Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

They completely gloss over the part where vigilante justice often kills the wrong person. I guess that's because the guy probably deserves it for something else so it's all good.

Has it occurred to them that most women are attracted to men because biology, and it has nothing to do with choices? And furthermore it's kind of a necessity.

The way they dehumanize half our population is not attractive. Or, like, most of it actually, because any rational woman who gets confused when you tell them that any peaceful interaction with a man only happened because she just bowed down to him. Handmaiden victim/traitor!
 
I have seen common held thoughts that women fertilized other women or self fertilized themselves, though not majorly common it is an awful lot, more common are the commentators like Bindel who advocate a feminist utopia with men held in concentration camps to provide material for women to procreate by and aborting/killing at birth male babies to keep the male population at a level to provide said material.
Do these women ever contemplate how they could actually enforce men into their own slavery?

Seems kinda hard when you're generally the physically weaker sex. Plus any organization that they would need to enforce it, is male dominated as well...
 
They completely gloss over the part where vigilante justice often kills the wrong person. I guess that's because the guy probably deserves it for something else so it's all good.

Vigilante justice is usually just some guy who wants to murder someone and picks whatever excuse sounds good. Someone who goes around killing people who haven't done anything to him personally also isn't likely to have the best judgment in other aspects of his thinking.
 
Here's a bunch of radfems dogpiling a sane person for criticizing Leah and Terris insane ideas.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20190827-170241~2.png
    Screenshot_20190827-170241~2.png
    396 KB · Views: 323
  • Screenshot_20190827-170252~2.png
    Screenshot_20190827-170252~2.png
    574.5 KB · Views: 293
  • Screenshot_20190827-170308~2.png
    Screenshot_20190827-170308~2.png
    556 KB · Views: 348
  • Screenshot_20190827-170414~2.png
    Screenshot_20190827-170414~2.png
    594.2 KB · Views: 284
  • Screenshot_20190827-170426.png
    Screenshot_20190827-170426.png
    610.5 KB · Views: 280
  • Screenshot_20190827-170615~3.png
    Screenshot_20190827-170615~3.png
    438.3 KB · Views: 295
Here's a bunch of radfems dogpiling a sane person for criticizing Leah and Terris insane ideas.
"We don't have to be nice!!!" No, but maybe screeching like demented harpies and calling anyone who criticizes you libfems and handmaidens (kind of like how troons reeeeeee about terfs and nazis) isn't a great way to get people to listen to your concerns. Defending Leah is like defending Yaniv.
 
"We don't have to be nice!!!" No, but maybe screeching like demented harpies and calling anyone who criticizes you libfems and handmaidens (kind of like how troons reeeeeee about terfs and nazis) isn't a great way to get people to listen to your concerns. Defending Leah is like defending Yaniv.

This kind of shit is why I distanced myself from the radfem community. In general, they fall to pieces every once in a while and have a really hard time distinguishing between society and individuals.
 
We don't have to be nice!!!" No, but maybe screeching like demented harpies and calling anyone who criticizes you libfems and handmaidens (kind of like how troons reeeeeee about terfs and nazis) isn't a great way to get people to listen to your concerns.

They dont care. According to radfems, if you are not 100% with them, you can fuck off. They have little insight into how to persuade or how to gather political power. Their movements go no where because they refuse to compromise, they get nothing accomplished in the long run. I believe they think this makes them equal to or better than men in the logic category but uhhh... No.
 
They dont care. According to radfems, if you are not 100% with them, you can fuck off. They have little insight into how to persuade or how to gather political power. Their movements go no where because they refuse to compromise, they get nothing accomplished in the long run. I believe they think this makes them equal to or better than men in the logic category but uhhh... No.
Same thing with troons their entire movement is based off of autisticly screeching at people who slightly disagree with them.
 
The way they dehumanize half our population is not attractive. Or, like, most of it actually, because any rational woman who gets confused when you tell them that any peaceful interaction with a man only happened because she just bowed down to him. Handmaiden victim/traitor!

Yeah, that’s why I had to leave GC. There was just too much victim mentality bullshit all around. LOL like really? I only married my husband because of “internalized misogyny”? He’s raping me every time we go to bone town? It’s sheer fucking ridiculousness. We’re two halves of the same species. We can’t afford to go to war with each other.

The irony is, they sound identical to troons calling for TERF blood when they’re sperging out about the evils of men. You just need to swap out “TERF” for “male”.

Edit: I’d just like to add that I’m so happy to be here on the Farms. People here are so much nicer and saner than they are on Reddit!
 
