Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

5511597af8857b9bcc3ca3bfbc9bc625.png


Holy shit you fat psychopath it was just a Sharpie calm the fuck down.

They hate the fact that Sharpie is 100% american and trump like it, ergo they are the tools of satan
 
e799f28f224f6c4707040479ee4501e4.png


And in Flynn-related news, there was a scheduling hearing for his case today. Judge Sullivan has given Van Grack (Who apparently looks like an inbred Devin Nunes) and the prosecution two weeks to respond to the Brady issues raised by the defense. Powell is also explicitly asking for Joe Pientka's 302 forms, suspecting that they may have been destroyed when Andrew McCabe replaced them with his own version.

The next hearing that will concern the Brady issues will take place on October 31st.
 
So let me sum up the Flynn issue @It's HK-47

1)Flynn pleads guilty.

2)It comes out through.... a leak(?) that there is exculpatory evidence the prosecution holds.

3)Prosecutors want Flynn to change plea to not guilty so case can be dropped?

4)Lawyer says no, files Brady something or the other that can put prosecutors over the barrel?

Is that close?
 
Swedish man is not allowed 'offensive' Trump licence plate
Officials say request for plate spelling US president’s last name has been turned down

Swedish authorities say a man has been denied a personalised number plate with the letters TRUMP because it would violate motor vehicle department rules, calling the letter combination “offensive”.
The Aftonbladet tabloid, one of Sweden’s largest newspapers, reported that the man had said he “was drunk and thought it would be fun to apply” online for a new licence plate with the US president’s last name “because the car is American”.
The Swedish Transport Agency confirmed its ruling to the Associated Press on Monday, saying it did not approve letter combinations referring to politics. It informed Marcus Saaf, who made the request, that its ruling could not be appealed.



Fucking lol at Sweden. We need a megathread on this country as there's just so much stupid going on there.
 
So let me sum up the Flynn issue @It's HK-47

1)Flynn pleads guilty.

2)It comes out through.... a leak(?) that there is exculpatory evidence the prosecution holds.

3)Prosecutors want Flynn to change plea to not guilty so case can be dropped?

4)Lawyer says no, files Brady something or the other that can put prosecutors over the barrel?

Is that close?
741dc75dea55e6d54a236ee7e3f2c20b.png


Powell's already gone on record as saying that the material differences between the notes they have don't match the 302 that the prosecution has produced. At the same time, the prosecution is trying to say that the FBI just can't find Pientka's original 302, and can only produce the one that McCabe gave them, which... Doesn't match with the original statements in the 302.

They're fighting like Hell to keep Pientka's 302 away from Flynn's defense because as soon as they have it, they can prove that McCabe's 302 was falsified, which means that literally everything about the FISA investigations and the Special Counsel would have been based on a lie.
 
What infuriates me is the fact that the average person isn't gonna know any of this shit. No meaningful number of people are going to know the extent to how fucking corrupt Washington is and how close a coup was to happening.
That's why I want impeachment to go ahead. The Democrats want America to watch the proceedings and I do too. But like Mueller's testimony, it won't go the way they think it will.
 
741dc75dea55e6d54a236ee7e3f2c20b.png


Powell's already gone on record as saying that the material differences between the notes they have don't match the 302 that the prosecution has produced. At the same time, the prosecution is trying to say that the FBI just can't find Pientka's original 302, and can only produce the one that McCabe gave them, which... Doesn't match with the original statements in the 302.

They're fighting like Hell to keep Pientka's 302 away from Flynn's defense because as soon as they have it, they can prove that McCabe's 302 was falsified, which means that literally everything about the FISA investigations and the Special Counsel would have been based on a lie.

Since we're slowed down due to 1337 h4xx0rs, I also want to double check I've got the right understanding here.

As I'm understanding it:
After Flynn plead guilty, Flynn's legal team files a brady discovery motion arguing that the prosecution is withholding exculpatory information, that is information that would affect Flynn's sentencing or destroy the prosecution's case.

Flynn doesn't want to change his plea because if he does, the prosecution can drop the case and render the Brady filing moot, escaping any punishment for trying to railroad an innocent man.

Providing my understanding is correct:
I'm not quite seeing how Flynn could plead guilty to a crime he didn't commit, or more specifically how/why the court is allowing a Discovery motion to proceed with a guilty plea from the defendant.
Couldn't the prosecution simply ask the court to dismiss the charges and the guilty plea?
 
Well... could they win?
We're going to find out soon, it seems like. All I can say with absolute certainty is that the prosecution can't convict him without producing the Brady evidence, and they know it. If they convict him without it there would be a massive scandal and it would be completely illegal, and if they produce the Brady evidence then it would prove that Flynn was innocent of the crime he for which he took a plea deal. There is literally nothing the prosecution has been able to do with Flynn except stall for time, and that's why they've been doing it for around two years, now.

Since we're slowed down due to 1337 h4xx0rs, I also want to double check I've got the right understanding here.

As I'm understanding it:
After Flynn plead guilty, Flynn's legal team files a brady discovery motion arguing that the prosecution is withholding exculpatory information, that is information that would affect Flynn's sentencing or destroy the prosecution's case.

Flynn doesn't want to change his plea because if he does, the prosecution can drop the case and render the Brady filing moot, escaping any punishment for trying to railroad an innocent man.

Providing my understanding is correct:
I'm not quite seeing how Flynn could plead guilty to a crime he didn't commit, or more specifically how/why the court is allowing a Discovery motion to proceed with a guilty plea from the defendant.
Couldn't the prosecution simply ask the court to dismiss the charges and the guilty plea?
They dug themselves in too deep for that. If they dismissed the charges it would cause everything else that was downstream of the case to collapse, too. The prosecution leveled a gun at him and told him to plead guilty whilst knowing that they had exculpatory evidence that would disprove his guilt. Flynn apparently knew that too, because he immediately pleaded guilty, locked in the charges, and turned around a second later and filed for the Brady evidence.

They were completely and totally willing to let an innocent man go to prison on falsified charges, and they knew he was innocent. The prosecution has essentially spent the last two years holding a rabid tiger by the tail, trying to figure out how the fuck to get out of the room without getting mauled to death.
9c038d4b5128429dfe2823e3aa3724a2.png
 
The situation almost reminds me of Cleavon Little holding himself hostage in Blazing Saddles.

The various flavors of retard elsewhere on the political blogs are screaming how Flynn is guilty, sentence him already... because, I suspect, they know that if Flynn's charges unravel, there's gonna be some serious fuckin' fallout.
 
The situation almost reminds me of Cleavon Little holding himself hostage in Blazing Saddles.

The various flavors of exceptional individual elsewhere on the political blogs are screaming how Flynn is guilty, sentence him already... because, I suspect, they know that if Flynn's charges unravel, there's gonna be some serious fuckin' fallout.
This one?
1568166799358.png
 
Ok.

So let's say all this goes into Flynn's favor.

Then what? Are we looking at careers over? People arrested? Would this effect the Speci Counsel in anyway?

I only ask because this is the only place talking about it.

Also: how is it that the Trump Campaign is like ten or fifteen moves ahead of these intelligence cretins?
 
Can someone explain to a "non murrican" what these special elections are about?

I haven't heard anything about them until today.

What is the big deal?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Kinkshamer
Back