- Joined
- Sep 13, 2018
Which is pretty much exactly one of their defenses. "Imagine how bad things would be if we hadn't been fighting so hard!"
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Thread starter Randall Fragg
- Start date
Which is pretty much exactly one of their defenses. "Imagine how bad things would be if we hadn't been fighting so hard!"
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2017
I have struggled mightily against the attack gnome infestation that has threatened our civilization for eons. The Red Hat Tide! The Gnome World Order!
You have me to thank for your freedom. Without me, you'd have been sliced to death from the knees up.
Please donate to my Patreon: AprilRains is creating A World Safe From Gniggers.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2019
By definition, it's a pseudoscience; regardless of how factual or unfactual man-made climate change ends up being.
If when faced with new conflicting evidence you throw it out as the work of hostile conspiracy, or alternatively take it as in fact evidence your theory was correct all along and we should all ignore every prediction made up until now; that's a psudeoscience, undeniably. This is the same pattern every "THE RAPTURE IS COMING" prophet and "I CAN COMMUNICATE WITH THE DEAD" psychic lives by. Deny their own past predictions, blame unseen enemies, move goalposts, change their story; because THEY are never WRONG, you just need to BELIEVE. And if you don't believe, well you're going to Hell or you're a part of the conspiracy or you just need to buy their new book. Because, despite what some might think, it was never the world ending or ghosts or bigfoot or man-made climate change that was the problem. The problem was always the utter lack of any scientific discipline, and the tendency for every environmentalist movement to morph into a cult that advocates global sterilization and genocide campaigns. Because without killing billions of people; we'll starve, no wait run out of room and have to live in crowded megacities, no wait all animal life will go extinct, no wait the ice caps will melt and flood the world, no wait rainforests will disappear and we'll run out of air, no wait drought will boil the oceans away, no wait climate change will cause mass migration (which is a good thing anyway). Every crisis under the sun qualifies in their predictions, and never once should it be mentioned every predicted crisis they have ever imagined and spooked small children with has never once come true - not on the day and hour predicted, nor in the manner prophesied either.
If anything, it's shit like what the Soviets did in the Aral Sea - to try to increase food production, and avoid that particular so often predicted extinction level event - that permanently destroys the environment. Another Soviet plan involved using a solar mirror to heat Siberia to create a new breadbasket, and of course I bet you may already know about the German plan to dam the Mediterranean to provide European nations with new land to send excess populace as well as of course produce all the food that we are scientifically predicted to run out of "soon" if "something" is not done. And in both of these proposed cases, no new farmable land would be created. Just huge deserts. But never mind THOSE stupid ideas, let's try using a solar shade to cool the Earth so as to prevent climate change. Yeah, great fucking idea.
But you call these morons what they are, pseudoscientists, and of course the definition of pseudoscience as per Karl Popper is magically wrong and must be redefined. The whole of philosophic and scientific norms must change to accommodate the would-be saviors of Mother Earth. Honestly, I think Malthusianists are worse than communists at this point because at least communists starve and murder populations as a result of incompetence or paranoia, not as part of cold calculated design present from the very onset.
School of Fish
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
China, India, and Brazil generate the most emissions and the most environmental damage but are pretty much excempt from the Paris protocols.
Even assuming Climate Change is influenced by humans to levels the people who have been wrong about climate data say it is, anything done by the US and Europe is pointless as long as those countries are given a free pass to do whatever the fuck they want.
They also don't realize how much they hurt their case with anyone paying attention by screaming about apocalypse level events. And once something does pretty much happen and the world DOESN'T end, they can't haul them out because they were screaming this would end the world.
Remember Colony Collapse Disorder and the end of the honey bee? That was a lie.
CCD was/is a real problem. Its killing bees. But not to the level of threatening the species, and not even to the level of disrupting honey production. What it DOES disrupt is Honey Bees as a commercial pollinator: That is, parking hives near orchards and fields so the bees will pollenate the flowers for crops.
This is actually a huge deal! Without a scale pollinator, produce, especially fruit, would start becoming scarce and more expensive as it would likely not get pollinated at levels that will benefit. But there are other insects that are also viable commercial pollinators. Farmers can switch to them; they aren't as convenient as bees, but they'll do the job.
However, instead of saying "Hey, its really worrying that honey bees are dying off. Fruit is going to go up in price if we don't figure out what's going on." They scream and flail about the end of the world and how you are killing the planet if you don't spend quadruple to eat "organic".
Remember acid rain? That was a real, serious problem we "fixed" (by regulating business out of profitablity in the west so factories could open in china with zero environmental oversight). But it was never as bad as it was made out to be. And once stopped, it didn't fuck things up for decades after. Within a few years, like it didn't happen.
