StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I can see a lot of Stonetoss' stuff as being a bit circlejerky but I'll always like this


1564137002616.png

People will say he's a 'Nazi' but remember - they called Hitler a 'Nazi' too.

I liked these too

 
Last edited:
While I can agree with the general motive of a lot of these comics I can't help but feel that they are inspired by a great deal of contempt and smugness. The punchlines are too on the nose and lack any subtlety. Compare Stonetoss to hehesilly from the same edgy niche and you'll get a very different tone to the comics.
 
People didn't get mad about nattycomics/Steve Winchell getting a thread and that was almost literally the same thread as this, just with a different political bent.
really makes you :thinking:
Yeah I have nothing against this page, it's accurate and gives a basic summary of events. And if the critics are right it'll fall to the bottom pages. I'm still a relative newbie to the Farms so who am I to critique but there's a good middle ground between anything goes thread posting and total bureaucratic spergery as seen on old Slashdot.org.

It would only be rather trite if this thread becomes "Let's discuss Racist Shmorky's newest dumb comic." Because lets be real Stonetoss is regugitated /pol/ memes. If he's ever had a "hot take" I've never seen it.
 
Stonetoss can you make a comic that has a punchline, please? Like Im comparing your shit to Watterson and that's unfair because the dude was a legend but this is like if right wing took Garfields premise and just ran with it. It's the "I hate Mondays" of /pol/ comics.
 
Last edited:
I think the real difference between stonetoss and natty comic is that stonetoss doesn't portray autistic power fantasies with his work, its just a very right wing social commentary mixed in with a bit of chan culture, the guy clearly knows his audience well.
 
Last edited:
i guess this is what happens when someone takes a bunch of generic /pol/ shitposts and makes then into four panel comics: some of them end up being mildly funny (at best), but most just fall flat and turn out boring and unfunny.

that said, i don't see much cow potential here. his tweets seem dull and uninteresting, the one that gets closest to being cow material is probably the "looking for white woman in japan, hit me up girls" because it reeks of desperation and delusion, but that's it. no juicy drama, no internet beef with other e-celebs, no autistic rants posted on social media, there's simply not a lot of cow content to laugh at here.
There’s no way he’s an 8.5 IRL.
 
Man people sure are mad in this thread :thinking: Where is the patience? With the way this guy has been shitting out content that is conceptually the same as the last 10 things he posted it's only a matter of time until one of his fans asks him why his stuff is all the same and he starts spewing tard cum.
 
StoneToss is weird because you dont know if he's fucking with you or not. Especially when he's making comics about da Jews. I agree with you guys a lot that he's not funny, but a bigger point that needs to be made is that alot of his comics have confusing punchlines. Look at this one for example:

consent-and-marriage-comic1.png

(Edit: lol, didnt know that this was posted right before my post; spent 5 minutes writing this)

What's the joke supposed to be? Is the implication that this women is about to be fucked over as a single mother? Is the implication that the person she is in bed with is likely to fuck off? Is the husband supposed to be the husband that wouldve stuck by him?

I also dont get his foot fetish comic either. Depending on the extremes, foot could either be one of the lightest or one of the worst, but it's not THE worst. But there are WAY more degenerate fetishes to be had.
 
StoneToss is weird because you dont know if he's fucking with you or not. Especially when he's making comics about da Jews. I agree with you guys a lot that he's not funny, but a bigger point that needs to be made is that alot of his comics have confusing punchlines. Look at this one for example:

View attachment 859987

(Edit: lol, didnt know that this was posted right before my post; spent 5 minutes writing this)

What's the joke supposed to be? Is the implication that this women is about to be fucked over as a single mother? Is the implication that the person she is in bed with is likely to fuck off? Is the husband supposed to be the husband that wouldve stuck by him?

I also dont get his foot fetish comic either. Depending on the extremes, foot could either be one of the lightest or one of the worst, but it's not THE worst. But there are WAY more degenerate fetishes to be had.
I think he's saying that women who are sluts fail to attract men who are willing to settle down because they don't want "used goods"? I always found this one a little strange.
 
I say keep the thread, but it's pretty much guaranteed to die. Posting his shitty, unfunny comics (which he does have quite a few of) and discussing them isn't exactly what I'd consider lolcow content. If he stays relatively unspergy and it does end up being a thread for discussion of his comics, it should probably be moved to the art subforum.
 
Back