alt-right thinking and his return to leftist ideology makes it sound as if he will consume any political talking point which is presented to him. I truly believe that all of these breadtubers who have campfire stories about their flirt with alt-right lack the cognitive reasoning skills to think critically about the political views they are presented with.

Oh god that innuendo studies guy...What a pretentious twat. Only vid from him I remember liking from back in the day was his vid on Phil Phish which I still kinda like seeing how Phil was (or still is before he left the public view basically) a huge cunt.

While I can understand his arguments and viewpoints, his major flaws is that like all other breadtubers, they all follow the same argumentative cycle of "hurr durr nazis bad and evveryone who disagrees with us is also a nazi aka alt right" and deep down are ideologically indifferent to the supposed "irrational left/antifa" Generally it's an issue I have noticed with a lot of these "My descent into the alt right" and other pretentious nonsense with a black and white worldview that is still remained in the victim vs the offender aka oppressed vs oppressor mentality(sounds familiar to something right?" and that because of this silly almost religious-esque convertion that ultimately just makes breadtube so insanely obnoxious.

These retards label everyone they dont like or for example, who post on this lovely feeder forum as "alt right" eg you ARE THE WITCH. It's a childish worldview and I'm not saying people o the real alt-right side cannot act like that too, no that would be silly, I despise the alt right but my point is that these pseudo-intellctual vids are just political garbage where he labels something as X and therefore it is X. Or in another way, pretending to be a "reasonable guy" while being an actual cunt otherwise (Very similar to the supposed "rational skeptics" who then engaged in krauts gay ops shit)

In general, I may sound mad and I guess I kinda am but for me the one word about it all is how obnoxious it is. People think they have gotten their own version of a "redpill" or whatever calling it while in reality it's just the same (apologize for using such an overused word) sjw bullshit. Been following the breadtube thread and stuff for quite a while bust mostly been lurking and just felt like giving my input about it.


Oh and by the way. Here's a vid of him in person, who would have thought he's a fat ugly balding walking caricature of the "soy boy" meme? Maybe it's a low hanging insult, but it's just a perfect way to round it all off. I sincerely can't wait for the day these pseudo-intellectuals get their own sex scandals or shit like all male feminist types eventually do or maybe contra kills themselves who knows.


Also some interesting youtube comment, I'll paste them here.

"He can't talk to the right because he doesn't want to talk. He wants to tell you why he is right and you are wrong. I can't believe leftists can't just simply ask other people what the think without holding any kind of judgement. When I meet someone in real life who is actually a radical progressive, which is rare, I just ask them why they believe what they do, and I don't use it to prove them wrong either. I just want to know what they think so I ask and accept their answer as is."

"So much focus on shaping others' opinions and so little on reaching actual conclusions or results, and all on the basic premise of being on "the good side"... Almost sounds like totalitarian damage control"


And to summarize it all up:

"Your solutions all seem to start with the assumption that you must be right. Then you go on to try to figure out how to convince those that disagree. You don't seem to have an open mind."

pretensious twat.jpg
100% CHAD:tycesuit:

EDIT;
Jgreg made a parody vid of this kind of nonsense. Never heard of him but it was a hilarious satire of these ”coming out” videos. Also fixed typos.

 
Last edited:
Oh god that innuendo studies guy...What a pretentious twat. Only vid from in I remember liking from back in the day was his vid on Phil Phish which I still kinda like seeing how Phil was(or still is before he left the public view basically) a huge cunt. While I can understand his arguments and viewpoints, his major flaws is that like all other breadtubers, they all follow the same argumentative cycle of "hurr durr nazis bad everyone who disagrees is nazi aka alt right" and deep down are ideologically indifferent to the supposed "irrational left/antifa" Generally it's an issue I have noticed with a lot of these "My descent into the alt right" and other pretentious nonsense with a black and white worldview that is still remained in the victim vs the offender aka oppressed vs oppressor mentality(sounds familiar to something right?" and that because of this silly almost religious-esque convertion that ultimately just makes breadtube so insanely obnoxious. These exceptional individuals label everyone they dont like or post on this lovely forum as "alt right" eg you ARE THE WITCH. It's a childish worldview and Im not saying people o the real alt-right side cannot act like that too, no that would be silly, I despise the alt right but my point is that these pseudo-intellctual vids are just political garbage where he labels something as X and therefore it is X. Or in another way, pretending to be a "reasonable guy" while being an actual cunt otherwise (Very similar to the supposed "rational skeptics" who then engaged in krauts gay ops shit)

In general, I may sound mad and I guess I kinda am but for me the one word about it all is how obnoxious it is. People think they have gotten their own version of a "redpill" or whatever calling it while in reality it's just the same (apologize for using such an overused word) sjw bs. Been following the breadtube thread and stuff for quite a while bust mostly been lurking and just felt like giving my input about it.


Oh and by the way. Here's a vid of him in person, who would have thought he's a fat ugly balding walking caricature of the "soy boy" meme? Maybe it's a low hanging insult, but it's just a perfect way to round it all off. I sincerely can't wait for the day these pseudo-intellectuals get their own sex scandals or shit like all male feminist types eventually do or maybe contra kills themselves who knows.


Also some interesting youtube comment, I'll paste them here.

"He can't talk to the right because he doesn't want to talk. He wants to tell you why he is right and you are wrong. I can't believe leftists can't just simply ask other people what the think without holding any kind of judgement. When I meet someone in real life who is actually a radical progressive, which is rare, I just ask them why they believe what they do, and I don't use it to prove them wrong either. I just want to know what they think so I ask and accept their answer as is."

