Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

So I'm referring to everyone who acts exceptional to victimize themselves crisis actors from now on.

Jamie, Monica, the Yost twins, (Michelle doesn't get a spot here because she can't act), MBA is about to get there, Marzgurl, TUG every time someone points out how much of a disaster he is, Pridemore. Can't prove that anything happened but they were actually there and there were real tears shed

Dominique Skye is just a crisis, as is Ron.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt, theworstkindofeurofag, FadeIntoObsurity and 6 others
GenericReviewerDraco said:

Wham Bam Thank You Ma’am (@wham_am) | Twitter

The latest Tweets from Wham Bam Thank You Ma’am (@wham_am). Getting back to the real world it’s been fun 👏🏼
twitter.com twitter.com

archive.fo

Twitter

archived 8 Oct 2019 17:25:27 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

twitter.com

𝕂𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕤𝕪🌹 𝕂𝕖𝕚𝕛𝕠 ℙ𝕣𝕚𝕫𝕖 ℚ𝕦𝕖𝕖𝕟 on Twitter

“#ISWV #IStandWithVic #KickVic Ty Beard crowdsourced legal advice on Vic's lawsuit from Nick Rekieta's patreon discord. Nick raised $200k for Vic then convinced Vic to hire Nick's family's personal lawyer aka the man who has discretion over how to spend his grandpa's trust $...
twitter.com twitter.com

archive.fo

Twitter

archived 8 Oct 2019 17:30:02 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

twitter.com

𝕂𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕤𝕪🌹 𝕂𝕖𝕚𝕛𝕠 ℙ𝕣𝕚𝕫𝕖 ℚ𝕦𝕖𝕖𝕟 on Twitter

“Teal deer, #ISWV #IStandWithVic and #KickVic should be in agreement over one thing: Nick Rekieta and Ty Beard do not care about Vic, they only care about how much money they can bleed him for. Grifters have no place in our community. #KickNick #KickTheBeard”
twitter.com twitter.com

archive.fo

Twitter

archived 8 Oct 2019 17:30:57 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

View attachment 963756
View attachment 963757
View attachment 963758
Very hot takes hour. I think they are trying to attack the GFM for the nth time just in case Vic appeals. These hoes and white knights be scurred of having to answer for their crimes.
Click to expand...
So they completely misinterpret that chat log, screw up the time line and make more shit up? Their gross incompetence is absolutely astounding.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Confused Doggo, IamWeebtrash and 1 other person
Son of Sparda 84 said:
View attachment 963924View attachment 963927
Click to expand...

I remember chapped asscheeks there, he was one of the first Law Twitter spergs I had to block on Twitter.

I pointed out that he was getting In Re: Lipsky not only wrong, but completely 180 degreess ass fucking backwards, and BOY HOWDY he wanted to let me know that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and thus I should bow down and let him dunk on me so maybe Popehat would give him permission to cum.

Seriously, they sperged out on me for about 8 days straight, just all going in big circles where they'd get shit proven wrong and just go in a big circle back until they started with their first talking point. If one got BTFO'd, some other one would show up and do the exact same circle with the exact same talking points in the exact same fucking order. All while they jerked each other off with likes and retweets constantly. Thouands of fucking notifications.

I guess his new fanfiction is that Nick is a "former lawyer?" That's cute, considering Bettik, IIRC, is an "academic lawyer." I.e., he got a useless law degree but can't be fucking bothered to actually practice law. But he's also not good enough or charismatic enough to do a youtube channel or blog, so... Law Twitter it is.
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Botchy Galoop, Gee Willows Wilson! and 10 others
HTTP Error 404 said:
I remember chapped asscheeks there, he was one of the first Law Twitter spergs I had to block on Twitter.

I pointed out that he was getting In Re: Lipsky not only wrong, but completely 180 degreess ass fucking backwards, and BOY HOWDY he wanted to let me know that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and that he was a lawyer and thus I should bow down and let him dunk on me so maybe Popehat would give him permission to cum.

Seriously, they sperged out on me for about 8 days straight, just all going in big circles where they'd get shit proven wrong and just go in a big circle back until they started with their first talking point. If one got BTFO'd, some other one would show up and do the exact same circle with the exact same talking points in the exact same fucking order. All while they jerked each other off with likes and retweets constantly. Thouands of fucking notifications.

I guess his new fanfiction is that Nick is a "former lawyer?" That's cute, considering Bettik, IIRC, is an "academic lawyer." I.e., he got a useless law degree but can't be fucking bothered to actually practice law. But he's also not good enough or charismatic enough to do a youtube channel or blog, so... Law Twitter it is.
Click to expand...

