Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

[ChuckSlaughter]

Ever seen "Pac-Man Fever"?! Woman in a coma for several years, & relative pays for her care. Finally, same relative comes to visit 1 final time before they disconnect machines & she is not existent-but-lifeless; She is completely gone.

Irony is I shall come to this site until this thread is not only inactive, but dead & gone.

hihihihihihihihihihihihihihi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Mr. X]

Most or all of these are applicable to TJ's abysmal writing.

 

[deductionotaku]

THREAD UPDATE

Chyoo crossover 2:

Just this one until it gets the right answer.

"...and both valid". The ending of that sentence proves further you make several mistakes, such as forgetting it was approved previously on both sites.

Approve it next time? Want me to re-submit what was approved before?

A Day:

Any not connected in any way to this editor.

I'm not homosexual or homophobic.

You need to re-categorize the story so people know not to include females, but let them know some other place or way celebs are allowed. Until then, you need to revert to approving my thread as it originally was approved on this sad excuse for a story.

Got that, dingbat?!

Saving you from an intro question that doesn't fit your story.

EDIT: NEW UPDATES

Chyoo crossover 2:

Not until the editor answers this one correctly.

No, but it keeps your opinion as just that: Solely an opinion, and only held by one person.

Facts, however, show the thread was approved between 2010 & now. Until it is again, you will continue reading submissions from me.

Got that, Punk?

A Day:

Any not connected in any way to this editor.

I am not homophobic or attempting to use homosexuality as an insult.

The fact is neither of us should feel insulted... You're denying my thread because it makes your work appear as the low-quality work we both know it to be, & I'm continuing to submit to your story in hopes of approving its overall quality.

Nobody is stupid here, outside of you for denying great work instead of approving it & thinking it's obvious your story is about gay characters & relationships when that is written no place.

Is Stupid written on your forehead?

Saving you from an intro question that doesn't fit your story.

Discuss.

 

[Cowlick]

1] Ambrose, it needs to be hyphenated in that case. Also, you have no friends that would count if the people counting only used positive numbers.

2] Roger, never have menstruated, nor will I ever.

3] Sikotik, I don't think any of you ever forget about me or my blogs. However, I similarly am well-aware many of you have admitted many times to not understanding what things I write mean. So don't tell me what anything I wrote means.

4] Mr. X. explain to me how anything applies to something that does not exist.

 

[Yog-Spergoth]

Your writing does not exist?

Do you actually think before you type, or do you just randomly hit keys and hope words come out?

Edit: Also @TM Ambrose is correct. That does not need to be hyphenated.

 

[TM Ambrose]

Also, you have no friends that would count if the people counting only used positive numbers.

TJ, I know where you live, your mothers name, your name and what sites you frequent. Other than this particular site you know nothing about me. One of us is more apt at making calls on the other simply because of the availability of information. Also I don't think you can have negative friends. So I don't believe that is how it works. I can assure you, while I'm not a social butterfly, mostly due to time management issues, I actually have people who I can rely on if I need it and can rely on me. I don't think I can make enemies quite like you have. So far you have 4 entire sites against you. When reading claims I always consider the source, and no matter how hard you try you'll always be TJ Church, the guy that even porn sites don't want to deal with and has admitted to eating shit through sloppy language.

it needs to be hyphenated in that case.

Many people on this forum have established you don't know grammar. I don't have any reason to believe you on this.

I'm sure you'll respond with another post about me being X (where X is literally anything at this point. At one point you called me a pedophile, at another you called me a failed professor and in another situation you called me gay (the only actual statement you've gotten correct)) and I'll just laugh at you because normally your logic is that of a mentally handicapped person. From this I will tell you that your logic is that of a mentally handicapped person and you'll respond with the equivalent of "Nuh-uh. I'm just smarter than you blahblahblahblah nobody agrees with you". Then people will agree and you'll say something like "you're all just picking on me because I'm more successful" not understanding how that contradicts your previous statement. You'll then get frustrated and your grammar will worsen for a few post. You'll disappear for about a day and come back bitching about how the thread isn't gone and how we talk about you behind your back on a forum dedicated to talking about people behind their backs. Rinse and Repeat.

what things I write mean

If you take the time to analyze someones poor grammar you can eventually get the gist of what they are saying. Since we've established that your syntax and grammar are garbage we can assume that, from what you said, we've actually analyzed it. While you do make a valid point in saying that we don't initially get it, given time most are able to decipher your stupidity.

 

[Chan the Wizard]

TJ, I know where you live, your mothers name, your name and what sites you frequent. Other than this particular site you know nothing about me. One of us is more apt at making calls on the other simply because of the availability of information. Also I don't think you can have negative friends. So I don't believe that is how it works. I can assure you, while I'm not a social butterfly, mostly due to time management issues, I actually have people who I can rely on if I need it and can rely on me. I don't think I can make enemies quite like you have. So far you have 4 entire sites against you. When reading claims I always consider the source, and no matter how hard you try you'll always be TJ Church, the guy that even porn sites don't want to deal with and has admitted to eating shit through sloppy language.

