- Joined
- Jun 11, 2018
With Fashionable Pug apparently written out, Rubber Chicken has now become the most likeable character in the recent batch of comics. The rest of it is the same cringe-worthy stuff we've come to see in Assigned Male.
As for LaBelle's comic/poster about trans nodies being perfect as is and not need changing: If that was really true and transgendered people believed that, there wouldn't be such a big push to start hormones, puberty blockers, tiddy skittles, and SRS on kids ASAP regardless of age.
NGL, I find amusement when people creatively spoof company names -- for example "Royal Burgers" instead of Burger King. However, Assigned Male lacks creativity in all aspects: drawing, content, and presentation. Consequently, the pitiful attempt to spoof NetFlix only furthers the opinion that Assigned Male is nothing more than mindless mishmash. Also, "NetFiix" sounds more like a term one might use to describe an internet addiction ("I need my NetFiix!") or an online site on the Dark Web for buying black market drugs such as those needed for HRT.
On the flip side, there are adults that seem almost too eager to teach kids about sexuality or expose sexuality to them at a younger age when they simply can't fully understand that aspect of life. Worse, they see nothing wrong with their young kids watching media with gratuitous or explicit sex scenes and references, only to wonder later why they talk and act inappropriately about sex.
Hand in hand with this, it's absolutely horrifying when transgendered people such as LaBelle strongly advocate that kids too young to understand sex should be encouraged to transition with both hormones and surgery when they first show interest in anything the opposite sex traditionally likes or enjoys.
(E: Spelling and clarity)
As for LaBelle's comic/poster about trans nodies being perfect as is and not need changing: If that was really true and transgendered people believed that, there wouldn't be such a big push to start hormones, puberty blockers, tiddy skittles, and SRS on kids ASAP regardless of age.
with them saying NETFIIX?
I assume it is to avoid getting in trouble with Netflix. Though, any reasonable person will know what they mean by Netfiix.
Even with big corporations wanting to tick off checkboxes by passing themselves off as "diverse", "inclusive", "woke", etc, they still protect their brand names because it's the only to enforce their ownership/copyright. Odds may be low NetFlix would target someone such as LaBelle using their name in a shitty web comic. At the same time, if the reaction to those comics proves to be too negative, they don't want to have their brand or reputation irreparable tarnished, either.Oh, so they say it to not get in trouble and avoid copyright even though that’s not how copyright fucking works? LOL that is so funny.
NGL, I find amusement when people creatively spoof company names -- for example "Royal Burgers" instead of Burger King. However, Assigned Male lacks creativity in all aspects: drawing, content, and presentation. Consequently, the pitiful attempt to spoof NetFlix only furthers the opinion that Assigned Male is nothing more than mindless mishmash. Also, "NetFiix" sounds more like a term one might use to describe an internet addiction ("I need my NetFiix!") or an online site on the Dark Web for buying black market drugs such as those needed for HRT.
Funny how LaBelle and company hate the idea of being "labeled without permission" yet they do the same thing when they label their critics as "CIS scum," "Nazi," or other hateful slurs. That makes them no better than the people they're trying to criticize.I imagine it's also some sort of distaste for the whole "Someone is labelling me without my permission" idea where the declaration of a gender comes in.
IF this is true, I'd wonder if LaBelle became a godparent pre-transition. However, I'm filing this under "LaBelle's Lies" until proven otherwise.Omg. He has a godson? What kind of exceptional degenerate would choose him as a "godmother".
The worst is those parents that pull their kids out of sex ed for whatever well-intended but naive reason without teaching their kids what they have to know and need to know at that age. That's more of a disservice than letting them be part of the lessons -- even if the parents have legitimate concerns about the content or how it's presented. Also, peer pressure starts to become a thing at that age, so kids will wonder what weird reason their classmate is being withheld from sex ed.When my son had sex ed, there was a kid that passed out in class. So, yeah, some kids can't really handle it well. And 5th grade is too young to be talking about sex in great detail. They need to know what to expect during puberty, basic mechanics of reproduction, how to protect themselves against STDs, and consent. That's it. Older kids can handle more info. Kids in 5th grade can't.
On the flip side, there are adults that seem almost too eager to teach kids about sexuality or expose sexuality to them at a younger age when they simply can't fully understand that aspect of life. Worse, they see nothing wrong with their young kids watching media with gratuitous or explicit sex scenes and references, only to wonder later why they talk and act inappropriately about sex.
Hand in hand with this, it's absolutely horrifying when transgendered people such as LaBelle strongly advocate that kids too young to understand sex should be encouraged to transition with both hormones and surgery when they first show interest in anything the opposite sex traditionally likes or enjoys.
(E: Spelling and clarity)
Last edited: