US CA Rep. Katie Hill Allegedly Involved Female Staffer In 2-Yr ‘Throuple’ Relationship - (Ho-CA)

Freshman Rep. Katie Hill (D-CA), Vice Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, shared with Elle in a June 2019 interview a quote from the late Rep. Elijah Cummings, Chairman of the Committee “that has stuck with her.”

In one of those first meetings, Hill says, Cummings said something that has stuck with her. “It [was] that our role on Oversight is to get to the truth and to follow the truth wherever it leads us and to expose that for the American people,” Hill tells me over the phone. “To make sure that they have the information that they should have to, frankly, evaluate their government.”
It is in that spirit that we are sharing information obtained from multiple confidential sources relating to Rep. Hill, who’s currently in divorce proceedings. It is this writer’s view that events that occur within a marriage or affairs that lead to its demise should be kept between the parties involved and are not the business of the general public. When those events or affairs occur within one of the parties’ workplace, though, and that workplace is the United States Congress, the public should know about them as they determine that elected official’s fitness to serve.

Photographs and text messages obtained by RedState show that Rep. Hill was involved in a long-term sexual relationship with a female campaign staffer. The woman, whose name is not being released, was hired by Hill in late 2017 and quickly became involved in a “throuple” relationship with Hill and her estranged husband, Kenny Heslep.

Before-Kiss-Blur-620x712.jpg
Kiss-Blur-Copy.jpg

Heslep and the staffer, according to text messages provided to RedState, believed the polyamorous arrangement to be a long-term, committed relationship. The trio took multiple vacations together, including to Alaska, where this photograph was taken.

1571472624567.png

RedState was also provided with intimate photographs of the women, which we have chosen not to publish.

According to a source close to the staffer, the throuple agreed to continue their committed relationship when Hill moved to Washington, D.C. on January 2019, but that Heslep and the staffer quickly noticed a difference in Hill’s demeanor. By late May, Hill broke off her relationships with both Heslep and the staffer, claiming she wanted to focus on “this important work” and that it wasn’t fair to be involved in a relationship. The staffer, as these text messages show, was distraught and trying to figure out how to move on with her life.

Text-2-620x1001.png


In this message, Hill references their continuing work relationship and that she “want[ s] it to be as ok as possible.”

Text-1b-576x1024.png


The staffer asks if the political risk led Rep. Hill to end the relationship.

Text-1-576x1024.png


To which Hill replied:

No. I mean I guess maybe partially. Honestly, though, it’s that I want to be alone.
I don’t want to be accountable to anyone else. I want to be entirely focused on this work that I think is so important
And that’s not fair to anyone as a partner.
According to the text messages reviewed, after Hill left the throuple Heslep was told “by numerous sources” that Hill had been involved in a sexual relationship for a year with her then-finance director, now Legislative Director, Graham Kelly. In a post on his now-deleted Facebook account, Heslep posted a screenshot of a text message between himself and a friend of the couple in which the friend admits that he now knows about the Hill/Kelly affair.

text-friend-576x1024.png


Heslep asked the friend:

I’m just going to ask you this plainly bc I respect you. Did you know about Graham and Katie?
The reply:

I do know, yes, but I didn’t know until recently.
After Heslep found out about the alleged affair between Hill and Kelly, he filed for divorce.

72699068_2553001234927700_2106743877447712768_n-620x1013.jpg


He wrote:

“I didn’t file for divorce because she was bi! I just didn’t know she opened our relationship.”
A review of FEC records for Hill’s 2018 and 2020 campaigns reveals that the staffer was first paid in November 2017, with her payment classified as “salary,” making her an employee. California law doesn’t expressly prohibit consensual sexual relationships between an employer and a direct report, but it’s certainly a murky legal and ethical area. Some legal pundits contend that an employee can’t truly consent to a sexual relationship with the person who signs their paycheck.