Remember the hole in the Ozone layer over antartica? How that fucker fixed itself almost immediately? Yeah well its coming back because the Chinese don't give a shit.
If you don't regulate China, you're just trying to drain the Nile with a tin cup.
And no one wants to address the real issue: Population. Urban sprawl, the explosion of 3rd world populations with western medicine and food production. Reduce the number of people, stop turning forest and farms into condos, and most of these problems go away.
Even assuming Climate Change is influenced by humans to levels the people who have been wrong about climate data say it is, anything done by the US and Europe is pointless as long as those countries are given a free pass to do whatever the fuck they want.
They also don't realize how much they hurt their case with anyone paying attention by screaming about apocalypse level events. And once something does pretty much happen and the world DOESN'T end, they can't haul them out because they were screaming this would end the world.
Remember Colony Collapse Disorder and the end of the honey bee? That was a lie.
CCD was/is a real problem. Its killing bees. But not to the level of threatening the species, and not even to the level of disrupting honey production. What it DOES disrupt is Honey Bees as a commercial pollinator: That is, parking hives near orchards and fields so the bees will pollenate the flowers for crops.
This is actually a huge deal! Without a scale pollinator, produce, especially fruit, would start becoming scarce and more expensive as it would likely not get pollinated at levels that will benefit. But there are other insects that are also viable commercial pollinators. Farmers can switch to them; they aren't as convenient as bees, but they'll do the job.
However, instead of saying "Hey, its really worrying that honey bees are dying off. Fruit is going to go up in price if we don't figure out what's going on." They scream and flail about the end of the world and how you are killing the planet if you don't spend quadruple to eat "organic".
Remember acid rain? That was a real, serious problem we "fixed" (by regulating business out of profitablity in the west so factories could open in china with zero environmental oversight). But it was never as bad as it was made out to be. And once stopped, it didn't fuck things up for decades after. Within a few years, like it didn't happen.
Remember the hole in the Ozone layer over antartica? How that fucker fixed itself almost immediately? Yeah well its coming back because the Chinese don't give a shit.
If you don't regulate China, you're just trying to drain the Nile with a tin cup.
And no one wants to address the real issue: Population. Urban sprawl, the explosion of 3rd world populations with western medicine and food production. Reduce the number of people, stop turning forest and farms into condos, and most of these problems go away.
- Joined
- May 31, 2019
"B-b-b-b-but if we cast the immigrants out of our homelands and stop cramming food aid down their gullets, then who will nanny our children and mow our lawns for less than minimum wage?"
Maybe if "Climate Experts" wanted to convince the average Republican that they're not a bunch of grifters hoping to use Global Warming Hysteria to cudgel the US Middle Class into living in pods and eating grubs, they might , you know, NOT collect Hummer vehicles by the dozen or attend climate conferences in emissions-belching private jets. The first time a celebrity gives all of their money to the poor and goes to live in a clean but modest one bedroom apartment - that's the time I'll listen to and believe in their hysteria. Not a moment before.
Super-Chevy454
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
Let’s be honest, you should drop out of the race.
Having to put up with you complaining about your butt plug.
Having to put up with you complaining about your butt plug.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2018
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2019
I was passing through the airport a short while ago and stopped to take a peek at the TV because CNN had a good one. Their chyron said something along the lines of "Putin asked Trump to release transcript of Helsinki conversation."
The story they laid out went on to discuss Putin telling Trump "a secret" which was that Russia will still meddle in the 2020 elections and that they would continue to troll the American public. CNN reported this with zero self-awareness whatsoever. They started their morning news cycle off with Putin allegedly saying he would be trolling the American public and decided to stake their claim on the hill of "Putin asked Trump to release transcript of Helsinki conversation."
Not only that, doesn't this also blow another hole in the Swiss cheese tapestry that is Trump being Putin's puppet? Is he or isn't he? And did any of this even happen at all? Or is Putin simply trolling CNN like they said he would in their own reporting?
Yes!!
The story they laid out went on to discuss Putin telling Trump "a secret" which was that Russia will still meddle in the 2020 elections and that they would continue to troll the American public. CNN reported this with zero self-awareness whatsoever. They started their morning news cycle off with Putin allegedly saying he would be trolling the American public and decided to stake their claim on the hill of "Putin asked Trump to release transcript of Helsinki conversation."
Not only that, doesn't this also blow another hole in the Swiss cheese tapestry that is Trump being Putin's puppet? Is he or isn't he? And did any of this even happen at all? Or is Putin simply trolling CNN like they said he would in their own reporting?
Yes!!
