Opinion Nick Fuentes fills Milo’s gap

They’re being called the Groypers — named after Pepe the Frog’s more sinister, overweight toad cousin — and they’re making life hell for Charlie Kirk and his campus conservative organization Turning Point USA.

Following eyebrow-raising comments from Kirk recently that have been interpreted as elevating Israel above the United States, advocating automatic green cards for foreign exchange students, and one incident where a TPUSA leader was terminated after she posed in a group photograph with ‘fringe’ figures, the Groypers, led by 22-year-old shitlord Nick Fuentes, have been infiltrating TPUSA events to launch a barrage of uncomfortable questions at Kirk. In some instances, they’ve managed to dominate the entire Q and A portion of events, as Kirk squirms on stage.

This campaign of terror peaked Tuesday night at Ohio State, where Kirk was joined on stage by TPUSA ambassador Rob Smith, a gay, black, Iraq war veteran who, since leaving the Democrat party just last year has been a fixture on Fox News and the campus speaking circuit. Smith, or rather TPUSA’s open embrace of homosexuality, got the brunt of the attack at Ohio.



‘You’ve advocated on behalf of accepting homosexuality, accepting homosexual acts as normative in the conservative movement, how does anal sex help us win the culture war?’ one rosary-clutching, Fuentes plant asked.

It was a stunning moment and something I, as a gay man with right-wing views, have been desperate for someone to ask. Many lifelong conservatives have watched politely as a new class of people have been anointed their national spokespersons simply because they were ex-Democrats who ticked a certain identity box. I hope I do not fall into this category somewhere. Yet often these people, and I’m not talking about Rob, propped up as the second coming of William F. Buckley, turn out to be incurious morons who couldn’t tell Burke from Beyonce. They don’t truly understand conservatism. All they know is the left is bad and lies a lot, and they’ve built careers on this not exactly groundbreaking concept. The whole thing comes off as defensive posturing: if the left says we are racists and homophobes we must hand the spotlight over to our blacks and gays.

Smith took the mic, rattling and unprepared. He lauded America’s exceptionalism and the contributions gay men and lesbians make to society. But for an event titled ‘Culture War,’ his response seemed to only validate the perception that TPUSA is out-of-touch and not, in fact, comprised of cultural warriors. The correct response to that question, from a homosexual, should have been something like, ‘But, honey, without us your women would have awful hair.’

Fuentes and some of his followers, though certainly not all, could be said to legitimately hold far-right views on ‘white identity’, ethno-nationalism, and Christian morality. While many of the questions asked were tough, challenging, and highly engaging, there was an undeniable strain of authoritarianism weaved underneath. It was enthralling and slightly chilling. But by no means were all of their questions about race. Some were legitimate policy inquiries. Kirk dodged those, too.

This is happening for two reasons. First, the left is no longer an interesting or formidable foe. The culture war issues that sent Trump to the White House in 2016 are old hat to dissident right-wingers who live on the internet. That was a millennial war and now the zoomers are ascending. Those with a knack for sensing the mood of the nation and predicting the direction culture will go — a club, by the way, devoid of anyone on the left or in media — watch the left’s continued narrow-sighted, cannibalistic spiral of madness with increasing boredom, whether it’s Russiagate, impeachment, or boycotting a Chick-fil-A.

Once you’ve figured out the left, and have successfully stood up to them and survived, they become less worthy of your mental energy.

Conservatism, Inc does not understand this. They deliver talking points very well, but that’s about it. Still, they were aloof, or cocky, enough to title their campus tour ‘culture war,’ and didn’t think some people might cringe whenever they took stage firing t-shirts from a cannon while dressed in a J.Crew blazer, loafers, and Ray-Bans. Because, when all’s said and done, they’re corny and unconvincing. Even Turning Point’s own members are abandoning it: Twitter was awash yesterday with resignations, including two chapter presidents, one from Drexel University and the other from Kansas. And even Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin retweeted the resignation statements. So it’s not just the dark underbelly of the internet waiting to see Kirk stumble.

Let’s face it, they’re as dorky as the Never-Trumpers, only younger. And yet, many see them as snatching the baton and appointing themselves the guardians of 2016’s spoils. I sincerely have no beef with Turning Point USA, Charlie Kirk, or anyone affiliated with that organization. They do decent work and all seem like nice, hard-working people. But as far as in-fighting goes, where liberals stifle and suffocate, conservatives brawl. And the celebratory reaction to Tuesday night’s spectacle from mainline Trump supporters who have zero tendencies toward ethno-nationalism proves what I’ve suspected for a while: there’s a feeling among anti-establishment conservatives that their self-appointed leaders have grown lazy and take their support for granted, if not downright insult their intelligence by robo-tweeting the same blanket statements about liberal corruption or America First, day in and day out, for three years. It never occurred to these cultural war generals to evolve, that people may be thirsty for depth, more philosophy, Christianity, or just quality entertainment.

