- Joined
- May 16, 2019
Well, every single "fraudulent affidavit" contains what the people in question wanted to say and wanted submitted to the court. Nobody was tricked, no party was deceived, and no unfair advantage was obtained. Had he thought to do so, Ty could simply have hired someone who actually did have the remote notary certification, or had them go to a nearby bank or any other place with a notary. This would have been trivial.
The idea that it was anything other than a mistake is the diseased fantasy of the brain-damaged and malevolent J. Sean Lemoine.
Diseased fuckery aside, there's a theory floating around that someone on the defense "flipped" Slatosch, and the reason Lemoine is desperate to get him into court is specifically to contradict that affidavit. If he manages that, he can shit-fling and accuse Ty of changing what Slatosch meant, therefore committing actual fraud, therefore something something $257,000 in sanctions.
My own theory is Lemoine is taking his unethical campaign on the road. He's hoping to bulldoze an unprepared non-lawyer with confusing questions, claim Slatosch "admitted" something contradictory, and continue from there. He then makes the same accusation about the other 2 affidavits by implication (zero evidence), and crams all this lying into the 30 day window so Ty can't cross-examine or rebut it before the deadline. As Nick predicted, he'll then get a nod from the disinterested judge who already gave up and is waiting for appeals.
The other option is that this is a Ron Toye rage demand. Out of the limited discovery that happened, he's the one most clearly implicated, caught red-handed, and he wants something on the court record that he can point to and claim vindication. The texts are bad, but the Slatosch affidavit is damning, and if Ron can somehow get the words "fraud" or "bad faith" attached to it he'll screenshot that out of context and tweet it out for the rest of his pathetic little life.