Disaster Jeffery Epstein has comitted suicide - Matt Groening got him

1565442580806.png

Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein is dead, law enforcement sources said Saturday.

A gurney carrying a man who looked like Epstein was wheeled out of the Manhattan Correctional Center around 7:30 a.m. The ambulance went to New York Downtown Hospital.
 
Wait. What? So if he does what he does in the us as opposed to the us, one makes him a pedo and one not?
Yeah it's weird because the law in the UK stipulates that basically any kind of sex is legal when you're 16. While most US states have their consent at 17 or 18. Even if we assume Prince Andrew "gained her consent", he would still be committed a sexual offence even if she was 17 (some sources say 16) because the federal age of consent in the US is 18. This applies because she was most likely trafficked in from outside New York (that would make it a federal crime).
 

What, with the toddler? Dude, come on... they're small enough that you can run them through a meat grinder in about an hour and then just toss them out like regular spoiled food, and no one's the wiser. You gotta stop being careless.

Oh, the robbery?

It's suspicious. It's not impossible, it's just a deviation from a trend that involves a degree of other factors.

Had it been just some dude, it wouldn't be that weird. Had people been robbed and shot to death there before, no biggie. Had the guy's shit actually been stolen or his pockets rifled through at least, it'd be pretty mundane.

One deviation from a trend is expected. Two deviations warrants scrutiny. Three, and you can bet it's something else entirely and there's more to it.
 
Yeah it's weird because the law in the UK stipulates that basically any kind of sex is legal when you're 16. While most US states have their consent at 17 or 18. Even if we assume Prince Andrew "gained her consent", he would still be committed a sexual offence. Even if she was 17 (some sources say 16), the federal age of consent in the US is 18. This applies because she was most likely trafficked in from outside New York.

I know ill get shit on, but 17 is generally not what id consider pedo. Most of us were sexually active at 17. Im just saying, sure he broke laws, but like the word nazi just throwing pedo around makes it lose the real vileness of men who fuck children
 
I know ill get shit on, but 17 is generally not what id consider pedo. Most of us were sexually active at 17. Im just saying, sure he broke laws, but like the word nazi just throwing pedo around makes it lose the real vileness of men who fuck children
The point is that Prince Andrew groping and having sex with a trafficked 17 year old would be a federal crime. So even if you think that "17 is old enough", the federal age of consent is still 18. So under those pretenses you would be prosecuted for having sex/groping a minor.
That's ignoring the child prostitution shit which negates consent laws. Because 17 is still considered legally a child in basically every country ever.
In this case the word "pedo" isn't being thrown around enough.
 
Last edited:
why can't I find the picture of him being given oxygen that was in the thread? was it removed?
I removed it because I'm an idiot who didn't know that's standard operating procedure, so the assumption I was making would have done nothing but fuel conspiracy-mongering. It's still over here if you want it, though.
 
What, with the toddler? Dude, come on... they're small enough that you can run them through a meat grinder in about an hour and then just toss them out like regular spoiled food, and no one's the wiser. You gotta stop being careless.

Oh, the robbery?

It's suspicious. It's not impossible, it's just a deviation from a trend that involves a degree of other factors.

Had it been just some dude, it wouldn't be that weird. Had people been robbed and shot to death there before, no biggie. Had the guy's shit actually been stolen or his pockets rifled through at least, it'd be pretty mundane.

One deviation from a trend is expected. Two deviations warrants scrutiny. Three, and you can bet it's something else entirely and there's more to it.
To make my sarcasm as obvious as possible without resorting to reddit tier shit. The other interesting thing is that Rich was covered in scrapes and bruises. Someone took the the time to rough him up, shoot him in the back, but didn't take anything and police suspect that it was hardened criminals with a string of armed robberies in their wake. I never delved into him being the DNC leaker conspiracy, but people saying his death isn't suspicious are being disingenuous. It was odd to say the least.

You know what would be really interesting that I never see anyone bring up? What if the killers did take something? Something they were told he was carrying or had previously taken? Something police or his parents wouldn't know he had. What if he wasn't a leak, but he was going to be one?
 
Back