Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Do you think Kara's affidavit will hold up? She seems dumber and more delusional than Monica for choosing an event CAUGHT ON TAPE. The damage control and back forward tracking is hilarious. I really hope her affidavit doesn't get thrown out, she needs to turn up in court.
 
I am not a lawyer and its obvious even to me what a stupid idiot the douche is. This is pre trial. Meaning "before trial". This where all the parties get their ducks in a row. Determine just what the actual dispute is, determine that the dispute is in fact something that violates law, and then arrange a presentation for the actual trial where the matter will be deliberated and decided.

What these morons are trying to argue are facts of dispute to be determined "AT TRIAL". But this is not trial. All the plaintiff needs to prove is there is a valid dispute. Which in this case is ridiculously easy. Ty does not need to prove Vic was defamed right now. He needs to prove that there is a valid claim he was defamed.
But every lawyer onboard his twitter train said this was DOA (:_(

I think he means to say every non Texas, mostly IP lawyer, whose days in court have been short of sending threatening letters, and one bald fat moron who can’t breathe at night without a machine lung THINK it should be DOA based on non Texas law... as if we don’t have lower courts for just this reason.

How is it that a bunch of dumbasses think the first amendment should protect these morons but then they go on to try and take people’s first amendment rights to talk about this case?

How about the idiots who are knowingly lying in their affidavits get their own lawyers and how about you stop crying, after the person you’re defending WANTED this lawsuit for “truth” to come out, made you look like a fuckin stupid moron for giving you crooked facts to protect on twitter.

You don’t get 300k in the hole and bankrupt by being good at what you do couchette.

let’s not forget Akiva “I can’t beat my own ex wife’s lawyer” ‘Super Lawyer’ Cohen.
 
Last edited:
Do you think Kara's affidavit will hold up? She seems dumber and more delusional than Monica for choosing an event CAUGHT ON TAPE. The damage control and back forward tracking is hilarious. I really hope her affidavit doesn't get thrown out, she needs to turn up in court.

Ty may want to keep it in evidence just so he can put her on the stand in front of a jury and have Cary make her squirm. The stupid bitch was just tweeting about how she wants to move past this. Which is absolutely idiotic since she is now a sworn witness for the defense, which the defense has submitted before the court. I am absolutely blown away by these idiots. She clearly has no idea at all what she has just done and what it means. Lemon Party clearly didn't tell her and she did not get legal council of her own.

She has made a sworn affidavit. You don't get to walk away from that and trial requires the opposing party the right to cross examine. Which means everything her whore mouth says is said under penalty of perjury. No sweety. You dont get to talk about netflix now.
 
Good. I hope Ty does the same for Manjaw as well. Out of all the parties, suing her will be the greatest community service.
 
Good. I hope Ty does the same for Manjaw as well. Out of all the parties, suing her will be the greatest community service.

She's unlikely to be sued, but it would be entertaining to see her get torn apart under cross examination. I doubt she'll stay the distance, though.

She has such a target on her back. It's just a matter of time before she is served. By whom is the question.

She desperately wanted to be a witness. She only has herself to blame.
 
I think it was mentioned somewhere she has a job in data. If that's to be believed it should make her a viable target, much better than the woke and broke Funi cabal. And she doesn't live in Texas so wages can be garnished. Vic may have a case with the recent open TI case with Liberty City Con. Don't think she's high on the list, but if it isn't Vic I hope someone puts down the serial abuser soon.
 
I think it was mentioned somewhere she has a job in data. If that's to be believed it should make her a viable target, much better than the woke and broke Funi cabal. And she doesn't live in Texas so wages can be garnished. Vic may have a case with the recent open TI case with Liberty City Con. Don't think she's high on the list, but if it isn't Vic I hope someone puts down the serial abuser soon.

Maybe TUG? The owners of Liberty City Con? Tekko Con?
 
View attachment 855909

(Crossposting whatever)

Honestly what are chances Judge Chupp goes for Casey and Lemongrabs favor. Is he that gullible, has he his reasons to doubt Ty and Vic. Also don't know about the Law but what does Vic supposedly being a Public Figure prove? There's obvious proof getting out of the industry was planned inside job.

The irony of an unemployed, unemployable homeless hobo lawyer speaking with deep knowledge and certainty about another lawyer being incompetent is staggering. Ty Beard built his practice from scratch and mainly services the private and family needs of 9 figure rich oil barons. His practice is thriving, his clients are quite satisfied and he and his partners have a stellar reputation in their community. Whereas Doucette can’t give his services away. Everything about him screams “state ethics investigation waiting to happen”.
 
The irony of an unemployed, unemployable homeless hobo lawyer speaking with deep knowledge and certainty about another lawyer being incompetent is staggering. Ty Beard built his practice from scratch and mainly services the private and family needs of 9 figure rich oil barons. His practice is thriving, his clients are quite satisfied and he and his partners have a stellar reputation in their community. Whereas Doucette can’t give his services away. Everything about him screams “state ethics investigation waiting to happen”.
If his clients weren’t also broke vaginas he wants to add to his resumé that might happen.
I’d sooner take a public defender or represent myself over this smelly cooch any day.
 
I think it was mentioned somewhere she has a job in data. If that's to be believed it should make her a viable target, much better than the woke and broke Funi cabal. And she doesn't live in Texas so wages can be garnished. Vic may have a case with the recent open TI case with Liberty City Con. Don't think she's high on the list, but if it isn't Vic I hope someone puts down the serial abuser soon.