Many people on this forum have established you don't know grammar. I don't have any reason to believe you on this.

He also adds a hyphen to spelling bee, so you're probably right with your belief.

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

Okay, revealing a small bit of my power level: I have done professional editing for more than 10 years. While I have a different job now, I use my less busy periods to take on freelance editing jobs because I enjoy it. I usually edit to University of Chicago style, rather than Associated Press, because I'm normally working with books, not journalism.

Titty Master Ambrose is absolutely correct. That expression did not need to be hyphenated in that case. You would hyphenate two descriptors only when using them as a compound adjective, as in "We bought the less-towering Christmas tree because we have low ceilings." In that case, "less-towering" is an adverb and adjective joined together to form a single descriptor meaning "shorter." But if your character said to the tree salesman, "I want a tree that is less towering than this one," there would be no hyphen.

I've explained this before, and I'm sure, like the extra-tall (hyphenated!) Christmas tree your character didn't buy in my example, it is over TJ's head. I am just pointing out why Ambrose is totally correct in this case.

 

[Yog-Spergoth]

Okay, revealing a small bit of my power level: I have done professional editing for more than 10 years. While I have a different job now, I use my less busy periods to take on freelance editing jobs because I enjoy it. I usually edit to University of Chicago style, rather than Associated Press, because I'm normally working with books, not journalism.

Titty Master Ambrose is absolutely correct. That expression did not need to be hyphenated in that case. You would hyphenate two descriptors only when using them as a compound adjective, as in "We bought the less-towering Christmas tree because we have low ceilings." In that case, "less-towering" is an adverb and adjective joined together to form a single descriptor meaning "shorter." But if your character said to the tree salesman, "I want a tree that is less towering than this one," there would be no hyphen.

I've explained this before, and I'm sure, like the extra-tall (hyphenated!) Christmas tree your character didn't buy in my example, it is over TJ's head. I am just pointing out why Ambrose is totally correct in this case.

@Cowlick, at the risk of sounding crass: Q.E.D, bitch.

 

[deductionotaku]

THREAD UPDATE

A Day:

Anyone dating someone other than the editor.

The edits say nothing every time you deny them, & ratings are not named, so you can't consider the source.

Also, I know about using getting out as an insult as you did, but you should use quotation marks less so your meaning is clearer.

Also, you have stated the thread (not the story) is about gay characters, but I am the one writing it, & since the story is not in the gay category, I can write the thread about anyone I choose.

Got that, dingbat?!

Saving you from an intro question that doesn't fit your story.

Chyoo crossover 2:

WTH?

This time, denied because I unlike you wrote comprehensible sentences.

Try it sometime?

EDIT: AND AGAIN

Chyoo crossover 2:

Jeopardy.

Give me a right answer first.

You know what one looks like?

A Day:

Any not connected in any way to this editor.

Your thread never explicitly stated a gay situation... At least not when I originally submitted my thread, which was originally approved. You must have changed yor orientation & the thread's after every living girl rejected you.

Give your bone to your dog? Or does it prefer to eat its own feces?

Saving you from an intro question that doesn't fit your story.

Discuss.

 

[TM Ambrose]

This time, denied because I unlike you wrote comprehensible sentences.

This sentence is an example of dramatic irony. The comma is used in a completely wrong manner here. Instead of separating the clauses, being denied and him being better than the person who denied him, he uses one at the beginning of the sentence, a spot that makes little grammatical sense. This is dramatic irony because we are way more aware of TJ's mistakes and what is actually going on at the site than TJ is. TJ uses bad grammar and has a horrible writing style. This gets him denied, which in turn causes him to respond with more bad writing. Eventually he begins projecting the flaw everybody claims he has onto everyone else. This results in poorly written sentences that have their meanings obstructed by poor writing about how sentences are poorly written. If I were to suggest a book for TJ to read I would say Eats, Shoots, and Leaves.

 

[Cowlick]

This sentence is an example of dramatic irony. The comma is used in a completely wrong manner here. Instead of separating the clauses, being denied and him being better than the person who denied him, he uses one at the beginning of the sentence, a spot that makes little grammatical sense. This is dramatic irony because we are way more aware of TJ's mistakes and what is actually going on at the site than TJ is. TJ uses bad grammar and has a horrible writing style. This gets him denied, which in turn causes him to respond with more bad writing. Eventually he begins projecting the flaw everybody claims he has onto everyone else. This results in poorly written sentences that have their meanings obstructed by poor writing about how sentences are poorly written. If I were to suggest a book for TJ to read I would say Eats, Shoots, and Leaves.

