- Joined
- Aug 29, 2016
Jon appoints Miriam as his de-facto lawyer, then de-appoints her when member tells him MY should be speaking not him

Cousineau's going to take stress leave after all this shit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jon appoints Miriam as his de-facto lawyer, then de-appoints her when member tells him MY should be speaking not him
Holy shit those tweets what a shitshow-Canada is fucking done, put a fork in it, it's cooked to a crisp. Yaniv belongs in a mental hospital along with crazy Miriam. The only good thing is they've taken themselves out of the gene pool. This is what the troons have planned here in the USA, believe it.Twitter's goinglikeelsie is tweeting out notes from the 7/26 hearing. Highlights; Jonathan asked member to reinstate publication ban for "Jonathan" then deadnames himself in testimony; Jon appoints Miriam as his de-facto lawyer, then de-appoints her when member tells him MY should be speaking not him; tries to get the JY elevator video guy ejected, member refuses.
archive.li is returning a 503 https://twitter.com/goinglikeelsie
Honestly, I genuinely feel like Devyn has had it though. She's going to rule against him and if he wants to take it further, he's going to have to go to a real court. I wonder if any of this was peak trans for her? I don't know how I'm going to wait four months for her ruling tbh.Holy shit those tweets what a shitshow-Canada is fucking done, put a fork in it, it's cooked to a crisp. Yaniv belongs in a mental hospital along with crazy Miriam. The only good thing is they've taken themselves out of the gene pool. This is what the troons have planned here in the USA, believe it.
GoingLikeElsie tweeted about this earlier - Yaniv claims they complained to the mall owners but were told that tenants have the right to "refuse service to trans". This didn't lead to a complaint to the BCHRT, so presumably they settled to prevent Yaniv from making one.It’s very possible there’s more involving the mall: like JY complained to security and they called them a man or some shit and It went from there.
JY requests a publication ban of former first name, Jonathan. JY does not want the name Jonathan in the media. No one should be reporting on JY's former name Jonathan.
Member says not in her power to ban media from using JY's former name Jonathan.
Honestly this sounds like another ESL woman being taken advantage of. She's like, "Jonathan? What? Ok spell that... Hang on... Yeah no sorry we don't wax balls." I don't see where they agreed and then took it back. It sounds like someone was taken aback for a second about wtf was going on before they figured it out and said no. This motherfucker is intentionally obfuscating his intentions with these women so he can claim discrimination when they are rightly confused.Assuming that it's legal to record phone convos in Leafland, Mr. Jonathan just may have an Actual Case here, if they were really willing to wax his balls when he said he was a guy, but not the same balls when he said he was a laydee. If he wins on this, though, (being refused the same service as any other man) it would hardly be "gender affirming," tho.
I wonder why MN didn't send someone to the hearing...
![]()
goinglikeelsie on Twitter: "More on Ivanhoe Cambridge later. JY plays…
archived 28 Jul 2019 00:55:38 UTCarchive.li
Assuming that it's legal to record phone convos in Leafland, Mr. Jonathan just may have an Actual Case here, if they were really willing to wax his balls when he said he was a guy, but not the same balls when he said he was a laydee. If he wins on this, though, (being refused the same service as any other man) it would hardly be "gender affirming," tho.
I wonder why MN didn't send someone to the hearing...
![]()
goinglikeelsie on Twitter: "More on Ivanhoe Cambridge later. JY plays…
archived 28 Jul 2019 00:55:38 UTCarchive.li
It seems like Cousineau actually caught onto that. She asked him why he was recording his FIRST phone interaction with them, before he'd even have known they were bigoted. She's going broke on woke but it seems like she's catching up!It is legal in Canada, and is covered under PIPEDA. Essentially it’s a “one-party consent” rule which means as long as one party is aware of the recording (Yaniv), then they can record a second party (Merle Norman clerk) without their knowledge or consent. And yes, these recordings are permissible as evidence in court. It’s only when a third outside party records a conversation without consent that it is illegal.
And I’m sure Jonathan looked all this shit up before baiting these businesses and the recording them, fucking creep.
The kid pepper-sprayed him in the toilets when she wouldn't join in with the topless swim-fest. /sneed![]()
Did I read this incorrectly, or is Jon actually suing a ten year old kid?![]()
The system is lactose intolerant?Can someone please explain why the system automatically substituted "tard cum" for "thewordmilk" ?
Notice how this fuckwit only started mentioning 'Gender Affirming Care' when Devyn wrote it in that decision?“I believe I’ve won”
Well, you also believe you have a vagina, can have a period and get pregnant so colour me skeptical here potato.
View attachment 862673
Lets not forget Elsie's reminder on this string of tweets:Assuming that it's legal to record phone convos in Leafland, Mr. Jonathan just may have an Actual Case here, if they were really willing to wax his balls when he said he was a guy, but not the same balls when he said he was a laydee. If he wins on this, though, (being refused the same service as any other man) it would hardly be "gender affirming," tho.
I wonder why MN didn't send someone to the hearing...
![]()
goinglikeelsie on Twitter: "More on Ivanhoe Cambridge later. JY plays…
archived 28 Jul 2019 00:55:38 UTCarchive.li
That's why I'm hoping he ends up in a bona fide court one day. No poncing about him ignoring instructions; threats of suicide and digging up of bodies from either wouldn't be entertained; he'd have to back up his claims with evidence; evidence would be there to question him over; momma wouldn't be allowed to act like a crazed loon and so on.Lets not forget Elsie's reminder on this string of tweets:
View attachment 862992
This Muthalicka flip flops between both arguments depending on whichever suits him best that day and shoots himself in the foot fucking constantly