Following Tuesday night’s melee, Rob Smith (whom I know personally, and like) stirred even more ire when he took to Twitter to claim the event had been infiltrated by neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Other conservatives with blue check marks but not affiliated with TPUSA echoed this. While I don’t understand the obsession some on the right have with Israel — pro or con, despite personally falling in the pro-camp — and I glaze over at any mention of ‘white identity,’ if the embarrassment on stage didn’t do it, those tweets may have been the death of Turning Point. The media’s treatment of Covington Catholic student Nicholas Sandmann is still fresh for Trumpers. How could anyone, especially supposed leaders of the culture war, label young men in MAGA hats as Nazis, carelessly deploying the same empty, meaningless insults the left uses to destroy lives? No one has forgotten that Kirk condemned the Covington boys before he praised them.

If the energy behind the Groyper insurgency has you worried about an actual rising tide of ethno-nationalism, Facebook and Twitter are to blame. Silicon Valley censorship created Nick Fuentes. The true culture warriors on the right, save for the president himself, were silenced by Big Tech when it became clear how beloved and effective they were. Love them or hate them, the likes of Alex Jones, Gavin McInnes, Roger Stone, and Milo Yiannopoulos built large followings of young right-wing men. They could be mean, offensive, shocking, and totally bonkers but they weren’t consciously steering their audience towards ethno-nationalism. They also understood and listened to their audience better than anyone else in living memory in the conservative movement.

Their un-personing left a gigantic void in the national discourse that Conservatism, Inc, ill-equipped, rushed in to fill. These new interlopers lack the talent, insight, intelligence, and grit of the Banned. (Full disclosure, I also personally know Yiannopoulos and McInnes and have worked with them before). It also created the opportunity for extremely self-confident zoomer Fuentes to rise up and give a contrarian, challenging voice against the new, unelected face of Trumpism. Had the aforementioned provocateurs never been banned, Turning Point would be in no one’s crosshairs, but just another, milder delegation sitting under the big tent. No one would have heard of Nick Fuentes.

 
BTW, the irony in the title is that Milo is an Israel shill too. He supports people like Laura "people hate me because I'm Jew and I want Aryan babies" Loomer, Candace "Hitler was right", and Scientology Joy. They're grifters.

Milo has a lot in common with Fuentes, but he also shares a lot with Kirk, especially in the aspects that matter. If you ask him what he feels about Israel, I'm certain he will share Kirk's opinion.
 
Funtes is a crazy, unstable sped. Atleast Funtes is funny though.
Fuentes is like that because he's a zoomer. If you have been paying attention, all zoomers act like they ran out of adderal and are using 3 or more red bulls as a subsitute.

What you should have said is "atleast Fuentes actually believes the crazy shit that comes out of his mouth and not trying to trick people to donate to his retirement fund by shouting out the most popular opinions of today."
 
They're really overplaying their hand.

I wonder if all these knee jerk reactions of labeling all people anti-semites/racists/etc. and trying to silence them if they ask too many questions, all supposedly in an attempt to prevent the rise of nazism and thus another holocaust, will only end up causing said holocaust in the long run.
 
Milo gets that lovely chocolate seeding from bbc all the time. He will end up a poz camwhore in no time.
 
Charlie Kirk is a "conservative" in the same way that the "right-wingers" who go along with the tranny pandemonium call themselves conservatives. Much like how Candace "social autopsy" Owens is considered a right-winger by so many of these dipshits.

I don't doubt his authenticity in what he says he believes, he's just another member of the "lose with dignity" retarded right that needs to be (metaphorically) taken out back and shot for the lame horse it both is and has been for decades. Nick and his brain-dead allies are retarded for different reasons, but they're not wrong to call out these idiots for what they are.

Fuentes is like that because he's a zoomer. If you have been paying attention, all zoomers act like they ran out of adderal and are using 3 or more red bulls as a subsitute.

What you should have said is "atleast Fuentes actually believes the crazy shit that comes out of his mouth and not trying to trick people to donate to his retirement fund by shouting out the most popular opinions of today."

I keep having to bring up the fact that you can be a true believer and a grifter at the same time to people. Just because the Vatican makes bank and the pope benefits from that doesn't mean the old geezers in it aren't true believers.
 
Charlie Kirk is a "conservative" in the same way that the "right-wingers" who go along with the tranny pandemonium call themselves conservatives. Much like how Candace "social autopsy" Owens is considered a right-winger by so many of these dipshits.