Also of concern in the alleged throuple relationship is the age differential between Hill, Heslep, and the staffer. The staffer was 22 and a new college graduate when the relationship started; Hill and Heslep were in their 30s.

In addition to the legal and ethical issues raised by allegations of a congresswoman having not one, but two extramarital affairs with people on her staff, concurrently, there are issues of national security. Hill serves on two influential committees in that regard: Oversight and Reform and Armed Service. She has access to extremely sensitive national security information. If people who don’t have our nation’s best interests at heart had access to the photographs, text messages, and other information provided to RedState, Rep. Hill would be an easy blackmail target.

Hill’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Article from RedState (lol)
Archive
 
Last edited:
It'll come out that they were swingers or someshit, or that (surprise surprise) she's full of shit calling her husband an abuser and denying the other cheating allegation.

Whether we ever find out or something is a whole different matter, IMO the biggest reason we know this much is because they are getting divorced and for a changed it's the house husband publicly spilling dirty on their bread winning ex in the hope of getting a favourable outcome.
 
I don't think this should be a thing in all honesty. Same with the media freaking out at any Republican wearing blackface 30+ years ago.
As for her crumbling relationship with her husband and swinger lifestyle; if Newt Gingrich is allowed to do the monstrous things he did and not have Republicans and Democrats outraged, I don't see how this matters.

I am convinced that more than any political meaning this may have, it further solidifies that cucks of any gender are the worst types of people. This is clearly revenge porn by her cuck of a husband, how else would we be getting pics like this from such voyeurist angles?
If I were a gambling man I'd put my money on it being that after years of encouragement to fuck other people, she accepted that this is where their relationship was and leaned into it. Eventually like every other cuck ever he realized "Oh god, what have I done? i destroyed my marriage for a quick nut" once she developed feelings for the various people he endorsed. Then he got mad because he most likely wanted to "fix" what he did, which led to the divorce. Most likely because he, like every other cuck ever, made it about how she messed up instead of owning up to the fact that he is simultaneously massively insecure and narcissistic.

I could be entirely wrong, but I have seen this same scenario play out in group therapy time and time again with little or no deviation to the way it plays out.
If her resignation is a preemptive shutdown done by her in order to fight a much larger incident that has yet to come out, Its going to be that she was fucking everybody in her community she could while her husband watched.

Biggest thing to keep in mind, her husband was posting to swinger reddits asking if any men would fuck his wife. You don't just accidentally stumble into that.
 
I don't think this should be a thing in all honesty. Same with the media freaking out at any Republican wearing blackface 30+ years ago.
As for her crumbling relationship with her husband and swinger lifestyle; if Newt Gingrich is allowed to do the monstrous things he did and not have Republicans and Democrats outraged, I don't see how this matters.

I am convinced that more than any political meaning this may have, it further solidifies that cucks of any gender are the worst types of people. This is clearly revenge porn by her cuck of a husband, how else would we be getting pics like this from such voyeurist angles?
If I were a gambling man I'd put my money on it being that after years of encouragement to fuck other people, she accepted that this is where their relationship was and leaned into it. Eventually like every other cuck ever he realized "Oh god, what have I done? i destroyed my marriage for a quick nut" once she developed feelings for the various people he endorsed. Then he got mad because he most likely wanted to "fix" what he did, which led to the divorce. Most likely because he, like every other cuck ever, made it about how she messed up instead of owning up to the fact that he is simultaneously massively insecure and narcissistic.

I could be entirely wrong, but I have seen this same scenario play out in group therapy time and time again with little or no deviation to the way it plays out.
If her resignation is a preemptive shutdown done by her in order to fight a much larger incident that has yet to come out, Its going to be that she was fucking everybody in her community she could while her husband watched.

Biggest thing to keep in mind, her husband was posting to swinger reddits asking if any men would fuck his wife. You don't just accidentally stumble into that.
Sorry, but screwing staffers is and will always be a no-no.
 
