- Joined
- Jun 13, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No deal in mediation, according to Rekieta.
Anything else would of been surprising, except for possibly Funi working something out.
I still stand my suspicion that Chupp is gonna chuck it all, and deal with it after the Appeals Court kicks it back to him. What's he got to lose costing all these citizens more time and money?
I got my own suspicions, but this is definitely one of the more likely ones. That being said, its not the worst thing he could do. The hearing was fundamentally flawed and throwing it all out would allow the plaintiff to appeal it all at once and in the long term would save money compared to going forward with the current suite and appealing the others later.Anything else would of been surprising, except for possibly Funi working something out.
I still stand my suspicion that Chupp is gonna chuck it all, and deal with it after the Appeals Court kicks it back to him. What's he got to lose costing all these citizens more time and money?
Something like this is probably going to be the sole impact of the mediation bullshit.
View attachment 957202
I might as well commit to Chupp's decisions for a lark.
Anything he ruled on stays ruled on. Anything he didn't rule on moves forward.
Monica will have depended on mediation, but since she didn't settle, she stays in (and so does the MoRon conspiracy).
Most importantly, loli is ruled illegal in retaliation for the "death threats." Civil war ensues.
I mean I think thats a decent guess but realistically what Chupp says doesn't matter because the TCPA is just going to be an appellate level question.I might as well commit to Chupp's decisions for a lark.
Anything he ruled on stays ruled on. Anything he didn't rule on moves forward.
Monica will have depended on mediation, but since she didn't settle, she stays in (and so does the MoRon conspiracy).
Most importantly, loli is ruled illegal in retaliation for the "death threats." Civil war ensues.
I listened to that part of the show, and it can be interpreted as Marchi simply not showing up (which could be contempt, right?), or that she did not go into it in good faith. I'm going to assume it's the latter since it seems pretty dumb to disobey a judge when you're technically scot free.Except Rackets is implying that not all parties were present, Marchi didn't show.
Yah, better to err on the side of caution and assume the less damaging thing. Cause that way no egg is on our face, and if evidence of her doing the dumber thing comes out we can have a big, hefty guffaw.I listened to that part of the show, and it can be interpreted as Marchi simply not showing up (which could be contempt, right?), or that she did not go into it in good faith. I'm going to assume it's the latter since it seems pretty dumb to disobey a judge when you're technically scot free.
Yah, better to err on the side of caution and assume the less damaging thing. Cause that way no egg is on our face, and if evidence of her doing the dumber thing comes out we can have a big, hefty guffaw.
Also, depends. If she gave her Attorney complete power to settle for her, I can see this not being an issue. Thoooough not sure how/if that'd work, would need to ask a LawKiwi.
Except Rackets is implying that not all parties were present, Marchi didn't show.
I listened to that part of the show, and it can be interpreted as Marchi simply not showing up (which could be contempt, right?), or that she did not go into it in good faith. I'm going to assume it's the latter since it seems pretty dumb to disobey a judge when you're technically scot free.
He implied... something. It was vaguely worded and he didn't seem giddy. Could be tempered expectations due to Chupps... Chuppness. Could be a nothingburger.Did Nick specifically say she didn't show? Chupp said all parties with final settlement authority had to show. That would include all parties. Not showing would be contempt.
Here's the relevant clip.Did Nick specifically say she didn't show? Chupp said all parties with final settlement authority had to show. That would include all parties. Not showing would be contempt.
Here's the relevant clip.
Most likely it's Marchi being a smug bitch, and that's it.
With the way he worded it, it's pretty obvious he meant that Marchi showed with a lack of good faith rather than just not showing up at all.
I got my own suspicions, but this is definitely one of the more likely ones. That being said, its not the worst thing he could do. The hearing was fundamentally flawed and throwing it all out would allow the plaintiff to appeal it all at once and in the long term would save money compared to going forward with the current suite and appealing the others later.
Edit:My own is that this was a test to see how the parties want to operate. Chupp will base his stuff off how they acted in mediation, and will do a bit of reworking his decision. It seems the least appealable thing he could do.
Edit to the edit: Cause my prior edit sounds... optimistic. Assuming I am right, I suspect Marchi stays out, TI is thrown back in, and he ignores all filings after deadlines. This is the most heavy handed on everyone, but no one could conclude it was prejudicial to anyone specifically. Still appealable in a few points but at least tightens up the ship.
Does Kojicasts case even have merit?Something like this is probably going to be the sole impact of the mediation bullshit.
View attachment 957202
Does Kojicasts case even have merit?