Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

View attachment 942714
Beto is making himself look like an imbecile again. AR-15s are not the same as tanks you numbskull!

Beto is a literal joke candidate at this rate and is pretty much in the same position Jeb was back in 2016 except even worse.

Like I don't get his mindset that he is trying to run for president right after losing to Ted Cruz to all people in a senate race.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Syaoran Li
230012f9c18235e5fa8736c7814a7dc5.png


It is 100% legal to own a tank in America. Fuck off, Robert.
Brb buying a new vehicle.
 
Beto already knows he's not gonna fucking win, he's just saying exceptional shit to tard cum the attention while he still can. I'm well past done hearing about this loser already

At this point, I wonder if he's doing and saying all of this crazy shit to basically audition for the VP slot. Under the guise that the Democrats will want the most crazy, insane as fuck guy they can get as VP to be insurance that no one dares try and kill his running mate, the same way that Biden and Pence were insurance policies to protect Trump and Obama from assassins.

Taylor Swift's new interview is so fucking cringe it makes MovieBob the new Immanuel Kant.

This is what she said about politics.

To be fair, her recent rantings make it clear to anyone with a brain that she's been extorted in some way to say this shit. Especially given the canned nature of her talking points.

Also of note:

1. She was recently subjected to the ultimate dick move in the industry (having legal ownership of her masters sold out from under her without consent or permission) with the added salt to the wounds being that they were sold to someone Taylor hate with a fucking passion (a Kanye West crony). So she may have submitted to the anti-life equation in hopes of ONE day, ONE DAY, getting her masters sold back to her at a price that doesn't begger her.

2. Her so-called "alt right" album Reputation, didn't top the record sales of 1989; which was her commercial zenith and from which all of her future albums (saleswise) will be judged by in terms of her label using that standard to punitively punish Swift by taking away label support if her later albums don't top said sales of 1989. So following that up with an all SJW album, complete with pro-gay video AND video with her having a black male love interest as part of the pandering to appease her label.

3. She wants to get into Hollywood/acting or into the lucrative film score production scene, where you have people like Trent Reznor have found second life as an artist and even greater acclaim (IIRC Reznor even has a freaking Oscar). Which means, again, submitting to the anti-life equation.
 
Last edited:
At this point, I wonder if he's doing and saying all of this crazy shit to basically audition for the VP slot. Under the guise that the Democrats will want the most crazy, insane as fuck guy they can get as VP to be insurance that no one dares try and kill his running mate, the same way that Biden and Pence were insurance policies to protect Trump and Obama from assassins.
I think Bob's just hoping to get more money like Bernie is, though I can see him cynically virtue signalling to try and get the VP slot to pretend he's more relevant than he really is.

He still loses out to Buttgag man tbh, since he's more memorable than the Sweat Goblin. At least Buttgag has a dumb name, more crowd power, and can be remembered for his :neckbeard: posts on religion.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Syaoran Li
I wonder why Beto hasn't come for this weapon of war that was designed for MILITARY USE, and, in fact, WAS USED FOR WAR, that my family owns yet?

Thus showing the total ignorance of his position that military = black magic civvies can't be trusted with.





Funny how the left spent 8 years fretting that it would take only one comitted racist to bring down thier Black Jesus and ruin Utopia that we are this close to..... and nothing happened.

And now, the PAPERS are crying out daily "Won't someone rid us of this turbulent orange dictator who is killing us all?!" ... and wondering WHY nothing is happening....

Displacement, much?
Why is paddy o’rourke even allowed at the debates? He’s polling at 1%.
 
Considering the mindset of most modern leftists they would probably consider the loss of the firstborn sons to be the first time God has ever done anything nice for them.
No more toxic masculinity driven males running around raping women and destroying shit! Now the future would truly be female.
At least until God decides that two can play at that game...Death of the firstborn daughter anyone?
In the current year, firstborn sons can be daughters too BIGOT
 
They already tried this with Russia; are these retards looking at the 1960's playbook? Because forcing Robbie O'Rourke, Paddy Exceptionale, into the debates while ignoring how he fails to qualify (moreso than Tulsi and Yang) and using old anti-commie bs and chicken hawk shittery to push war is very 1960s.