I don't think this should be a thing in all honesty. Same with the media freaking out at any Republican wearing blackface 30+ years ago.

Being a BPD alcoholic in a fundamentally unstable and drama-filled type of relationship while fucking multiple coworkers and paying them off with campaign funds should not be a 'thing'"? She can't control her personal life, what makes you think she can fulfill her duties as a congresswoman other than mechanically voting 'yes' for whatever bill the neolibs place before her? (that is, if she didn't drink too much the night before and miss her flight.) Newt did some vile things in his personal life, but he could compartmentalize his work life from his private life and function effectively as a legislator. Katie Hill is about what you'd expect from someone who is 32 and never had a real job in her life.
 
Do not, I repeat, Do Not Trust a Woman in Power. Particularly a woman that comes in to power after you're already in a relationship.
In defense of women, the husband looks and talks like a cuck. He had a pretty sweet deal for a while. This is the staffer he and his wife were fucking:
morgan-desjardins[1].jpg

Or maybe it was just his wife that was hitting that. Who knows.

I'm watching the documentary on her campaign now. Pretty sure the chubby ginger is the one that said 'Hola mi amigo!', and I bet this people pleaser did know the husband was getting cheated on.



When I see this, I realize that I'm a slave to women. She is completely forgiven in my book.
Fuck her abusive ex, fuck the media for giving a platform to this revenge porn, and fuck all of you.
 
Last edited:
If it was a man, he'd be slaughtered in the public courts, named as "an abuser of power" and the woman "a victim of Stockholm syndrome" etc. and she would be taken completely serious if she went to the press and told them that she was "oh so afraid of saying no to someone in a higher position." You know those stories by heart by now. All the interns who insist they weren't drawn in by sex appeal and power and insist they were just gripped with fear of losing their jobs. Suddenly no such accusation comes up when it happens with an older woman.

Maybe I'm being too harsh, it's not that special to have an affair in politics and there's nothing else that'd make the public scream bloody murd-

Hill, you're goddamned lucky you weren't born with a dick, you saucy tart.

Remember how fast Asia Argento's grooming of a teenaged boy got memory-holed?

Katie Hill said:
I am disgusted that my opponents would seek to exploit such a private matter for political gain. This coordinated effort to try to destroy me and people close to me is despicable and will not succeed.

Save it, Katie; we all know how quickly either side will jump on the merest hint of a scandal, especially a sexual one, and the Dems are just as guilty of crowing about anti-gay GOP getting caught with a mouthful of a cock, as the GOP are when Dems get caught being financially supported by gay men that have had 2 black dudes die in their house, or by guys that ran international child-trafficking rings, or whatever.


As far as that iron cross being "a hate symbol", the ADL image specifically has a swastika inset into it, and her tattoo is a smudged up college black-line piece of shit she probably got with her sorority sisters. As far as "pointing out obvious double standards, that's fine, but all that "hate symbol" shit should never have been allowed to get off the ground, in the first place, especially with all the double standards associated with it.
 
Being a BPD alcoholic in a fundamentally unstable and drama-filled type of relationship while fucking multiple coworkers and paying them off with campaign funds should not be a 'thing'"? She can't control her personal life, what makes you think she can fulfill her duties as a congresswoman other than mechanically voting 'yes' for whatever bill the neolibs place before her? (that is, if she didn't drink too much the night before and miss her flight.) Newt did some vile things in his personal life, but he could compartmentalize his work life from his private life and function effectively as a legislator. Katie Hill is about what you'd expect from someone who is 32 and never had a real job in her life.