1] TMA, we all admit your expertise in poor writing, which most of your posts prove if the proof is needed for anyone.

2] No need to even attempt writing over my head (which NGH did unsuccessfully). We all know that mine is lower than those of most members here due to actually having a brain & other things in it.

3] TMA, just because you are obsessed with me does not mean I am with you, so I have no desire to read your ex's Fifty Shades-like description of your relationship. (Lack of underlining or anything of the sort in your recommendation proves the first statement I made in this post.)

 

[Yog-Spergoth]

1] TMA, we all admit your expertise in poor writing, which most of your posts prove if the proof is needed for anyone.

2] No need to even attempt writing over my head (which NGH did unsuccessfully). We all know that mine is lower than those of most members here due to actually having a brain & other things in it.

3] TMA, just because you are obsessed with me does not mean I am with you, so I have no desire to read your ex's Fifty Shades-like description of your relationship. (Lack of underlining or anything of the sort in your recommendation proves the first statement I made in this post.)

1. Mr. Ambrose writes far better than you do. His posts are at least understandable.

2. No, you have a LARGER head than the other members of this forum. I can see how you could get this confused.

3. What the fuck are you talking about?

 

[Red_Rager]

1] TMA, we all admit your expertise in poor writing, which most of your posts prove if the proof is needed for anyone.

2] No need to even attempt writing over my head (which NGH did unsuccessfully). We all know that mine is lower than those of most members here due to actually having a brain & other things in it.

3] TMA, just because you are obsessed with me does not mean I am with you, so I have no desire to read your ex's Fifty Shades-like description of your relationship. (Lack of underlining or anything of the sort in your recommendation proves the first statement I made in this post.)

So you are admitting that your head is located up your ass.

 

[namazuros]

Ooooh, a 50 shades joke. How wonderfully topical.

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

No one is attempting to write over your head, Einstein. It just happens. I am correct about the hyphenation issue, but it will just zoom past you. So it goes.

Also, just to pull rank, I was a state spelling bee champion, and competed in the National bee held by Scripps-Howard in DC. While I was eliminated in the Nationals, so were roughly a hundred other kids. That's the nature of the bee. But I had been the state champion, aged ten. So even your ridiculous accomplishment is overshadowed by my ridiculous accomplishment. So it goes.

(For everybody else, I totally recommend the documentary Spellbound. It follows eight kids from all over the country who get into the Nationals; one of them is the winner for that year. If you ever wanted to see the mindbending hours of practice that go into anything above the level of your own school, or one of the most terrifying stage parents I have seen with any kid over any endeavor, that documentary is your chance.)

 

[Pizza The Hutt]

I spent the last three days reading the 284 pages about this guy, you know what I learned? The people on this forum are hilarious.

As for watermelon head? He ain't exactly giving out too much info about himself that isn't kinda sad or depressing to read.

Weirdest thing is how shitty this guy's memory is. He forgot he got groceries one time and surprised himself when he went to the fridge later that day and saw he had a new case of soda. He has a best friend, but can't remember what he does for a living. Is this guy living out that Memento movie? It would make sense to me how he is able to come here almost every day and make the same argument again and again and again.

Also its pointless to keep up the logical arguments against him, no matter what he isn't going to get it. Better off just ignoring him and talking about him instead. I can imagine that would make him furious.

 

[Chuggernaut]

Okay, revealing a small bit of my power level: I have done professional editing for more than 10 years. While I have a different job now, I use my less busy periods to take on freelance editing jobs because I enjoy it. I usually edit to University of Chicago style, rather than Associated Press, because I'm normally working with books, not journalism.

Titty Master Ambrose is absolutely correct. That expression did not need to be hyphenated in that case. You would hyphenate two descriptors only when using them as a compound adjective, as in "We bought the less-towering Christmas tree because we have low ceilings." In that case, "less-towering" is an adverb and adjective joined together to form a single descriptor meaning "shorter." But if your character said to the tree salesman, "I want a tree that is less towering than this one," there would be no hyphen.

I've explained this before, and I'm sure, like the extra-tall (hyphenated!) Christmas tree your character didn't buy in my example, it is over TJ's head. I am just pointing out why Ambrose is totally correct in this case.

What up, fellow professional editor. I hope your explanation gets better results than when I tried this like 150 pages ago.

I asked Teej the other day if his mouth was always all fucked-up looking like in his pictures we have seen. Naturally he denied it, which means that those photos of himself are how he CHOOSES to present himself to the world. Discuss.

 

[Mr. X]

4] Mr. X. explain to me how anything applies to something that does not exist.

People say you're a shitty writer because you're a shitty writer.

 

[Chan the Wizard]

Holy shit, it just hit me who he reminds me of, if not in attitude, but appearance.

Master Billy Quizboy!