8chan Is a Megaphone for Shooters. ‘Shut the Site Down,’ Says Its Creator.

Status
Not open for further replies.
8chan Is a Megaphone for Shooters. ‘Shut the Site Down,’ Says Its Creator.
August 4, 2019

in News
242 12
8chan-Is-a-Megaphone-for-Shooters.-%E2%80%98Shut-the-Site-Down%E2%80%99-750x375.jpg

495
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Fredrick Brennan was getting ready for church at his home in the Philippines when the news of a mass shooting in El Paso arrived. His response was immediate and instinctive.
“Whenever I hear about a mass shooting, I say, ‘All right, we have to research if there’s an 8chan connection,’” he said.

Mr. Brennan started the online message board 8chan in 2013, as a spinoff of 4chan, the better-known message board. In its early years, the site was known as an unmoderated free-for-all site populated by anonymous posters, where shocking and offensive humor reigned.
Now, 8chan is known as something else: a megaphone for mass shooters, and a recruiting platform for violent white nationalists. And Mr. Brennan, who stopped working with the site’s current owner last year, is calling for it to be taken offline before it leads to further violence.
“Shut the site down,” Mr. Brennan said in an interview on Sunday. “It’s not doing the world any good. It’s a complete negative to everybody except the users that are there. And you know what? It’s a negative to them, too. They just don’t realize it.”
So far this year, three mass shootings — El Paso, the mosque killings in Christchurch, New Zealand, and the synagogue shooting in Poway, Calif. — have been announced in advance on 8chan, often accompanied by racist writings that seem engineered to go viral on the internet.
Moments before the El Paso shooting on Saturday, a four-page message whose author identified himself as the suspected shooter appeared on 8chan’s politics board, known as /pol/. The person who posted the message encouraged his 8chan “brothers” to spread its contents far and wide.
Given its repeated involvement in mass shootings, 8chan has become a focal point for those seeking to disrupt the pathways of online extremism.
“8chan is almost like a bulletin board where the worst offenders go to share their terrible ideas,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League. “It’s become a sounding board where people share ideas, and where these kinds of ideologies are amplified and expanded on, and ultimately, people are radicalized as a result.”
8chan has been run out of the Philippines by Jim Watkins, a United States Army veteran, since 2015, when Mr. Brennan gave up control of the site.
The site remains nearly completely unmoderated, and its commitment to keeping up even the most violent speech has made it a venue for extremists to test out ideas, share violent literature and cheer on the perpetrators of mass killings. Users on 8chan frequently lionize mass shooters using jokey internet vernacular, referring to their body counts as “high scores” and creating memes praising the killers.
Mr. Brennan, who has a condition known as brittle-bone disease and uses a wheelchair, has tried to distance himself from 8chan and its current owners. In a March interview with The Wall Street Journal, he expressed his regrets over his role in the site’s creation, and warned that the violent culture that had taken root on 8chan’s boards could lead to more mass shootings.
After the El Paso shooting, he seemed resigned to the fact that it had.
“Another 8chan shooting?” he tweeted on Saturday. “Am I ever going to be able to move on with my life?”
Mr. Watkins, who runs 8chan along with his son, Ronald, has remained defiant in the face of criticism, and has resisted calls to moderate or shut down the site. On Sunday, a banner at the top of 8chan’s home page read, “Welcome to 8chan, the Darkest Reaches of the Internet.”
“I’ve tried to understand so many times why he keeps it going, and I just don’t get it,” Mr. Brennan said. “After Christchurch, after the Tree of Life shooting, and now after this shooting, they think this is all really funny.”
Mr. Watkins did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
In the early days of 8chan, Mr. Brennan defended the right of 8chan users to post anonymously, without censorship. And he dismissed incidents of harassment or violence by users of the site as the price of being an open forum.
“Anonymity should not be taken away from everyone just because of a few bad apples,” he told Ars Technica, the technology website, in a 2015 interview.
But more recently, Mr. Brennan, who has begun attending a Baptist church, has tried to persuade Mr. Watkins to shut down the site. He and Mr. Watkins live near each other in the Philippines, he said, and he often drives past Mr. Watkins’s house on his way to church.
Mr. Brennan said that other websites, like Facebook and Twitter, also play a role in spreading the kinds of violent messages that often originate on 8chan. But he said that those sites have been more proactive about removing dangerous content, making them less appealing venues for a would-be terrorist.
“Shutting it down, having these chan sites pushed underground, it wouldn’t totally stop these kinds of things from happening,” he said. “But it wouldn’t happen every few months.”
Mr. Brennan said he doubted that Mr. Watkins makes money from 8chan, since it is free to use and costly to maintain, and since its toxic content has made it radioactive to advertisers. (In a 2017 interview, Mr. Watkins said of running 8chan, “It doesn’t make money, but it’s a lot of fun.”) And Mr. Brennan is hopeful that sustained pressure on Mr. Watkins and his son will get them to change their minds eventually, and take down 8chan for good.
“How long are they just going to allow this to go on?” he asked.
The post 8chan Is a Megaphone for Shooters. ‘Shut the Site Down,’ Says Its Creator. appeared first on New York Times.
 
