🐱 How Circumcision Affects the Sensitivity of Your Penis

CatParty

Much like whether Louis Tomlinson of One Direction has a fake baby, male circumcision, or the surgical removal of part or all of the foreskin on the penis, remains a fraught topic. Despite the medical community's wide support of the practice—the CDC officially endorsed circumcision in 2014—men, even those who are not explicitly intactivists, have mixed feelings about the act of cutting off part of their dick.


Studies have shown, however, that circumcision comes with health benefits, including a lower risk of contracting some STIs, a lower risk of contracting UTIs during infancy that could cause kidney damage, and few health risks. In terms of sex and aesthetics, a survey conducted by Queen's University's Sex Lab found that women prefer circumcised penises for vaginal intercourse and fellatio.

Still, men circumcised at birth often lament the fact that they never got to experience life with foreskin. The same survey showed that men "indicated a strong preference toward intact penises for all sexual activities assessed and held more positive beliefs about intact penises." This gender discrepancy makes sense. Women don't want to deal with an extra skin flap that smells kind of weird; on the other hand, it's been considered common knowledge that the foreskin increases penile sensitivity. What guy would want to give that up?

But is a penis sporting a crewcut really less sensitive than one that is safely swaddled in its turtleneck? A 2016 study published in the Journal of Urology, also from Queen's University's Sex Lab, says no. The researchers recruited 62 men aged 18 to 37; roughly half were circumcised and half were not. Led by doctoral student Jennifer Bossio, who has done several studies on the effects of circumcision, researchers found that sensitivity to both heat and pain didn't differ between the two groups.

The idea that the foreskin is more sensitive stems from a 2007 study that measured response to light touch; this study found that "the glans [or the head] of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis." When testing the same metric, Bossio's study also found that the foreskin was indeed more sensitive. Yet she argues that response to heat and pain are more analogous to sexual sensations. "We measured heat detection and heat pain by attaching a thermode to the penis," Bossio told Broadly. "Men would indicate either when they would feel a change in temperature or when it hurt. The nerve fibers in the penis that are activated by temperature and pain are more relevant in sexual functioning—or the feel of a sexy touch—than the light touch that past researchers had done. Even though [the foreskin] is more sensitive to light touch, I suspect that isn't implicated in sexual pleasure. I think that's the take-home message of this study."

Read More: Why Men Draw Dicks on Everything

The most extreme of anti-circumcision activists often like to compare the routine surgery to the obviously horrific practice of female genital mutilation (FGM). But that circumcision actively harms the physical aspects of male sexual function is not backed by science, Bossio said. "With FGM, oftentimes the clitoris is removed, which would be the equivalent of removing the entire penis." She said the surgery could be more accurately understood as a cosmetic modification like labiaplasty. "All of these self-reports from men who say, 'Circumcision ruined my penis' are not necessarily supported by what we are finding," Bossio said. "It was my hope that this study would calm people's fears [about circumcision]. We really found no evidence that a circumcised penis differs from an uncircumcised penis."

Bossio notes that a forthcoming study from the Sex Lab, in which the same group of men were shown porn, found that the men's sexual response—both their sexual arousal and their subjective experience of sexual arousal—also didn't differ between those who were circumcised and those who weren't.

In other words, you really don't need to buy this.
 
Still, men circumcised at birth often lament the fact that they never got to experience life with foreskin. The same survey showed that men "indicated a strong preference toward intact penises for all sexual activities assessed and held more positive beliefs about intact penises."
Who the fuck are these faggots? Your life is so fucking great that the only problem you could settle on is not having a foreskin? Eat shit.

Spend less time having a pity party about your dick and spend more time working on getting him wet.
 
Studies have shown, however, that circumcision comes with health benefits, including a lower risk of contracting some STIs, a lower risk of contracting UTIs during infancy that could cause kidney damage, and few health risks. In terms of sex and aesthetics, a survey conducted by Queen's University's Sex Lab found that women prefer circumcised penises for vaginal intercourse and fellatio.

I wonder (((who))) is pushing that drivel.
 
Who the fuck are these faggots? Your life is so fucking great that the only problem you could settle on is not having a foreskin? Eat shit.

