Megathread Insane Parents of "Transgender" Kids - Parents who push a transgender identity on their children

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Is it just me or is “gender dysphoria” the new ADHD?

Boys can be rambunctious and difficult to control, so let's put them on Ritalin/blockers in an attempt to socialize them as "acceptable and compliant" while thwarting their fiery will and spirit? You may be onto something. Much of the transgenda seems to be about watering down and neutering, if not outright ending, true masculinity.
 
It's similar (and still massively over-diagnosed) but with ADHD the goal is medicating any young boy who, for example, can't sit still for 7 hours a day because he's full of energy and just won't behave like the female students - whereas with "gender dysphoria" they're targeting the more reserved young boys who don't display that sort of overtly stereotypically extraverted masculine behaviour. They're pathologizing them by saying they must be girls. So yeah, depending on the male childs temperament, he'll likely line up with one or the other, or both. As the dude above said as I was typing this, a lot of it seems to be about neutering masculinity (as a form of control) because they don't behave like the model female students.
 
I hope the dad has watched "Dear Zachary". If so, he should know how this will all end and that there's only one solution: kill her.

I'm not exaggerating, even in the movie (that I strongly recommend) the grandmother says that. If justice fails you, you must take some extreme solutions.
It might help send a message to others in the same situation and get some laws passed to prevent these fuck-ups.
 
I hope the dad has watched "Dear Zachary". If so, he should know how this will all end and that there's only one solution: kill her.

I'm not exaggerating, even in the movie (that I strongly recommend) the grandmother says that. If justice fails you, you must take some extreme solutions.
There are some pretty funny reactions from conservatives on Twitter at the moment.
1571857809048.png

https://archive.li/vLKFe

The reason that this is happening at all is that such people do not live in a society. Obviously, any decent person would take the appropriate action against the woman, the judges, and the lawyers responsible in this case if their son was affected. In fact, a decent person would do this to protect someone else's children (but muh individualism). But not even the father will do the needful in this case.

I look forward to when one of these blustering conservative pundits has this happen to them, and they do nothing. It'll be a great laugh.
 
View attachment 978184

There are more troons in the South than there are in the North. That's not a coincidence. If you're a really traditional person who had rigid ideas of what men and women do (like many people in conservative areas tend to be), you might begin to think you're the wrong sex if you enjoy things not within those definitions. Same applies to adults who observe those behaviors in children. It's not unthinkable that there are people out there who would rather have a troon "daughter" than an effeminate gay son.

I'm a little disturbed to see that no one in this thread has stopped and actually thought about this map for five consecutive seconds. There's an obvious problem with looking at it and saying "Yep, the South's the obvious champion of trannies!" Those four quadrants of the U.S. do not, in any way, have equal populations. In fact, the southeast has significantly more people than any of the other three quadrants of the listed map. Because autism, I went and looked up the populations of those four quadrants and figured out the percentage of the population of each that was trans, assuming the statistics in the map are accurate (and, Christ, who knows if they even are?). Here they are, from most to least trannie:

1. THE WEST : 0.554% trans
(total pop.: 78.1 million)

2. THE SOUTHEAST: 0.505% trans
(total pop.: 124.6 million)

3. THE NORTHEAST: 0.421% trans
(total pop.: 56.1 million)

4. THE MIDWEST: 0.403% trans
(total pop.: 68.3 million)

It seems like the bible belt falls in second place behind the notoriously secular western states. And that the battleground midwest lags in last, behind the urbanized, solidly Democrat northeast. Still, the southeast is in second place, and the midwest doesn't lag the northeast by that much. Overall, the map posted as evidence that it's 'traditional values' that are the primary cause of people trooning out is extremely ambiguous. Before people get too defensive, my point isn't that you're wrong, it's that since How to Lie with Statistics has been out for over 60 years, there's no excuse for reflexively falling for this sort of thing.
 
Lol, now libertarians and other scum are pointing to the fact that the father had some rulings go against him in a divorce case, as an excuse for the abuse of James Younger being perfectly alright.

Apparently, if you're a boy, and your father is a bit of a dick to your mother, that makes it just fine for her to engage in psychological warfare against you with the goal of turning you into a eunuch. An 'interesting' point of view, to say the least.
1571897643896.png

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1187071237807206400
https://archive.is/wv19q
 
I'm not sure how I feel about Gov. Abbott getting involved.

I mean obviously it's good if they stop them mutilating this little boy.

But for every Democrat and even a good portion of the so-called Conservative Party in the UK, the Republicans are worse than Hitler, and a 'far-right' Republican intervening against child castration is just proof that we need to intensify the child castration program.

I think we are going to have to wait for these kids to grow up and commit mass shootings etc. for anything to change.

Edit: lol

1571900118263.png
 
There are some pretty funny reactions from conservatives on Twitter at the moment.
View attachment 982554
https://archive.li/vLKFe

The reason that this is happening at all is that such people do not live in a society. Obviously, any decent person would take the appropriate action against the woman, the judges, and the lawyers responsible in this case if their son was affected. In fact, a decent person would do this to protect someone else's children (but muh individualism). But not even the father will do the needful in this case.

I look forward to when one of these blustering conservative pundits has this happen to them, and they do nothing. It'll be a great laugh.

Being a pretty right wing guy in a blue state who gets really sick and tired of hearing how I need to cut and run to a red state rather than holding the line and fighting from others I have to admit that it tickles my funny bone a bit to be seeing this gross miscarriage of justice happen in the heart of Texas. It doesn't matter where you live, the poz is going to come for you unless we collectively push back harder.
 
