Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

AnOminous said:
This kind of lunacy from that disgusting little pale, flabby, white as tard cum marshmallow man will help undercut his credibility. He hurls these deranged libels at anyone he gets angry at, and being a pussified little mass of hypersensitivity, that's more or less anyone who doesn't slavishly worship him.
Click to expand...

It’s sure as shit gonna be oh so helpful to Waid’s affirmative defenses once he gets to trial. It rather undercuts any claims of “truth” or “in the public interest” when the Plaintiff has him calling a black guy a White Supremacist, and quite literally calling on his fans to publicly dogpile said Black “White supremecist”. What is the standard again? Reckless Disregard for the Truth?

And you see the same lunacy with KV. Not to mention the law twitter fools. Doucette feels like a disbarment hearing waiting to happen.

Rondo Richter Belmont said:
Late and gay, but not sure if anyone saw this post I saw on my Twitter feed.

So Comic book.com did some articles on Sabat's pitch for a DB spin-off, and some user quoted their post with something along the lines of Sabat being a predator who lured underage girls to his room? Like how Kevin the Troontarian accused Vic of doing.

Now that should be taken with a grain of salt (Maybe a whole ocean), but has anything involving that with Sabat popped up? Besides his implications of getting upcoming talent blacklisted if they don't give him head as implied by Nick.

I'll have to find the tweet, if I don't crash from lack of sleep.
Click to expand...

We’re not entirely sure yet. Nick has been dropping hints that there is something possibly involving Sabat being banned from cons for inappropriate sexual shenanigans out there, but we have no solid reports or claims yet.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, BlehFail.451, Riceprice and 12 others
RodgerDodger said:
It’s sure as shit gonna be oh so helpful to Waid’s affirmative defenses once he gets to trial. It rather undercuts any claims of “truth” or “in the public interest” when the Plaintiff has him calling a black guy a White Supremacist, and quite literally calling on his fans to publicly dogpile said Black “White supremecist”. What is the standard again? Reckless Disregard for the Truth?

And you see the same lunacy with KV. Not to mention the law twitter fools. Doucette feels like a disbarment hearing waiting to happen.
Click to expand...
As I say often, thats because it's the same people. Mark Zaid, Waid's attorney, is...a "Superlawyer" so there's one overlap. Renfamous and her crew of lobotomites is yet another. And thats just the public view. Go behind the scenes and you'll find a lot more. They are no different in operation than every other collection of left wing culture warriors because ...same people.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Chudbacca, Botchy Galoop, GenericReviewerDraco and 1 other person
1565489988644.png


someone wanna explain how this guy came to this logic?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, P5Fever, Coach Kreeton Of All That and 15 others
BigRuler said:
it's honestly scary how fast this has changed

just 5 years ago the common female reaction to seeing a hoverhand was "ugh what a creep" and the male reaction was "lmao beta virgin"
now the male reaction is "smart move" and the female reaction is... i dont know, probably smug self-satisfaction at seeing how afraid the guy is of her? i have no idea honstly
Click to expand...

Probably insulted. If you touch them it's sexual harassment. If you don't you're too good for them.

There isn't any winning.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Agree
Reactions: Lone MacReady, GenericReviewerDraco and ManateeHunter
DarkKirby14 said:
View attachment 885073

someone wanna explain how this guy came to this logic?
Click to expand...

I mean, technically he's not wrong. There are defenses of defamation that don't require proof of anything. Unfortunately, "we're telling the truth" is one of the ones that does require proof.

Well, that's not 100% true. It doesn't require proof, but you're gonna lose if you don't have it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: ConSluttant, Seraphic_Vishnal and ColtWalker1847
Immaculate Ape said:
I absolutely condone him hoverhanding women. Here stands a man who had consent from every single female he hugged and/or kissed and had several of those snakes accuse him of raping them.

If women are sad that he doesn't want to touch them anymore, then they should take it out on the fucking pukes that abused their social privilege and attempted to kill a man.

Weaponizing sex/gender is something that should not only be shamed, but dragged out in the middle of the street and publicly stoned to death.


Edit: Also, Cody Baier

View attachment 884402
Click to expand...
Ha, is he wearing a shirt for his furry comic?
 
these KV people are so dead set that the TPCAs will get through. I'm starting to have my own doubts because there are so many of them and they all keep saying it, and trying to cite laws as to why it will happen. Bloody hell, these people
 
theworstkindofeurofag said:
Looks like Vic is pulling a Keanu Reeves and is doing the hoverhand now (:_(

View attachment 884343

archive.fo

Twitter

archived 10 Aug 2019 18:44:18 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

View attachment 884346

archive.fo

Twitter

archived 10 Aug 2019 18:48:21 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

Seems to still put his arm around men. Lots of pics like this.

View attachment 884350

archive.fo

Twitter

archived 10 Aug 2019 18:50:41 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

Here's a picture of him huggig a girl. Looks uncomfortable tho. Like he's pulling away.