Last edited:
Yeah, that’s why I had to leave GC. There was just too much victim mentality bullshit all around. LOL like really? I only married my husband because of “internalized misogyny”? He’s raping me every time we go to bone town? It’s sheer fucking ridiculousness. We’re two halves of the same species. We can’t afford to go to war with each other.

The irony is, they sound identical to troons calling for TERF blood when they’re sperging out about the evils of men. You just need to swap out “TERF” for “male”.

Edit: I’d just like to add that I’m so happy to be here on the Farms. People here are so much nicer and saner than they are on Reddit!

Another part that really bothers me is that 'male' isn't exclusive to potential sex partners. Are we supposed to loathe baby boys? (supposing we're not entirely insane and didnt selectively abort them) If not, when are we supposed to start hating them? Five? Nine? Fifteen?

Another huge problem I see is them constantly reeeeeing about porn consumption. I am trying to imagine parenting a teenage boy and the day when you learn that they have discovered it. Are we... Supposed to call them deviant, deranged perverts for expressing sexual behavior in a way that every man ever does? Because whatever TERFs want, it is absolutely normal and they will do it. And they won't be terrible people for it.

I'm not exactly thrilled by the concept, but this seems like a pointless hill to die on and they just blow up the importance of what most of us consider to be a fact of life. But of course any female accepting a reasonable degree of male behavior is just a victim of the patriarchy, doing everything they can to appease the men.
 
Another part that really bothers me is that 'male' isn't exclusive to potential sex partners. Are we supposed to loathe baby boys? (supposing we're not entirely insane and didnt selectively abort them) If not, when are we supposed to start hating them? Five? Nine? Fifteen?

Another huge problem I see is them constantly reeeeeing about porn consumption. I am trying to imagine parenting a teenage boy and the day when you learn that they have discovered it. Are we... Supposed to call them deviant, deranged perverts for expressing sexual behavior in a way that every man ever does? Because whatever TERFs want, it is absolutely normal and they will do it. And they won't be terrible people for it.

I'm not exactly thrilled by the concept, but this seems like a pointless hill to die on and they just blow up the importance of what most of us consider to be a fact of life. But of course any female accepting a reasonable degree of male behavior is just a victim of the patriarchy, doing everything they can to appease the men.
I wonder what they would say about a woman or teenage girl getting aroused by pornography?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Syaoran Li
I wonder what they would say about a woman or teenage girl getting aroused by pornography?
Really, it just smacks to me of sexual repression of a sort that is close to abuse, for a parent. I can buy that producing porn is questionable, but your kid or boyfriend is just watching people banging, and how does that make them unacceptably toxic?

I suppose both the parent angle is what makes this topic stick in my mind (I can't imagine condemning your kid for this) and because it seems like another cheap reason to hate people that conveniently *happens* to span most men. I thought social progress included reducing the stigma attached to having sexuality.

Reminds me how trans morons believe that a family member who is 100% supportive of you transitioning, but doesn't actually subscribe to the belief that you change sexes and has hangups about it is somebody toxic that you need to cut out of your life.
 
I suppose both the parent angle is what makes this topic stick in my mind (I can't imagine condemning your kid for this) and because it seems like another cheap reason to hate people that conveniently *happens* to span most men. I thought social progress included reducing the stigma attached to having sexuality.
I've seen a number of people who've been generally unfamiliar with radfems until recently comment on how bizarrely conservative they are for feminists. I think that mostly comes down to the movement being a product of the 1960s and staunchly refusing to change over the years. In the wider political landscape, positions like "everyone who watches porn is evil" have been completely discarded, but the Truest of Believers will gladly die on those old hills regardless of how many supporters their movement bleeds.

Here's a bunch of radfems dogpiling a sane person for criticizing Leah and Terris insane ideas.
I haven't seen many people accuse BLM activists for not being kind or hating white people. Somehow, women are the only oppressed group being told how mean we are.
Yes, as we all know, there was absolutely zero backlash against BLM, and black people definitely aren't stereotyped all the time. Only women.
 
What amazes me about their porn obsession is how they're able jump through hoops to make pornography or "porn-sickness" the root cause of so many widely different problems. Doesn't matter the topic, eventually they will link it back to society (men's) porn consumption somehow.

On r/GC you can also see them simultaneously upvote completely contradictory ideas along as porn use is ultimately to blame
e.g. a thread about sex a comment; "porn usage has made modern men take ages and ages to cum during regular sex, and that harms women"
upvoted right next to "men cum really quickly and can't last long in bed, that's directly due to their use of porn"
Both completely conflicting but as long as it blames men and porn then they will upvote regardless, (and the mods delete any dissenting opinions).
 
Back