Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

100B4698-2C06-4616-A05D-D304CD8D36A9.jpeg

This guy is insane. He calls Trump a fascist while calling for the entire Republican Party to be dissolved and shutting down Fox News in the same breath.
 
View attachment 961778
This guy is insane. He calls Trump a fascist while calling for the entire Republican Party to be dissolved and shutting down Fox News in the same breath.

Don't forget that guy is calling himself God. He probably thinks he has some power when most people who use Twitter are underage and Twitter is international so a lot of non-Americans are liking his shit.
 
View attachment 961778
This guy is insane. He calls Trump a fascist while calling for the entire Republican Party to be dissolved and shutting down Fox News in the same breath.
A narcissistic guy who is calling himself "God" is going to dictate to everyone how to think. Decrying supposed fascism while acting like a fascist themselves in more ways than one.
  • Wants political opponents arrested for crimes they didn't commit.
  • Wants news outlets and political parties opposed to their own ideology closed down.
  • Wants to do away with the Electoral College and thus help pave the way for potential voter fraud crimes.
  • Evidently supports false accusations made against Brett Kavanaugh (mob justice mentality), which have no solid proof whatsoever.
  • Pushes "Free stuff!" talking points used by wannabe Communists like Bernie Sanders among others.
 
View attachment 961778
This guy is insane. He calls Trump a fascist while calling for the entire Republican Party to be dissolved and shutting down Fox News in the same breath.
Remember folks, the unspoken slogan for these people is "It's OK when WE do it!".

Never trust anyone desiring to perform fascist tactics against their enemies or gut the voting systems "for our own good".
 
View attachment 961778
This guy is insane. He calls Trump a fascist while calling for the entire Republican Party to be dissolved and shutting down Fox News in the same breath.
So get rid of all news since maza says it all gets filtered through fox and sent to everyone else?

Having a fake fetlife account to find lolcows brought this absolute nut to my attention:

View attachment 961842

If you have an account, I'd recommend following her if you like TDS mixed with batshit insanity.
I feel awful for anyone who might have had any sex with her.
 
The majority of the American public couldn't stand them and their constant stonewalling of things like gay rights

That's why the courts had to institute gay marriage, of course. Because the majority wanted it, despite voting against it fairly consistently.

But it's okay when you do it, when it's something you want...
 
Last edited:
That's why the courts had to institute gay marriage, of course. Because the majority wanted it, despite voting against it fairly consistently.

But it's okay when you do it.
"Majority" may have been hyperbolic since I don't know the breakdown for the numbers off the top of my head, but it would be disingenuous to say that a fairly significant chunk of the population wasn't frustrated with the Religious Right over policies like those. What ended up happening later was interesting, though: Once that had wound up being "cemented" into law for so long, the Conservatives began to do what they've always been known to do: They defended the status quo.

Now we're seeing the Republican party take aim at foreign countries for failing to decriminalize gay marriage. Trying to imagine a Democrat or a Republican take up an anti-gay stance nowadays as a policy for their election would be unbelievably jarring, but not too long ago that's what quite a few of them were doing on both sides of the fence. Hell, even Hillary was against the idea back in 2000.
 
And who knows how the popular vote would of came out had the FBI not done the whole MUH RUSSIA hoax. Not out of the realm of possibility he would of won the popular vote.

Remember the media was already calling him a Kremlin agent in October 2016

Also in California anybody can walk up and vote..no voter ID..no nothing needed. There is a real possibility non citizens voted in large numbers

I could be wrong but i think california operates this way...im to lazy to fact check my statement..it wouldnt matter if i was wrong because California has to much electoral power in our country (53 congressman?)
To register to vote in California, you need to go to a website and click on a box that says "I assure you, I am a citizen."
 
What ended up happening later was interesting, though: Once that had wound up being "cemented" into law for so long, the Conservatives began to do what they've always been known to do: They defended the status quo.

The alleged "conservatives" in government have always given lip service to the mandate of their constituents, and then acted however they wanted once the election was over. Note that despite their constant campaigning about the rights of the unborn, Ron Paul's bills to vindicate those rights never once made it out of committee.

The GOP is really very good at surrender, which is part of why leftists hate Trump so much. He's supposed to put up a token struggle, and then sigh and smile and say that it's time to compromise or take the high road.

