DESMOND IS AMAZING / desmondisamazing / Wendylou, Andrew, & Desmond Napoles - Child being abused/sexualized by parents for financial gain and fame.

  • Thread starter Thread starter RI 360
  • Start date Start date
Nobody's allowed to be a tomboy/tomgirl in today's society. You either have to be gay, into 'drag' or trans, and in the latter case, mutilated by your parents' notions of who you ought to be. Pretty sad.
Weird how the progressives have become the opposite to progressive, and now just look to categorise people into black vs white labels.

Sure, i'll bet a 2 year old was into RuPaul, since 2 year olds are into anything with bright flashy colours and music.
 
Tom Dillon talked a little in a recent podcast about how drag queens used to be known for their dirty jokes at bars, yet now are getting paraded around like they're meant to be the spokespeople of PC culture.

https://youtu.be/KcNMljjsqGg (not bothering finding the exact time)

It's sort of a recent phenomenon where you get one drag queen after another being uptight and acting like SJWs. I imagine it's because of trannies becoming the victim du jour for the past few years and believers of tranny ideology treating wanting to cross dress as equivalent to being the opposite sex. So they end up complaining about any drag queens that don't treat cross dressing with an absurd respect. Since the whole drag queen act is practically lampooning the nature of trannies.

I'd guess as a result of all this you have a lot of the pro-tranny crowd thus viewing drag queens as this weird sanitized moral police rather than the traditional dirty jokesters.
even the last hold-outs against sjw-ism in drag have been publicly and brutally flogged and shunned into submission. there's no room even for a neutral stance
 
It’s everywhere. Please, someone make it stop!

View attachment 1011015
What the fuck, Mile High Comics? Although they've already gone broke and been forced to close their main store, going woke like this isn't going to get any more paying customers. Every facet of the entertainment industry has to bend over backwards for these people, while they do nothing except chase customers away.
 
Most, if not all, civil rights and charity organizations turn corrupt, no matter how “noble” their original cause was.
Lok at Susan G. Komen, pushing all that pink shit and using the proceeds to pay their own salaries (with like 5% of the money actually funding breast cancer research, IIRC).
 
I don't know, maybe I'm biased because I know a kid who liked to play dress-up in skirts and dresses and his parents were 100% normal, non-SJW types who never had any kind of sexualized LGBT material in their home. I don't think kids should be shamed and hidden away for wanting to wear non-gender-compliant clothing, if that clothing is appropriate for their age. Actually, NO extra attention should be given to those kids, positive or negative. It's just clothing.

But I also get the argument that drag is inherently sexual.

Hold on.

I think you're operating under a slight misunderstanding.

Cross-dressing and Drag are not the same thing. They are similar, but they are not the same. Drag is a specific subset of crossdressing. It's rather like burlesque is a subset of stage performance. Drag is a stylized performance, even when drag queens are not actively on stage. It's not just wearing a dress.

<edit> I see Spastic Colon beat me to the punch. Leaving this here to boost the signal of the basic message.
 
Look how happy she is with herself.
View attachment 1013062

This pretty much definitively proves who is actually in charge and reveling in the attention and it ain’t Desmond. But I guess people see what they want to see.

2ADC625E-C771-41D3-AAA7-ED6FC3E60E1D.jpeg
 
Cross-over with the biggest Hillary Clinton ex-fan of all time:
koelkoe-png.1014699

(For those who have forgotten or are unaware of it, UpsetterFC is Andrew's account)
aeoelael-png.1014701

"I crossdressed as a joke, spurred on by other children, at a controlled school function. This is clearly equivalent to a child being made by his parents to dance provocatively for adult men who actively want to fuck him."

I feel like anyone who tries to say "triggered by drag kids lololol" doesn't realize it'd be just as bad if it weren't crossdressing. Almost no one against this child drag shit's biggest issue with it is the crossdressing bit, it's the sexualization. If Desmond were wearing a Magic Mike getup, it would still be sexualizing and exploiting a minor and putting him in a vulnerable position, and it would still be wrong.
 
"I crossdressed as a joke, spurred on by other children, at a controlled school function. This is clearly equivalent to a child being made by his parents to dance provocatively for adult men who actively want to fuck him."