Let me start by saying that I'll admit that my post was reductionist and dismissive of the issue.
I do not condone Katie Hill's actions in the least, nor am i excusing her for a scandal that she brought upon herself with her immensely unstable lifestyle. What I am doing is calling a spade a spade.
She managed to win over a staunchly Republican area in Cali and was considered promising by the left. Again, that is not to say I support her stances or don't see that she is a whinging hypocrite as most dems are. However, given how the incident has played out so far, I can't say that this is more than what has been said.
The only thing that I can find about her doing anything with campaign money, was allegedly fucking the campaign finance manager. So if you got something else, post it so i can read it and I'll concede to it if it's factual.
And no, Newt Gingrich was not able to compartmentalize his work life, so much so that the republican party did everything but officially ousting him in 97' due to his public image being what they felt, was a liability.

The point I'm trying to make is that ultimately, in a perfect world this shit doesn't happen, but what do we do? By your standards Newt Gingrich was an effective legislator. By the view of Cali Dems, Katie was a promising up and comer. Where do we draw the line on what should be considered relevant to the politics game?
 
Where do we draw the line on what should be considered relevant to the politics game?

How about not being in the party that tries to make scandals like Weinstein seem like the norm, as though men are constantly lurking like predators, while dismissing shit like FSoG, Asia Argento, AoC's campaign funding irregularities, the disappearance of the entirety of the Clinton Foundation's endowment within a few weeks of her losing the election, and so much more?

Neither party is in any kind of position to lay claim to any kind of moral high ground, but damned if both don't love to throw stones in glass houses, while their own degeneracy is on 8k HD display. Both sides need to shut up and just have some consistency.
 
Let me start by saying that I'll admit that my post was reductionist and dismissive of the issue.
I do not condone Katie Hill's actions in the least, nor am i excusing her for a scandal that she brought upon herself with her immensely unstable lifestyle. What I am doing is calling a spade a spade.
She managed to win over a staunchly Republican area in Cali and was considered promising by the left. Again, that is not to say I support her stances or don't see that she is a whinging hypocrite as most dems are. However, given how the incident has played out so far, I can't say that this is more than what has been said.
The only thing that I can find about her doing anything with campaign money, was allegedly fucking the campaign finance manager. So if you got something else, post it so i can read it and I'll concede to it if it's factual.
And no, Newt Gingrich was not able to compartmentalize his work life, so much so that the republican party did everything but officially ousting him in 97' due to his public image being what they felt, was a liability.

The point I'm trying to make is that ultimately, in a perfect world this shit doesn't happen, but what do we do? By your standards Newt Gingrich was an effective legislator. By the view of Cali Dems, Katie was a promising up and comer. Where do we draw the line on what should be considered relevant to the politics game?

For fucks sake, there are plenty of representatives that know how to keep their shit together. The ones who don't get called out and removed from positions of power within Congress and get voted out. If you can't even keep your public image in check, how am I suppose to expect you to do your fucking job and represent me in the government? I don't want to be represented by a fucking idiot that takes and saves nude pics of themselves, marries someone posting their fucking nudes on fucking reddit and sleeps with their own employees while being on the fucking ETHICS COMMITTEE. That is not a high bar to clear, and she couldn't even do that.
 
Anyone read her resignation letter? States she's quitting so her husband will stop being abusive, completely evades the question about inappropriate relationships with multiple staffers.

Word is she was offered a position lobbying for Amgen. Completely avoids taking responsibility for her actions, blames a man for her troubles, has a golden parachute waiting.
 
Remember how fast Asia Argento's grooming of a teenaged boy got memory-holed?
Oh there are worse memory holes than that. Much worse.


Then there's one Swedish lady who was keeping refugee men as slaves in her home who was praised by feminist media as a matriarch that they were jealous of because "she dared to fulfill her dreams." You never even heard of that lady, but you heard about Breivik. Makes ya really think, don't it.
 
Tim the Beenie Man posted about it on his twitter and people are wondering if there's a bigger bombshell in the wings and that's why she resigned.

I'm wondering if she had access to sensitive information, like National Security related stuff, because back then during the cold war, this was exactly the kind of behavior which got you blackmailed by the KGB.
 
Back