"So much focus on shaping others' opinions and so little on reaching actual conclusions or results, and all on the basic premise of being on "the good side"... Almost sounds like totalitarian damage control"


And to summarize it all up:

"Your solutions all seem to start with the assumption that you must be right. Then you go on to try to figure out how to convince those that disagree. You don't seem to have an open mind."

View attachment 847417
100% CHAD:tycesuit:

EDIT;
Jgreg made a parody vid of this kind of nonsense. Never heard of him but it was a hilarious satire of these ”coming out” videos.


In that same lecture he also claims that NeoGaf, Reddit, and 4chan are all bastions of far right ideology:
58683711-734E-4A90-898C-74A8650DCE66.jpeg

He also claims you can’t judge a person by their politics but judges all evil right wingers anyway. He claims that someone’s you don’t even have to think about the “far right” ideas you debunk. Finally he concededs at the end that convincing people doesn’t really matter as progressives can just alter voting demographics to win any election.
 
Now that this thread's in the community watch forum, how long will it take for /r/BreadTube to react?

Meanwhile, here are some threads where we're mentioned:
If these people actually lurked here, they’d realize that most of the users tend to be centrist, libertarian, center right or center left. Just because this site doesn’t censor conservative viewpoints does not make it “alt-right”. You know, if these people prided themselves in research, they would actually go to the site itself and read stuff here.
 
If these people actually lurked here, they’d realize that most of the users tend to be centrist, libertarian, center right or center left. Just because this site doesn’t censor conservative viewpoints does not make it “alt-right”. You know, if these people prided themselves in research, they would actually go to the site itself and read stuff here.

Yeah exactly, I mostly use the forum to follow the antics of an insane deluded musician or watch fat women eat themselves to death while also just keeping track of bizarre stuff. But these people are either everything or nothing, they are fundamentally weak persons with a shaky ideological ground which is why they have to label everyone as alt right or some shit, otherwise their worldview and politics which is so deeply intertwined in themselves fall apart, or in another way, they themselves fall apart. Call me an armchair psychologists, but it's really why it often seems like they are impossible to reason with, or why they act just psychotic or insanely narcissitic on twitter and shit. Claiming memes lead to violence, quinton laughing at a youtuber getting kicked off for no reason, censoring opponents etc.
 
Oh god that innuendo studies guy...What a pretentious twat. Only vid from him I remember liking from back in the day was his vid on Phil Phish which I still kinda like seeing how Phil was (or still is before he left the public view basically) a huge cunt.

While I can understand his arguments and viewpoints, his major flaws is that like all other breadtubers, they all follow the same argumentative cycle of "hurr durr nazis bad and evveryone who disagrees with us is also a nazi aka alt right" and deep down are ideologically indifferent to the supposed "irrational left/antifa" Generally it's an issue I have noticed with a lot of these "My descent into the alt right" and other pretentious nonsense with a black and white worldview that is still remained in the victim vs the offender aka oppressed vs oppressor mentality(sounds familiar to something right?" and that because of this silly almost religious-esque convertion that ultimately just makes breadtube so insanely obnoxious.

These exceptional individuals label everyone they dont like or for example, who post on this lovely feeder forum as "alt right" eg you ARE THE WITCH. It's a childish worldview and I'm not saying people o the real alt-right side cannot act like that too, no that would be silly, I despise the alt right but my point is that these pseudo-intellctual vids are just political garbage where he labels something as X and therefore it is X. Or in another way, pretending to be a "reasonable guy" while being an actual cunt otherwise (Very similar to the supposed "rational skeptics" who then engaged in krauts gay ops shit)

In general, I may sound mad and I guess I kinda am but for me the one word about it all is how obnoxious it is. People think they have gotten their own version of a "redpill" or whatever calling it while in reality it's just the same (apologize for using such an overused word) sjw bullshit. Been following the breadtube thread and stuff for quite a while bust mostly been lurking and just felt like giving my input about it.


Oh and by the way. Here's a vid of him in person, who would have thought he's a fat ugly balding walking caricature of the "soy boy" meme? Maybe it's a low hanging insult, but it's just a perfect way to round it all off. I sincerely can't wait for the day these pseudo-intellectuals get their own sex scandals or shit like all male feminist types eventually do or maybe contra kills themselves who knows.


Also some interesting youtube comment, I'll paste them here.

"He can't talk to the right because he doesn't want to talk. He wants to tell you why he is right and you are wrong. I can't believe leftists can't just simply ask other people what the think without holding any kind of judgement. When I meet someone in real life who is actually a radical progressive, which is rare, I just ask them why they believe what they do, and I don't use it to prove them wrong either. I just want to know what they think so I ask and accept their answer as is."

"So much focus on shaping others' opinions and so little on reaching actual conclusions or results, and all on the basic premise of being on "the good side"... Almost sounds like totalitarian damage control"


And to summarize it all up:

"Your solutions all seem to start with the assumption that you must be right. Then you go on to try to figure out how to convince those that disagree. You don't seem to have an open mind."

View attachment 847417
100% CHAD:tycesuit:

EDIT;
Jgreg made a parody vid of this kind of nonsense. Never heard of him but it was a hilarious satire of these ”coming out” videos. Also fixed typos.

So is Jreg part of breadtube?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mexican_Wizard_711
Back