"ADF" / Philip Vincent Haskins-Delici / Isabel Rosa Araujo - The Original Troon Commie Cow

Phil didn't cook today because he's too busy arranging his toy box. So send him money for pizza.
Capture.PNG

Maybe Richard is the one sending him money.
 
Phil didn't cook today because he's too busy arranging his toy box. So send him money for pizza.
View attachment 951171
Maybe Richard is the one sending him money.
So he has food, but he doesn’t want to cook it because he’s too busy playing. Do you see how that is purely your problem Phil. Do you see.
 
Phil didn't cook today because he's too busy arranging his toy box. So send him money for pizza.
View attachment 951171
Maybe Richard is the one sending him money.
Dammit, Phil, how fucking hard is it to pour water in a cup of noodles and stick that shit in a microwave for three minutes? Is there any evidence to suggest that he even knows how to cook, even if it's just a microwave meal? Shit, man, you'd be a lot less poor than you are, now, if you just bought microwave pizzas and cooked them yourself, instead of ordering takeout every time someone sends you food money.
 
Every inch of his foul upper body is covered in tats; he used to think getting tats was a "therapy" that forestalled suicide.
Just check out the View attachment 950304 tag on this board.

26 Sep 2019
View attachment 950307
Article: "Three Arrows Down: How Soccer Supporters Built An Antifascist Space Within the Sport"

What's up with that pseudoacademic cultural studist language? "Built an antifasist space"? How about "organized a faggot gang"?

I could tell this was an American thing and not taking place in English football because these yahoos would get their shit caved in immediately at any Premier League match.
 
Last edited:
Phil sucks at history. Central and South America? Cuba? Puerto Rico? They all started out as colonies of Spain and Portugal, as did the South-West United States. Those colonials enslaved the natives, crushed their cultures, forced them to adopt Christianity, sacked their cities looking for gold, and raped them to "breed the savage out of them". So if white Americans are to be blamed for the actions of their ancestors, then why do modern Latinos not get blamed for the actions of their Conquistador ancestors who were arguably more brutal than white settlers?
Actually you might want to check that out. yes, they crushed their stone age cultures but technically they didn't have an extermination fetishism unlike the dutch and anglosaxons...
Even an Englishman gave a conference in the Darwin society club in London about how the Spanish Empire was the new "Rome" or an Empire of Enlightenment instead of the English empire as one of death.
 
27 Sep 2019
View attachment 950801

View attachment 950802
Would you believe that? The rich need Phil!

Oh look, a fat, lazy, jobless loser is lecturing useful working people about the job market and economy. And he is wrong on so many levels. Rich business are in fact job creators. They are usually the ones who can afford to start and maintain the businesses. It's those businesses that offer job opportunities for people. When people work those jobs they earn money and pay taxes. Those taxes go to pay for programs like disability benefits and EBT cards for people who don't work. It's really a simple concept.

Businesses also produce/distribute the products and food we enjoy. If it weren't for businesses then we wouldn't have delivery pizza, electronics, food in our grocery stores, clothes at Hot Topic, etc. Without money we then no one would make, produce, or grow anything.

And it isn't just rich people who start businesses. There are plenty of small business owners who start from nothing and become very successful, so long as their business actually fills a need or provides a useful service, and is run competently. The US is one of the few places left where someone can start with nothing and become wealthy if they work hard, have a marketable idea, and make wise business decisions.

Whenever I see Phil or people like him bitching about the rich people or harping about workers being exploited when they themselves don't work, all I see are havenots who are jealous and bitter about the haves. I see lazy, selfish people who are terrified of an honest day's work, earning their own way through life, and being responsible for themselves. So instead of working hard, applying themselves to improve themselves, and getting educated so they can find a better job, they'd rather live off the backs of their fellow man. That's not to say that everyone who goes on disability or welfare are just lazy leeches who just don't want to work, but it's common enough that its become a stereotype.

And none of this addresses "old money" or people who inherited their fortunes who don't own any businesses. How are they oppressing the workers? What about people who get rich investing their own money in the stock market? What about actors, musicians, or professional athletes? They're all rich, but they never had employees to supposedly exploit?
 
Oh look, a fat, lazy, jobless loser is lecturing useful working people about the job market and economy. And he is wrong on so many levels. Rich business are in fact job creators. They are usually the ones who can afford to start and maintain the businesses. It's those businesses that offer job opportunities for people. When people work those jobs they earn money and pay taxes. Those taxes go to pay for programs like disability benefits and EBT cards for people who don't work. It's really a simple concept.

Businesses also produce/distribute the products and food we enjoy. If it weren't for businesses then we wouldn't have delivery pizza, electronics, food in our grocery stores, clothes at Hot Topic, etc. Without money we then no one would make, produce, or grow anything.

And it isn't just rich people who start businesses. There are plenty of small business owners who start from nothing and become very successful, so long as their business actually fills a need or provides a useful service, and is run competently. The US is one of the few places left where someone can start with nothing and become wealthy if they work hard, have a marketable idea, and make wise business decisions.

Whenever I see Phil or people like him bitching about the rich people or harping about workers being exploited when they themselves don't work, all I see are havenots who are jealous and bitter about the haves. I see lazy, selfish people who are terrified of an honest day's work, earning their own way through life, and being responsible for themselves. So instead of working hard, applying themselves to improve themselves, and getting educated so they can find a better job, they'd rather live off the backs of their fellow man. That's not to say that everyone who goes on disability or welfare are just lazy leeches who just don't want to work, but it's common enough that its become a stereotype.

And none of this addresses "old money" or people who inherited their fortunes who don't own any businesses. How are they oppressing the workers? What about people who get rich investing their own money in the stock market? What about actors, musicians, or professional athletes? They're all rich, but they never had employees to supposedly exploit?
Phil doesn’t even know where his tugboat comes from, this may be a little advanced for him.
 
Phil doesn’t even know where his tugboat comes from, this may be a little advanced for him.

Yet he wants everyone to believe he's an expert on this shit. Phil wouldn't be so insufferably obnoxious if he wasn't always acting like a smug expert on whatever subject he's on. He clearly knows sweet fuck-all about most topics and just parrots whatever the people he looks up to say. If he realized that everyone knows he's just full of shit and stopped acting like a know-it-all, then he might actually find a real friend or two. But then, if he was capable of even that rudimentary level of self-awareness, he probably wouldn't have a thread here.
 
Actually you might want to check that out. yes, they crushed their stone age cultures but technically they didn't have an extermination fetishism unlike the dutch and anglosaxons...

Are you sure about that? The conquistadors would routinely goad Native American tribes into attacking their enemies with promises of support (which they provided, including troops with firearms), then kill their remaining "allies" after the other tribe was all dead. Their mindset might have been a bit different but they were every bit as brutal as the English or Dutch.
 
Back