This is my statement:

1. I obviously understand shutting down 8chan won't stop mass shootings, however:

It would however push message boards full of users who incite violence underground, making them harder for non-tech savvy people to access and set up. The problems are obviously structural and societal, but it would be a somewhat effective band-aid.

2. The journalist I spoke with somewhat conflated /pol/ with 8chan in general.

As I wrote on Twitter, if I were 8chan's admin I would restore order, and make terrorists not want to host their manifestos there, by shutting down /pol/ for a week to a month. Yes it's the largest board on the site but 8chan doesn't make a profit so it really, really doesn't matter. They'll go to other sites, no other site will be willing to run at a loss, if they get popular enough they'll fold, then they'll come back to 8chan.

3. @Null would never tolerate having a neo-Nazi subforum full of users who encourage more shootings and which hosts their manifestos.

It's simply bad for any website to do so. It makes a lot of people hate you for no gain to be the first place shooter's manifestos are posted to. Not deleting direct incitements to violence is a good way to get every webhost and ISP to hate you. Even CloudFlare is thinking about shutting down 8chan, CloudFlare.

Note that there's a difference between this and hosting manifestos originally posted elsewhere for the news value.

I'm happy to answer any other questions. I expect many "autistic" tags from people who never ran an imageboard and don't understand how shitty Jim is being. If this keeps happening laws might even change in the US. Those laws might be so broad even Kiwifarms won't be able to operate. Just saying.
 
Do people realise sooner or later next time another mass shooting or some terrorist attack by some white guy happens, journos are gonna target this forum that it breeds white supremacy? It doesn't matter whether this forum remains to be quite neutral and content on laughing at the lolcows. This forum gained some visibility when the New Zealand shooting happened.
 
This is my statement:

1. I obviously understand shutting down 8chan won't stop mass shootings, however:

It would however push message boards full of users who incite violence underground, making them harder for non-tech savvy people to access and set up. The problems are obviously structural and societal, but it would be a somewhat effective band-aid.

2. The journalist I spoke with somewhat conflated /pol/ with 8chan in general.

As I wrote on Twitter, if I were 8chan's admin I would restore order, and make terrorists not want to host their manifestos there, by shutting down /pol/ for a week to a month. Yes it's the largest board on the site but 8chan doesn't make a profit so it really, really doesn't matter. They'll go to other sites, no other site will be willing to run at a loss, if they get popular enough they'll fold, then they'll come back to 8chan.

3. @Null would never tolerate having a neo-Nazi subforum full of users who encourage more shootings and which hosts their manifestos.

It's simply bad for any website to do so. It makes a lot of people hate you for no gain to be the first place shooter's manifestos are posted to. Not deleting direct incitements to violence is a good way to get every webhost and ISP to hate you. Even CloudFlare is thinking about shutting down 8chan, CloudFlare.

Note that there's a difference between this and hosting manifestos originally posted elsewhere for the news value.

I'm happy to answer any other questions. I expect many "autistic" tags from people who never ran an imageboard and don't understand how shitty Jim is being. If this keeps happening laws might even change in the US. Those laws might be so broad even Kiwifarms won't be able to operate. Just saying.

I am sure this probably has been documented elsewhere or even here, but what exactly happened between you and Jim?
 
Now, 8chan is known as something else: a megaphone for mass shooters, and a recruiting platform for violent white nationalists. And Mr. Brennan, who stopped working with the site’s current owner last year, is calling for it to be taken offline before it leads to further violence.

My problem with this is that if it weren't 8chan today, it would've been 4chan tomorrow, or literally anywhere else you can paste a manifesto. LiveJournal, Blogger, WordPress, Facebook, anywhere that you can write text on page and have it seen by the public is a possible avenue for a shooter to post their crap. 8chan is the go-to because it's one of the most famous and one of the least difficult to use, so someone is guaranteed to see it. So if we knocked down 8chan over a spree shooter, we'd have to knock down every website where one makes an appearance until there's nothing left for anyone else. I'm not even sure why Hotwheels cares at this point. He sold the site, he's already washed his hands of it, so it's literally not his problem.

The site remains nearly completely unmoderated, and its commitment to keeping up even the most violent speech has made it a venue for extremists to test out ideas, share violent literature and cheer on the perpetrators of mass killings. Users on 8chan frequently lionize mass shooters using jokey internet vernacular, referring to their body counts as “high scores” and creating memes praising the killers.

I don't know if things have changed, but back in the 2000s, if you called a shooter's body count a high score, it meant you were making fun of them and calling them a retard, in part referencing the moral panic of vidya games following the Columbine shooting. When did people start using it as a term of endearment?
 
