- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nick wore a fursuit.
Slaneesh claims another follower.How many people have worn a fursuit for any length of time? 1 in 10,000? Nick is a furry confirmed.
How is Stan a creep and you make a living by taking going to conventions to take pictures so people can beat off to you? I guess it takes one to know one.
Could be a misdirection.On Twitch, someone asked, "so the rumor regarding the upcoming filing is that Ty has decided to let the gods decide the verdict and is challenging Lemoine to trial by combat, do you have any comments on that rumor?" Nick's response was, "What upcoming filing? I haven't heard anything about an upcoming filing, where's that coming from?"
So I guess whatever is coming next week is not that.
Fujos can’t separate fiction from reality. Fiction is reality to them.They self insert, and at the same time take it as an attack against their pet cause.
So if someone rejects the gay, it's attacking them, and attacking their pet battle, and they make it personal.
They need to separate fantasy from reality
Wait, do people actually care about this trust fund thing?Here's a fairly well-balanced look at the reality of the trust fund accusation: http://archive.li/M1xFM
Ignore the part where the guy says the "death tax" is incorrectly named and then goes on to explain how massive taxes can become due upon a wealthy person's death…
It's pretty complex, but from what I'm understanding, relevant bits are:
- Given that Louis's wife, Peaches, is still alive, as are Nick's mom and two of her siblings, it's unlikely Ty is solely in control of distributions of the fund.
- These same people would be aware if the money in the fund were being distributed in an undesirable way.
- There might not be all that much money in any fund that Nick would be getting distributions from in the first place.
Here's a fairly well-balanced look at the reality of the trust fund accusation: http://archive.li/M1xFM
Ignore the part where the guy says the "death tax" is incorrectly named and then goes on to explain how massive taxes can become due upon a wealthy person's death…
It's pretty complex, but from what I'm understanding, relevant bits are:
- Given that Louis's wife, Peaches, is still alive, as are Nick's mom and two of her siblings, it's unlikely Ty is solely in control of distributions of the fund.
- These same people would be aware if the money in the fund were being distributed in an undesirable way.
- There might not be all that much money in any fund that Nick would be getting distributions from in the first place.
They're struggling to find anything dirty on them other than their money and they're failing. Wouldn't be surprised if they start talking shit about the brands they wear next.Wait, do people actually care about this trust fund thing?
Every week KV sinks to a new level of stupid.
Wait, do people actually care about this trust fund thing?
I think so as the way he refers to "Nick" and "Ty" without surname or further content implies he's writing for an audience that already knows who these people are. I guess he's just not one of the more obnoxious voices in it, at least not yet.Was this guy on Law Twitter? He seems too rational for it.
Wait, do people actually care about this trust fund thing?
Every week KV sinks to a new level of stupid.
In true Law Twitter fashion, they think this creates a conflict of interest between Nick and Ty, which means that if Nick suggested Ty to Vic, then both Nick and Ty were guilty of ...
That's about where the madness takes hold and they start foaming at the mouth and moaning Ken White's name.
Because remember, suggesting a lawyer your family has worked with before is apparently not "Word of Mouth Advertising" but rather "An ethical violation on par with wire fraud." Just in case you thought Law Twitter was made up of actual lawyers, or lawyers who actually live in the real world.
Nick could purposely be Ty's son, husband, head of marketing and a literal bisected Siamese twin and he STILL wouldn't have a conflict of interest in the case because there's nothing hidden about it. It could literally have been as simple as, "Hey, this lawyer I know is a decent guy, I've hired him before and he doesn't live that far from where you live, you should go check him out!" Trying to claim a CoI based off of a recommendation instantly nullifies it as the recommendee would know of the party's relationship to each other.In true Law Twitter fashion, they think this creates a conflict of interest between Nick and Ty, which means that if Nick suggested Ty to Vic, then both Nick and Ty were guilty of ...
That's about where the madness takes hold and they start foaming at the mouth and moaning Ken White's name.
Because remember, suggesting a lawyer your family has worked with before is apparently not "Word of Mouth Advertising" but rather "An ethical violation on par with wire fraud." Just in case you thought Law Twitter was made up of actual lawyers, or lawyers who actually live in the real world.
I also find it interesting that since the hearing, there are some tweets I've noticed coming from the KV side taking a more "rehabilitative" stance towards Vic because he's being manipulated by grifters like Ty and Nick, like Vic is being held against his will and abused by them.
They're going the Shane route by faking sympathy towards him. Not that they'll keep their word on the matter.I also find it interesting that since the hearing, there are some tweets I've noticed coming from the KV side taking a more "rehabilitative" stance towards Vic because he's being manipulated by grifters like Ty and Nick, like Vic is being held against his will and abused by them.