Spend less time having a pity party about your dick and spend more time working on getting him wet.
I don't understand dudes who fetishize their missing foreskin and claim it's some kind of super secret sex organ that they have been denied. It's a bit of skin and a mucousal membrane, it's basically an eyelid for your dick. It has half as many nerve endings as your finger tips. If you want to experience the missing sensation from it rub your fingertips together and divide by two, or fingerfuck your nose.

It does make people post some funny shit though. Last week I was laughing at this kid who in the middle of his Anti-circumcision video decides to tell the internet he's certain his routine infant circumcision with no complications has "desensitized" his dick and that's why to make it work he has to look at "more and more degenerate" porn.
Timestamped at 5m02s
 
I don't understand dudes who fetishize their missing foreskin and claim it's some kind of super secret sex organ that they have been denied. It's a bit of skin and a mucousal membrane, it's basically an eyelid for your dick. It has half as many nerve endings as your finger tips. If you want to experience the missing sensation from it rub your fingertips together and divide by two, or fingerfuck your nose.

it's basically an eyelid for your dick

I'm pretty sure if we were cutting off baby's eyelids, people would object to it.
 
Who the fuck are these faggots? Your life is so fucking great that the only problem you could settle on is not having a foreskin? Eat shit.
Guys like this:

Alex4488lol_400x400.jpg
 
This isn't even news. It's been pretty well known for a long time. Stop mutillating boys because of western thot expectatioms/need for facial cream or because you're too lazy to teach pulling back on your dick so you can wash it.

Seriously, I got the standard American goy cut and it doesn't seem like it would be that hard to properly wash. It always gets me when people say "but muh dickcheese!" Like are you fuckers really that goddamn lazy?

EDIT: Honestly I don't mind being cut but it's not a practice that needs to continue unless there's a legit medical reason/the person is an adult
 
THIS.IS.STUPID. Every time I see one of these stupid articles I feel a million times stupider just seeing it promoted. Normally I just roll my eyes and not post but I've decided today that I am going to tell the fucktards crying about foreskin to shut the fuck up because you're all a bunch of whiny tards who don't understand that cutting foreskin off IS NOT THE SAME THING as having a circumcised clitoris. A circumcised penis can still feel sexual pleasure without the foreskin; a circumcised clitoris cannot do that.
 
Real talk, did you people argue about penises and foreskin to your irl acquaintances too or did you start when you got online? Like, were you gay already or did the Internet make you that way?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Grog
This study seems quite biased. The doctor says "We really found no evidence that a circumcised penis differs from an uncircumcised penis", while stating in the very previous paragraph, "[the foreskin] is more sensitive to light touch". So surely there is a difference? I would have also liked to know if there is any actual evidence behind the claims that "heat and pain are more analogous to sexual sensations" than actual touching. Surely if that were the case putting your dick in the oven or jamming a needle through it would somehow be more pleasurable than normal fapping? I mean, I haven't tried it...
 
I can't imagine putting a literal newborn through instant trauma of strapping them down bondage style and cutting off part of their skin with no anesthetic ends well. I'm not sure how babies brains develope, but I do know that lack of interaction and bonding with an infant can lead to bad things down the line. Popping a little shit out and then subjecting them to that probably isn't the smartest thing, for what is essentially as important as a boob job.

And I'm going to assume the only reason women "prefer" cut cocks is because that's what's mainstream in porn.
 
I can't imagine putting a literal newborn through instant trauma of strapping them down bondage style and cutting off part of their skin with no anesthetic ends well. I'm not sure how babies brains develope, but I do know that lack of interaction and bonding with an infant can lead to bad things down the line. Popping a little shit out and then subjecting them to that probably isn't the smartest thing, for what is essentially as important as a boob job.

And I'm going to assume the only reason women "prefer" cut cocks is because that's what's mainstream in porn.
You ever hear audio of them doing that? Because I have.

You'd think it gets easier to handle when the baby literally passes the fuck out and therefore stops screaming, but it really just makes it worse.

Eh, whatever, he won't remember it anyway!
 
Back