Last edited:
Do people realise sooner or later next time another mass shooting or some terrorist attack by some white guy happens, journos are gonna target this forum that it breeds white supremacy? It doesn't matter whether this forum remains to be quite neutral and content on laughing at the lolcows. This forum gained some visibility when the New Zealand shooting happened.

Of course we realise. We've had shooters and wannabes join here and our name quite often gets referenced in the "alt right domestic terrorism" discussion.
 
Did Jim screw you in some manner during the process of selling 8ch to him?

There are shades of grey. Clearly I meant to give 8chan to him and to have no more rights to it. I have no case in any court of law or even a court of public opinion as regards that.

At the same time, his chaotic and terrible administration has caused the media to intrude on my life several times. All I want to do is have a normal life as a freelancer when I need money and the rest of the time make my fonts in peace. If I had known how badly he'd manage things I may have chose to shut it down rather than give it to him.
 
My problem with this is that if it weren't 8chan today, it would've been 4chan tomorrow, or literally anywhere else you can paste a manifesto. LiveJournal, Blogger, WordPress, Facebook, anywhere that you can write text on page and have it seen by the public is a possible avenue for a shooter to post their crap. 8chan is the go-to because it's one of the most famous and one of the least difficult to use, so someone is guaranteed to see it. So if we knocked down 8chan over a spree shooter, we'd have to knock down every website where one makes an appearance until there's nothing left for anyone else. I'm not even sure why Hotwheels cares at this point. He sold the site, he's already washed his hands of it, so it's literally not his problem.

I don't think so. The reason people choose 8chan is they know that there's a community there, similar to the community here but made up of neo-Nazis, white nationalists, etc, who will archive any manifesto posted in case it makes it to the news. Posting it on a random FB profile or blog means it might get erased. Not every manifesto written has gotten out because of this.

Since this is a lolcow monitoring forum you guys know that people fail to archive things all the time.
 
2. The journalist I spoke with somewhat conflated /pol/ with 8chan in general.

As I wrote on Twitter, if I were 8chan's admin I would restore order, and make terrorists not want to host their manifestos there, by shutting down /pol/ for a week to a month. Yes it's the largest board on the site but 8chan doesn't make a profit so it really, really doesn't matter. They'll go to other sites, no other site will be willing to run at a loss, if they get popular enough they'll fold, then they'll come back to 8chan.
i mostly agree with this. i'm not for shutting down 8chan altogether for free speech reasons but there's no way 8pol can stay up as it is. honestly speaking how much of a lost would taking down 8pol be? when a good portion of its users now are either full on accelerationists spergs or literal feds, why would 'normal' pol users want to stay on what's basically a honeypot for catching white nationalists now. not really a question to you but in general maybe i'm out of the loop, but is there a reason that 'moderate' 8pol users wouldn't be able to post on 4pol without getting banned; i was thinking it's not like 4chan is going anywhere, anyone not a sperge could just migrate back.
 
I don't think so. The reason people choose 8chan is they know that there's a community there, similar to the community here but made up of neo-Nazis, white nationalists, etc, who will archive any manifesto posted in case it makes it to the news. Posting it on a random FB profile or blog means it might get erased. Not every manifesto written has gotten out because of this.

Since this is a lolcow monitoring forum you guys know that people fail to archive things all the time.

People really want to tether you to some idea you had when you were like 18-19. 8chan /pol/ had a chance to clean up there shit for YEARS, same for Ron and Jim. I'm not saying moderate shit that makes you uncomfortable, but don't be a radicalization center for atomized individuals to get adulation, training, and tips to commit mass murder.
 
2. The journalist I spoke with somewhat conflated /pol/ with 8chan in general.
yeah, and you gave them credibility instead of letting them look like another uninformed reactionary, and the point you were trying to make got misrepresented ANYWAY, so what good did it do?

what did you think was going to happen?
 
Well I honestly would not be surprised if 8chan eventually does close its doors for good sooner or later unless there are changes regarding with how the website is run in all.

Now the big problem with 8chan in itself is really how little moderation there is anyway. Now I'm all for free speech on the Internet but even then many websites still have reasonable moderation for the most part to make sure that there is some order on said platform and not have their users do really dumb stuff on their platforms (like Kiwi Farms) and the problem with places like that of 8chan is really the way that the website is moderated and they hardly keep their own speds in check.

If a place like ResetEra is one extreme where the moderation is far too strict to the point where you can't have any fun on that forum then 8chan is the other extreme on the opposite side of the spectrum where it's almost total anarchy and the people that moderate 8chan just hardly give a shit and not really care what their own crazies do on their platform until tragedies happen than involve 8chan in all.

So overall, it's either 8chan has to start keeping their own speds in check or they have to close their doors for good because they can't continue to still allow morons to LARP as the main character from The Turner Diaries and shit.

This post = "common sense gun control."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back