Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're a pedophile. That is what you are. If you want to argue semantics; you may not be a pedophile if you haven't actually committed the deed, so at worst you are a pedophile sympathizer.
Your train of thought seems to be on par with that of a Holocaust denier. If one bit of our argument seems out of line or hypocritical, the entire logic behind, "You should not have sex with children", falls apart for you. There isn't a single fact, document or study that says you shouldn't have sex with children, there are millions. While you say if there is one fact/document/study that says it's okay to have sex with kids, that's all you need.
This is not how logic works.
Show me one such document then. Since there are so many.
And be aware, logic and "a study said so, so it's true" are not the same thing. Studies can be conducted badly. Scientists admit this.
Show me one such document then. Since there are so many.
And be aware, logic and "a study said so, so it's true" are not the same thing. Studies can be conducted badly. Scientists admit this.
Show me one such document then. Since there are so many.
And be aware, logic and "a study said so, so it's true" are not the same thing. Studies can be conducted badly. Scientists admit this.
Show me one such document then. Since there are so many.
Show me one such document then. Since there are so many.
And be aware, logic and "a study said so, so it's true" are not the same thing. Studies can be conducted badly. Scientists admit this.
Ok, how is your childfucking logic any better then? Like you have a bunch of studies saying fucking kids is great and doesn't hurt them at all and those studies are all somehow more rigorous than the large body of psychological research saying otherwise? Your "oh the problems could be from regular abuse and sex has nothing to do with it!" falls apart when there are also plenty of studies on the effects of physical abuse that doesn't include sexual abuse, and while physical abuse certainly creates longterm issues from what I've seen it's not nearly on the magnitude of what childhood sexual abuse causes. Heck, I even know a girl who entered into a sexual relationship with her father as a preteen in arguably the most consensual way that's possible and she still readily admits he took advantage of her and it has directly resulted in a lack of trust, depression and hypersexuality. BTW I have a BS in Psychology, who gave you your degree, NAMBLA?Show me one such document then. Since there are so many.
And be aware, logic and "a study said so, so it's true" are not the same thing. Studies can be conducted badly. Scientists admit this.
Show me one such document then. Since there are so many.
And be aware, logic and "a study said so, so it's true" are not the same thing. Studies can be conducted badly. Scientists admit this.
Jesus christ you sound like an anti-vaxxer
Can we get a new thread name? This may have started with dogmongling but I think we found who the real lolcow of this thread is, and that's Holden 2.0 here.
you have no idea what you're talking about. scientific studies have little to do with it when there are victims to tell you how wrong you are, including me. Stop deluding yourself. You are gross.Show me one such document then. Since there are so many.
And be aware, logic and "a study said so, so it's true" are not the same thing. Studies can be conducted badly. Scientists admit this.
Rainn said:While each individual’s experiences and reactions are unique, there are some responses to child sexual abuse that are common to many survivors:
Victims of Crime said:Some victims may appear to be free of the above symptoms (page 16![]()
Professor Bessel van Der Kolk, Harvard Medical School conducted a five year study of 528 trauma patients from American hospitals. This study identified a range of symptoms that correlated well with prolonged severe childhood sexual abuse:
Counseling.org said:While the nature and severity of the sexual act may cause more serious impact, many other factors may influence the degree of damage the victim experiences. Other factors may include the perspective of the individual, the individual’s internal resources, and the individual’s level of support (Courtois, 1988, as cited in Ratican)
The four traumagenic dynamics do not apply solely to the abuse event. They are ongoing processes that have a history prior to and a future subsequent to the abuse. They can be assessed in each phase. In the pre-abuse phase, the traumagenic dynamics need to be understood particularly in relation to a child’s family life and personality characteristics prior to the abuse. For example, a child who was a previous victim of physical or emotional abuse may have already been suffering from a disempowering dynamic before the abuse occurred. However, an eldest child with important responsibilities, living in a fairly healthy family environment, may have acquired a well developed sense of personal efficacy and powerfulness. In such a context, the disempowering aspects of a sexual abuse experience may have only a minor or transient effect. If the child had experienced an unstable family configuration, in which the loyalty of significant others was in doubt, then the dynamic of betrayal may have already been strongly potentiated. However, the betrayal dynamic from the sexual abuse experience might be substantially less for a child who had a sense of trust firmly established.
A'ight! See, this is something.I respect that. However, if you read your sources carefully, there's a common theme.
The "prolonged severe" part will come up later, but basically the research done on the subject acknowledges that there are differing degrees of abuse and abuse trauma. Even your own sources acknowledge this.
So if there's one child out there who approaches you for sex, it's completely their choice. You would take it?Condensed for clarity.