I feel like anyone who tries to say "triggered by drag kids lololol" doesn't realize it'd be just as bad if it weren't crossdressing. Almost no one against this child drag shit's biggest issue with it is the crossdressing bit, it's the sexualization. If Desmond were wearing a Magic Mike getup, it would still be sexualizing and exploiting a minor and putting him in a vulnerable position, and it would still be wrong.

Also these particular libfucks seem to throw their obsession with consent out the window when it comes to drag (and transing) kids, plus I'm sure nearly all of them find pageant kids like JonBenet and Toddlers and Tiaras repellent and exploitive. There's so much fucking hypocrisy and inconsistency with these people and their weird agendas.
 
"I crossdressed as a joke, spurred on by other children, at a controlled school function. This is clearly equivalent to a child being made by his parents to dance provocatively for adult men who actively want to fuck him."

I feel like anyone who tries to say "triggered by drag kids lololol" doesn't realize it'd be just as bad if it weren't crossdressing. Almost no one against this child drag shit's biggest issue with it is the crossdressing bit, it's the sexualization. If Desmond were wearing a Magic Mike getup, it would still be sexualizing and exploiting a minor and putting him in a vulnerable position, and it would still be wrong.
Why do liberals always go to "wow, we molested your kids/hit you with a bike lock, and you're upset? TRIGGERED MUCH, SNOWFLAKE TROLOLOLOLO" as some sort of gotcha equivalent to having a meltdown over being told mtf transgenders don't qualify for maternity leave?
 
Why do liberals always go to "wow, we molested your kids/hit you with a bike lock, and you're upset? TRIGGERED MUCH, SNOWFLAKE TROLOLOLOLO" as some sort of gotcha equivalent to having a meltdown over being told mtf transgenders don't qualify for maternity leave?

Because "we think pedophilic exploitation is fine as long as heterosexuals aren't doing it" doesn't really sound that great to normal people.
 
Also these particular libfucks seem to throw their obsession with consent out the window when it comes to drag (and transing) kids, plus I'm sure nearly all of them find pageant kids like JonBenet and Toddlers and Tiaras repellent and exploitive. There's so much fucking hypocrisy and inconsistency with these people and their weird agendas.
For them, a boy saying "mom, I'm a girl now!" is consent.

But a woman specifically saying "yes, I'll have sex with you" is not if she regrets it next day.

It makes sense in their vapid minds.

ETA: Also, yes. IT's different when heterosexuals do it because in queer theory, heterosexual is forced by the patriarchy: women and children are naturally queer and sexual and straight women don't exist.
 
"I crossdressed as a joke, spurred on by other children, at a controlled school function. This is clearly equivalent to a child being made by his parents to dance provocatively for adult men who actively want to fuck him."

I feel like anyone who tries to say "triggered by drag kids lololol" doesn't realize it'd be just as bad if it weren't crossdressing. Almost no one against this child drag shit's biggest issue with it is the crossdressing bit, it's the sexualization. If Desmond were wearing a Magic Mike getup, it would still be sexualizing and exploiting a minor and putting him in a vulnerable position, and it would still be wrong.
He's not making a good argument here. He cross dressed and turned into a troon with a collapsing anus. Doesn't really seem like it is harmless fun for kids when you look at it in that context.
 
AE1080FC-3C84-4BAA-A2EA-04F5110C0CCC.jpeg


Ummm......there is literally a video recorded by Piggylou herself and proudly uploaded on Desmond’s YouTube page that shows him pimping his ass out on stage at a gay bar while grown men are giving him money. I’m getting kind of confused by all the people who keep saying “yeah, that never happened” when there are fucking videos and photos of Desmond doing it more than once, most of which were recorded by his mother. If they’re trying to gaslight, then they’re not very good at it.
 
Zach, like most of his progressive friends, is very blind to things that are inconvenient. The poor child could be raped in front of him and he would be denying it happened.

I’ve been seeing “he never danced for money at a gay bar, that’s a hoax, check your facts!” all over social media. My brain can’t even process this anymore. Do these people exist on some kind of separate astral plane?
 
Back