Besides, who wants to be called "hateful", regardless of their reasoning? Ask Brendan Eich how it feels to change your mind--or else.
 
View attachment 961778
This guy is insane. He calls Trump a fascist while calling for the entire Republican Party to be dissolved and shutting down Fox News in the same breath.

I dunno man.

God wants weed legal everywhere and edibles for all. That's an offer from God that is hard to refuse, especially when it comes to smoking the Devil's Lettuce.
 
"Majority" may have been hyperbolic since I don't know the breakdown for the numbers off the top of my head, but it would be disingenuous to say that a fairly significant chunk of the population wasn't frustrated with the Religious Right over policies like those. What ended up happening later was interesting, though: Once that had wound up being "cemented" into law for so long, the Conservatives began to do what they've always been known to do: They defended the status quo.

Now we're seeing the Republican party take aim at foreign countries for failing to decriminalize gay marriage. Trying to imagine a Democrat or a Republican take up an anti-gay stance nowadays as a policy for their election would be unbelievably jarring, but not too long ago that's what quite a few of them were doing on both sides of the fence. Hell, even Hillary was against the idea back in 2000.
The alleged "conservatives" in government have always given lip service to the mandate of their constituents, and then acted however they wanted once the election was over. Note that despite their constant campaigning about the rights of the unborn, Ron Paul's bills to vindicate those rights never once made it out of committee.

The GOP is really very good at surrender, which is part of why leftists hate Trump so much. He's supposed to put up a token struggle, and then sigh and smile and say that it's time to compromise or take the high road.

Besides, who wants to be called "hateful", regardless of their reasoning? Ask Brendan Eich how it feels to change your mind--or else.
Republicans defending the status quo and offering token struggle before surrendering is why I can't do anything but roll my eyes when people talk about the overton window being shifted to the right. That and when people complain about "attacking from the right". Where are the right wing death squads I was promised? Where is the return to a segregated America (that isn't demanded by the left)? Instead, we have repubs defending progressive values, constitutionalist judges being put in place (while progressives bemoan the idea of the constitution), and a president that mostly shitposts on the internet. No new genocide, no ethnic cleansing, no day of the rope (which any white supremacist worth his salt can tell you is targeting race traitors and their enablers rather than a genocide in its own right).
It's all so tiresome. Why can't we get legislation to strip away progressive wins in the past? It won't ever happen. But the revolutionary must have xir revolution, and so here we are.
 
God made me realize something

I don't want weed to ever be legal and I hope people catch salmonella, e-coli, and hopefully ebola from their edibles. I don't know how you could cause such a conglomerate of diseases to fester all at once but the chance is greater if it has no FDA oversight.

And bonus points if the user is already infected with AIDS and Gonorrhea. I want a fucking cage match between all these plagues as they rend your mortal coil asunder.
 
I'm all for legal weed. But I think this guy needs to detox for a few weeks.

I'm also for legal weed, but it needs to come with provisions for the decriminalization of killing of completely worthless potheads.
Like the victim having a THC level of more than 5 ng/ml and owning the latest release of FIFA needs to downgrade it to at least 3rd Degree Manslaughter.
 
Wonder how he feels about this:

That God twitter account is literally an Atheist+ LARPer. He's been around for as long as twitter itself. Originally the account was supposed to troll fundamentalists with "Jesus was a socialist, but he also never existed" contradictory atheist dogma; but over time the tone has become more and more unironic and lazy.
 
which is part of why leftists hate Trump so much. He's supposed to put up a token struggle, and then sigh and smile and say that it's time to compromise or take the high road.
I've heard the NeverTrump crowd bemoan how "unintellectual" Trump is and I agree with them.
Trump is no "intellectual" and that is a good thing.
This so called "uncouth" and "loudmouth" President has done more to stop the Left in three years than all those "Intellectual/Principled Conservatives" have in fifty years.
Of course once Trump's eight years are up I fully expect his Republican successor to either pull a McCain/Romney, roll over and get crushed, or a Bush, manage an election win or two but be so nonexistent/ineffective that they might as well have just lost in the first place.
Or maybe Trump really has been a paradigm shift in the GOP.
At best my attitude is wait and see on that front.
 
Back