Great Value brand lawtwits really have to remind you that they're the Walmart generic brand over and over and over again.

Took the bar exam in the toilet paper aisle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, HighwayStar and Dean Pentel
HTTP Error 404 said:
Can it be filed before Chupp decides how much to award the defense re: legal fees + sanctions?

And I'm calling it now: Chupp will try and award them the entire Go Fund Me amount as sanctions. Because of course he will.
Click to expand...
No clue, the whole thing is retarded, but I also thought they had 30 days to get the appeal in from El Chupo's writ.
 
HTTP Error 404 said:
Can it be filed before Chupp decides how much to award the defense re: legal fees + sanctions?

And I'm calling it now: Chupp will try and award them the entire Go Fund Me amount as sanctions. Because of course he will.
Click to expand...
It seems I have to repeat myself.
P5Fever said:
That is irrelevant, what Chupp did was dumb but it is within the boundaries of the kind of power he has as a Judge.
He can not say “say that’s a nice gfm you have it’d be a shame if I took it away from you”. That is not how awarding attorney fees work. That is not how a judge works. That is not how GFM works.
What you asked is literally not something a Judge could do. He can award attorney fees POTENTIALLY, he can still tell them no you cannot have them even at the event of Vic losing, but he cannot say “hey literally all that money, yeah that GFM belongs to the defendants now”
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Exterminatus, Dumpster dived waifu, GenericReviewerDraco and 4 others
HTTP Error 404 said:
Can it be filed before Chupp decides how much to award the defense re: legal fees + sanctions?
And I'm calling it now: Chupp will try and award them the entire Go Fund Me amount as sanctions. Because of course he will.
Click to expand...
You don't seem to understand the difference between fees and damages.
Chupp can't award more than what the defendants paid.

And IANAL but...
The TCPA states that the plaintiff will only be ask to pay reasonable fees.
Usually, anti-SLAPP motions are filed right away, so any discovery expenses might be considered unreasonable.

And you're not a lawyer too, so you should really stop extrapolating stuffs that aren't on the same level.
Chupp ruling was sloppy, true, but what you're suggesting seems far beyond being simply sloppy.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, P5Fever and Roland Daggett
Virtual Insanity said:
TL;DR: MBA sperg'd one Saturday night and his wife got scared, So he's moving his own family off to somewhere!
Click to expand...

Nigger needs to get himself a Snoopy Snack and calm down.

20191008_162727.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt, ConSluttant, BubbleButt and 2 others
P5Fever said:
It is difficult to predict what he will do yes, but predict things that he can do, not what idiots on twitter say he can do when he cannot do it.
Click to expand...

I think the point people are trying to make is "Chupp's a Maverick. He follows his own law."

Chupp can attempt to order something. Whether Chupp can follow through is another question.
 
  • Dislike
  • Like
Reactions: theworstkindofeurofag, Confused Doggo, Roland Daggett and 1 other person
Mister Y said:
You don't seem to understand the difference between fees and damages.
Chupp can't award more than what the defendants paid.

And IANAL but...
The TCPA states that the plaintiff will only be ask to pay reasonable fees.
Usually, anti-SLAPP motions are filed right away, so any discovery expenses might be considered unreasonable.

And you're not a lawyer too, so you should really stop extrapolating stuffs that aren't on the same level.
Chupp ruling was sloppy, true, but what you're suggesting seems far beyond being simply sloppy.
Click to expand...
I mean Chupp giving a huge amount to the defense would be counter to his trying to get rid of this case right? If he was trying to do that. I mean that would incentivize Vic to appeal, but if it was reasonable and not too expensive it may just go away.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mister Y
Garm said:
I think the point people are trying to make is "Chupp's a Maverick. He follows his own law."

Chupp can attempt to order something. Whether Chupp can follow through is another question.
Click to expand...
And my point is we need to consider things which are what is actually within Chupp’s power, instead of fear mongering things what isn’t within his power.

@Mister Y explains it much better but what is being suggested is illogical.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: BlehFail.451, indianshedevil and Roland Daggett
HTTP Error 404 said:
Can it be filed before Chupp decides how much to award the defense re: legal fees + sanctions?
Click to expand...

It not only can, it has to be if that's after October 24.

Mister Y said:
You don't seem to understand the difference between fees and damages.
Chupp can't award more than what the defendants paid.
Click to expand...

The TCPA requires an award of fees and sanctions. The sanctions can be nominal, i.e. $1.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: AStupidMonkey and Mister Y
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back