I believe she referred to herself as a 'data analyst', She made some sort of twitter boast/threat to Nick, along the lines of, "now you have to deal with the fury of this data analyst", or something similarly silly. Aside from data analysts being a threat to no one but actuaries, pretty much anyone who has seen a pie graph or an excel spreadsheet could call themselves a 'data analyst'.
 
I believe she referred to herself as a 'data analyst', She made some sort of twitter boast/threat to Nick, along the lines of, "now you have to deal with the fury of this data analyst", or something similarly silly. Aside from data analysts being a threat to no one but actuaries, pretty much anyone who has seen a pie graph or an excel spreadsheet could call themselves a 'data analyst'.
I checked her dox thread and there's a few entries of data jobs on her linkedin. But after the embarrassing incident of trying to pass easily searchable artwork as her niece's, something only a grade schooler would do, you are right that we should treat any of her claims with most suspicion.
 
But every lawyer onboard his twitter train said this was DOA (:_(

I think he means to say every non Texas, mostly IP lawyer, whose days in court have been short of sending threatening letters, and one bald fat moron who can’t breathe at night without a machine lung THINK it should be DOA based on non Texas law... as if we don’t have lower courts for just this reason.

How is it that a bunch of dumbasses think the first amendment should protect these morons but then they go on to try and take people’s first amendment rights to talk about this case?

How about the idiots who are knowingly lying in their affidavits get their own lawyers and how about you stop crying, after the person you’re defending WANTED this lawsuit for “truth” to come out, made you look like a fuckin stupid moron for giving you crooked facts to protect on twitter.

You don’t get 300k in the hole and bankrupt by being good at what you do couchette.

let’s not forget Akiva “I can’t beat my own ex wife’s lawyer” ‘Super Lawyer’ Cohen.
Law Twitter really is laughably bad at presenting any coherent legal arguments. I won't pretend like I know the outcome of a case this early on, but they don't even try to actually provide legal reasoning for half the shit they say. They instead rely upon legalese and just sheer overwhelming quantity of mentions/like brigades to prove their point for them.

Legitimately I quoted to them a Texas Supreme court ruling, and legal analysis, that went over how Truth is not an absolute defense to defamation in Texas, and all they could do was regurgate back "Truth is an absolute defense, period." Despite the opposite being provided to them with precedence from the highest court in Texas. There are multiple cases establishing this.

Texas looks at the overall gist of the statement(s) not the individual truth or falsity of each claim.

They also do nothing more than semantic quips, and then outright lie when cornered because they can't even get their language usage right. They are jokes through and through, and the only people who still buy into them are the traveling circle jerk for KickVic and drive by SJW types.
 
Law Twitter really is laughably bad at presenting any coherent legal arguments. I won't pretend like I know the outcome of a case this early on, but they don't even try to actually provide legal reasoning for half the shit they say. They instead rely upon legalese and just sheer overwhelming quantity of mentions/like brigades to prove their point for them.

Twitter is utterly worthless for conveying any argument that requires thought to make or understand. It makes everyone who uses it dumber.
 
The irony of an unemployed, unemployable homeless hobo lawyer speaking with deep knowledge and certainty about another lawyer being incompetent is staggering. Ty Beard built his practice from scratch and mainly services the private and family needs of 9 figure rich oil barons. His practice is thriving, his clients are quite satisfied and he and his partners have a stellar reputation in their community. Whereas Doucette can’t give his services away. Everything about him screams “state ethics investigation waiting to happen”.

Lawtwitter is a profane reflection of what caused this mess in the first place. Envy.

There is a reason envy is a deadly sin. A great tragedy we dont teach our children about them anymore. This entire drama was caused by a combination of lust, greed and envy and it is being fed by wrath.

The only sin left is Pride, which above all the others brings forth the deepest circles of hell and eternal damnation. The only thing that will prevent this lawsuit from being settled and ending on terms that gives the defendants hope for their futures is pride. If they choose to fight this to the bitter end they will discover the heart of the inferno is a frozen desolation.

Nick commented that this drama has shown God has a sense of humor. It really does seem that way to me.
 
My point was that even if they'd been married for 5 years, it still wouldn't resolve the conflict of interest issue or the undue burden issue.

They are, in fact, trying to argue that privilege applies in this case as a way of explaining why Ron knew about the Funi investigation without being Funi's agent.

There are a number of problems with that argument which go beyond how common law marriage is codified in Texas, not the least of which is that spousal privilege (or its equivalent) is limited to communications which were intended only for the spouse. Ron making his knowledge of the Funi investigation public may well have negated any argument for privilege.
Now, IANAL, but I know a thing or two about privileged information. May does not -begin- to cover what Ron making that information public opens up for Pandora's box. The core concept of spousal privilege (And any other form of informational privilege) is that something about the situation (Being married, being in a position of authority, etc.) provides you a level of access to information that revealing said information in court would infringe upon.
I.E. If the court were to force a lawyer to discuss what a husband says to a wife, it would inherently rip apart the social fabric that makes up the family bond, and this could be abused really badly.
BUT, once you reveal that information publicly (And try to claim it falls under that), you just null and voided that privilege ENTIRELY. This doesn't just make a statement open to cross examination, it opens up everything they'd try to file under that privilege.

The only sin left is Pride, which above all the others brings forth the deepest circles of hell and eternal damnation.
Two words, Christopher Sabat.

The only man involved in this who could match Vic for name recognition in the games industry, a man with more wealth and authority than Vic. Envy cannot be this man's sin, only Pride can be. Pride that he knows what is best for the industry and that he will destroy anyone who views as not fitting HIS perfect vision. If he does not purely embody the sin of Pride, no one does.
 
Back