- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
How do you guys clip this?I'm just uploading it to the site for preservation sake:
View attachment 992830
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do you guys clip this?I'm just uploading it to the site for preservation sake:
View attachment 992830
Twitter:How do you guys clip this?
Reasonable wage based on the services they are providing to the business. So if they're doing nothing $0 is a reasonable wage. If you actually get audited, which you never will, and they can't find your spouse's signature on a single document they're going to levy taxes against the invalid business expense deduction.
And there is no CEO or Secretary of his business because it's a sole proprietorship. All income paid is taxed the same whether he pays himself all of it or pays half to himself and half to his wife. As a sole proprietor he and his business are the same legal person. As a married couple he and his wife are the same legal person.
Tbh, my knowledge of taxes is purely for another jurisdiction, but generally the two main advantages of having a spousal employee is the tax deductions, and being able to equalize income. Everything he "pays" Kat is deducted from his business income, and thus is spared the so dreaded "business taxes". While Kat would be taxed on this income, she's probably in a lower bracket than Dave and should be taxed at a lower rate.Reasonable wage based on the services they are providing to the business. So if they're doing nothing $0 is a reasonable wage. If you actually get audited, which you never will, and they can't find your spouse's signature on a single document they're going to levy taxes against the invalid business expense deduction.
And there is no CEO or Secretary of his business because it's a sole proprietorship. All income paid is taxed the same whether he pays himself all of it or pays half to himself and half to his wife. As a sole proprietor he and his business are the same legal person. As a married couple he and his wife are the same legal person.
He pays no business taxes because he's a sole proprietor. All of the business' profit is his income directly. I said that in the post you're quoting.Everything he "pays" Kat is deducted from his business income, and thus is spared the so dreaded "business taxes". While Kat would be taxed on this income, she's probably in a lower bracket than Dave and should be taxed at a lower rate.
If I remember they both had 1 earbud from a set in so that they could both hear audio from the game and each other talking. She wasn't listening to music or something.Holy shit what a good catch I never noticed that she was wearing headphones.
Back on point with yesterday's stream, the only games that will work with his audience is bloodstained and that pc indie game. Everything would have been dead. I guess his plan of action for Luigi's Mansion is to do a play through of a switch game before pokemon sword/shield.
The household wouldn't pay more for FICA; it's a flat 15.3%.Not to mention that Phil would have to pay more for FICO taxes as well, as he'd be paying both his and Kat's FICO taxes.
15.3% times half his business income + 15.3% times half his business income = 15.3% times all of his business income.
im positive twitch changed their tos to include offsite statement which would make sense as to why he deletes 'controversial' segments of his streams when he uploads to the 'archive'Phil stated once after being banned (sorry, 'suspended' - I WAS NEVER BANNED) that Twitch walked him through the rules and informed him that they would never take any third party source as verification of a complaint. This presumably includes Phil's own 'archive' channel since it is not on Twitch. Shortly after, Phil began deleting his Twitch streams very quickly, and seemed to shove his more dubious comments into 'unrecorded' segments or in his Twitch chat. The only way Phil can get caught on these things after the VODs are removed is via screen caps, chat logs or detractor videos that Twitch allegedly won't rely on.
That said, you can still view VODs that have been 'deleted' if you have them open in a tab, so I'm fairly sure this isn't as safe as he thinks, since Twitch can probably still pull them up on their end. But it also gives them deniability if they just don't want to act on a complaint.
We all know Twitch will make up reasons for whatever they feel like, but Phil goes to some effort to give himself that buffer.
I think Phil's PSU might have died a long time ago, that shit runs on pure autism.Aaaand he showed his desktop again.
View attachment 992340
For people who want to compare, here's the screenshot from when he showed his desktop during the Feb. 2019 Retrospective Event:
View attachment 992344
I think it was the lack of donations that really pissed him off enough to shout out Tevin at the end of the Halloween stream. Someone donated saying Tevin was getting a ton of donations during the stream, more than DSP, and I think it soured the rest of the evening.
Good. That's what you get for begging for 1800 dollars over the course of a week, and then begging for 500 dollars the very next day. Get a job, DSP.
You mean viewbots. Don't forget, DSP claims someone told him Tevin PAYS for viewbots.dave is jealous tevin has over a thousand viewers
I'm just uploading it to the site for preservation sake:
You mean viewbots. Don't forget, DSP claims someone told him Tevin PAYS for viewbots.
Has either of the two ever discussed if DSP has ever tried to take down Tevin's YT streams? I have a feeling DSP has tried, but doesn't have dick sucking mod support (like on twitch) to do it; and Tevin fought it to the point either DSP has to lawyer up to do it or back off.DSP is more pissed off that Tevin is "successful" than that Tevin insults him. Even Tevin said "what success are you talking about?"
Everything is about money for DSP and DSP legitimately believes that money that gets donated to Tevin is legally DSP's money due to the "stealing."
dave is jealous tevin has over a thousand viewers
Has either of the two ever discussed if DSP has ever tried to take down Tevin's YT streams? I have a feeling DSP has tried, but doesn't have dick sucking mod support (like on twitch) to do it; and Tevin fought it to the point either DSP has to lawyer up to do it or back off.