I don't doubt his authenticity in what he says he believes, he's just another member of the "lose with dignity" exceptional right that needs to be (metaphorically) taken out back and shot for the lame horse it both is and has been for decades. Nick and his brain-dead allies are exceptional for different reasons, but they're not wrong to call out these idiots for what they are.



I keep having to bring up the fact that you can be a true believer and a grifter at the same time to people. Just because the Vatican makes bank and the pope benefits from that doesn't mean the old geezers in it aren't true believers.

The problem is that Nick is unrealistic. Being unrealistic makes you look exceptionally stupid.
Nick and his Nickers don't understand that the world cannot function in the way he demands. It's just not possible.
They think that the US has infinite resources to just keep being the world's police, fuck Israel, fuck the Sauds, we don't need them - and that's just not how world politics works. It's not how it works today, in the future and it's not how it worked in the past.
He and his little gang of speds are akin to beauty pageant contestants when asked a question on foreign policy.
His whole thing about the USS Liberty, O.K, but the US has done exceptional shit too - Gulf of Tonkin for starters.
Thinking that the USS Liberty event somehow negates a degree of usefulness modern day Israel serves is retarded.
Yeah, they probably shouldn't be as heavily funded, but they're a strategic ally.
He's an overindulged child who should have got an education, got some experience in politics and then become an internet turbosped.

Charlie Kirk and his crew are massive faggots as well, there's literally no winner between the two. They're really all no different from loud leftist speds.

Alex Jones has 100% more credibility than them.
 
The problem is that Nick is unrealistic. Being unrealistic makes you look exceptionally stupid.
Nick and his Nickers don't understand that the world cannot function in the way he demands. It's just not possible.
They think that the US has infinite resources to just keep being the world's police, fuck Israel, fuck the Sauds, we don't need them - and that's just not how world politics works. It's not how it works today, in the future and it's not how it worked in the past.
He and his little gang of speds are akin to beauty pageant contestants when asked a question on foreign policy.
His whole thing about the USS Liberty, O.K, but the US has done exceptional shit too - Gulf of Tonkin for starters.
Thinking that the USS Liberty event somehow negates a degree of usefulness modern day Israel serves is exceptional.
Yeah, they probably shouldn't be as heavily funded, but they're a strategic ally.
He's an overindulged child who should have got an education, got some experience in politics and then become an internet turbosped.

Charlie Kirk and his crew are massive faggots as well, there's literally no winner between the two. They're really all no different from loud leftist speds.

Alex Jones has 100% more credibility than them.
Nick and his brain-dead allies are exceptional for different reasons,

Thank you for helping to list the aforementioned different reasons.
 
There's literally nothing wrong with being gay, please tell me that these stupid fucking cuckservatives aren't going to fucking fight this battle AGAIN for their stupid sky daddy.

Nick Fuentes is a shining example of zoomer stupidity even on the right wing.
It's more like the Stonetoss strip
"How will this help us sell conservatism?"
"Conservatism?"
 
The problem is that Nick is unrealistic. Being unrealistic makes you look exceptionally stupid.
Nick and his Nickers don't understand that the world cannot function in the way he demands. It's just not possible.
They think that the US has infinite resources to just keep being the world's police, fuck Israel, fuck the Sauds, we don't need them - and that's just not how world politics works. It's not how it works today, in the future and it's not how it worked in the past.
He and his little gang of speds are akin to beauty pageant contestants when asked a question on foreign policy.
His whole thing about the USS Liberty, O.K, but the US has done exceptional shit too - Gulf of Tonkin for starters.
Thinking that the USS Liberty event somehow negates a degree of usefulness modern day Israel serves is exceptional.
Yeah, they probably shouldn't be as heavily funded, but they're a strategic ally.
He's an overindulged child who should have got an education, got some experience in politics and then become an internet turbosped.

Charlie Kirk and his crew are massive faggots as well, there's literally no winner between the two. They're really all no different from loud leftist speds.

Alex Jones has 100% more credibility than them.
It totally does negate how useful Israel is. An ally is only valuable when they dont turn around and fuck you again and again and again and this whole 'but they're our ally!' excuse just gets more and more thin the more you look into the US-Israel relationship. A dog is only kept around as long as it doesnt bite its owner.

Of course thats implying the US is the one holding the leash in that relationship.
 
The article is correct. He's the Catholic version of Milo only without the protection of being gay and Jewish. Everyone seems to forget the 2 years he was an absolute Trump-cuck after the election.

EIP_c64WwAEYiLk.jpeg
 
You know it wouldn't surprise me if the Powers That Be find or manufacture some embarrassing info on Mr. Fuentes and he gets totally discredited in the next month or so.

Nick_Standing_On_Chair.png

I don't like Nick sending his "Groyper Army" :cringe: out to say highly inflammatory things while their faces are clearly on camera and being recorded. These kids could easily get kicked out of school or have their professional lives damaged down the line for some of the stuff they are saying or hinting at. I do not like how he is endangering his fan's future. Zoomers, you don't want no part of this shit! Save the politics for when you're a lame adult. Don't risk your future to be apart of some"Groyper Army" :cringe:
 
Nick_Standing_On_Chair.png

I don't like Nick sending his "Groyper Army" :cringe: out to say highly inflammatory things while their faces are clearly on camera and being recorded. These kids could easily get kicked out of school or have their professional lives damaged down the line for some of the stuff they are saying or hinting at. I do not like how he is endangering his fan's future. Zoomers, you don't want no part of this shit! Save the politics for when you're a lame adult. Don't risk your future to be apart of some"Groyper Army" :cringe:

I don't like Wicket sending his "Ewok Army" :cringe: out to attack Imperial troops while their faces are clearly on camera and being recorded. These Ewoks could easily get killed by a turbolaser or stomped by an AT-ST. I do not like how he is endangering his fans' future. Ewoks, you don't want no part of this shit! Save the politics for when you're a lame adult. Don't risk your future to be apart of some "Ewok Army" :cringe:. Hail Palpatine! Hail Vader!
 
Nick_Standing_On_Chair.png

I don't like Nick sending his "Groyper Army" :cringe: out to say highly inflammatory things while their faces are clearly on camera and being recorded. These kids could easily get kicked out of school or have their professional lives damaged down the line for some of the stuff they are saying or hinting at. I do not like how he is endangering his fan's future. Zoomers, you don't want no part of this shit! Save the politics for when you're a lame adult. Don't risk your future to be apart of some"Groyper Army" :cringe:
To be fair many of them probably think they might not have much of a future with how Conservatives or so called "Conservatives" are handling or conserving absolutely nothing of our culture and basically selling us out, not only to foreign "allies" but to demographic replacement which even our government has acknowledged will lead to negative changes in the forseen future. Besides one that can only be speculated.

End response-

--

His whole thing about the USS Liberty, O.K, but the US has done exceptional shit too - Gulf of Tonkin for starters.
Thinking that the USS Liberty event somehow negates a degree of usefulness modern day Israel serves is exceptional.

In regards to Nick's call out of Israel as allies, I think the fact that Kirk and other Republicans (or Neocons in actuality) prove they aren't even willing to address reality of Israel's actions speaks volumes. It's one thing to just go "So." and allow people to look into the issue and see what they expect of their government. It's another to like a "Yes man" to Israel, claim it's a conspiracy theory (it is not) and then make up shit because... Because.

It shows a huge issue within the Republican party. This weird Israelcons, or Israelphiles within our government, smells like foreign control to me. It also gives credibility to those yammering about "The J question" whether people want to admit it or not and makes people more suspicious, even to some normies will start to question what purpose there is to cover a guise like that.

Either way it smells to high heaven. I don't think it's merely a case of "See Israel did something bad! HA! We never did anything wrong!" [which isn't the case] It's more of a "Why is our own politicians vehemently covering for Israel beyond hoops and bounds of how they cover for other countries (Edit: Let alone allies)?" Let alone questioning their true allegiance with quite a few of their antics. (Even outside of politicians just in political circles) It raises a few suspicions in all kinds of directions and raises more than a few eye brows to those reactions of said claims and denials.
 
I used to be deep into all this Politard stuff

now the Nick Fuentes stuff comes up and I am like "Who is he and why should I care?"

I feel like a boomer in all this.
[Trick question, I shouldn't care]

More Broadly American Conservatism is a political ideal and a political ideology

Americans love the ideal, the problem is the Ideology of American conservatism doesnt work out well with the realities of how the nation state has worked for the last 100 or so years. And voters are trained to respond to way the nation state functions not if the nation state functions in a way thats best for them
 
American conservativism as a movement has to consider what it actually stands for and seeks to conserve if that doesn’t include the values of the Christian denominations, to which at this time most Americans still claim to belong.

The majority of Christian denominations are not ok with equal rights for LGBT folks. Almost all of them refuse church sacraments such as marriage to same sex couples. Many of them refuse full membership of the church (especially participation in Communion or similar rite) to people living in a same sex partnership. Many of them continue to teach that living an openly gay life is not compatible with God’s wishes for the church members.

Being economically of the right is not the be all and end all of a conservative movement. Economically right wing people dgaf if other folks are gay, but morally/socially right wing people give very many fucks indeed. If American conservativism intends to protect “traditional American values”, living as openly gay is not in accordance with that. People did not traditionally come out in idealised 1940s small town America.
 
Back