TheMysteriousMrEnter

Status
Not open for further replies.
Optimus Prime said:
It's also what apparently had a part in getting him temp banned from YT. The ToS for YT explicitly state their services are not to be used such that a user can post copyrighted material that isn't theirs and make money off of it.

Mr. Enter's videos are entirely nothing but clips from cartoons, not so much as even a text-only slide or just video of him talking.
Click to expand...
Other reviewers at least go to make visual gags in their videos and often cut back to them in their chair talking. As a fan of the Nostalgia Critic, I'm surprised Enter doesn't do that. Actually I'm not.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: SteelPlatedHeart, WhoWantsStancakes, Simplicity111 and 1 other person
Gazelle_Bro said:
Other reviewers at least go to make visual gags in their videos and often cut back to them in their chair talking. As a fan of the Nostalgia Critic, I'm surprised Enter doesn't do that. Actually I'm not.
Click to expand...
im pretty sure it just come down to him being too lazy to flip on his webcam and record himself if it was about quility he could have easily bought a new cam by now
 
  • Like
Reactions: chimpburgers and WhoWantsStancakes
MrEnter's horribly flawed perspective of the animation industry truly does trigger me.

A wise animator (John K) said that one must have a lot of different influences to create something fresh and original. Otherwise, your work will end up as generic and unmemorable. Jonathan is the antithesis of this. He literally steals jokes and even characters from other cartoons (usually SpongeBob and MLP:FiM). Do his lunatic 12yo fans believe this is what the industry needs? Just a bunch of inbred recycled material? He's the definition of safe.

That, and he's an "retard" at that. If he was being notified by the "EVIL" Viacom about copyright, what's the logical thing to do? Scream at them until your account eventually goes down? I know Pieguyrulz evades the copyright issue entirely by using slides instead of footage. Why couldn't he do something similar if Viacom was bothering him this much?

MrEnter and his butt-buddy Nayolfa aren't going anywhere with this. The logical option would be to drop the series, study animation, read books, talk to animators, learn how to write, learn how to draw. THEN you resume the project. As it is, it's going to fail, and the worst part is they know it.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: NostalgiaJazzAdmirer, Meowthkip, PixelKnot and 8 others
#928: That's where I heard "I won't do older animation because I wasn't born yet. I won't understand."

There is so much that was shit then and was shit now. He can't review Paddy the Pelican? The Little Clowns of Happytown? Even the Buddy cartoons?

#929: Much as I think John K. is an insufferable, yet talented, guy, I have to admit that is one of the wisest things an animator can say.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Scratch This Nut, Meowthkip, PixelKnot and 6 others
InternetShaft said:
MrEnter's horribly flawed perspective of the animation industry truly does trigger me.

A wise animator (John K) said that one must have a lot of different influences to create something fresh and original. Otherwise, your work will end up as generic and unmemorable. Jonathan is the antithesis of this. He literally steals jokes and even characters from other cartoons (usually SpongeBob and MLP:FiM). Do his lunatic 12yo fans believe this is what the industry needs? Just a bunch of inbred recycled material? He's the definition of safe.

That, and he's a exceptional individual. If he was being notified by the "EVIL" Viacom about copyright, what's the logical thing to do? Scream at them until your account eventually goes down? I know Pieguyrulz evades the copyright issue entirely by using slides instead of footage. Why couldn't he do something similar if Viacom was bothering him this much?

MrEnter and his butt-buddy Nayolfa aren't going anywhere with this. The logical option would be to drop the series, study animation, read books, talk to animators, learn how to write, learn how to draw. THEN you resume the project. As it is, it's going to fail, and the worst part is they know it.
Click to expand...

I still don't understand why someone like PGR could get anything out of being associated with such a douche other than the fact that he wanted to boost his subscriber base. Smh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhoWantsStancakes
Gazelle_Bro said:
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned in this thread yet, but Enter ripped off one of Doug's videos and put in his own shit. Even using Top 11 as opposed to Top 10.
Click to expand...
i hate to nitpick but his editing really pisses me off especial on that bit about not reviewing south park sherk and the like would it be so hard to show clips of a show while you are talking about said show he is showing clips of south park while talking about sherk
 
geekboy400 said:
i hate to nitpick but his editing really pisses me off especial on that bit about not reviewing south park sherk and the like would it be so hard to show clips of a show while you are talking about said show he is showing clips of south park while talking about sherk
Click to expand...
Compare it to Doug's. I think Doug does his quite professionally in comparison to Enter.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Scribbler, chimpburgers and Simplicity111
Soradawn said:
That's not really much of a surprise. He's clearly influenced by Doug Walker and has used his gags and clips more than once in his reviews.
Click to expand...
Still he just completely ripped off Doug and doesn't mention it at all.
 
The dude has WAY too many restrictions when it comes to reviews. He won't review something that's low budget? Well, that takes away the good and many bad HB cartoons. Then he can't review old cartoons, which have a lot of great material for his reviews. Plus they're everywhere online.

I wouldn't mind enter so much if he wasn't so critical. It's almost like he doesn't like cartoons that are fun.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Meowthkip, Ho Mo for Women, Whatisgoingon and 6 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back