Also they'd have brought this out earlier if it had legs, meaning they haven't learned shit and are continuing to make people not want to support their gay toxic ideology with this insane and repetitive dust kicking. It's absolutely pathetic that they're proving themselves to be bigoted against ex-commie nations too, since replacing Russia with the Ukraine does shit all... unless this is to nuke Biden by referencing what his shit of a younger son did while he was Veep.
 
Why is paddy o’rourke even allowed at the debates? He’s polling at 1%.

A good chunk of the DNC elites and their corporate backers invested HUGE into Beto for his Senate run; so much money and energy was invested and they got nothing in return due to Beto losing, that rather than cut their losses, they are doubling down because they don't want to admit that they backed a dud. Also, as I mentioned, they probably figure at the very least, they can finagle him the VP slot to try and rebuild his brand, especially since his anti-gun remarks have basically rendered him unelectable in Texas going forward.
 
1569022050674.jpeg

So I was talking to someone (Who was excusing Antifa's violence but got mad when the Proud Boys committed acts of violence) about this thing called Horseshoe Theory, which basically is the theory that people on the opposite ends of the spectrum tend to believe in the same things, just with their own spin on them, hence this image, and the idiot responded with

"Horseshoe Theory is a lie made to equate the oppressed with the oppressors"

I then went and said

"I think that white supremacists should have the same right to the debate floor as anyone else. I believe that if they engage in civil, peaceful discourse then they could be of as much value to a debate as any other person"

"Uh, no, racism isn't civil, they shouldn't be allowed to debate"

"Alright then, what about black supremacists? Those exist..."

"No, the oppressed and their oppressors are not the same thing."

"UH, no, https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/black-nationalist, you can't call this propaganda as this is the SPLC website."
 
Last edited:
Why is paddy o’rourke even allowed at the debates? He’s polling at 1%.

I can think of a number of reasons, but they all boil down to him being a "useful idiot" to the Dems* until his big time Howard Dean 2.0 "Hell yes we're gonna take yer guns!" moment just made him the regular kind of idiot, more famous for a gaffe than content.

* Possible reasons

1. - he had a lot of leftover cash from his loss to the Zodiac Killer in Texas, and since he wouldn't share it/fold it into the DNC coffers, he could at least be baited into using it to spout D talking points constantly by promising him a seat at the big boy debate table despite the fact his polling was so bad that negative support was within the margin of error for him.

2. - The dems still believe in a Blue Texas in the next 10 years at the most, and are trying to keep him circulating as the heir apparent to that promised kingship.

3. - These days, youngish Dems who aren't also socialist weebs who believe in free everything are hard to find, so they supported him as the least socialist option when every single seasoned Dem is fairly socialist, with the Freshmen behind them being Junior Communists. Beto may be a spazz, but at least he's not a spazz promoting a plan like the GND that would cost more than the GNP of the nation to implement.
 
A good chunk of the DNC elites and their corporate backers invested HUGE into Beto for his Senate run; so much money and energy was invested and they got nothing in return due to Beto losing, that rather than cut their losses, they are doubling down because they don't want to admit that they backed a dud. Also, as I mentioned, they probably figure at the very least, they can finagle him the VP slot to try and rebuild his brand, especially since his anti-gun remarks have basically rendered him unelectable in Texas going forward.
Also given how aged and decrepit a lot of the powerbrokers in the dems are, I get the vibe that some of it is due to them having memberberries about JFK and his lionization as this big force for the New Left. I legit that at least some of it is due to senility and nostalgia for the time a Mick in an Empty suit tried and managed to succeed in schmoozing his way into office. The difference was Jack actually had charisma and could show balls to a degree, while Robert O'Rourke is a sweaty and nervous Paddy larping as a Mexican who out boomers boomers in cringey meme shit.
 
The Dems would have played up anyone going up against Ted Cruz, just as they played up Stacey Abrams and Andrew Gillum.

I mean, look at how much money Amy McGrath raised in the first 24 hours after she announced she would run against Mitch McConnell.

'Someone is running against someone I hate so they must be the greatest thing ever.' That's literally the extent to which they've thought things through.
 
Back