- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
What's interesting is, wouldn't saying to Marchi's lawyer "see ya soon", show that he thinks the appeal would succeed?
Potentially. Or he's alluding to the fact that there will be a formal dismissal. Dude's a wild card.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's interesting is, wouldn't saying to Marchi's lawyer "see ya soon", show that he thinks the appeal would succeed?
not just that. He literally went on a short rant about the appeals court sometimes overturning him. This is basically him telling Johnson "Don't get comfy you aint out of this yet."What's interesting is, wouldn't saying to Marchi's lawyer "see ya soon", show that he thinks the appeal would succeed?
thanks for providing us with the goods.
So in conclusion Chupp actually got scared by some faggot being just that. That much is fine some people are like that they get scared easily by dumb shit.
But the Crux seems to truly be what people suspected. He'd rather this case just end here and now and with how he addressed it probably wasn't gonna dismiss anything else.
Of course little does he know that the only possible settlement is "Everybody pays their own legal fees and we go back to how life was before 2019. Everybody apologizes to everybody and we just ignore each other beyond necessary work issues" and that will never happen because as i previously pointed out: This only benefits Vic
He goes A Mea Culpa and the defense goes apeshit. Chupp is also under a time frame he CANNOT extend unless permitted by law. He doesn't rule by Oct 3rd the TCPA gets tossed.
I mean fuck, this is why it required a Prima Facie case with a "preponderance of the evidence", not "clear and specific" and "beyond a reasonable doubt" evidence.
The point of a Prima Facie case is to be convincing, not necessarily "true". That's for the defense to plead to the Jury that the case is false. Anything else is a violation of the Plantiff's 7th Amendment's rights for a Jury trial.
"Is everybody still here? I mean, I don't remember who represents who ..." - JUDGE JOHN P. CHUPP 17.09.2019Are you faggots asleep or just too busy getting trolled...
Well, what I take away from that is that:
1. Chupp seems to be taking the "threats" seriously, and thinks that the threats might extend to the counsel, defendants or plaintiff.
2. Chupp seems very aware that his ruling may be overturned on appeal, and seems to suggest this is a likely outcome.
Am I crazy, or...are these things that a judge really shouldn't be saying out loud in a meeting with legal counsel?
Thought: What if he "accidentally" goes past Oct 3rd? According to the transcript he thinks he has until October 6th, and hasn't filed anything.
If he doesn't file anything, and it goes past Oct 3rd, it goes past TCPA. The defense loses their goddamned minds but OH FUCKING WELL, the law is the law and Chupp has an out.
He technically does have until October 6th. He has 30 days from the hearing, and 30 days from the hearing would be October 6th. That's a Sunday so as a practical matter he needs to rule by Friday, October 4th. Hence him ordering to have mediation sorted out one way or another by October 3rd so he can rule on the 4th.Thought: What if he "accidentally" goes past Oct 3rd? According to the transcript he thinks he has until October 6th, and hasn't filed anything.
If he doesn't file anything, and it goes past Oct 3rd, it goes past TCPA. The defense loses their goddamned minds but OH FUCKING WELL, the law is the law and Chupp has an out.
If that does happen I'm going to find where the change font size thing is just to post a giant Called it in all caps.Thought: What if he "accidentally" goes past Oct 3rd? According to the transcript he thinks he has until October 6th, and hasn't filed anything.
If he doesn't file anything, and it goes past Oct 3rd, it goes past TCPA. The defense loses their goddamned minds but OH FUCKING WELL, the law is the law and Chupp has an out.
1. was a prime opportunity for Ty to point out that both he and Vic have been getting threats this entire time from those on the KV side. Hell, he could have pointed out that Vic has been getting death threats for 15+ years since he refused to sign gay incest child porn fanart back in the day.
I'm loving it. Chupp is just hoping this fucking case goes away, desperately, he knows he's been thrown into an autism tornadolmfao that transcript is a fucking beauty.
>Sometimes the appeals court side with me, sometimes they don't. IDK fam, I guess sometimes they just have a different feeling about all this law stuff, y'know?
This guy is a massive boomer considering his age. Shocked he didn't crack a fresh can of monster from the bench while talking about how he just, like, wants the anime community to heal and y'all should watch your backs, this shit aint no anime cartoon for kids!
Welp. Can't read the transcript because I'm on my phone apparently.
Sounds like Chupp is not giving any fucks. Also if I remember correctly, the estimated time for Vic's appeal is "about a year." The defendants get an "expedited appeal."
And Chupp figures they would be "back in about 3 months."
Hmmmmm.
Chupp: The anime community really needs to heal itself.
Well, what I take away from that is that:
1. Chupp seems to be taking the "threats" seriously, and thinks that the threats might extend to the counsel, defendants or plaintiff.
2. Chupp seems very aware that his ruling may be overturned on appeal, and seems to suggest this is a likely outcome.
Am I crazy, or...are these things that a judge really shouldn't be saying out loud in a meeting with legal counsel?
I must admit since the TCPA hearing I have been just staring at this in slack jawed wonder, Whoever would have expected that the fucking judge is more autistic than the various spaz's already involved in this?
The judge isn't that slick. He's just ignorant.