Infected MAP/NOMAP community - "Virtuous Pedophiles" has a prodigy

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
1564593620564.png

1564593648769.png


1564593667349.png

1564593735615.png


1564593781444.png

1564593820108.png

 
Praise the lord and pass the ammo, we're going perv-hunting.

Edit -

For all the NOMAP/MAP fuckheads shown that claim "paedophilia is a sexual orientation!", they can fuck directly off, because the AGE of a child is not "a sex", and sexuality is "attraction to a sex", not "attraction to a characteristic", which is best described as a paraphilia.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who thinks these guys are pedophiles is wrong. They are ephebophiles.
A pedophile is attracted to children. Meaning pre-puberty. Ephebophiles are attracted to adolescents or teenagers. Which is natural in males. Women are at the healthiest age for pregnancy between the ages of 12ish to 18ish. Our body wants a mate who will make the healthiest children possible. Sex is always about reproduction whether you want a child or not. Why do women shave all their hair off (except for the hair on their head) and wear make up? So they can look young and healthy. They want to disguise themselves as a female in peak reproductive health. This show is a bunch of shit! It's nothing more than the exploitation of male sexuality. These guys don't want to have sex with a child, They want to have sex with a fully ripe 12 year old woman!
If this was a dailymail comment section it would have worked. Nice execution, obvious gimmick. 6/10
 
I remember when news about these fucks started appearing on Twitter. People claimed they were starting to become more common on the site, though they probably were already there and no one had paid attention until fairly recently. Still, I can't fathom how anyone would think shit like accepting the act of fucking children is remotely ok, but if anything, at least we got threads like these to laugh at them.

Also if I recall correctly, I remember a point in time when many of those MAPs/NOMAPs associated with the clown emoji, which is fitting for how much they make fools of themselves.
 
I remember when news about these fucks started appearing on Twitter. People claimed they were starting to become more common on the site, though they probably were already there and no one had paid attention until fairly recently. Still, I can't fathom how anyone would think shit like accepting the act of fucking children is remotely ok, but if anything, at least we got threads like these to laugh at them.

Also if I recall correctly, I remember a point in time when many of those MAPs/NOMAPs associated with the clown emoji, which is fitting for how much they make fools of themselves.
What were they going for with the clown emoji? It just struck me, because that library drag queen story hour in Portland where the kids ended up crawling all over the "queen," he was actually a self-described "drag clown."
 
View attachment 868825

Daycare teacher: “Today, we are going to learn what a rimjob is”
View attachment 868822

That organisation got banned from PayPal recently:
peds1.png
peds2.png

http://archive.fo/K8LaC

Their "official response": https://prostasia.org/blog/paypal-fails-to-shut-down-prostasia/ (archive)
Some quotes:
"These bans have affected sex educators, writers, artists, and YouTubers—especially women and sexual minorities. But this is the first time that these opaque policies have been applied against a child sexual abuse prevention organization."
"it is trying to censor us from doing so by cutting off the donations that support our work"
"Under the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, corporations have a responsibility to respect human rights, and the express purpose of #SexContentDialogue was to collaboratively develop a set of principles for how they can be more mindful about how they execute this responsibility when dealing with sexual content online."

So they see themselves as having their UN-recognised human rights infringed upon and censored, akin to sexism and racism. The fact that a bunch of pedos were RTing and crying over this ban was enough to make me suspicious of the organisation. It takes a lot of wading through their website to figure out what exactly they stand for as they don't really come out and say it, which itself is suspect – most charities are pretty clear about what they do. It's couched in 'reasonable' and 'pro-science' language without saying anything till you're deep into the text.

Here's where they really get into their stance: https://prostasia.org/blog/child-sexual-abuse-prevention-isnt-a-soft-option/ (archive):
One of the least problematic social groups at whom secondary measures can be targeted — because they are not a protected class, and already face significant social stigma — are those who are sexually attracted to minors, such as pedophiles. Targeting pedophiles is by no means a perfect way to reach potential offenders, because a large majority of all sexual offending against children is committed by those who aren’t pedophiles.
[...]
if the right of a child to not be sexually abused is worth anything at all, it has to outweigh our disgust at having to work with pedophiles to help them avoid offending [...] How can they be helped to do so? Does peer support play a role? How about the availability of legal outlets for their sexual fantasies? These are questions that science can answer, which will have important implications for child protection law and practice.

So what this org really seems to be about is advocating for the rights of pedophiles and sympathy for them, providing them with access to 'legal child porn', campaigning against legal restrictions intended to stop the spread of CP and child trafficking, and telling the public that most sexual assaults on children aren't committed by pedophiles (!), all under the guise of concern for the right of a child not to be abused and with the air of progressiveness by calling it "sex-positive".

Well at least PayPal is an org that actually is about stopping child abuse!

What were they going for with the clown emoji?

Maybe because some people think they're fine to have around children but kids are fucking terrified of them.
 
All these MAP/NOMAP people just sound and look extra exceptional.
Pedophile activism always has been a bin for the most exceptional of the most exceptional. Most pedos are either not interested in this sort of activism, or are smart enough to realize it will go no where, and only puts a big red target on them. People have it in their head that most pedos are card carrying NAMBLA members, when even at NAMBLA's height they probably had a few thousand members at most. Your average pedo is going to be on some darkweb forum, trading CP, while keeping as low a profile as possible.

The pedos who do try public activism and their allies are what happens if you pour a big bucket of distilled autism into lefty politics, taking their logic and reasoning to absurd ends, often with the shear purpose of being he edgiest communist at the party meeting.

I would also like to add how exceptional this new crop of pedo activism is, since a lot of it hinges on being "non-contact" yet they want to make it into some sort of identity with with total acceptance for something they claim to have sworn off. Its like they want an award for something they are not doing. The Tumblr origin is really showing.
 
Last edited:

We need more information on pedophile Joshua A Casey. Confirming the widely known fact that pedophiles have low IQs, he believes a child sex doll is a `thought`.

,`morality is based on harm` - what? How can someone know so little about his own vile hobby-horse?


Edited to add - the top article on his website is titled, How to Protect yourself online. Like publicly outing yourself as a chomo, perhaps? He calls himself a CSA advocate, which is literally true, I suppose.
 
Last edited:
We need more information on pedophile Joshua A Casey. Confirming the widely known fact that pedophiles have low IQs, he believes a child sex doll is a `thought`.

,`morality is based on harm` - what? How can someone know so little about his own vile hobby-horse?


Edited to add - the top article on his website is titled, How to Protect yourself online. Like publicly outing yourself as a chomo, perhaps? He calls himself a CSA advocate, which is literally true, I suppose.
After faildoxing him I did a lot more intensive search into his online history, I feel like I have a pretty good grasp on his persona (he used to be quite normal actually), and can attempt a write up and put it in proving grounds if anyone is interested.
 
Back