View attachment 884352

archive.fo

Twitter

archived 10 Aug 2019 18:52:53 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

Someone please tell Vic the best thing he can do is to hug his female fans like before. There was never anything wrong with it. Him refusing to do it now is him admitting that there is something wrong with it.

(:_(

Here is another one from a facebook group.

View attachment 884358

Can't archive, since the group is closed.
Click to expand...
Admittedly, this is pretty fucking funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chudbacca
It's worth remembering that these people don't seem actually believe it is possible to defame people online, and they shift their perception law to fit this belief.

Because the only defamation they have ever dealt with is crazy people mad that they got made fun of on the internet.

The people that typically are actually damaged don't have the money to respond (as this phenomena is a fairly recent one by most accounts), or the lack of concern with going in to crippling debt pursuing legal action which crazy people tend to possess. We're in mostly uncharted territory with Vic because he has the monetary resources, we definitely have actionable damages, and we have a papertrail, but how will the court view things? We just don't know yet.

But we know how Oberlin turned out. It didn't go well and the legal world was just SOOOOO SURE that there was no case to be had.

Also getting stuck on the defamation is what they want you to do because of the causes of action it is the weaker one. Not that it is necessarily a weak claim given what we know, but given the standards for TI in Texas, the TI is about as close to a slam dunk as you can get and the defamation is distinctly less so. So, still strong, but it's definitely in the "it's an argument" category. So keep coming back to the TI, as that's where the most damning proof resides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exterminatus, ManateeHunter, Francis York Morgan and 4 others
An impressive turnout for a meet-up off-site from the con with the location shell game in play. Pretty sure the con organizers are scratching their asses right now as to why they listened to a bunch of idiots on Twitter telling them how to run their event (and yet furthering the argument for TI). The usual suspect costhots have to absolutely ass-blasted with this result, and if they're not, expect them to screech like fucking banshees.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: OHenri41412, Exterminatus, ManateeHunter and 4 others
DynamiteNinja said:
NOT ANOTHER FUCKING VA WHOSE VOICE I LIKE GODDAMNIT :mad:
Click to expand...
Wow, holy fuck this industry is Incestuous as Fuck, Karbowski down now. This Vic lawsuit is outing a Disproportionate number of either WOKE assholes or slimy cowards. The western licensing industry is becoming more and more WOKE by the year. Now that the defendants have EMBARRASSED themselves, their credibility, their company, and their case, I wager certain mongoloids are jumping on the train with Rial, Marchi and the Funki-bunch in a increasingly desperate bid to secure their financial futures. Funimation has to be hurting from the loss of subs and bad press, I think some like Karbowski (fucking Hernandez now ew) see the blood. In fact, Karbowski herself made that vid (#BeThere or some gay shit) with that old putz months ago to try and "calm people down" so no one's pocket books would be effected. The industry is beyond saving, and I will only be importing from Japan from now on. The animators and creators there need your money, not these US Snakes who are editing dubs to propagandize your fellow countrymen with globohomo.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: 3 Cucks None The Richer, Exterminatus, The Decimator and 11 others
HarblMcDavid said:
It's worth remembering that these people don't seem actually believe it is possible to defame people online, and they shift their perception law to fit this belief.

Because the only defamation they have ever dealt with is crazy people mad that they got made fun of on the internet.

The people that typically are actually damaged don't have the money to respond (as this phenomena is a fairly recent one by most accounts), or the lack of concern with going in to crippling debt pursuing legal action which crazy people tend to possess. We're in mostly uncharted territory with Vic because he has the monetary resources, we definitely have actionable damages, and we have a papertrail, but how will the court view things? We just don't know yet.

But we know how Oberlin turned out. It didn't go well and the legal world was just SOOOOO SURE that there was no case to be had.

Also getting stuck on the defamation is what they want you to do because of the causes of action it is the weaker one. Not that it is necessarily a weak claim given what we know, but given the standards for TI in Texas, the TI is about as close to a slam dunk as you can get and the defamation is distinctly less so. So, still strong, but it's definitely in the "it's an argument" category. So keep coming back to the TI, as that's where the most damning proof resides.
Click to expand...
I think the Defamation is the most interest because it's more or less going to rule if Vic was lied about or not to the best possible knowledge to an impartial third party. This exonerates Vic's reputation to a degree and gives him something to pull out to defend himself if the accusations come up. The TI is something that could be won if the claims were true or false, so they don't have that same relevance. But its his best chance to recoup financially which should also be his concern.

--------------------------------

Unfortunately society has been slow to respond to address this mobbing nonsense. Usually the sequence is punitive consumer behavior, followed by civil actions, then glacially behind civil will be criminal. Since there are no alternatives to Twitter that still grant you access to people on Twitter, there will be no consumer reaction. And twitter doesn't feel compelled to do so. Rage clicks for one, the twitter mob makes twitter relevant is the other. Civil actions will help establish public norms but its an option that escapes most due to cost and time. Criminal action will eventually come.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 Cucks None The Richer, Exterminatus, Francis York Morgan and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back