Manosphere Jordan Peterson - Internet Daddy Simulator, Post-modern Anti-postmodernist, Canadian Psychology Professor, Depressed, Got Hooked on Benzos

[ProgKing of the North]

Lol what a boomerpost

 

[OwO What's This?]

you can do a lot of things to the internet and be forgiven

but you cant take away the memes

 

[Steamboat_Bill]

Did anyone try and use it to make it sing "Rainbow Connection"?

 

[Exceptionally Exceptional]

Jesus what a faggot. Can't even let us have fun.

�

Edit: What the fuck? What are these weird boxes in my post and how do I get rid of them?

 

[Get_your_kicks_with_30-06]

So much for being a """""""""""""free speech advocate"""""""""" NO FUN ALLOWED BUCKO CLEAN YOUR ROOM!

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

lol triggered

 

[The Pink Panther]

Free speech for me and not for thee

 

[Cool kitties club]

I happen to think Rap God is an amazing piece of work, and when I first encountered my verbal avatar belting out the lyrics I thought that it was cool, in a teenage tech-geek sort of way

Translation: I'm actual really cool guys even though im getting triggered over memes

 

[Steamboat_Bill]

Translation: I'm actual really cool guys even though im getting triggered over memes

People who cry over Pinocchio are not cool. Ever.

 

[Silent]

Quickly, comrades! Deepfry all the lobster memes!

 

[Bessie]

I should have used the opportunity to make him quote Faith Goldy. RIP notjordanpeterson.com.

 

[Commander X]

It is to be expected, Peterson IS known for being . . . twisted

 

[AirdropShitposts]

"Make making fun of me a Felony!" - famous lolcow demands

 

[NoBully]

So much for being a """""""""""""free speech advocate"""""""""" NO FUN ALLOWED BUCKO CLEAN YOUR ROOM!

It's always like that isn't it? It's all "free speech is great" until they start getting made fun of. Also you forgot to add "CLEAN YOUR BALLS!"

 

[Fully Eshay Skits Bruh]

I don't know why I made theses, but I did.

 

[Diabeetus]

Here's what he had to say about the website

I Didn't Say That | Jordan Peterson

In April of this year, a company called Coding Elite exposed an artificial intelligence (AI) program that to a substantial sample of my voice, which is...

www.jordanbpeterson.com

Spoiler

undefined

What a pussy. Jordan has been largely irrelevant for nearly a year now, and this brought back interest to his name. So many people had so much fucking fun with this tool, myself included. It's so annoying that this happened.

Wake up. The sanctity of your voice, and your image, is at serious risk. It’s hard to imagine a more serious challenge to the sense of shared, reliable reality that keeps us linked together in relative peace. The Deep Fake artists need to be stopped, using whatever legal means are necessary, as soon as possible.

Jordan could have just summed up this paragraph in one sentence, "Oy vey, shut it down!"

I genuinely hope the so-called "deep fake artists" don't stop. I wonder who should have a bot made about them next? I nominate Matt Jarbo. It would certainly make @Jarbo The Hutt's job easier.

you can do a lot of things to the internet and be forgiven

but you cant take away the memes

It's funny because Jordan Peterson frames himself as "being able to kek and meme", with the Kermit comparisons and the lobsters and whatnot. But as soon as someone makes the wrong jokes about him, like making him say a feminist manifesto, suddenly there's a problem. It's all so dumb.

 

[Spatula]

This guy needs to eat an apple or something, those bags under his eyes show his kidneys are dying.

 

[Grog]

He's right, impersonation with the purpose of defamation is a serious crime and can ruin the life of the victim. We may think it's funny to hear Jordan Peterson saying the fourteen words and hailing Hitler, but some less tech-savvy people won't be able to tell the truth from the deepfake joke. Something should be done to regulate this new technology and prevent it from being used for fraud or defamation.

 

[ComedyEnjoyer]

This guy needs to eat an apple or something, those bags under his eyes show his kidneys are dying.

I remember him saying at one point he's a reverse vegan and eating anything other than meat causes him severe suicidal thoughts.

 

[Man vs persistent rat]

He's right, impersonation with the purpose of defamation is a serious crime and can ruin the life of the victim. We may think it's funny to hear Jordan Peterson saying the fourteen words and hailing Hitler, but some less tech-savvy people won't be able to tell the truth from the deepfake joke. Something should be done to regulate this new technology and prevent it from being used for fraud or defamation.

I'm sorry but this reads like every boomer panic about something new ("get the government in on this!"). Should all learning software now go through a US government vetting process no matter how cursory its construction? Or just the entire format of learning software used to create pictures and sounds be banned? Or just constant oversight of everything produced with the software (how?)? This will disrupt all sorts of legitimate or similar uses for the technology (photo-to-painting generators, speech-to-text [and vice-versa], text recognition, text and audio translation, image and video upscaling, person/map/landscape/3D object generation, object identifaction/facial recognition/image scanning, deep dreaming, automated composition of music, etc) without doing anything to stop bad actors not going through the self-identifying process. It's also not hard to do, and increasingly so, so we're not talking about something that can't be done by a single person with a home PC, not to mention that it can as easily be performed outside of the US with no impact on its ease of distribution. It will give other countries a bizarrely unforced advantage in being able to develop and enjoy the rewards of these products when the US is hindering it. In a hypothetical government registration system, not announcing what a program does/keeping it secret might indicate the potential illegality of the creator's intent, but does not confirm anything beyond them being unwilling to jump through the regulatory hoop, and laws already exist for the end-result of this problem if it was used for illegal content. As with doxing, there's nothing wrong with learning programs or fakes unless the information is used maliciously and illegally, then the individuals in question are prosecuted. For the same reason you can paint a perfect replica of a Monet, but it only becomes illegal if you try to sell it as a Monet. Even hanging it on your wall and calling it a Monet just makes you a common liar unless you are trying to curry interest in its sale or possibly deceptively offer access to whatever high society lifestyle you are larping in exchange for peoples time and resources (though even this is a stretch). If a person does decide to do something illegal with a program as you describe such as impersonation for the purposes of reputation or material harm, and is smart enough not to be caught, this puts a burden on news outlets to not swallow every gotcha soundbyte that is emailed their way. It's not as though they don't peddle this nonsense with no evidence and get away with it anyway (pissgate), so anything that chills media hysteria and makes them think twice when suddenly they're bombarded with unverifiable fake information, the better. It won't have a huge impact on legitimate exposes, as stuff like professionally-couducted wiretaps, data theft by spy agencies, accounts by reliable uninvolved individuals, and found information by credible sources with all the additional material - not just soundbytes/video; traceable data - intact (not suspiciously anonymous people delivering spicy excepts what you want to hear) will still have the weight it used to.

Sorry to wall of text you, but this is a genie out of the bottle and I'm looking forward to the first trials from people misusing the technology, while the rest of us just make memes with it.