Furry Fandom and Drama General

Apperently Milo is planning on attending anyway because he "already paid for a room under 2 friend's names" and he's bringing his posse.

Maybe he really is a furfag because he seems genuinely upset about not being able to attend the actual con now.

View attachment 938144
View attachment 938143


The furries played right into Milo's hand. It's like they heard all the twitter sperging but didn't bother to actually look up who he was and how he thrives off this kind of attention.
 
as said earlier in this thread getting banned was most likely milos plan from the getgo

he's constantly pulling the "im a poor victim" routine just on the right side of the political spectrum
he'll show up do some half-assed attempts at gathering fanboys and/or triggering security etc. in hopes to get himself thrown out and then go on a media circus about how "obbressed blease gib batreon" he is
 
More news articles.



 
More news articles.



Imagine being such a pretentious attention seeker that even furries doesn’t want to get involved with you.
Go back to the Cortez Hotel.
 
More news articles.



Funny, furry left-wingers accuse others of "hate" but when a furry literally mocks anyone who is religious, not interested into penis art or anything from their repertoire everything is literally OK.
 
1568745923390.jpg


Milo’s still a retard though.
 
Yeah, we allow dogfuckers and paedos but at least we're on the right side of history

(Note: Milo is still an exceptional individual)

This.

This right here homes in on a core issue.

Furries cannot address the intrinsic problems of the fandom and medium, if you can call it that: the unacceptable individuals, paraphilias, and obsessions that it, by nature of it's content, attracts.

The core of the fandom is anthropomorphic fantasy. The origin of the fandom is an offshoot of the sci-fi/Star Trek fandom that obsessed over animal anthromorphic characters. Without a singular focus, like produced anime or video games, you end up with a loose definition, a fandom with no gate to keep. Bringing it back to fantasy, you then have the problem of any garden variety degenerate, the kind of person who prioritizes fantasy fetish over any kind of real life personal accountability, being attracted to the fandom not because of the idea of anthropomorphism not as a theme, but as a paint job over a bunch of stupid fetishist bullshit.

Bringing this back to your point about "yeah we allow dogfuckers...right side of history" then you have people who will attach any kind of lofty discourse, the kind that gets traction as "progressive and ethical" to things that are at least pointlessly fantastical and at worst destructively abusive to ones self or others.

Look, just like my icon, I'm about four drinks in. What i'm trying to get at is that furry is empty. It's a surface paint job for any internet loser to attach their stupid fantasy fetishes to and then discourse about how every single whim they have is justified. The addition of performatively woke potlitics is just a symptom of how bad things are for people right now. But at it's core, furry is just a vehicle for whatever people want it to be. It's a fucking shame that it attracts mostly aimless degenerate fetishists.

I'm not apologizing for sperging out about this. Most of us here are burned out on the fandom for one reason or another.
 
Furries cannot address the intrinsic problems of the fandom and medium, if you can call it that: the unacceptable individuals, paraphilias, and obsessions that it, by nature of it's content, attracts.
Yes they can. They just don't want to because either:

a) They're just as guilty as the next dog-fucker, or
b) Their self-selected idols ("popufurs") are afraid to shine a light on all the bad shit that's happening, so they follow suit and avoid rocking the boat

Basically, the problem is that furries are either sheep in wolves' clothing, or the farmer that rapes and murders wolves and sheeps alike. Nobody of consequence wants to change anything. If someone does try to change something, they get drowned out by a lot of people in column A and ignored by the people in column B so nothing fucking happens.

Some of them will inevitably get mentioned here on the farms because, frankly, a lot of the exceptional individuals who sperg out about the fandom cannot tell a lolcow from a hole in the ground.
 
So MFF banned some obnoxious twink whose only crime is being pathetically desperate for attention, but did not ban the convicted child molester and registered sex offender.

Makes perfect sense to me.

It certainly makes sense if you assume furry fandom is a degenerate hive of sex predators and child molesters, which it is.
 
So MFF banned some obnoxious twink whose only crime is being pathetically desperate for attention, but did not ban the convicted child molester and registered sex offender.

Makes perfect sense to me.
LOL is he even out of jail yet? But yeah, Growly needs to be immolated.
 
Ooooh shit, someone is making some bold claims and got no receipts for show!


Scarf's rebuttal

 
Last edited:
Ooooh shit, someone is making some bold claims and got no receipts for show!

The fuck does "enabled a pedophile to groom me" even mean? Did he flip the big on/off switch on the back of PEDOTRON and it came advancing upon this autist with all its limbs flailing?
 
Ooooh shit, someone is making some bold claims and got no receipts for show!


Here's Scarf's reply.
1568775179317.png

1568775193681.png

1568775211572.png

1568775236352.png

1568775255242.png


Even Matt joined in the conversation.
1568775346859.png

 
Have a funny, apparently this site represents Milo or something? Also if someone could archive that’d be cool.
 
Back