Lol, now libertarians and other scum are pointing to the fact that the father had some rulings go against him in a divorce case, as an excuse for the abuse of James Younger being perfectly alright.

Apparently, if you're a boy, and your father is a bit of a dick to your mother, that makes it just fine for her to engage in psychological warfare against you with the goal of turning you into a eunuch. An 'interesting' point of view, to say the least.
View attachment 983257
https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1187071237807206400
https://archive.li/wv19q
Eesh, when did Popehat get this cucked? "The father's an asshole, so obviously we should be cool with the mom putting the kid in a dress."
 
A generation of boys was turned into drugged out zombies simply for exhibiting a little masculine behavior. Clearly that wasn't enough, though, as we now just want to turn the next generation straight into chicks.
And at the same time, we're pushing girls to abandon any feminine characteristics and try to be like boys. The game plan has to make all of us so confused and miserable in our own bodies that we don't have the energy to fight for any meaningful change. I can't think of any other reason why the 1% (and their proxies -- politicians) would be pushing all this crap so hard.
 
Eesh, when did Popehat get this cucked? "The father's an asshole, so obviously we should be cool with the mom putting the kid in a dress."

Popehat is a depressive libertardian eunuch who looks like the textbook definition of 'cuck'. He needs high-dose SSRIs just to get through a 24 hour period without killing himself, has been institutionalized at least twice, and is essentially a liberal that dislikes taxes and being called 'progressive'. He also was completely incapable of passing on his defective genes (nature wins again) and so had to adopt some poor Korean kid who will likely end up being bullycided into becoming Eliot Rodgers 2.0.

Look at this dude. Just look at him.

da839c1.jpg
47e75c3.jpg


The fact that anyone takes this faggot or his opinions seriously explains why libertarians have accomplished exactly nothing since inception as a political 'movement'.
 
Popehat is a depressive libertardian eunuch who looks like the textbook definition of 'cuck'. He needs high-dose SSRIs just to get through a 24 hour period without killing himself, has been institutionalized at least twice, and is essentially a liberal that dislikes taxes and being called 'progressive'. He also was completely incapable of passing on his defective genes (nature wins again) and so had to adopt some poor Korean kid who will likely end up being bullycided into becoming Eliot Rodgers 2.0.

Look at this dude. Just look at him.

da839c1.jpg
47e75c3.jpg


The fact that anyone takes this faggot or his opinions seriously explains why libertarians have accomplished exactly nothing since inception as a political 'movement'.

I ... wow. Ok. Clearly I haven't looked in on his stuff in a long time.
 
View attachment 978166
Some very impressive mental gymnastics there! Really stuck the landing with the way she justified yelling at a child for being harmlessly affectionate towards her friends. Bonus points for derailing criticism by pointless semantics over the word "swarthy".

Real talk though, this woman seems like a huge cow. Like, bigger than most of the parents in this thread. It's like a Portlandia bit came to life.


It's time to stop tasting paint, friend. Setting aside that Slippery Slop is a rhetorical fallacy for a reason...

There's a big difference between respecting what consenting adults do with their own bodies and encouraging children to take horse piss pills because they have a penis and play with dolls. Have you ever considered that if people were truly okay with men being effeminate (as was the objective in the eighties and nineties like you said), people today wouldn't be chopping their dicks off because they like "girly" things?

View attachment 978184

There are more troons in the South than there are in the North. That's not a coincidence. If you're a really traditional person who had rigid ideas of what men and women do (like many people in conservative areas tend to be), you might begin to think you're the wrong sex if you enjoy things not within those definitions. Same applies to adults who observe those behaviors in children. It's not unthinkable that there are people out there who would rather have a troon "daughter" than an effeminate gay son.
Slippery Slope is as equally fallacious as it is legitimate. It is not the concept itself but its application. In this instance, it barely even qualifies as slippery slope given that it's analyzing history not predicting the future. A history that is well supported as most progressive parties had an element that wanted this.

Someone else has already corrected that map for statistics, but I would go farther and argue that, at minimum Maryland, West Virginia, and Texas shouldn't be included in defining the South. I would further include Virginia and Florida.
 
Being a pretty right wing guy in a blue state who gets really sick and tired of hearing how I need to cut and run to a red state rather than holding the line and fighting from others I have to admit that it tickles my funny bone a bit to be seeing this gross miscarriage of justice happen in the heart of Texas. It doesn't matter where you live, the poz is going to come for you unless we collectively push back harder.
That's because the entire purpose of boomer conservatism is to act as a mere speedbump to woke liberalism. The whiny Ben Shapiros of 2035 will be owning Democrats by their own logic by claiming that "liberals are the real transphobes." Honestly, fuck conservatives they're fundamentally liberals and are unequipped to stop troonery.
And at the same time, we're pushing girls to abandon any feminine characteristics and try to be like boys. The game plan has to make all of us so confused and miserable in our own bodies that we don't have the energy to fight for any meaningful change. I can't think of any other reason why the 1% (and their proxies -- politicians) would be pushing all this crap so hard.
Corporate America wants everyone to be de-sexed, deracinated godless worker drones with no family who exist purely to consume products. When this inevitably thanks the native birthrate, they just import hordes of foreigners as replacements, then they'll neuter them too.
 
Back