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
So let's examine the ways Kamala would disregard or has disregarded the Bill of Rights.
1st amendment: Wants to use government power to force private companies to restrict freedom of speech on their behalf.
2nd amendment: Wants to unilaterally confiscate citizens' private arms.
3nd amendment: Not yet, but she wants her personal militia, MS-13 to be able live in your neighborhood, so not really that far off.
4th amendment: Wants to be able to forcibly enter your home to seize said private arms.
5th amendment: Violated defendants' due process by withholding exculpatory evidence while Prosecutor.
8th amendment: Supports bail system that adversely affects lower class citizens and kept those convicted in jail to use as cheap labor.
10th amendment: Wants to enact her authoritarianism at a federal level because she knows no states except the bluest ones would support her policies.
1st amendment: Wants to use government power to force private companies to restrict freedom of speech on their behalf.
2nd amendment: Wants to unilaterally confiscate citizens' private arms.
3nd amendment: Not yet, but she wants her personal militia, MS-13 to be able live in your neighborhood, so not really that far off.
4th amendment: Wants to be able to forcibly enter your home to seize said private arms.
5th amendment: Violated defendants' due process by withholding exculpatory evidence while Prosecutor.
8th amendment: Supports bail system that adversely affects lower class citizens and kept those convicted in jail to use as cheap labor.
10th amendment: Wants to enact her authoritarianism at a federal level because she knows no states except the bluest ones would support her policies.
Wallace
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2015
"But it's for your own good!"
Reminds me of 2003 when anyone criticizing the war in Iraq/Afghanistan would be accused of hating America or labeled a terrorist sympathizer.
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
I have to wonder, honestly, what exactly is the purpose of all of this sudden, dialed-to-11 impeachment inquiry nonsense? They know it won't pass the Senate, and by going at it this hard it's all going to be completely stale by the time 2020 rolls around and nobody will want to hear about it. What would they have to gain by sending it to the Senate in the first place? What would drive the Democrats so insane that they'd attempt to drive Trump out before the primaries are even finished?
I can't help but notice that a certain story completely fell off the airwaves recently. Most of the time the really interesting stuff that you find doesn't come from what the MSM is saying, but from what they aren't saying. What would best complete this sentence: "A president who is up for reelection and is under an impeachment inquiry should not be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination.
I can't help but notice that a certain story completely fell off the airwaves recently. Most of the time the really interesting stuff that you find doesn't come from what the MSM is saying, but from what they aren't saying. What would best complete this sentence: "A president who is up for reelection and is under an impeachment inquiry should not be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination.
She finished her last round of treatments at the end of August, and right about now is when a cancer patient would be heading back to receive a follow-up. You can call me crazy if you want, because it's just pure speculation and I have absolutely no evidence whatsoever to back it up, but I wonder if we'll be seeing the Democrats and the media start to repeat that line about how Trump shouldn't be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination sometime really soon here. If they do, then we know way more about Ginsberg's health than they're willing to tell us.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
Last edited by a moderator:
Leon Breitling
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
The sky's REALLY gonna fall this time, guys, holy shit!
edgy supermacy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2019
cant wait for what the spiel will be in 2020
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2018
If RBG has pancreatic cancer, her chances are slim at best. Cancer has killed people in FAR better shape and age than her (I still miss Patrick Swayze, damn it, and people still sink a drink to Stefan Karl Stefansson's memory).
The problem is that the Dems are walking a tightrope. If they actually push through an article of impeachment, it goes to the Senate -- and from the way Mitch is giggling and cracking his knuckles, I get the feeling the crazy cocaine-fueled fucker WANTS it there. Because Trump will be able to subpoena people under oath and force them to testify. So they DEFINITELY don't want it out in the Senate where the klieg lights will be turned on.
But if they don't push it through, their lunatic fringe will start acting up, and worse, Trump can make the case that their antics aren't really about impeachment but just a smear job. It's almost a lose-lose situation for them, unless Trump makes some unforced error (not impossible, but I don't see it happening).
Want some popcorn?
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2019
The issue there is that the whole plan hinges on the Dems winning 2020, because otherwise they won't be able to postpone RBG's replacement for four years. And winning 2020 looks less and less likely when a feasible theory is that Hillary is going to make a comeback run, and she looks downright sane compared to some of the current frontrunners.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
I've always suspected impeachment to come around now. If they did this at the start of the year when they got the House, it'd be over by the end of the year, Trump rolls into election season with a big win over the Democrats and their only talking point.
They start it now, get going into actually investigations early next year, they can campaign on him being a President facing impeachment, treat all their accusations as fact, maybe harass his campaigning with making him testify.
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
