View attachment 846330
View attachment 846334
The paper
this article quotes is not an original research, but an essay
(paywalled) from BMJ Medical Ethics (they have another non-paywalled
commentary here). You can guess the author's conclusion from Rhys's dismissal.
And any anatomical comparison is "phrenology" these days!
View attachment 846355
These troons go on to refute science with their personal anecdotes:
View attachment 846385
View attachment 846386
The IAAF experts say there is no reliable tests for partial androgen insensitivity, yet these loon just knows they are "mildly androgen insensitive", presumably from moon magic?
View attachment 846369
Rhys is afraid that someone might develop a test one day (perhaps through transcriptomics?) to determine the effect of T on an individual.
View attachment 846377
+ + +
Christa has a googleshng-like outburst that amounts to nothing but "listen to women (and 'women')!"
View attachment 846399
The ultimate "another explanation" is that you have a perpetual PMS and should go back to the kitchen.
She is not finished yet:
View attachment 846400