"Jim" / James Augustine née James Patrick O'Shaughnessy / Mister Metokur / Jim81Jim / Internet Aristocrat - His autistic videos and the gay beta "sweetie squad" who mindlessly suck his cock.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Fucking right? I've had roommates steal far less from me, that I've been able to have through my own blood, sweat and tears, and I've wanted to ruin them over it because stealing the money right out of my pocket is pure bullshit.

Jim has every fucking right to be pissed and ready to destroy someone.


In the words of Charles Foster Offdensen: "That's my bread and butter you're fucking with."
I remember every fucker that ripped me off. From stuff borrowed and never returned to getting a paycheck withheld because my boss figured 'why not'.

Jim is right to be mad.
 
Jim is acting like a child. If he actually wants to fix this and get the money all he needs to do is ask a lawyer to to draft a letter threateningly asking for his money back. I've heard people who also got demonetized, instead of acting like a child, hired a lawyer and got their money back. I've also been told someone sued youtube after their channel was terminated and got the revenue Youtube still owed them. But no Jim instead of trying to fix the problem is going to complain about "SUSAN". The ceo of youtube does not know about the existence of some 303k sub channel.
I'm half-convinced that he knows he's never getting that money and this is an intentionally dumb gimmick that's meant to be more annoying than effective. He doesn't seem like he's autistic enough to think it'll actually work. Youtube told him that he has to reapply for monetization once he has enough active videos to do so, which came off as an excuse that they pulled out of their ass to justify demonetizing him after he purged his channel to prevent flagging, and this is his way of calling that bluff in as douchey a way as possible, by making these shitty ms paint videos that don't "technically" violate their rules just to populate his channel with active videos.

It's not particularly clever or anything but I can see why he'd do it.
 
Proof? I understand irish man = bad. But that dosen´t at all sound like Metokur.
I seem to remember null talking about it in one of his livestreams. I'm trying to find it and if I find the example i'll edit this post with it. But it was a throwaway thing from a while ago there is a good chance I won't find it.
 
I believe he once made an account to sock in his own thread and got banned.
I seem to remember null talking about it in one of his livestreams. I'm trying to find it and if I find the example i'll edit this post with it. But it was a throwaway thing from a while ago there is a good chance I won't find it.
Don't the mods normally just out the cow and give them an unflattering profile pic when someone does that?
I mean even Bryan Dunn, who has made tons of sock accounts, and shit up his own thread, and annoyed Null directly, currently has an active account.
 
I seem to remember null talking about it in one of his livestreams. I'm trying to find it and if I find the example i'll edit this post with it. But it was a throwaway thing from a while ago there is a good chance I won't find it.
Umm i have watched basiclly all of Nulls streams i think the guy you are reffering to is KOP aka @bryandunn and if you are you need to lurk more faggot.

Don't the mods normally just out the cow and give them an unflattering profile pic when someone does that?
I mean even Bryan Dunn, who has made tons of sock accounts, and shit up his own thread, and annoyed Null directly, currently has an active account.
Yes espically since Null seems to have some kind of beef with Jim. So that would make a lot of sense.
 
Don't the mods normally just out the cow and give them an unflattering profile pic when someone does that?
I mean even Bryan Dunn, who has made tons of sock accounts, and shit up his own thread, and annoyed Null directly, currently has an active account.
It looks like Queen of Pole used to be banned at one point and Josh changed his mind about it later for whatever reason.

 
It looks like Queen of Pole used to be banned at one point and Josh changed his mind about it later for whatever reason.
That's actually happened multiple times. In about August this year he went full BAN ME DO IT in his own thread and the mods obliged. He came back with another sock and so eventually the mods reinstated his old account, or merged the sock into it, or whatever they do exactly.
 
Umm i have watched basiclly all of Nulls streams i think the guy you are reffering to is KOP aka @bryandunn and if you are you need to lurk more faggot.

Yes espically since Null seems to have some kind of beef with Jim. So that would make a lot of sense.
No it was definitely Jim

I can't find it because I can't find what stream it was that null talked how Jim made a bunch of socks and had them argue with each other. The things you wished you archived. But since I can't find it and I have no proof feel free to say I was wrong.
 
No it was definitely Jim

I can't find it because I can't find what stream it was that null talked how Jim made a bunch of socks and had them argue with each other. The things you wished you archived. But since I can't find it and I have no proof feel free to say I was wrong.
I mean Josh can probably verify it if thats true, god that’d be funny. Kind of surprised it hasn’t been brought up more.
 
$4k made from Jim baiting a bunch of lonely losers through his shitty streams and superchat recitations. Sure $4k is a lot, but the work that was put in for it isn't. I love the new videos though, thanks Susan for putting Jim back in his place. Looks like quality Metokur is back on the menu.

If that's what comes out of this, Susan would have done the internet a favor.

Yes, Jim has the right to be mad. But posting autistic videos isn't going to a damn thing except maybe spurn the Sweetie Squad to buy more merch, which maybe what he's after.
 
I assumed he was making these videos to have original content on the channel in order to get it re-monetized and thus get his $4k and/or be able to stream with superchats again. His channel got de-monetized because he had nothing on it, the weird reason stated being that he didn't have original content. These drawings satisfy that by putting content on his channel again, and it's original content that was not copied from anyone or anywhere else.
 
I've tried avoiding Jim's clapter bait for a while, is there a reason he hasn't tried streaming on twitch or dlive to try for donations to go with his patreon?
 
Jim is acting like a child. If he actually wants to fix this and get the money all he needs to do is ask a lawyer to to draft a letter threateningly asking for his money back. I've heard people who also got demonetized, instead of acting like a child, hired a lawyer and got their money back. I've also been told someone sued youtube after their channel was terminated and got the revenue Youtube still owed them. But no Jim instead of trying to fix the problem is going to complain about "SUSAN". The ceo of youtube does not know about the existence of some 303k sub channel.
No, the thieving Susan personally stole this money and the bitch must pay up. It's not like Susan Wojcicki needs that money - she can fund her heroin habit with the paycheck from Google. Susan Wojcicki just likes to steal.
 
Last edited:
Why are people censoring that name? What’s for them to gain?


Schiff's "whistlblower" is a longtime DNC hack who has major ties to Biden and the DNC, to the point that if people started googling his name, they would see immediately that he's a lying piece of shit and shouldn't be trusted. In part, due to the fact that the DNC/Schiff didn't bother finding a patsy who didn't leave an undeniable paper trial online that damns him.
 
Back