Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

If they're hiding assets, Texas has very powerful post-judgment discovery which essentially means you can depose them, their family, their employers, anyone they know, etc. for the rest of their lives, any time you find out about them having new money.
There is no way these idiots are smart enough for that. And if it came to a judgement their own lawyers are just as likely to go after them. Broke ass idiots Moronica are.
 
That's assuming the backstabbing reptile is capable of human emotions.


This is something I can't wrap my head around. How... hasn't Monica gotten her strongest accusation's story straight? Does she still think everything is fun and games. She does realize that her credibility is a stake here, right?
I don't know about reptilians, but Jordan B. Peterson taught me that serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (such as Zoloft) work on some of our most ancient neural programming. If it's good enough for lobsters its good enough for that snake, Monica.
 
They can't actually believe that Vic's deposition went bad, right? Did they see Ron and Monica's depositions?
They have to know.

There's obviously a prejudice thing involved here in that they really want it to have gone bad, but I think there's a vague thread of logic involved. Basically, Vic admitted to doing some questionable things. This proves he is a "bad person". Since a "bad person" would do "bad things", obviously whatever "bad things" you accuse him of are incredibly likely to be true. Ergo, since he admitted to cheating on his ex-girlfriend and hired an escort, he's clearly a rapist. Or something like that.

Like I said, there is some sort of logic behind it, it's just not sound logic.
 
I wouldn't necessarily, just because I know some folks who know they would struggle with the tasks of property upkeep, whether it's because they acknowledge their own immaturity or they have disabilities. With this two, I would take a shot in the dark and guess it's because of laziness, because they certainly seem well off enough to own SOME sort of property.

Meh, it all depends on your lifestyle and such.

I know owning property is supposed to be the great American Dream and what adults do, but it’s not ideal for everyone.

Some people prefer the flexibility not owning property gives you, others might prefer to travel or whatever, instead of spending the first ten years of a mortgage basically paying off the interest.

Some just don’t want to deal with the headaches of maintenance, property taxes and worrying about real estate bubbles and busts.

I know successful people who don’t own property and unsuccessful people who don’t own, so I’m going to be fair and give them the benefit of doubt, even though they’re both despicable characters who’d never return the favor.
 
They can't actually believe that Vic's deposition went bad, right? Did they see Ron and Monica's depositions?
They have to know.
They got ONE piece of info to be confirmed, that was Vic pulling Marchi's hair at Funimation and they're trying to run with it like if that's true, everything else is.
 
They got ONE piece of info to be confirmed, that was Vic pulling Marchi's hair at Funimation and they're trying to run with it like if that's true, everything else is.
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the "hair pulling" because he was styling her hair for her?
 
Stupid question but if the defendants are broke, where does Vic get his money from? I understand it's not about the money for him, but he is suing them for monetary compensation, correct? Do they have to declare bankruptcy or something?
Kind of irrelevant. Yes, Vic will probably be entitled to monetary damages. But the primary focus of this case is A. investigating the claims (see also; confronting your accusers), and B. repairing Vic's name, as a matter of legal record. The law's remedy for these torts includes C. making him whole for the defendants' shares of damages from the unlawful interference (which then, hopefully, gets multiplied several times so as to deter others from acting this way in the future.)

Whether or not MoRonica can pay is a separate matter to be settled later. Vic still wants/needs A and B. C is how the law addresses the rest.

The punitive nature of the damages is important, too. The courts need to make it crystal clear: If you do illegal, malicious shit like this, you get financially wrecked. No more McMansions. No more new Audis. Do not pass go. Full stop.

"Where does Vic get his money" is kind of missing the entire point of what's going on here.
 
A picture of the Douchette approved TCPA train haring towards Victory Lasgana and the Percy Beard Experience:

800px-Train_wreck_at_Montparnasse_1895.jpg
 
After listening to last night there was some things that I would say weren't the best for Vic. Admitting to touching the hair of Jamie is not ideal. However he did state he didn't pull hair and that doesn't match up with her story. Also him answering what was a statement of fact or defamatory in the tweets he was shown he should have answered he doesn't know.

These are minor things, I think Vic did a great job of wrecking Funimation and their TCPA hopes, and continued to do well against Monica and Ron. Jamie's case seems a little weaker but that may only be because she hasn't be deposed yet.
 
After listening to last night there was some things that I would say weren't the best for Vic. Admitting to touching the hair of Jamie is not ideal. However he did state he didn't pull hair and that doesn't match up with her story.
I actually think this helps him. His explanation contextualizes her statement and reframes it in a way that normal human people (read: a Tarrant County jury) will understand and relate to. Touching someone's hair, unless you're a complete autist with no respect for personal boundaries, is something you only do with someone you consider a close friend.
 
I actually think this helps him. His explanation contextualizes her statement and reframes it in a way that normal human people (read: a Tarrant County jury) will understand and relate to. Touching someone's hair, unless you're a complete autist with no respect for personal boundaries, is something you only do with someone you consider a close friend.
Yeah the jury will understand for sure, I don't think he hurt his overall case, but the TCPA isn't for the jury to decide. I'm just saying in regards to that. And even then I still like Vic's chances on it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Teignmouth Electron
If they're hiding assets, Texas has very powerful post-judgment discovery which essentially means you can depose them, their family, their employers, anyone they know, etc. for the rest of their lives, any time you find out about them having new money.

So, we're talking this?



After listening to last night there was some things that I would say weren't the best for Vic. Admitting to touching the hair of Jamie is not ideal. However he did state he didn't pull hair and that doesn't match up with her story.

And saying that he didn't pull her hair wouldn't match up with her story, either.

I think there's something to note, there: he just as well can say that he never pulled her hair, and in fact, he could leave it at that. But he didn't, and with all the other embarrassing things he had to answer to, it demonstrates honesty.

Also him answering what was a statement of fact or defamatory in the tweets he was shown he should have answered he doesn't know.

It's not really "statement of fact" versus defamation, but rather "statement of fact" versus "statement of opinion", i.e. whether or not the statements are offered as objective. As Nick said, that's not even for them to decide, anyways.

Well well well...
we can't until somebody posts it elsewhere. And so far only Nick posted only that snippet

You mean it's not already downloadable?

i am coral blue number 2 right now
 
Do they actually think no one expects the TCPA to be filed?
Law twitter will posture this way, they are DESPERATELY in need of ANYTHING to claim they were right about while BHBH was wrong. I think they will try to spin this as it. "BHBH/Nick never expected a TCPA, and here one is, HAHA you idiots" is current spin, while reality is that Ty and Nick have talked about TCPA coming for a long long time.
 
why? last I checked, we don't suck nicks dick. at least I don't.

If he's the only source, fine.

Either way, going on a mining expedition and if I get something, i'll post it.
Reading comprehension must be hard. He said, to his knowledge, the doc isn't public yet and Nick has only posted that tease. So he can't post the rest, because none of us have it.
 
Back